IPFW School of Education
2010 Data Summary Reports
For
Education Leadership
Graduate Secondary and Elementary
Special Education
Initial Programs (Secondary & Elementary)
Gifted and Talented
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Table of Content
Section ……………………………………………………………………………………….Pages
I. Educational Leadership
………………………………………………………………….. ..3 - 7
II .Graduate Secondary Elementary
…………………………………………………………..8 – 20
III. Special Education …………………………………………………………………………… 21 – 22
IV. Initial Programs (Secondary & Elementary) …………………………………………..........23 – 30
V. Gifted and Talented …………………………………………………………………………… 31 – 34
2
Section I
Educational Leadership Summary
3
Table 1.1 Student Disposition Self Assessment Averages for 20062010
Score Description
Caring
Positive Environment
Change Agents
Creative Analysis
Applies Research
Effective Communicator
Professionalism/Collaboration
2009-10
3.4
3.5
3.2
2.9
2.9
3
3.5
Averages
2008-09 2007-08
3.6
3.5
3.6
3.5
3.3
3.3
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.6
3.6
2006-07
3.7
3.8
3.3
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.8
Figure 1.1 Comparison of Student Disposition Self Assessment Scores for 2006 - 2010
4
Table 1.2 Principal Assessment of Student Disposition
Averages for 2006-2010
Score Description
Caring
Positive Environment
Change Agents
Creative Analysis
Applies Research
Effective Communicator
Professionalism/Collaboration
2009-10
3.5
3.6
3.5
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
Averages
2008-09 2007-08
3.8
3.4
3.9
3.4
3.7
3.2
3.6
3.2
3.6
3.1
3.6
3
3.8
3.4
2006-07
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.6
3.7
3.8
Figure 1.2 Comparison of Principal Assessment of Student Disposition Scores for 2006 - 2010
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
2009-10
1
2008-09
0.5
0
2007-08
2006-07
5
Table 1.3 Difference Between Principal’s and Student’s Disposition
Assessments
Difference between Principal & Student Assessment
20092008200710
09
08
-0.1
-0.2
0.1
Caring
-0.1
-0.3
0.1
Positive Environment
-0.3
-0.4
0.1
Change Agents
-0.4
-0.5
-0.1
Creative Analysis
-0.5
-0.5
0.1
Applies Research
-0.5
-0.5
0.1
Effective Communicator
-0.1
-0.2
0.2
Professionalism/Collaboration
200607
-0.1
0
-0.5
-0.4
-0.2
-0.3
0
Difference Formula = student - principal
Figure 1.3 Comparison of Principal’s and Student’s Disposition Assessments
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
6
Table 1.4 ISLLC Average Scores for 2006 - 2010
Averages
Score Description
Vision
Learning Culture
Management
Collaboration
Ethics
Politics
2009-10
3.6
3.7
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.5
2008-09
2007-08
3.6
3.6
3.8
3.7
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.3
2006-07
3.7
3.6
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.4
Figure 1.4 Comparison of ISLLC Scores for 2006 - 2010
3.9
3.8
3.7
3.6
3.5
3.4
3.3
3.2
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
3.1
3
7
Section II:
Graduate Secondary and Elementary Summary
8
Table 2.1 Average scores for Conceptual Framework - All Students
Averages
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
Demo. & Comm.
3.66
3.59
3.77
3.74
Habits of Mind
3.76
3.71
3.78
3.81
Pedagogy
3.77
3.73
3.78
3.85
Knowledge
3.83
3.72
3.82
3.87
Experience
3.71
3.67
3.8
3.71
Leadership
3.65
3.65
3.76
3.71
Figure 2.1 Comparison of Conceptual Framework for all students for 2006 – 2010
9
Table 2.2 Difference of Conceptual Framework Average Scores
between Elementary and Secondary
Averages
2009-10
Demo. & Comm.
Habits of Mind
Pedagogy
Knowledge
Experience
0.2
0.24
0.18
0.22
0.18
0.25
Leadership
Difference Formula = Elementary - Secondary
2008-09
0.07
0.04
0.03
0.12
0.02
0.03
2007-08
-0.16
-0.14
-0.05
-0.02
-0.13
-0.21
2006-07
0.13
0.16
0.08
0.11
-0.09
0.02
Figure 2.2 Difference of Conceptual Framework Scores between Elementary and Secondary
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
-0.2
-0.25
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
10
Table 2.3 Average scores by Conceptual Framework Category for
Elementary
Averages
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
Demo. & Comm.
