Respiratory Responses to Chronic Hypoxia and Hypercapnia Stephen Reid Centre for the Neurobiology of Stress Department of Biological Sciences University of Toronto Scarborough Toronto, Ontario Respiratory Responses to Chronic Hypoxia and Hypercapnia 1. Environmental Hypoxia 2. Ventilatory Acclimatisation to Hypoxia (VAH) in Mammals a. What is VAH? b. Respiratory Control Systems c. Mechanisms of VAH d. The Role of Glutamate e. The Role of GABA 3. Amphibian Responses to Chronic Hypoxia a. Central Processes 4. Amphibian Responses to Chronic Hypercapnia a. Central Processes b. Olfactory Chemoreceptors c. Arterial Chemoreceptors d. Carbonic Anhydrase Hypoxia in an Aquatic Environment Hypoxia in an Aquatic Environment Anuran amphibians may experience environmental hypoxia and hypercapnia during aquatic over-wintering (Pinder et al., 1992). African elephants swimming in a lake near Chobe, Botswana while breathing through their trunks Did the trunk evolve as a snorkel? Aquatic ancestry? West, JB. 2002. Why Doesn't the Elephant Have a Pleural Space? News Physiol Sci 17: 47-50 Hypoxia in a Terrestrial Environment: High Altitude Hypoxia in a Terrestrial Environment: High Altitude Copper mining at 4 000 metres in the Andes employs thousands PO2 at 4 000m: 100 mm Hg Ruppell’s Griffin (Gyps rueppellii): The High Altitude Champion A Ruppell’s Griffin (vulture) was sucked into an engine of a British Airways Vickers VC10* at 11 275 metres (37 900 ft) above the Ivory Coast on Nov 29 1975. (2 km higher than the summit of Everest) *Design ceiling: 47 000 ft Hypoxic Hypercapnia in a Terrestrial Environment: Life Underground Hypoxic Hypercapnia in a Terrestrial Environment: Life Underground • 15-16% O2 and 2-3% CO2 in the tunnels • 12-14% O2 and 5-6% CO2 in the soil Talpid Moles “No other mammal, not even the high altitude llama or the diving seal, breathes this kind of [low quality] air”. Quillam, Clarke and Salsbury (1971) “…it is incumbent upon burrow-dwelling mammals to make physiological adjustments to avoid excessive energy expenditure in respiratory work while still insuring adequate O2 delivery to their tissues” Boggs et al (1984) Adaptations to Hypoxia Erythropoietin (stimulates red blood cell synthesis) 2, 3 Diphosphoglycerate (Enhances O2 delivery to the tissues) Increased capillary density Reduced plasma volume Haemoglobin Ventilatory Acclimatisation to Hypoxia: Ventilation (ml/min/kg) The Acute Hypoxic Ventilatory Response 1000 800 Sprague-Dawley Rats 2 600 400 1 200 Chronic Hypoxia Control 0 40 60 80 100 120 140 Arterial Oxygen Tension (mmHg) Acclimatisation to hypoxia results in: 1. An increase in overall ventilation when breathing room air. 2. An increased sensitivity to acute bouts of hypoxia (usually manifests during isocapnic hypoxia and not poikilocapnic hypoxia). Ventilatory Acclimatisation to Hypoxia: The Acute Hypercapnic Ventilatory Response Minute Ventilation (ml/min/kg) 2500 *, + *, + *, + Chronic Hypoxia *, + 2000 1500 + 1000 * * * 6 8 Control * 0 2 4 % Inspired CO2 Sprague-Dawley Rats • Chronic hypoxia also augments the acute hypercapnic ventilatory response Eskander and Reid, unpublished Important Respiratory Control Sites in the Mammalian Brainstem PONS Pontine Respiratory Group 4th ventricle Pre-Bötzinger Complex/ Parafacial Nucleus MEDULLA Obex Ventral Respiratory