9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 The Design, Implementation, and Results of a Blended On-Line and On-Campus Business Ethics Course Herbert Rau1 Abstract: This paper is a case study of the design, implementation, and results for an upper-level undergraduate business ethics course that integrated on-campus and on-line learning via an internet simulation and traditional course materials. Keywords: Teaching, simulation, business ethics, on-line course 1 School of Business and Justice Studies, Utica College, 1600 Burrstone Road, M/S 99, Utica, New York 13502-4892. hrau@utica.edu, 315-223-2571 October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 1 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 The Design, Implementation, and Results of a Blended On-Line and On-Campus Business Ethics Course ABSTRACT: This paper is a case study of the design, implementation, and results for an upper-level undergraduate business ethics course that integrated on-campus and on-line learning via an internet simulation and traditional course materials. INTRODUCTION: David Callahan (2004, pp12) writes “A 2002 survey of high-ranking corporate executives revealed that 82 percent admitted to cheating on the golf course”. He further notes (pp 219) “Business students are among those with the worst attitudes toward cheating, and those most likely to bring lax ethics into their professional lives. A 2001 study of 1,000 business students on six campuses found that ‘students who engaged in dishonest behavior in their college classes were more likely to engage in dishonest behavior on the job.’ [Roig and Ballew, 1994] With up to a quarter of college students typically choosing to major in business or a related field, and over 100,000 MBAs graduating annually, widespread cheating among business students is not an insignificant problem.” Recent corporate scandals (Enron, Tyco, WorldCom, Adelphia, HP, Arthur Anderson, Parmalat, etc.) seem to bear out the observation that this is not an insignificant problem and it is global in scope. However, it’s not apparent that this issue is caused by business schools, but rather that it mirrors the challenges facing society. For instance, Callahan further notes (pp 216) “In 1964, William Bowers published Student Dishonesty and Its Control in College, the most authoritative study up to that time on academic cheating. Based on surveys of more than 5,000 students at ninety-nine college and universities, Bowers concluded that three quarters of all students had engaged in some kind of cheating, and he drew a variety of other conclusions from his data.” [Bowers, 1964]. Bowers’ research indicates that this dilemma is not limited to business students, and it is likely that the issue of cheating is inherent in human October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 2 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 society and extends across thousands of years. It is highly probable that Hammurabi’s Code of 1792-1750 B.C., the reforms of Urukagina (2350 B.C.) and the creation of writing in Uruk, Iraq (3500 B.C.) were created to address the problem of cheating. Utica College accepts its responsibilities, and in line with the writing of Giacalone (2007) the College is actively addressing this issue. Although the College recognizes that we will not be able to eliminate the trouble, we share the responsibility to address and hopefully mitigate the problem. As such, the structure of the program for a business degree at Utica College is constructed on the concept of blending both a background in the humanities along with business courses. Specifically, to receive an undergraduate degree, each business student must complete a minimum of 34 credit hours of work in the General Education Core, and at least 3 credit hours must be successfully completed in a course taught by the Philosophy department. Additionally, Business Law, or Government and Economic Life is also required. However, considering the magnitude of the problem society faces regarding unethical behavior, it is suggested that this requirement should be further augmented with a specific course that focuses on business ethicalissues. DESIGN: The underlying assumptions for the design of the proposed course included a number of factors. It was desired to have a course that approached the topic of business ethics from an holistic perspective. That is, the course should not focus exclusively on case studies of “badapples”, but also must address the concern of the student as an ethical entity distinct from the business environment. It was also decided that the students should be exposed to skills and October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 3 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 strategies they may use in a practical setting, and that their work should move from a purely “academic” approach regarding the topic of ethics, to bringing ethics into their everyday experience. The course must also be designed so that it would stimulate, broaden and enrich the learning experience of the student. As a further requirement, it was desired that the course would address the three “Universal Principles” as identified by Seagal and Horne (1997), and would focus attention on values and visioning, relationships and subjectivity, and actualizing and systemic experience. A fifteen-week elective course was taught in the Spring 2008 semester at Utica College that blended on-line and on-campus instruction for an ethics course. This course was constructed around the computer simulation developed by C. Baird, and an ethics rubric developed by the faculty of the Business and Economics Department at Utica College. In addition to the simulation, the course also required the reading of three books beyond the text provided for the computer simulation, and was further augmented with select videos. Although the course was not initially identified as a writing intensive course, this course could easily be configured to achieve this purpose. The ethics rubric assessed four components