3.73
3.6
3.73
3.78
Habits of Mind
3.85
3.73
3.75
3.85
Pedagogy
3.84
3.75
3.79
3.88
Knowledge
3.9
3.78
3.82
3.91
Experience
3.77
3.69
3.79
3.68
Leadership
3.74
3.66
3.71
3.71
Figure 2.3 Comparison of Conceptual Framework for Elementary students for 2006 – 2010
11
Table 2.4 Average scores by Conceptual Framework Category for
Secondary
Averages
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
Demo. & Comm.
3.53
3.53
3.89
3.65
Habits of Mind
3.61
3.69
3.89
3.69
Pedagogy
3.66
3.72
3.84
3.8
Knowledge
3.68
3.66
3.84
3.8
Experience
3.59
3.67
3.92
3.77
Leadership
3.49
3.63
3.92
3.69
Figure 2.4 Comparison of Conceptual Framework for Secondary students for 2006 – 2010
12
Table 2.5 Average NBPTS scores for all students
Averages
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
Commits to Students
3.72
3.67
3.72
3.76
Knows Subject
3.66
3.64
3.68
3.78
Monitors Student Learning
3.64
3.62
3.69
3.72
3.7
3.66
3.74
3.68
3.64
3.57
3.72
3.73
Reflects on Practice
Commits to Learning Communities
Figure 2.5 Comparison of NBPTS for all students for 2006 – 2010
3.8
3.75
3.7
2009-10
3.65
2008-09
3.6
2007-08
3.55
2006-07
3.5
3.45
Commits to
Students
Knows Subject
Monitors
Student
Learning
Reflects on
Practice
Commits to
Learning
Communities
13
Table 2.6 Difference of NBPTS Average Scores between Elementary and Secondary
Averages
2009-10
Commits to Students
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
0.03
-0.16
-0.24
0.02
Knows Subject
-0.01
-0.16
-0.16
0.08
Monitors Student Learning
-0.01
-0.15
-0.22
-0.01
Reflects on Practice
0.02
-0.13
-0.11
0.13
Commits to Learning Communities
0.04
-0.22
-0.19
0.01
Difference Formula = Elementary - Secondary
Figure 2.6 Difference of NBPTS Scores between Elementary and Secondary
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
-0.2
-0.25
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
14
Table 2.7 Average NBPTS scores for elementary students
Averages
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
Commits to Students
3.73
3.62
3.65
3.78
Knows Subject
3.66
3.6
3.65
3.81
Monitors Student Learning
3.65
3.57
3.64
3.72
Reflects on Practice
3.71
3.62
3.73
3.72
Commits to Learning Communities
3.66
3.51
3.67
3.74
Figure 2.7 Comparison of NBPTS for elementary students for 2006 – 2010
3.85
3.8
3.75
3.7
3.65
3.6
3.55
3.5
3.45
3.4
3.35
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
Commits to
Students
Knows Subject
Monitors
Student
Learning
Reflects on
Practice
Commits to
Learning
Communities
15
Table 2.8 Average NBPTS scores for secondary students
Averages
2009-10
Commits to Students
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
3.7
3.78
3.89
3.76
Knows Subject
3.67
3.76
3.81
3.73
Monitors Student Learning
3.66
3.72
3.86
3.73
Reflects on Practice
3.69
3.75
3.84
3.59
Commits to Learning Communities
3.62
3.73
3.86
3.73
Figure 2.8 Comparison of NBPTS for secondary students for 2006 – 2010
3.9
3.85
3.8
3.75
3.7
3.65
3.6
3.55
3.5
3.45
3.4
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
Commits to
Students
Knows Subject
Monitors
Student
Learning
Reflects on
Practice
Commits to
Learning
Communities
16
Table 2.9 Service Learning for Diversity Scores for all students
Averages
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
Democracy and Community
3.61
3.65
3.64
3.77
Experience
3.76
3.81
3.78
3.88
Figure 2.9 Comparison of Service Learning for Diversity for all students for 2006 – 2010
3.9
3.85
3.8
3.75
Democracy and Community
3.7
3.65
Experience
3.6
3.55
3.5
3.45
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
17
Table 2.10 Difference of Service Learning for Diversity Scores between Elementary & Secondary
Averages
2009-10
Democracy and Community
Experience
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
-0.14
-0.43
-0.16
-0.16
0.08
-0.21
0.03
-0.03
Difference Formula = Elementary - Secondary