Group Nucleus of the Solitary Tract SPINAL CORD Alheid et al. 2002. J. Neurocytology, 31, 693-117. Pulmonary Stretch Receptors (Lung) Higher Brain Centers 4th ventricle PONS MEDULLA Pulmonary Vagus Nerve Obex Carotid sinus nerve Peripheral Chemoreceptors (Carotid Body) Central Chemoreceptors (pH/CO2) Phrenic Nerve SPINAL CORD Diaphragm Breathing is produced in brainstem respiratory centres and is modified by afferent input and central processes. Mechanisms of Ventilatory Acclimatisation to Hypoxia 1. An increase in the sensitivity of the O2 chemoreceptors to low levels of oxygen. NTS Phrenic Nerve 1 Carotid Body (O2 Chemoreceptors) 2 Diaphragm Carotid Sinus Nerve 2. An increase in the responsiveness of the CNS to input from the carotid body. Working Model Chronic Hypoxia Changes in glutamate- and GABA-mediated neurotransmission in the nucleus NTS of the solitary tract (NTS) An increase in the responsiveness of the CNS to carotid body input Ventilatory Acclimatisation to Hypoxia Carotid Body Diaphragm Excitatory Neurotransmission: Glutamate Glutamate Receptors (Ion Channel Family) NMDA MK 801; Receptor channel blocker Non-NMDA AMPA 1. Systemic injection of MK801 (i.p. injection). 2. Bilateral injection of MK801 into the NTS. Kainate Ventilatory Acclimatisation to Hypoxia in the Lab 9 days of chronic hypoxia (80 mmHg) in a hypobaric chamber Plethysmography is used to Measuring Breathing in Conscious Unrestrained Rats Ventilation (ml/kg/min) Effects of Systemic MK801 on Breathing N, Normoxia CH, Chronic Hypoxia * 1800 PreMK (CH) 5 1500 1200 6 Post MK (CH) 900 600 Post MK (N) Pre MK(N) 3 * Hypoxia (10% O2) 1 2 4. ventilatory acclimatisation to hypoxia Normoxia (21% O2) Systemic blockade of NMDA receptors with MK 801 alters the hypoxic ventilatory response in control and chronically hypoxic rats. Reid and Powell, J. Appl. Physiol. 2005 Ventilation (ml/kg/min) Effects of MK 801 injected into the NTS 1800 1600 N, Normoxia Pre (CH) 1400 CH, Chronic Hypoxia 1200 1000 800 600 Post (CH) Pre (N) Post (N) VAH 400 Hypoxia (10% O2) Normoxia (21% O2) Blocking NMDA receptors in the NTS (with MK 801) abolishes the hypoxic ventilatory response in chronically hypoxic, but not control, rats. Reid and Powell, unpublished Ventilation (ml/min/kg) Ventilatory Acclimatisation to Hypoxia in Mammals (Rats) 1000 800 2 600 400 1 200 Chronic Hypoxia Control Changes due, in part, to alterations in NMDA- mediated neurotransmission (illustrated by the MK801 treatment). 0 40 60 80 100 120 140 Arterial Oxygen Tension (mmHg) Acclimatisation to hypoxia results in: 1. An increase in overall ventilation when breathing room air. 2. An increased sensitivity to acute bouts of hypoxia. 10 a 9 81200 7 b a 61100 a Saline (○) 5 1000b 4 10 900 Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) a, # GABA (●) 200 180 160 15 20 25 30 800 b 700 c 10 140 15 a a 10 15 20 25 30 a Saline (○) GABA (●) a 120 100 20 25 9 days of infusion Minute Ventilation (ml/kg/min) Tidal Volume (ml/kg) GABA Infusion into the NTS in the Absence of Chronic Hypoxia Leads to VAH-Like Changes in Breathing 1200 1100 b 1000 GABA (●) a 900 b 800 Saline (○) a a, # a 700 10 15 20 25 30 Inspired O2 (%) 30 Inspired O2 (%) Reid et al., unpublished Baclofen and Muscimol Infusion into the NTS (Acute Hypoxia) 1200 Baclofen: GABAB receptor agonist