Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
MARINE ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE
Work Instructions
Topic specialists should use this template to record their assessment of the marine aspects of a safety case. The scope of a marine assessment is listed
overleaf. Assessment should be against the requirements of SCR2015.
Exemplar Approach - This template should be used in accordance with the scope of the Assessment Instructions when the topic is included for assessment.
An exemplar approach may be sufficient if some material has been previously accepted and has not materially changed. For example a CMAPP or SEMS
from an existing, accepted safety case.
The template is one of a series covering all assessment topics, which together form a complete record of the safety case assessment and create evidence of
how the decision to accept the case, or not, was reached. The templates identify the specific regulatory requirements of SCR2015 for the topic and indicate
what the competent authority expects to find within a safety case to demonstrate that those requirements are met. The template complements the published
guidance that supports the regulations and topic sector guidance. The templates are available to promote transparency and assist duty holders in drafting
submissions.
Green text indicates regulatory requirements that are new in SCR2015.
Black text represents regulatory requirements that are contained in both SCR2005 and SCR2015.
Non Acceptance Issue - A Non Acceptance Issue (NAI) is a deficiency in the demonstration made within a safety case, which, if not resolved, will prevent the
case from being accepted under the relevant statutory provisions. Non Acceptance Issues must be sent by a formal letters to the duty holder requiring them
to be dealt with in the appropriate manner, giving the duty holder a clear understanding of how to address the deficiency.
Clarification - A Clarification is an explanation provided by a duty holder on request during assessment to enable the assessing Inspectors to be confident of
their interpretation of the information in a safety case. Clarifications are a routine part of assessment work and should be raised with a duty holder promptly.
Clarifications do not require formal letters. Communicating by telephone and email is sufficient. A meeting between the duty holder and relevant topic
specialists may also be appropriate in some circumstances for clarifications. Clarification is not a first stage before raising non-acceptance issues. Any
aspect that could credibly lead to a Non-Acceptance Issue should be raised as such in the first instance.
Design or Relocation Notification - Where the template is used to aid the inspection of a Design or Relocation Notification, Inspectors should consider if the
information provided meets the requirements of Schedule 5 of the regulations. The inspection must identify any Potential Non Acceptance Issues to draw to
the duty holder’s attention. Reference to these requirements outlined in Sections 1(a) to 1(e) of this template may be useful when forming an opinion. A
record of the inspection should be made in Section 7.
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 1 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
Scope of Marine Assessment
A marine assessment will include the marine major accident hazards of ‘Loss of Stability’ (GASCET Chapter 2.2.2); ‘Loss of
Position (GASCET Chapter 2.2.3); and Collision (GASCET Chapter 2.2.4). The marine assessment will also include FPSO cargo
oil tank operations and offloading. Marine assessment applies to all mobile installations, and to floating production installations.
Fixed installations will not normally receive a marine assessment. An assessment of the management of marine operations from
fixed installations can be made on request. This is done in co-operation with ED3.3. Draft regulatory requirements are included at
the end of this template.
Relevant Pre-Existing Guidance

APOSC Principles:
All APOSC principles can be used to guide a marine assessment. The most commonly used are listed below:

Principle 1
[The factual information should meet the SCR05 requirements and provide sufficient detail to support the arguments made in the case

Principle 2
The safety case should demonstrate that the management system is adequate to ensure compliance with the relevant statutory provisions

Principle 4
A systematic process should be used to identify all reasonably foreseeable major accident hazards that apply to the installation, together with
potential initiating events or sequences of events

Principle 8
The major accident risk evaluation should take account of human factors

Principle 10
The identification of risk reduction measures should be systematic and take into account new knowledge

Principle 11
The reasoning behind the choice of risk reduction measures to be implemented should be described. Decisions on implementation should take
reasonable practicability into account
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 2 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]


Principle 12
Risk reduction measures identified, as part of the risk assessment, should be implemented if they are reasonably practicable

Principle 13
In deciding what is reasonably practicable, the case should show how relevant good practice and judgement based on sound engineering,
management and human factors principles have been taken into account

Principle 16
The safety case should explain how inherently safer design concepts have been applied in the design decisions taken

Principle 17
The measures for preventing major accident hazards should take account of the various activities undertaken during the installation's current
phase of operation

Principle 18
Appropriate detection measures should be provided for any reasonably foreseeable event requiring an emergency response

Principle 19
Appropriate control and mitigation measures should be provided to protect personnel from the consequences of a major accident