Figure 2.10 Difference of Service Learning for Diversity Scores between Elementary and Secondary
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
Democracy and Community
Experience
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
18
Table 2.11 Diversity and Community scores for secondary students
Averages
200910
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
Diversity and Community
3.67
3.87
3.75
3.89
Experience
3.72
3.91
3.75
3.89
Figure 2.11 Comparison of Diversity and Community for secondary students for 2006 – 2010
3.95
3.9
3.85
3.8
Diversity and Community
3.75
Experience
3.7
3.65
3.6
3.55
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
19
Table 2.12 Diversity and Community scores for elementary students
Averages
2009-10
Diversity and Community
Experience
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
3.53
3.44
3.59
3.73
3.8
3.7
3.78
3.86
Figure 2.12 Comparison of Diversity and Community for elementary students for 2006 – 2010
3.9
3.8
3.7
3.6
Diversity and Community
3.5
Experience
3.4
3.3
3.2
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
20
Section III:
Special Education Summary
21
Table 3.1 CEC Average scores
Averages
2009-10
3.7
3.6
3.9
4
Foundations
Collaboration
Development and Characteristics of Learners
Individual Learning Differences
Instructional strategies
N/A
3.9
3.7
3.9
Learning environments and social interactions
Language
Instructional planning
Assessment
2008-09
N/A
Professional and ethical practice
3.6
3.6
3.3
3.8
N/A
3.3
3.8
N/A
3.8
3.4
N/A
2007-08
2006-07
3.7
3.4
3.7
N/A
3.9
3.3
3.5
N/A
3.2
3.6
N/A
3.5
3.2
3.5
3.6
N/A
N/A
3.6
4
N/A
Figure 3.1 Comparison of CEC for 2006 – 2010
4
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.2
3
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.2
2
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
22
Section IV:
Initial Programs (Elementary and Secondary) Summaries
23
Table 4.1 Summary of Scores for Philosophy & INTASC Standards for All Students
Averages
Category
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
PHILOSOPHY
4.18
4.32
4.49
KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT
4.2
4.29
4.56
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
4.1
4.08
4.28
ADAPTING INSTRUCTION
4.2
4.11
4.26
INSTR. STRATEGIES
4.2
4.25
4.34
MOTIVATIN/ENVIRONMENT
4.22
4.18
4.29
COMMUNICATION
4.18
4.05
4.11
PLANNING
4.34
4.36
4.47
ASSESSMENT
4.13
4.1
4.17
REFLECTION/GROWTH
4.25
4.05
4.29
RELATION TO SCHOOL/COMM.
4.39
4.15
4.19
2006-07
4.71
4.5
4.37
4.34
4.48
4.28
4.35
4.55
4.32
4.4
4.42
Figure 4.1 Comparison of INTASC Standards – all students 2006 – 2010
24
Table 4.2 Summary of Scores for Philosophy & INTASC Standards for P-12 Licensure Students
Category
PHILOSOPHY
KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
ADAPTING INSTRUCTION
INSTR. STRATEGIES
MOTIVATIN/ENVIRONMENT
COMMUNICATION
PLANNING
ASSESSMENT
REFLECTION/GROWTH
RELATION TO SCHOOL/COMM.
2009-10
4.13
4.66
4.5
4.56
4.19
4.53
4.44
4.38
4.09
4.56
4.69
P-12 Averages
2008-09
2007-08
3.5
4.45
4.38
4.5
4.03
3.8
3.88
4
3.84
4.1
3.75
4
4
4.2
4.31
3.9
4.06
3.4
3.59
3.9
4.06
3.6
2006-07
4.33
4.67
4.33
4.5
4.58
4.58
4.83
4.5
4.67
4.67
4.83
Figure 4.2 Comparison of INTASC Standards – P-12 Licensure Students 2006 – 2010
25
Table 4.3 Summary of Scores for Philosophy & INTASC Standards for Elementary Students
Elementary Averages
Category
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
PHILOSOPHY
4.14
4.48
4.47
KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT
4.08
4.33
4.52
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
4.04
4.21
4.37
ADAPTING INSTRUCTION
4.24
4.28
4.38
INSTR. STRATEGIES
4.16
4.35
4.47
MOTIVATIN/ENVIRONMENT
4.21
4.31
4.32
COMMUNICATION
4.03
4.05
4.03
PLANNING
4.34
4.4
4.55
ASSESSMENT
4.08
4.22
4.28
REFLECTION/GROWTH
4.17
4.1
4.26
RELATION TO SCHOOL/COMM.
