FNS Peer Input Tool for Annual Evaluation: Contribution Peer feedback for (RN name): Directions: Evaluatee to send domain portions to peers who evaluatee would like feedback from Clinical Thinking and Judgment domain is to be completed by another RN Peers should indicate within the last column the level they feel is appropriate for the Evaluatee on each row Peers are encouraged to support their views with concrete examples Peers should complete the peer review within 7 Days and return electronically to the Manager/Designee and Evaluatee Role Entry / Competent Expert Mastery Peer Should Designate Appropriate Level Below DOMAIN: Contribution: Maintains a culture that is supportive and rewards professionalism. Utilizes appropriate clinical resources/liaisons Acts as a clinical resource and/or liaison within the program Acts as an expert clinical resource/liaison beyond the unit setting, i.e. specialist, consultant, or resource in any of the pre-hospital, local, state, national and international venues Maintains the required certifications Exceeds certification requirements in practice Teaches the certification requirements Attendance at internal committee meetings Active and contributing member of internal/and or external committees Holds leadership role within the committees Attends and participates in grand rounds discussions Active participation in case presentations at grand rounds Reliably contributes and presents cases at grand rounds based on the evidence based practice model. Understands there exists opportunities to promote the program/institution Actively participates and contributes to benefit the program and institution Provides expert instruction and education Has global awareness of program direction Embraces and supports visionary goals Understands and utilizes leadership qualities and cultivates the strengths and passions of the team members to implement initiatives beneficial to the program and institution Is able to utilize and facilitate educational offerings such as LZ courses/career development Visionary for the future advancement of the program 1 Please describe a time when you saw me at my very best. What qualities did I display in this domain? Please provide your input regarding opportunities for my personal and/or professional growth I have completed the Peer Feedback Class as required by the UMPNC contract, paragraph 28E, for participation in the peer review process. Name: Date: Revised 7/2015 Professional Development Framework RSAM Steering Committee/JIT Approved. 2