Principle 30
A systematic approach should be taken to identifying and assessing any additional major accident hazards arising from combined operations.
These can be new hazards or changes to existing hazards
GASCET Chapters:
Chapter 2.2.2
Chapter 2.2.3
Chapter 2.2.4

COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
Stability – Maritime Integrity
Station Keeping – System Failures (Moorings; Dynamic Positioning)
Vessel Impact - Collision
HID Inspection Guide Offshore:
Inspection of Maritime Integrity (Loss of Stability & Position)
- Guidance for inspectors is included in 5 Appendices: (1) Stability and Ballast systems; (2) Watertight Integrity; (3) Mooring
Systems; (4) Dynamic Positioning Systems; (5) FPSO Cargo Tank Operations and Offloading
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 3 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
1. Marine Requirements
[…….organisational structure, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for determining and implementing the corporate major
accident prevention policy …..]
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
a) SCR2015 Regulation 8 – Safety and environmental management systems (SEMS)
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarificati
on
Note: This section applies across all marine topic areas. Following sections have additional requirements for specific marine topics
Does the summary of SEMS in the safety case provide
sufficient information about the marine roles and
responsibilities on the installation an onshore for the duty
holder?
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
c) SCR2015 Regulation 13 – Description of verification scheme and well examination scheme
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
(1)For the purposes of these Regulations, a description of the verification scheme complies with this paragraph if it includes-…….
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
SC Ref
NAI
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
Is there evidence in the safety case that this requirement
will be met for marine SECE?
Clarific
ation
The duties in paragraphs (1), (3) and (4) must be completed – (a) in the case of a production installation, before completion of its design; and (b) in the case
of a non-production installation, before it is moved into external waters with a view to its being operated there
Clarification
b) SCR2015 Regulation 9 – Establishment of verification scheme
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Is there an adequate description in the safety case of the
verification scheme in relation to the marine SECE as
required by Schedule 6-6 or Schedule 7-6?
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 4 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
d) SCR2015 Regulation 16 – Management and control of major accident hazards
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
(1)(a)(i))management system adequate to ensure …relevant statutory provisions will,…. be complied with…..
(1)(a)(ii)…management of ..contractors and sub-contaxctors is satisfsactory.
(1)(d) all major accident risks……suitable measures,………taken to control those risks to ensure that the relevant statutory provisions will be complied with
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
Clarification
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
In relation to the marine SECE are there sufficient
particulars in the safety case to demonstrate that this
regulation has been met?
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
NAI
5. An adequate description of operator’s SEMS
6. A description of the verification scheme which complies with regulation 13(1)
7. ….taken into account matters raised by competent authority pursuant to regulations 152) or 19(2) – Design and Relocation Notifications
8(a)..A description of ….any limits for safe operation
8(b) …compliance with regulation 4 of DCR Regulations 1996
8(c) …description.. how..ensured..suitability of the SECE
8e)…any relevant codes, standards and guidance used in the construction and commissioning of the installation#
10..suitable plan of location with meteorological and oceanographic conditions and properties of seabed
11 description and suitable diagrams of the installation and layout and configuration of its plant
Clarification
e) SCR2015 Schedule 6 – Particulars to be included in a safety case for a production installation
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
Is there sufficient evidence in the safety case that
marine issues have been adequately addressed?
Does the description of the verification scheme
adequately cover the marine SECE?
Have matters raised from design or relocation
notification been dealt with adequately?
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 5 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
Does the location approval and determination of safe
environmental limits for operations take into account
any limits imposed by installation motions,
freeboard/air-gap, or wave loading from green water?
Many marine SECE (e.g. ballast; mooring;) provide a
function under DCR. Are all the expected marine
systems included as SECE? Refer to Section 2 for
more information.
Is metocean and soils data provided suitable?
Are descriptions and diagrams provide suitable ?
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
NAI
5. An adequate description of operator’s SEMS
6. A description of the verification scheme which complies with regulation 13(1)
7(a)..A description of ….any limits for safe operation
7(b) …compliance with regulation 4 of DCR Regulations 1996
7(c) …description.. how..ensured..suitability of the SECE
7(d))…any relevant codes, standards and guidance used in the construction and commissioning of the installation#
8..Particulars of locations in which installation may be stationed and operated safely with meteorological and oceanographic conditions and properties of
seabed
9. A description of the arrangements for identifying risks from the seabed and marine hazard…and assessing the risks that they pose to the installation.