regarding values and codes of ethics, and seven components addressing arenas of analysis for ethical issues. The ethics rubric follows: Does Not Meet Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations 0 1 2 0 1 2 Expectations Values and Codes of Ethics Student understands and abides by Utica College’s Rules of Conduct, Policy regarding Plagiarism, and Code of Ethics Student understands the purpose of a code of ethics October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 4 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 for his/her discipline, and knows the principle elements of those codes The student understands the importance of values and their place in society Student can identify law(s), if any, that are relevant to an ethical issue Analysis Student is able to identify an ethical dilemma or issue Student is able to identify stakeholders in an ethical dilemma Student is able to identify stakeholder’s different perspectives with an empathic understanding Student is able to identify and describe alternative courses of action regarding an ethical dilemma, and the consequences regarding those potential actions Student demonstrates an understanding of the checks and balances that exist within an organization that guide ethical behavior. Student is capable of formulating policies to help control un-ethical practices Student is able to identify organizational and societal mechanisms for reporting unethical behavior/activities 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 OVERALL ASSESSMENT Overall, the student: The syllabus for this course identified seven weeks of the fifteen weeks as being focused on independent study (on-line) with other activities (and on-campus classroom work) bracketing the simulation work. As designed, the course began with an overview of codes of conduct, and the creation of a code of conduct for the business school. The students were required to research various codes of conducts from web searches, and to report on the various codes they had identified. From a determination of the range of codes that existed across various business disciplines, they were instructed to determine core concepts necessary to achieve a useable code. This activity lead to a team-based project of creating a code of conduct for the business school, and a further task to assimilate the different team codes into one unified code. October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 5 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 There were multiple objectives designed into this activity. First there was the desire to force the students to research a topic with which they had limited experience. It was interesting to note that there was no duplication in codes identified by the students, and they ran the gamut of a few paragraphs to codes that were several pages long. The second design element was to place the students into a modified team environment to create a paper that was beyond the typical business-school case study, and also designed to be more nebulous in nature than a typical business-school case study. Time was taken during the on-campus class discussing the power of words, and the impact of thoughts that had emotional, as well as logical resonance. The third aspect of this exercise was for the students to viscerally “feel” the impact of blending their small (3-4 students per group) team-creation with the works of other teams in order to generate a unified whole that represented the entire student output. The purpose of this exercise was not merely to create a code of conduct, but to create the experience of making something that was personally important – a creation with which they had personal ownership – and moving from ownership of a few, to joint buy-in by the entire group. It is suggested that as students move into the corporate world, they will need to learn not only how to work on teams, but how to work collaboratively with others on projects that are not merely logical and explicit, but also emotional and potentially ambiguous in nature, and this exercise was intended to give the students some experience in this aspect. One student’s perspective on this component of the class is interesting: The first assignment that we were given was to come up with a code of ethics for the school of business. When it was assigned I thought that it would be an easy assignment. October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 6 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 When we read our code of ethics to our fellow classmates, I realized that we all had different ideas of what a code of ethics should be. It was a good exercise because I enjoyed hearing things from the perspective of others….I learned that the assignment was a lot harder than I thought it would be. Before the on-campus portion of the class disbanded for the distance-learning segment, two videos was reviewed: “Wal*Mart: the high cost of low price” and “Why don’t consumers behave ethically: The social construction of consumption”. From the beginning of the ethical conversations that drove the first portion of the class, the students were required to reflect on particular themes that were evident in the videos, and compare those themes to what they had already learned to that point. The two videos were intentionally juxtaposed in order to express that society can not look at ethical issues only from the perspective of condemning what a corporation does, but that we must also be cognizant of our actions within society. One significant advantage from using the consumer behavior video was that it showed the actions of people from other countries. This helped to accomplish a minor goal of encouraging global awareness in this course. The Wal*Mart video resulted in a rich conversation in the class, and the consumer behavior video resulted in papers that were insightful and allowed self-reflection by the students of their individual actions as consumers. October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 7 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 