Muscimol: GABAA receptor agonist b, + 1100 1000 Minute Ventilation (ml/kg/min) b a, #, + 900 b, # a, + 800 a 700 a a a 600 10 15 20 25 Baclofen (●) Saline (○) Muscimol (■) 30 Inspired O2 (%) • Baclofen treatment increases breathing • Muscimol treatment decreases breathing Reid et al., unpublished Changes in GABA-mediated neurotransmission in the NTS may account for VAH (when O2 is high). Breathing in Amphibians • Bimodal breathing • Buccal-pressure pump • Episodic breathing Buccal Pressure Episodic Breathing in Amphibians Lung Pressure B. Breath hold with lungs inflated Buccal Pressure 10 sec Buccal Oscillations Lung Pressure Inflation Breath Reid, Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2007 Balanced Breath Lung Inflation Cycle Deflation Breath 10 sec Peripheral Chemoreceptors Central Chemoreceptors (pH/CO2) Higher Brain Centers optic chiasma medulla Spinal cord olfactory lobes + - CRG(s) - NI X/IX Pulmonary Vagus Nerve VII V Pulmonary Stretch Receptors optic tectum “Respiratory Centers” (site of central integration) Breathing is produced in brainstem respiratory centres and is modified by afferent input and central processes. The Effects of Chronic Hypoxia on Amphibian Breathing Exposure to Chronic Hypoxia (or Hypercapnia) in the Lab ProOx Controller (set point of 10% O2) ProCO2 Controller (set point of 3.5% CO2) Effects of Chronic Hypoxia and MK801 Treatment on Breathing in Cane Toads (In vivo) Breathing Trial Chamber Air 5% O2 gas in gas out Computer Data Acquisition System (Windaq DI-194) Impedance Converter A. Control: Saline Injection 20 15 * * 10 5 0 N H Pre-Saline Injection Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) 25 25 20 15 10 5 Effects of Chronic Hypoxia and MK801 Treatment on Breathing in+ Cane Toads (In vivo) # D. Chronic Hypoxia: Saline Injection 0 N H Post-Saline Injection N H Pre-Saline Injection N H Post-Saline Injection 15 * 10 5 0 McAneney et Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) 25 25 E. Chronic Hypoxia: MK 801 Injection Control = Chronically Toads B. Control: MK 801 InjectionNormoxic * N =20Exposure to Acute Normoxia (21% 20 O2) H = Exposure to Acute Hypoxia (5% O2) 15 10 + * + 5 # 0 MK801 = NMDA (glutamate) receptor channel blocker. N H N H al., Pre-MK801 Respir. Physiol. Post-MK801 Neurobiol. Injection Injection 2007 N H Pre-MK801 Injection N H Post-MK801 Injection A. Control: Saline Injection 20 15 * * 10 5 0 N H Pre-Saline Injection Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) 25 25 D. Chronic Hypoxia: Saline Injection 20 15 Line 2 10 + Line 1 5 # 0 N H Post-Saline Injection N H Pre-Saline Injection N H Post-Saline Injection 10 Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) 25 25 E. Chronic Hypoxia: MK 801 Injection Control = Chronically Toads B. Control: MK 801 InjectionNormoxic * Chronic Hypoxia = Exposure to 10 days of 10% O2 20 20 N = Exposure to Acute Normoxia (21% O2) + H =15 Exposure*to Acute Hypoxia (5%15O2) * 10 + Line 1: Exposure to chronic hypoxia doesn’t alter “resting” breathing.* 5 5 # Line 2: Chronic hypoxia abolishes the acute 0 0 hypoxic ventilatory response.