10 description and suitable diagrams of the installation and layout and configuration of its plant
Clarification
f) SCR2015 Schedule 7 – Particulars to be included in a safety case for a non-production installation.
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
Is there sufficient evidence in the safety case that
marine issues have been adequately addressed?
Does the description of the verification scheme
adequately cover the marine SECE?
Have matters raised from design or relocation
notification been dealt with adequately?
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 6 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
2. Stability, Ballast System and Watertight Integrity Requirements
The duty holder shall ensure that an installation at all times possesses such integrity sas is reasonably practicable
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
a) DCR 1996 Regulation 4 – General duty
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarific
ation
Note: This section is supplementary to the main requirements listed in Section 1. It details some specific issues which relate to
compliance with relevant statutory provisions and therefore build principally on OSDR 2015 Regulation 16 and Section 1(d) of this
template. References are given to the most appropriate HSE legislation, and where relevant reference to other guidance and
standards.
Capability to withstand reasonably foreseeable forces and damage
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
b) DCR 1996 Regulation 5 – Design of an installation
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarific
ation
Has the guidance of RR387 been followed, or is there
demonstration that an equivalent standard for stability and
watertight integrity has been met?
Has the guidance of OIS 4/2013 been followed?
Integrity secured throughout life cycle of the installation
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
c) DCR 1996 Regulation 6 – Work to an installation
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarific
ation
Has green water impact, freeboard, and air-gap been
assessed by reference to model testing or other analysis
methods?
Are modifications made to the installation described?
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 7 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
Ensure that the installation is not operated in a way as may prejudice its integrity
NAI
d) DCR 1996 Regulation 7 – Operation of an installation
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarific
ation
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
Clarific
ation
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
Are any geographical, water depth, or other location limits
clearly defined?
Are the environmental limits fpor safe operation clearly
defined?
Is there reference to an adverse weather policy, and is
this suitably summarised in the safety case?
Are all ballast valves fail-safe closed? Is suitable
justification given for any variations?
Are suitably there qualified personnel for the operation
and maintenance of the stability and ballast systems?
e) DCR 1996 Regulation 8 – Maintenance of Integrity
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Periodic assessment of integrity and remedial work after damage or deterioration
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
Is there an adequate description of the maintenance
management system in the safety case.?
Are all marine systems included as SCE?
Where marine system is not defined as SCE is there
adequate evidence that this system is maintained?
Are the piping and control systems capable of controlling
flooding and restoring installation to stable equilibrium?
Is there a secondary means of de-ballasting with
emergency power supply available?
Is there sufficient information available for recovery from
damage or flooding in the operations manual or
emergency response plan? (Also PFEER Reg 8 applies)
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 8 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
3. Mooring System Requirements
The duty holder shall ensure that an installation at all times possesses such integrity as is reasonably practicable
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
a) DCR 1996 Regulation 4 – General duty
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarific
ation
Note: This section is supplementary to the main requirements listed in Section 1. It details some more specific issues which relate
to compliance with relevant statutory provisions and therefore build principally on OSDR 2015 Regulation 16 and Section 1(d) of
this template. References are given to the most appropriate HSE legislation, and where relevant reference to other guidance and
standards.
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
NAI
Capability to withstand reasonably foreseeable forces and damage
Clarific
ation
b) DCR 1996 Regulation 5 – Design of an installation
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarific
ation
Has the mooring system been assessed for compliance
with guidance in OIS 4/2013? Are any identified
deficiencies justified and acceptable?
Is the mooring system designed and maintained to a
classification notation for positional mooring?
c) DCR 1996 Regulation 6 – Work to an installation
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Integrity secured throughout life cycle of the installation
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
Has the mooring system been subject to thorough review to
account for new codes and standards, equipment condition,
and new knowledge?
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 9 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
Ensure that the installation is not operated in a way as may prejudice its integrity
NAI
d) DCR 1996 Regulation 7 – Operation of an installation
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarific
ation
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
Clarific
ation
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
Is there a station keeping monitoring system and a