When this portion of the class was completed, the sequence moved into using the Ethicsgame.com simulation. This portion of the class was done entirely off campus, and involved independent reading in addition to the simulation. The package that C. Baird has assembled for the simulation is fully supported with an integrated software offering. It might also be noted that the pedagogical foundational assumptions with which Baird designed the simulation (increasing self-awareness, knowledge and ability to apply four ethical traditions to the resolution of problems, and a decision model for daily use) aligned nicely with the course designed structural elements. In addition to providing a student-friendly on-line help (19 manuals ranging from how to write the individual assignments, to the philosophical positions for each of the major lens), the material is also supported with a live person (if needed). The software package includes a grading section for the instructor, and a suggested syllabus that may be used for different lengths of courses. One component of the simulation that was not actively used by the instructor (but monitored by the students) was the financial scores for the various teams. This component is included in the simulation to motivate the students with a friendly competition between the various teams (via the financial success of each of the teams). It appears that this component is successful in motivating students, because several students noted that they reviewed the financial results on a regular basis. The textbook supporting the simulation is very effective. The format for the text allows the students to learn at their own pace, is integrated nicely with the simulation (so that the text advances as the simulation advances) and provides excellent tools that students may use later in life. Useful problems are included at the end of the chapters, and the problems range from October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 8 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 writing about articles in local papers or journals that present an ethical dilemma, to interviewing people involved in an ethical debate. The problems presented don’t reflect to any specific item in the text, but rather extend the material in the text to real-life situations and issues. The text is constructed around four “lens” of an ethical framework identified by Baird as being primarily developed by Petrick and Quinn (Management Ethics: Integrity at Work) and Wilber (Sex, Ecology, and Spirituality). These four perspectives are the reputation, relationship, rights/responsibility, and results schools of thoughts, and they are represented most closely with the writings of (respectively) MacIntyre, Rawls, Kant, and Mill. The framework provided by the text was also augmented with a model develop by Kidder (1995). The textbook and the simulation were key components in the design of the course. It was desired to have a course that mimics the situations students will face when they are in the corporate environment, and it was desired to have supporting materials that would help to guide the students in arriving at ethical decisions in the “real” world. One critical element in the decision process was to have a “package” that was well integrated. The textbook and simulation achieved that requirement. The student perspective regarding the text is informative: If it wasn’t for Everyday Ethics, I doubt that I would have been able to get through the course material. This book also did a good job of explaining the ideas of the concepts in the simulation game. October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 9 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 Everyday Ethics: Making Hard Choices in a Complex World is a good textbook, however, some of the explanations where too vague to understand….In order for me to get an understanding of what the author was trying to express, I had to read a chapter more than three times. The only reason that I started grasping information is because it dealt with the Ethics Game. I would consider Everyday Ethics: Making Hard Choices in a Complex World a good text book….Since it coincided with the game, it was easy to apply what I just finished reading to the decisions that I had to make in the Ethics Game. Overall, I thought it was your typical textbook. I am graduating this spring and I know that a lot of the information I gained from this class due to the Everyday Ethics textbook, the three other books that were assigned to read, and the GG Ethics Simulation Game will be very useful when entering the workforce. I honestly felt that compared to my other ethics textbook, this textbook was a little easier to understand. It does a good job of explaining what is at stake when complex decisions have to be made. Before making a critical decision you should think about who the decision is going to impact, how is it going to impact them, how is this going to impact me, and is there a better possible solution. I know I wouldn’t have been able to come up with this if it wasn’t for the textbook. One of the critical design elements of the course was the requirement for a simulation. A traditional methodology for teaching business classes is the use of case studies. However, students do get tired of reading and writing case study work. The simulation allows the student to October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 10 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 “play” and learn at the same time. However, the simulation must be easy to learn, and engaging for the duration of the class. Consequently, it needs to start slowly and build in complexity. Further, and not insignificantly, the simulation must be easy for the instructor to learn and use. The GG Ethics Game accomplishes these requirements. The simulation is designed around the concept of a high technology corporation. The students are randomly assigned an executive role, and each week, each position receives an email regarding a problem that their particular