* N H N H Pre-MK801 McAneney et al., Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol.Post-MK801 2007 Injection Injection N H Pre-MK801 Injection N H Post-MK801 Injection *, Different from the response in mammals 20 15 10 5 0 N H Pre-Saline Injection Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) * * 25 B. Control: MK 801 Injection * D. Chronic Hypoxia: Saline Injection 20 15 10 + 5 # 0 N H Pre-Saline Injection 25 N H Post-Saline Injection E. Chronic Hypoxia: MK 801 Injection 20 In 15control animals, MK801+augments * the10acute hypoxic ventilatory response.* * 10 5 0 N H Pre-MK801 Injection 25 N H Post-Saline Injection 20 15 Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) A. Control: Saline Injection Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) 25 N H Post-MK801 Injection + 5 0 *, Different from the # response in mammals where MK801 N H N H reduced the response. Pre-MK801 Post-MK801 Injection Injection 20 15 10 5 0 N H Pre-Saline Injection Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) * * 25 B. Control: MK 801 Injection * * 10 5 0 N H Pre-MK801 Injection 25 N H Post-MK801 Injection D. Chronic Hypoxia: Saline Injection 20 15 10 + 5 # 0 N H Post-Saline Injection 20 15 Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) A. Control: Saline Injection N H Pre-Saline Injection Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) 25 25 N H Post-Saline Injection E. Chronic Hypoxia: MK 801 Injection 20 15 10 + * + 5 # 0 N H Pre-MK801 Injection N H Post-MK801 Injection Mammal (Rat) versus Amphibian (Cane Toad) Chronic Hypoxia Increases Resting Ventilation Doesn’t Alter Resting Ventilation Chronic Hypoxia Often augments the acute hypoxic ventilatory response. Abolished the acute hypoxic ventilatory response. Attenuates or abolishes the acute hypoxic ventilatory response. Augments the acute hypoxic ventilatory response. NMDA Channel Blockade with MK801 Effects of Chronic Hypoxia on Central pH/CO2-Sensitive (Fictive) Breathing Peripheral Chemoreceptors Central Chemoreceptors (pH/CO2) Higher Brain Centers optic chiasma medulla Spinal cord olfactory lobes + - CRG(s) - NI X/IX Pulmonary Vagus Nerve VII V Pulmonary Stretch Receptors optic tectum “Respiratory Centers” (site of central integration) In Vitro Brainstem-Spinal Cord Preparation Record activity from the nerves that innervate the respiratory muscles (fictive breathing) Recording (suction) electrode O2 CO2 • • Used to study the central control of breathing in the absence of peripheral input. artificial cerebral spinal fluid (aCSF) 20°C Central pH/CO2 chemoreceptors can be stimulated by altering (lowering) the pH/CO2 of the artificial cerebral spinal fluid. micromanipulator Stiff Wire electrode Suction electrode Superfusion chamber Optic lobes V VII IX/X XII Spinal cord Breathing Patterns In Vitro Single Breaths Doublets Episodes Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) Reid and Milsom (1998) Chronic Hypoxia Attenuates Central pH/CO2 Chemosensitivity in the Cane Toad 25 Chronic Normoxia 20 Fictive Breathing Frequency 15 (fictive breaths per minute) 10 Chronic Hypoxia * * 5 *, # 0 7.6 *, # 7.8 8.0 Artificial Cerebral Spinal Fluid pH McAneney and Reid, Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2007 Which respiratory control system is responsible for the chronic hypoxia – induced decrease in pH/CO2-sensitive fictive breathing? Peripheral Chemoreceptors Central Chemoreceptors (pH/CO2) Higher Brain Centers optic chiasma medulla Spinal cord olfactory lobes + - CRG(s) - NI X/IX Pulmonary Vagus Nerve VII V Pulmonary Stretch Receptors optic tectum Removal of the Midbrain Converts Episodic Breathing to Continuous Breathing Episodic Fictive Breathing (pre-transection; pH 7.8) ENG X 2 sec 3 Continuous Fictive Breathing (post-transection; pH 7.8) ENG X 2 sec American Bullfrog (Rana catesbieana) Reid and Milsom, Respir. Physiol. 