“The Next Accreditation System ” (NAS) ’S ROLE

advertisement

“The Next Accreditation System

(NAS) ”

PROGRAM DIRECTOR ’S ROLE

Brian L. Cohen, MD, FRCOG, FACOG

Associate Dean of Graduate Medical Education

Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women ’s Health

Introduction

1999: ACGME introduced the domains of clinical competency

2009: ACGME began a multiyear process to restructure the accreditation system to be based on outcomes

2013: Phased implementation of the NAS

Aims of NAS

 Enhance the peer review system to prepare physicians

 Accelerate ACGME accreditation based on outcomes

 Reduce the burden of the current system which is process based

Basis

 Institute of Medicine Report

 Public pressure

 Congressional pressure

 Constrained finances and possible reductions for GME

July 2013

-

Phase I

 NAS will be implemented by 7 of 26 core specialties

 Emergency medicine

 Internal medicine

 Pediatrics

 Diagnostic radiology

 Neurosurgery

 Orthopedic surgery

 Urology

 All other specialties and preliminary programs implementation July 2014

 GME communities must be prepared for changes

NAS Compliance

Five important data collection areas:

① Annual ADS consists of:

 Program statistics

 Program structure & resources

 Scholarly activity

 Teaching responsibilities

NAS Compliance

② Board Pass Rates

 Improve curriculum / didactics

NAS Compliance

③ Clinical Experience

 Case log

 Case mix

 Minutes from meetings of program evaluation

NAS Compliance

④ Resident Survey

 Duty hours

 Supervision & teaching

 Teamwork

 Education vs. service

 Evaluations

 Patient safety

NAS Compliance

⑤ Patient Safety

 Resident participation

Additional Information

 Minutes from annual meetings to be submitted annually

 Residents on committees

 Sample PLA & LOA policy

 Policies

Supervision

Handover rounds

Work hours

Others

Milestones

 Essential component of NAS are the MILESTONES

 Basis is to track development in the 6 competencies

 Dreyfus Model:

Novice

Advanced beginner

Competent

Proficient

Expert

Master

Milestones

Milestones Developed By

 RRC

 Boards

 P.D.

’s

 Residents

Milestones

Milestones Will Supplement,

Not Replace Existing Assessment Tools

Timeline:

Develop by December 2012

Submission to ACGME 2013 & 2014

Clinical Competency Committee (C.C.C.)

Include

 Core faculty

 Program directorprofessionalism

 Chief resident

Function

 Evaluate milestones & early warning

 Track progress of residents

 Faculty development

Purpose

 Reduce potential bias/subjective

Function measure

 Decision making by multiple people

 Evaluate 360 ° assessments

Clinical Learning Environment

Review (CLER)

Focus is:

 On resident learning of patient safety

 Institution responsibility for quality and safety of the learning environment

Clinical Learning Environment

Review (CLER)

Focus Comprises Six Areas:

1.

Patient safety

2.

QI by residents

3.

Transition of care

4.

Supervision

5.

Duty hours & fatigue management

6.

Professionalism

Evaluation by Site Visits

Personnel Involved:

 Site visitors

 CEO of medical institution

 DIO

 GMEC chair

 Residents

 Safety officer

 Senior administration

Process

 Three weeks advance notice

 No advance documentation

 Conduct interviews

 Work hour reports

 Visit learning environment

Summary

NAS will involve four areas (2013 & 2014):

1.

NAS itself

2.

Milestones

3.

Clinical competency committee

4.

CLER

Begin the process NOW (2013 & 2014)

Handoff / Handover Process

Program directors provide:

 Structured & standardized protocols

 Assess resident skills

 Use of technology

May be:

 Verbal

 Written

 Written & verbal

 Electronic

Objective:  Accuracy

 Patient safety

Standardized Tool

S ick – degree

I dentifying data

G eneral hospital course

N ew events

O verall health status

U pcoming plan

T asks to complete

Q uestions

2000

2013

Download