4.27
4.19
4.13
2006-07
4.71
4.57
4.51
4.39
4.52
4.31
4.35
4.6
4.41
4.35
4.39
Figure 4.3 Comparison of INTASC Standards –Elementary students 2006 – 2010
5
4.8
4.6
4.4
4.2
4
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.2
3
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
26
Table 4.4 Summary of Scores for Philosophy & INTASC Standards for Secondary Students
Secondary Averages
Category
2009-10
2008-09
2007-08
2006-07
PHILOSOPHY
4.26
4.29
4.53
4.73
KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT
4.26
4.22
4.62
4.43
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
4.09
3.93
4.25
4.15
ADAPTING INSTRUCTION
4.06
3.95
4.16
4.29
INSTR. STRATEGIES
4.28
4.21
4.22
4.43
MOTIVATIN/ENVIRONMENT
4.17
4.11
4.30
4.23
COMMUNICATION
4.33
4.06
4.19
4.31
PLANNING
4.32
4.32
4.44
4.49
ASSESSMENT
4.22
3.95
4.16
4.21
REFLECTION/GROWTH
4.3
4.09
4.38
4.43
RELATION TO SCHOOL/COMM.
4.51
4.11
4.33
4.42
Figure 4.4 Comparison of INTASC Standards –Secondary students 2006 – 2010
27
Table 4.5 Summary of Impact on P-12 Student Learning for 2007-09
Habits of Mind
Conceptual Framework
Democracy and Community
2007-08
1.47
1.47
0.77
2008-09
1.31
1.31
0.83
28
Table 4.6 Summary of Averages and Frequency Distribution for Impact on P-12 Student Learning for Fall 2009
Fall 2009
Averages
n = 77
1
0.5
0
Explain the data
0.82
Frequencies
Analyze what was
learned
0.82
Frequencies
56
14
7
Interpret the
P-12 Standards
0.77
Frequencies
54
18
5
Discuss the
teaching/learning
process
Implications for
future learning
0.83
Frequencies
50
19
8
0.8
Frequencies
57
14
6
51
21
5
Figure 4.5 Comparison of P-12 for Student Learning Frequency Distribution for Fall 2009
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Needs Improvement
Meets Expectations
Exceeds Expectations
29
Table 4.7 Summary of Averages and Frequency Distribution for Impact on P-12 Student Learning for Spring 2010
Explain the
data
Spring 2010
Analyze what
was learned
Interpret the
P-12 Standards
Discuss the
teaching/learning
process
0.78
Averages
0.79
0.78
0.79
n = 111
Frequencies
81
14
16
Frequencies
75
23
13
Frequencies
80
15
16
1
0.5
0
Frequencies
Implications for
future learning
0.78
Frequencies
76
22
13
73
27
11
Figure 4.6 Comparison of P-12 for Student Learning Frequency Distribution for Spring 2010
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Needs Improvement
Meets Expecations
Exceeds Expectations
30
Section V:
Gifted and Talented Summary
31
Table 5.1 Gifted & Talented Field Experience Evaluations
Reflects regularly on practice and adjusts practice
Is aware of impact of attitudes and behaviors
Sensitive and respects culture
200910
3.78
3.74
3.78
2008-09
3.71
3.86
3.29
Figure 5.1 Comparison of Gifted and Talented Evaluations 2008 - 2010
3.9
3.8
3.7
3.6
3.5
3.4
3.3
3.2
3.1
3
2009-10
2008-09
Reflects regularly
on practice and
adjusts practice
Is aware of
impact of
attitudes and
behaviors
Sensitive and
respects culture
32
Table 5.2 W595 NAGC/CEC summary by category
Characteristics of Learners
Instructional Strategies
Learning Environments
Instructional Planning
Assessment
Table 5.3 W595 NAGC/CEC Frequency of Scores
Scores
Exemplary
Characteristics of Learners
2
Instructional Strategies
2
Learning Environments
3
Instructional Planning
3
Assessment
2
2009-10
2.67
2.67
3
3
2.67
Proficient
1
1
0
0
1
Unsatisfactory
0
0
0
0
0
33
Table 5.4 W554 NAGC/CEC Summary by
Category
Characteristics of Learners
Individual Learning Differences
Instructional Strategies
Instructional Planning
Assessment
2009-10
2.88
2.75
2.63
2.75
2.63
Table 5.5 W554 NAGC/CEC Frequency of
Scores
Characteristics of Learners
Individual Learning Differences
Instructional Strategies
Instructional Planning
Assessment
Exemplary
7
6
5
6
5
Scores
Proficient
1
2
3
2
3
Unsatisfactory
0
0
0
0
0
34