2000 1 2 3 Breathing Frequency (breaths/min) The conversion from episodic to continuous breathing is accompanied by an increase in breathing frequency. * 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1. 2. 3. Removal of descending inputs prevents breath clustering and increases breathing frequency. American Bullfrog (Rana catesbieana) Reid and Milsom, Respir. Physiol. 2000 Midbrain Transection Restores the Central pH/CO2 Chemosensitivity Previously Blunted by Chronic Hypoxia 25 Fictive Breathing Frequency 20 (fictive breaths per minute) 15 Chronic Normoxia Chronic Hypoxia * 10 5 * Pre-Transection *, # 3 *, # 0 7.6 7.8 8.0 Artificial Cerebral Spinal Fluid pH McAneney and Reid, Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2007 Midbrain Transection Restores the Central pH/CO2 Chemosensitivity Previously Blunted by Chronic Hypoxia 25 Fictive Breathing Frequency 20 (fictive breaths per minute) 15 Chronic Normoxia Post-Transection Chronic Hypoxia * 10 5 * Pre-Transection *, # 3 *, # 0 7.6 7.8 8.0 Artificial Cerebral Spinal Fluid pH McAneney and Reid, Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2007 Midbrain Transection Restores the Central pH/CO2 Chemosensitivity Previously Blunted by Chronic Hypoxia 25 Fictive Breathing Frequency 20 (fictive breaths per minute) 15 Chronic Normoxia Post-Transection Chronic Hypoxia * 10 5 * Pre-Transection *, # 3 *, # 0 7.6 7.8 8.0 Artificial Cerebral Spinal Fluid pH McAneney and Reid, Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2007 The Effects of Chronic Hypercapnia on Amphibian Breathing Chronic Hypercapnia Increases Central pH/CO2 Sensitive Fictive Breathing 35 *, + 30 Fictive 25 Breathing Frequency 20 (fictive breaths 15 per minute) 10 5 9-10 days; 3.5% CO2 *, + Chronic Hypercapnia Control * 0 7.4 Gheshmy et al., 2006 7.6 7.8 8.0 8.2 Artificial Cerebral Spinal Fluid pH Which control system is responsible for the chronic hypercapnia (CHC) – induced increase in pH/CO2-sensitive fictive breathing? Fictive Breathing Frequency HYPOTHESIS #1: Descending Inputs from the Midbrain (as was the case with chronic hypoxia) 3 Pre = Pre-Transection Post = Post-Transection 16 14 12 10 8 +* 6 + 4 2 CHC Pre + * Control Pre 0 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 aCSF pH Gheshmy et al., 2006 Fictive Breathing Frequency HYPOTHESIS #1: Descending Inputs from the Midbrain (as was the case with chronic hypoxia) 3 Pre = Pre-Transection Post = Post-Transection 16 14 12 10 8 +* 6 * + 4 2 CHC Pre + Control Post Control Pre * 0 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 aCSF pH Gheshmy et al., 2006 Fictive Breathing Frequency HYPOTHESIS #1: Descending Inputs from the Midbrain (as was the case with chronic hypoxia) 3 16 Pre = Pre-Transection Post = Post-Transection +* 14 12 + + 10 8 6 +* CHC Post * + 4 2 CHC Pre + Control Post Control Pre * 0 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 aCSF pH Gheshmy et al., 2006 HYPOTHESIS #2: CO2-Senstive Olfactory Chemoreceptors