position must address. The simulation is capable of addressing five different problems each week, and if all six weeks of problems are used, there are 30 different problems with which the students will be exposed. The dilemmas the students must address focus on financial, human resource, marketing, operations, and chief executive problems, and each student remains in their position for the entire simulation. Therefore, if one student has been assigned the position of CFO, all the problems that student will face will be of a “financial” flavor. The challenge for the student is to determine the fundamental problem being addressed, the main actors for that problem, and how to best resolve the problem. The student is required to send an email to their team’s colleagues and inform them of the problem, as well as the proposed solution. Their colleagues then rate each other on how the memo was written, if they understood the particular problem, and if the proposed solution addressed the problem. Therefore, if the instructor desired, each student could receive a 360o evaluation regarding their work. One student noted that the feedback from his colleagues was very important: October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 11 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 Being the VP of Human Resources meant that I was going to have to deal with some of the more personal problems that people had….This was very interesting because I never would have figured that Human Resources has to deal with all of these different problems. After doing this I feel that people in HR have difficult jobs, because when employees come to see you, there must be something wrong with the way that they feel they are being treated. The decisions that I had to make were very difficult. Most of the time there would be win/lose options, but when analyzing the situation, I tried to choose the option that was closest to win/win. Many of the students found the simulation to be the most engaging component of the class. Following are some of their comments: The highlight of this class to me was the business ethics simulation game….The real bonus to this simulation game is that it helps you break down each decision by ethical actor and stakeholder….Another plus to the simulation game depend on your decision and time management used because financials are determined from your decisions. I think the best part of the class was the simulations game. It gave us an opportunity to make decisions that people in the business world have to make everyday. The GG Ethics online simulation game was a brand new experience for me and I liked it very much. In addition to the writing required for the simulation (each student writes three separate components to complete the weekly simulation requirement including a one paragraph reflection October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 12 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 on their individual thought process, a detailed analysis regarding their assessment of the problem and the steps they took to determine an optimal solution, and the memo to their colleagues regarding the problem and their proposed solution), there was additional writing that addressed a particular ethical issue the students discovered through weekly readings of the text and current events. Therefore, each week, each student was submitting a minimum of four written pieces in addition to reading the text and completing the simulation. Regarding the specific dilemma analysis, each student needed to address five areas within the written responses: responsible, attentive, intelligent, reasonable, and awareness. At week six of the course, the class reconvened. The first purpose was to determine if the students were having any individual problems that needed to be addressed in person (since the students were now working in an on-line mode). The second purpose for reconvening the class, was that in addition to the Everyday Ethics text book, three additional books were assigned. These works included true to yourself: leading a values-based business, The Cheating Culture: Why More Americans Are Doing Wrong to Get Ahead, and Business Ethics, and the Environment: Imagining a Sustainable Future. At the beginning of the semester the students were instructed to be certain to read these books, and week six became a review of the first book. The reason for including these books in the design of the class was to broaden the perspective of the students regarding the issue of ethics. The books chosen presented their topics from a highly personal perspective (true to yourself: leading a values-based business), addressing man’s impact on the world (the whole world perspective of Business Ethics, and the Environment: Imagining a Sustainable Future), and exploring the extent of unethical behavior in our society October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 13 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 (The Cheating Culture: Why More Americans Are Doing Wrong to Get Ahead). As such, it was desired to force the students to look at ethics from multiple angles, to realize that there is no one “correct” way to address a situation, and that different mental models and world-views must be confronted and understood. As designed in the syllabus, the first assigned book beyond the text was true to yourself: leading a values-based business, and its placement in the structure of the class was to move the concept of ethics in the workplace way from a perspective of doing the right thing because it is mandated by corporate rules and regulations, and rather transition the thought process to an intensely personal experience of living an individual life (even if it is within a corporate setting) to one of personal values that may be embedded within a business. The students were required to write one paper for this book, and the assignment was a paper that described similarities and differences of true to yourself and Everyday Ethics. Student’s perspective on true to yourself: leading