Center for Catastrophic Risk Management 1 University of California Berkeley

advertisement
University of California Berkeley
Center for
Catastrophic Risk Management
University of Colorado at Boulder
1
CHALLENGE: Increasing exposure of
obsolete, defective, decayed, brittle,
non-resilient, non-sustainable
critical interdependent
infrastructure systems
2
Ecosystem
Delta Critical Legacy Inderdependent
Infrastructure Systems
Levee
Railroad
Road
Water supply pipeline
Gas supply pipeline
Agriculture
3
4-Year Project Goal
Develop and validate advanced
Risk Assessment &
Management (RAM) approaches
to help improve the Resilience
and Sustainability of the Delta’s
Critical Interdependent
Infrastructure Systems
4
A Multidisciplinary
Economics
Venture
Law
Management
CCRM
Architecture &
City Planning
Public Health
Engineering
5
Lessons from 600+ disasters
(research started in 1988)
Natural variabilities &
Model uncertainties
Intrinsic
Human & organizational
performance &
knowledge uncertainties
Extrinsic
>60 %
6
‘The Spear’
Blunt
end
Regulators
organizations
Company
Sharp end Management
Operational
operators
Staff
Government
Operators
Actions
Accident
7
Uncertainties
Taxonomy
Intrinsic
Inherent
Variability
Type 1
Analytical
Models
Type 2
Factors of Safety
Extrinsic
Human
Performance
Type 3
Information
Development
Type 4
Human Reliability
8
Approaches & Strategies
Types 3 & 4 Uncertainties
Dominate Major Failures
Addressed by traditional
reliability & risk analyses
10%
10%
50%
30%
Type I
Type 2
Type 3
Type 4
9
probability of failure
Time dependent reliability
Type 4 uncertainties dominate
initial & final phases
Time
‘burn-in’ failures
‘service’ failures
10
‘wear-out’ failures
Engineered ‘systems’
Operators
Structure
Organizations
Interfaces
Procedures
Hardware
Environments
11
RAM Formulation
System ‘S’
Union = ‘or’
Probability of ‘failure’
P (FSi) = P (FSi I  FSi E)
Reliability attribute ‘i’
Intrinsic causes ‘I’
Extrinsic causes ‘E’
12
RAM Formulation
Probability of failure due to intrinsic
causes given no extrinsic causes
Probability of failure
due to intrinsic causes
given extrinsic causes
P (FSi)=P(FSiI | E Si) P(E Si) +
P(FSiI | ESi) P(ESi) +
P(FSiE | E Si) P(ESi)
Term included in
traditional reliability
analyses
Probability of failure due to
extrinsic causes given extrinsic
causes
P(E Si)=1-P(ESi)=probability of no Extrinsic Causes
13
Robustness
Proper configuration
High ductility
Excess capacity
ULS Capacity - %
100 %
Appropriate correlation
Robust
Ductile
Brittle
Damage or Defect - %
14
Organization Performance
• Extensive process auditing
• Risk mitigating reward systems
• Higher quality standards
• Risk perception - early warnings
• Command & control systems
15
Command and control systems
• Migrating decision making
• Redundancy - robustness
• Maintaining the ‘bubble’
• Formal rules and procedures
• Selection & training
16
Loss or injury = ‘failure’
Probability of
failure
Consequences of
failure
Pf
Cf
Risk
Pf & Cf
17
Managing PfiPfi
Concept
Definition
Design
Construction
Maintenance
Decommissioning
Reduce Likelihoods
Present
Future
Reduce Effects
Increase Detection
& Correction
Increase
Margins of Quality
18
Cfi
Managing Cfi
Rescue
Repair
Recovery
Rehabilitation
Direct
Immediate
Indirect
On-Site
Off-Site
Delayed
19
Employ three complimentary
Approaches
Proactive
knowable
Interactive
unknowable
Reactive
reactionary
20
Apply three complimentary
Strategies
Reduce likelihood
of malfunctions
Reduce effects
Increase detection
& correction
21
Reliability
Probability of developing
desirable:
Serviceability
Compatability
Safety
Durability
Resilience
Sustainability
22
Resilience - time & cost to regain
Functionality
Good resililence
100 %
Functionality
Poor resililence
rehabilitation
rescue
recovery
repair
Time
23
Benefits / Costs
Sustainability - Utility
during life cycle
High Sustainability
Initiation
Utility
Operation
Improvement
Decay
Low Sustainability
Time
24
Technology Delivery System: TDS
Public
Inputs
TECHNOLOGY
Outputs
Nature
Industrial
Enterprise
Government
25
Sacramento Delta Is ‘Choke Point’
for California
26
GIS - an essential tool for
visualization and analysis
27
Sherman Island Confluence of Critical
Legacy Infrastructure Systems
28
29
30
31
Critical Interdependencies
32
33
34
Power supply
Power demand
• Primary Challenge: Management of Change
• Primary Concern: Security (supply & demand, terrorists)
• Legal concerns - liabilities of research
35
36
Download