High CO2 optic chiasma medulla Spinal cord olfactory lobes + - CRG(s) - NI X/IX VII V optic tectum Reduce Breathing Frequency CHC → Increased Olfactory CO2 Chemoreceptor Input → Decrease Breathing → This is not Advantageous → Increased Central pH/CO2 Chemoreceptor-Sensitive Breathing (Function) to Compensate? HYPOTHESIS #2: The Effects of Olfactory Chemoreceptor Denervation (OD) on Central pH/CO2-Senstive Fictive Breathing Olfactory Denervation (OD) CHC or Control Brainstem Preparations Measure pH/CO2Sensitive Fictive Breathing Fictive Breathing Frequency 35 *+ # 30 Chronic Hypercapnia (CHC) 25 +# 20 15 + # Data with no OD 10 Control 5 0 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 aCSF pH Gheshmy et al., 2007 HYPOTHESIS #2: The Effects of Olfactory Chemoreceptor Denervation (OD) on Central pH/CO2-Senstive Fictive Breathing Olfactory Denervation (OD) CHC or Control Brainstem Preparations Measure pH/CO2Sensitive Fictive Breathing Fictive Breathing Frequency 35 *+ # 30 Chronic Hypercapnia (CHC) 25 +# 20 15 + # Data with OD 10 Control 5 Control-OD 0 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 aCSF pH Gheshmy et al., 2007 HYPOTHESIS #2: Olfactory Chemoreceptor Denervation (OD) Abolishes the Chronic Hypercapnia (CHC)-Induced Augmentation of pH/CO2-Senstive Fictive Breathing (Central Chemosensitivity) Olfactory Denervation (OD) CHC or Control Brainstem Preparations Measure pH/CO2Sensitive Fictive Breathing Fictive Breathing Frequency 35 *+ # 30 Chronic Hypercapnia (CHC) 25 +# 20 15 + # Data with OD 10 5 Control 0 Control-OD CHC – OD 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 aCSF pH Gheshmy et al., 2007 HYPOTHESIS #3: Peripheral (Arterial) Chemoreceptors in the Carotid Labyrinth and Aortic Arch Low O2/High CO2 optic chiasma medulla Spinal cord olfactory lobes + - CRG(s) - NI X/IX VII V optic tectum Increase Breathing CHC → Increased Arterial CO2 Chemoreceptor Input → Increased Central Chemoreceptor Function → Increased pH/CO2-Sensitive Fictive Breathing. The Ideal Experiment: Denervate the Carotid Labyrinth and Aortic Arch 1. Control 2. CHC 3. Chronic Hyperoxia 4. Chronic Hyperoxic Hypercapnia (HH) Brainstem Preparations Measure pH/CO2Sensitive Fictive Breathing Fictive Breathing Frequency HYPOTHESIS #3: Simultaneous Exposure to Chronic Hypercapnia and Hyperoxia (Hyperoxic Hypercapnia; HH) 35 *@ $ Chronic Hypercapnia (CHC) 30 @$ 25 20 @$ 15 10 Control 5 0 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 aCSF pH 7.9 8.0 Gheshmy et al., 2007 1. Control 2. CHC 3. Chronic Hyperoxia 4. Chronic Hyperoxic Hypercapnia (HH) Brainstem Preparations Measure pH/CO2Sensitive Fictive Breathing Fictive Breathing Frequency HYPOTHESIS #3: Simultaneous Exposure to Chronic Hypercapnia and Hyperoxia (Hyperoxic Hypercapnia; HH) 35 *@ $ Chronic Hypercapnia (CHC) 30 @$ 25 20 @$ 15 10 Control 5 0 * 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 aCSF pH 7.9 8.0 Chronic Hyperoxia Gheshmy et al., 2007 1. Control 2. CHC 3. Chronic Hyperoxia 4. Chronic Hyperoxic Hypercapnia (HH) Brainstem Preparations Measure pH/CO2Sensitive Fictive Breathing Fictive Breathing Frequency HYPOTHESIS #3: Simultaneous Exposure to Chronic Hypercapnia and Hyperoxia (Hyperoxic Hypercapnia; HH) Abolishes the Chronic Hypercapnia (CHC)-Induced Increase in Central pH/CO2-Sensitive Fictive