a values-based business included: I indicated in my first paper on true to yourself that I very much enjoyed reading the book. I feel there was a great deal of information throughout the book in which I learned a lot about leading a best-in-class values-based small business. true to yourself was my favorite book in this class this semester. It was very insightful and interesting. October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 14 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 true to yourself was my favorite book because it was a great building tool with insight. With the concept being explained throughout the book, you can put it into day-to-day decisions or situations throughout the business world. The book was interesting because it spoke about being considerate of others….The fact that the book is designed for small business owners is a good thing… Between week seven and week ten, the class again completed their work in a distancelearning format. At week 10, the class was reconvened for three purposes; to be sure there were no issues that need face-to-face contact, to be certain that the second book was being read, and view a video presentation of Peter Block on the topic of Stewardship. In this case, the students not only completed their normal assignment and wrote a paper on the distinctions between Business, Ethics, and the Environment and Everyday Ethics, but also to write a short paper on the presentation by Block. The purpose of viewing the presentation was to present to the class an alternative model of leadership (stewardship); one that is different from an all too common paternalistic approach of management compared to a model that might be described as an adultto-adult relationships for managing work. Most of the students found that the video was difficult to watch, and that nothing dramatically new was being presented to them. However, the video was included because the actual world of work is different from the theoretical world of work that is frequently taught, and the video presented the perspectives of a consultant actively engaged in making organizations more humane. Regarding the reading of Business, Ethics and the Environment, generally the student’s opinions were less positive than the book true to yourself: leading a values-based business: October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 15 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 The only book I didn’t like was Business, Ethics and the Environment. At times the book was good, however I always had to reread it in order to get a better understanding of what the author was trying to express. If the book wasn’t so boring, it would have more readers like true to yourself. …my least favorite book of the semester: Business, Ethics and the Environment: Imagining a Sustainable Future. I found this book boring and it didn’t really keep my attention or motivate me to keep reading. I’m sure it had a very insightful and good message in the end, but it was just another book that I had to read for class. In the second book, Business, Ethics and the Environment, it was a little scary to learn about the current detrimental state that humanity faces… Notwithstanding the student’s comments, this book will remain as a required reading. True, the book is somewhat more difficult to read than the other material, however, the students need to be challenged by material that is not normally in their comfort zone, and they need to be exposed to material that they would not normally choose to read. Further, the book presents an argument that the students must be exposed to, that is, the impact humanity is having on the ecosystem. This book accomplished those goals admirably. From week 11 through 14, the students were again in their distance-learning mode. At week fifteen, the class reconvened to view the Michael Moore film “Sicko”. An additional writing assignment was given in reviewing the movie in consideration to all of the material they had October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 16 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 been exposed to in the class. Additionally, the final report was due on the book The Cheating Culture. While the students didn’t dislike The Cheating Culture, they also tended to be somewhat depressed by the material. One student summed it up nicely: … The Cheating Culture, was very depressing. I mean it is obvious that there is much more cheating that occurs in America’s society today, but what people may not realize is that if something is not done soon, the future of America does not look good. In sum, the class had seven weeks of individual distance-learning (primarily focused on the simulation, with the first week being preliminary setting the stage for the simulation), four weeks of video presentation work (with discussion) and four weeks of class lecture that set the stage for the class and focused attention on codes of conduct. RESULTS: Student feedback to the course was good. Anonymous Student Opinionaires distributed by the college resulted in all scores of 5 (33%) and 6 (67%) on a scale of 1 to 6. Anonymous written comments submitted by the students for the evaluated aspect of “evaluate the overall quality of the course” included the comments: Outstanding course October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 17 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 Quality of the course was good. The course was put together [well] and everything always ran smoothly Great High quality A very entertaining class in which I was able to learn a lot about school Regarding the evaluated aspect of “evaluate the learning environment in this class”, the student comments included: Challenging, but worth the effort because of the knowledge gained form the course In this course we were always intellectually challenged…the classes were always thought provoking Very intellectually challenged by the online simulated game. It has broadened my knowledge of this subject. A very good learning environment, in which we could say