system for the detection of a failed mooring line?
Are there personnel with a defined level of competency
and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of
the mooring system?
Are there suitable emergency procedures, mitigation
measures, and drills to deal with events such as lost
mooring line?
Is emergency mooring release possible and is this system
been adequately tested? Will deluge system operate on
winches during emergency release?
Are the control modes for a thruster-assisted mooring
clearly explained and understood?
Are suitable performance standards defined for thusters in
a thruster assisted mooring system?
e) DCR 1996 Regulation 8 – Maintenance of Integrity
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Periodic assessment of integrity and remedial work after damage or deterioration
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
TRIM: 2015/______
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 10 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
4. Dynamic Positioning System Requirements
The duty holder shall ensure that an installation at all times possesses such integrity as is reasonably practicable
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
a) DCR 1996 Regulation 4 – General duty
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarific
ation
This section is supplementary to the main requirements listed in Section 1. It details some specific issues which relate to
compliance with relevant statutory provisions and therefore build principally on OSDR 2015 Regulation 16 and Section 1(d) of this
template. References are given to the most appropriate HSE legislation, and where relevant reference to other guidance and
standards.
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
NAI
Capability to withstand reasonably foreseeable forces and damage
Clarific
ation
b) DCR 1996 Regulation 5 – Design of an installation
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarific
ation
IS DP system certified in accordance with IMO MSC
Circular 645 and IMCA M103?
Are the FMEA reports and DP trial reports referenced, up to
date and available?
Are the DP capability plots consistent with the defined
operational limits for the installation?
c) DCR 1996 Regulation 6 – Work to an installation
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Integrity secured throughout life cycle of the installation
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
Are adequate records kept of changes and modifications to
the DP system?
Are minimum levels of personnel and competency defined
for the operational profile of the installation?
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 11 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
Ensure that the installation is not operated in a way as may prejudice its integrity
NAI
d) DCR 1996 Regulation 7 – Operation of an installation
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarific
ation
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
Clarific
ation
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
Are operating guidelines compatible with DNV-RP-E307?
Are safest modes of operation and activity specific
operating guidelines defined?
Has the interface of the DP system with any thrusterassisted mooring system been adequately assessed?
Is there a system for reporting of DP faults and the
actions taken to rectify them?
Does the management support system include on-line
diagnostics and support from DP supplier?
e) DCR 1996 Regulation 8 – Maintenance of Integrity
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Periodic assessment of integrity and remedial work after damage or deterioration
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
TRIM: 2015/______
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 12 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
5. FPSO Cargo and Offloading System Requirements
The duty holder shall ensure that an installation at all times possesses such integrity as is reasonably practicable
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
a) DCR 1996 Regulation 4 – General duty
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarific
ation
Note: This section is supplementary to the main requirements listed in Section 1. It details some specific issues which relate to
compliance with relevant statutory provisions and therefore build principally on OSDR 2015 Regulation 16 and Section 1(d) of this
template. References are given to the most appropriate HSE legislation, and where relevant reference to other guidance and
standards.
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
NAI
Capability to withstand reasonably foreseeable forces and damage
Clarific
ation
b) DCR 1996 Regulation 5 – Design of an installation
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarific
ation
Are tank venting arrangements compliant with safety
bulletin OSD 5-2010?
Have the O&GUK “Tandem Loading Guidelines” been
referenced and followed?
Are tank blanketing and isolation systems suitable for the
isolation of a tank (for inspection and entry) whilst
production is maintained to other tanks?
c) DCR 1996 Regulation 6 – Work to an installation
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Integrity secured throughout life cycle of the installation
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
Are the components of the tank blanketing system (e.g. IG
deck seal; PV valves) adequately maintained?
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 13 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
Ensure that the installation is not operated in a way as may prejudice its integrity
NAI
d) DCR 1996 Regulation 7 – Operation of an installation
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarific
ation
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
Clarific
ation
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
Are arrangements for communication with shuttle tanker
and establishment of ‘green-line’ in accordance with
Tandem Loading Guidelines?
Is the tank gauging and alarm system adequately
maintained and defined as safety critical?