Breathing 35 *@ $ Chronic Hypercapnia (CHC) 30 @$ 25 20 @$ 15 10 5 0 * * 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 aCSF pH 7.9 8.0 Control Chronic HH Chronic Hyperoxia Gheshmy et al., 2007 Total Fictive Ventilation (×10-2 V·s·min-1) The Role of Carbonic Anhydrase in the Chronic Hypercapnia (CHC) – Induced Increase in pH/CO2 Sensitive Fictive Breathing 14 b, + Chronic Hypercapnia 12 10 08 06 04 02 00 b a b Control a, b a 7.6 7.8 8.0 aCSF pH Srivaratharjah and Reid, unpublished Leopard Frogs (Rana pipiens) A Putative Model of Central pH/CO2 Sensing CA: Carbonic Anhydrase 1. Inhibit CA with Acetazolamide cell permeant 2. Add exogenous CA not cell permeant Fictive Breathing Before and After Acetazolamide (ACTZ) Treatment Control Chronic Hypercapnia Pre-ACTZ 1µM ACTZ 10µM ACTZ 7.5 sec Inhibition of carbonic anhydrase with ACTZ abolishes the CHC-induced increase in fictive breathing. Srivaratharjah and Reid, unpublished Acetazolamide (ACTZ) Treatment Abolishes the CHC-Induced Increase in Fictive Breathing Total Fictive Ventilation (X 10-2 V.sec.min-1) Control Chronic Hypercapnia 12 12 Pre-ACTZ Pre-ACTZ 8 8 1µM ACTZ 4 1µM ACTZ 4 0 10µM ACTZ 0 7.6 7.8 aCSF pH 8.0 10µM ACTZ 7.6 7.8 aCSF pH 8.0 This suggests that an increase in CA activity/amount is involved in the CHCinduced increase in fictive breathing. Srivaratharjah and Reid, unpublished Addition of Exogenous CA had no Effect on Fictive Breathing Total Fictive Ventilation (X 10-2 V.sec.min-1) Control Chronic Hypercapnia 20 20 15 15 10 10 Pre-CA 5 Pre-CA CA Washout 5 CA CA Washout 0 CA 7.6 7.8 aCSF pH 8.0 0 7.6 7.8 aCSF pH This suggests that intracellular, rather than extracellular CA is involved regulating CO2-sensitive fictive breathing. 8.0 Srivaratharjah and Reid, unpublished Respiratory Responses to Chronic Hypoxia and Hypercapnia 1. Environmental Hypoxia 2. Ventilatory Acclimatisation to Hypoxia (VAH) in Mammals a. What is VAH? b. Respiratory Control Systems c. Mechanisms of VAH d. The Role of Glutamate e. The Role of GABA 3. Amphibian Responses to Chronic Hypoxia a. Central Processes 4. Amphibian Responses to Chronic Hypercapnia a. Central Processes b. Olfactory Chemoreceptors c. Arterial Chemoreceptors d. Carbonic Anhydrase Acknowledgements Amphibian Studies Rat Studies Jessica McAneney (PhD Student; ongoing) Andrew Peters (PhD Student; ongoing) Afshan Gheshmy (BSc; 2004: MSc; 2006) Kajenny Srivaratharjah (BSc; 2007; MSc; 2008) Angelo Noronha (BSc; 2004) Sarangan Uthayalingam (BSc; 2004) Jasmin Manga (BSc; 2004) Robert Vukelich (BSc; 2005) Donela Besada (BSc; 2006) Ali Anari (BSc; 2006) Alex Cui (BSc; 2007) Sean Chung (MSc; 2005) Jeff Knight (BSc; 2007: MSc; 2008) Balinda Phe (MSc; 2008) Mukarram Khan (BSc; 2005) Irene Bekit (BSc; 2006) Tony Eskander (BSc; 2006) Daniel Fingrut (BSc; 2006) Manu Maldeniya (BSc; 2008) Stephen Chan (BSc; 2009) Collaborators Dr. Frank Powell, UCSD Dr. Kevin Campbell, Univ. Manitoba Dr. Suzanne Erb, U of T Dr. Gwen Ivy, U of T Dr. Katie Gilmour, Ottawa U. Funding NSERC; CFI; OIT Ontario Thoracic Society Francis Families Foundation Canadian Society of Zoologists 2009 Annual Meeting May 12 to 16 2009, University of Toronto Scarborough (UTSC) For information contact csz2009@utsc.utoronto.ca or visit our web site http://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/~csz2009/