exactly how we felt about things. And from written comments (that were in addition to the Student Opinionairre survey): The class was very educational. I learned a lot about ethical practices….I have learned all of this information from this class, and I am glad that I enrolled in it. I will try my best to take the lessons from the videos, textbook, and readings with me as I prepare to enter the business world. October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 18 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 Overall, the class this semester was good. I enjoyed it and its flexibility. If you make it a point to stay loyal to your individual ethical values, even in the business world, then it is the first step in changing the evil ways of today’s society one person at a time. So if nothing else, I promise to always stay true to myself by following my ethical beliefs, my moral values, and keeping religion a part of my life because it has always been important to me. Management Ethics (MGT 300) can be considered my most interesting class I have taken so far throughout my history at the College….Another benefit of this class is it opened my eyes more about me and the things that need to be fixed in order to have a better chance at being successful. Without this class I wouldn’t be able to handle a [an ethical] situation and figure out the best answer. I also learned to think more ethically about decisions rather than looking at the simplest solution. The problem that I came to realize with myself is procrastination and lack of focus….As a result, I learned to prioritize to relieve myself from stress at the end of the day instead of creating more stress. If I could change and do the semester all over, I would manage my time and prioritize my workload. This is one of the main lessons that I actually got from this class. However, some of the students did note that there was a lot of work in the class. One of the students summed it up nicely: October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 19 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 I would lighten the workload because it was crazy and hard to keep up along with all the other work from my other classes. The course was designed to force students to be more reflective, and specifically for this course, to be reflective regarding how the individual students live their lives. It was also designed to expose the students to a variety of models and perspectives of the world. From a personal assessment of this course, the integrated material achieved the designed purposes. From the expected learning outcomes of the syllabus (the student will demonstrate an understanding of different philosophical perspective, the student will be able to demonstrate effective decision making using ethical decision-making strategies for situations that pose ethical dilemmas, the student will demonstrate knowledge of codes of ethics and conduct, the student will demonstrate effective use of writing skills in completing assignments), the goals of the course were achieved. From the perspective of achieving the requirements as expressed in the ethics rubric, the students mastered the items that were identified by the faculty committee that created the rubric. The design of the course also aligns with the perspective expressed by Smith (2008) and the need to expose students more deeply to ethical content. Also, the goals of the course appear to have met the needs of the students. October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 20 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 Albion, M. (2006). true to yourself: leading a values-based business. San Francisco, CA. BerrettKoehler. Baird, C.A. (2005). Everyday Ethics: Making Hard Choices in a Complex World. Denver, CO. CB Resources, LLC. Block, P. (1995). Stewardship: A Governance Strategy for the Learning Organization. Cambridge, MA. Pegasus Communications, Inc. Bowers, W.J. (1964). Student Dishonesty and Its Control in College. Columbia University Bureau of Applied Social Research. 214 and 103. Callahan, D. (2004). The Cheating Culture: Why More Americans Are Doing Wrong To Get Ahead. Orlando, FL. A Harvest Book, Harcourt, Inc. DesJardines, J.R. (2007. Business, Ethics, and the Environment. Upper Saddle River, NJ. Pearson Prentice Hall. Doty, E. (2007). Personal Ethics in the Corporate World. Leading Ideas: Strategy+Business. Booz/Allen/Hamilton. Eckhardt, G., Devinney, T., and Belk, R. (2006). Why don’t consumers behave ethically?: The social construction of consumption. October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 21 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 Giacalone, R.A. (2007). Taking a Red Pill to Disempower Unethical Students: Creating Ethical Sentinels in Business Schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education 6 (4), 534-542. Goodstein, J.D., and Wicks, A.C. (2007). Corporate and Stakeholder Responsibility: Making Business Ethics a Two-way Conversation. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3). 375-398. Greenwald, R. (2005). Wal*Mart: the high cost of low price. Retail Project, LLC. www.bravenewfilms.org. Kidder, R.W. (1995). How Good People Make Tough Choices. New York. William Morrow and Company. Moore, M. (2007). Sicko. Santa Monica, CA. Dog Eat Dog Films, Inc. Nonis and Swift (1994). An Examination of the Relationship Between Academic Dishonesty and Workplace Dishonesty. The Psychological Record 44 76. Roig, M., and Ballew, C. (1994). Attitudes Toward Cheating of Self and Others by College Students and Professors. The Psychological Record 44 3-12. October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 22 9th Global Conference on Business & Economics ISBN : 978-0-9742114-2-7 Seagal, S., and Horne, D. (1997). Human Dynamics: A New framework for Understanding People and Realizing the Potential in Our Organizations. Pegasus Communications, Inc. Waltham, MA. Smith, N.C. (2008). On Ethics and Social Responsibility. BizEd VII (3) 28-29. October 16-17, 2009 Cambridge University, UK 23