Template for review of activity prior to re-signing a Memorandum of Understanding and related Agreements Template for review of activity prior to re-signing a Memorandum of Understanding and related Agreements The following template should be completed at least six months before the expiry of the agreement or at least three months prior to any notice period specified as part of the termination clause in the agreement. For jointly delivered/awarded programmes and validated provision, a programme review should be undertaken at the same time as the review of activity prior to renewing the agreement. 1. Name of partner: 2. Type of collaborative activity: 3. Date MoU came into effect and date of expiry: 4. Date MoA came into effect and date of expiry: 5. If relevant, schedule number for the related Schedule of Activity, start date of programme activity and academic year of final cohort of students accepted under the agreement: 6. College contact for the partnership: 7. Summary of activity undertaken: This will vary depending on the nature of the collaborative activity but should include the academic and student experience benefits gained from the partnership. 8. Any particular challenges that have been faced and how these have been overcome: Taking into account any issues relating to the partnership activity that were noted/reported/discussed as part of the annual monitoring process, including any recommendations or action taken to overcome these. 1 Template for review of activity prior to re-signing a Memorandum of Understanding and related Agreements 9. Student data for each year of the operation of the agreement: For Jointly delivered/awarded programmes and validated provision, numbers of participating students, progression and completion data should be differentiated for full and part-time students and, where relevant, compared to the cohort on campusbased programmes. For postgraduate research degree programmes this should include submission and referral rates. Numbers of participating students (incoming and outgoing) admitted to each named programme in the agreement Progression and completion data as compared to the cohort as a whole 10. Partner profile: Taking into account the details provided before the arrangement was entered into for checking the Partner had sufficient resources in place to discharge effectively its part in the proposed arrangement, has a review been undertaken (include details of any site visit) and are there any adjustments to be made. 11. Reasons why the collaboration should continue or reasons why the collaboration should cease: Faculty (Institute/School) approval (relevant Faculty committee): Signed: ………………………………………………….. Date: …………………………… Final approval (appropriate authority depending on the risk category): Signed: ………………………………………………….. Date; …………………………… Programme Development and Approval Committee: Signed: ………………………………………………….. 2 Date: ……………………………