Are any loading restrictions properly communicated and
understood . Are these reflected in loading plans?
e) DCR 1996 Regulation 8 – Maintenance of Integrity
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Periodic assessment of integrity and remedial work after damage or deterioration
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
TRIM: 2015/______
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 14 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
6. Management of Marine Operations (Collision avoidance)
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
NAI
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
NAI
The duty holder shall ensure that arrangements, which are appropriate for health and safety purposes, are in place for effective commiunication –
(a) Between the offshore installation and the shore, vessels, aircraft and other installations;
Clarificati
on
a) MAR 1995 Regulation 12 – Communication
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarification
Note: This section is supplementary to the main requirements listed in Section 1. It details some specific issues which relate to
compliance with relevant statutory provisions and therefore build principally on OSDR 2015 Regulation 16 and Section 1(d) of this
template. References are given to the most appropriate HSE legislation, and where relevant reference to other guidance and
standards.
Is there evidence that the safety management system has
minimised the risk of collision from vessels by reference to
‘Effective Collision Risk Management (OTO 1999 052);
O&GUK publications ‘Collision Avoidance’ (OP013) and
GOMO – Guidance on Offshore Marine Operations
(OP020)?
b) PFEER 1995 Regulation 10 - Detection of Incidents
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
The duty holder shall take appropriate measures –
(a) With a view to detecting fire and other events which may require emergency response……….
(b) With a view to enabling information regarding such incidents to be conveyed forthwith to places from which control action can be instigated
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
SC Ref
Criteria Met / Not Met - Assessment Comments
Is the role of the ERRV in relation to collision avoidance
clear and understood and tkes into account O&GUK ERRV
‘Management Guidelines’ (HS008) and ‘Survey Guidelines’
(HS009)?
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 15 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
7. Design / Relocation Notification Requirements
a) SCR2015 Schedule 5 – Design / Relocation Notification Requirements
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Schedule 5 - Particulars to be included in a design notification or a relocation notification
NOTE: List only potential non-acceptance issue, based on an inspection of the Notification using Sections 1(a) to 1(e) of this template to guide your inspection
Assessment Criteria / Minimum Information
TRIM: 2015/______
SC Ref
Potential NAI
Where this template is used to aid the inspection of the marine aspects of a Design or Relocation Notification the inspector needs to consider the relevant
information supplied the meet the requirements of Schedule 5 of the regulations. The inspector is not required to assess or accept the submission but in
completing their inspection they must identify any potential Non Acceptance Issues to draw to the attention of the duty holder. The information supplied does
not need to be assessed against the full marine requirements in a safety case; however, reference to the full requirements outlined in Sections above may be
useful when forming an opinion and recording it below.
Criteria Met / Not Met - Inspection Comments
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 16 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
MARINE REQUIREMENTS - ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
NAI – Non Acceptance Issue
SCR2015 Regulatory Requirement
Clarification
Required
NAI
Required
Conclusion
1. Marine Requirements
a) SCR2015 Reg 8 – Safety and environmental
management systems (SEMS)
b) SCR2015 Reg 9 – Establishment of verification
scheme
c) SCR2015 Reg 13 – Description of verification
scheme and well examination scheme
d) SCR2015 Reg 16 – Management and control of
major accident hazards
e) SCR2015 Schedule 6 - Particulars to be included
in a safety case for a production installation
f) SCR2015 Schedule 7 – Particulars to be included
in a safety case for a production installation
2. Stability, Ballast, & WT Integrity Requirements
a) DCR Reg 4 – General duty
b) DCR Reg 5 – Design of an installation
c) DCR Reg 6 – Work to an installation
d) DCR Reg 7 – Operation of an installation
e) DCR Reg 8 – Maintenance of Integrity
3. Mooring System Requirements
a) DCR Reg 4 – General duty
b) DCR Reg 5 – Design of an installation
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 17 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
c) DCR Reg 6 – Work to an installation
d) DCR Reg 7 – Operation of an installation
e) DCR Reg 8 – Maintenance of Integrity
4. Dynamic Positioning System Requirements
a) DCR Reg 4 – General duty
b) DCR Reg 5 – Design of an installation
c) DCR Reg 6 – Work to an installation
d) DCR Reg 7 – Operation of an installation
e) DCR Reg 8 – Maintenance of Integrity
5. FPSO Cargo and Offloading System Requirements
a) DCR Reg 4 – General duty
b) DCR Reg 5 – Design of an installation
c) DCR Reg 6 – Work to an installation
d) DCR Reg 7 – Operation of an installation
e) DCR Reg 8 – Maintenance of Integrity
6. Management of Marine Operations (Collision
avoidance)
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 18 of 19
Document Title: Marine Assessment Template
Logos: DECC / HSE / OSDR Logos
Case Title - [Safety Case Title]
Duty Holder – [Company Name]
COIN Numbers - [Case] / [SVC Number]
Topic Assessor – [Name]
a) MAR 1995 Regulation 12 – Communication
b) PFEER 1995 Regulation 10 - Detection of
Incidents
7. Design / Relocation Notification Requirements
a) SCR2015 Schedule 5 – Design / Relocation
Notification Requirements
TRIM: 2015/______
Revised: [Date] - DRAFT
Owner: ED4.3
Page 19 of 19