1. How clear were the instructor’s presentations?
Very clear
Clear
Somewhat clear
Unclear
2. How effective were the instructor’s examples for clarifying difficult concepts?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Not effective
3. How clear were the instructor’s explanations?
Very clear
Clear
Somewhat clear
Unclear
4. How effective was the instructor at using visual as well as verbal communication?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Not effective
5. How well did the instructor relate course material to real life situations?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not at all
6. How clear were the instructor’s examples?
Very clear
Clear
Somewhat clear
Unclear
7. How adequate were the number of examples used to clarify difficult concepts?
More than adequate
Adequate
Somewhat adequate
Not at all adequate
8. How effective were the instructor’s definitions of terms, concepts, and principles?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Not effective
9. How effective were the instructor’s explanations of why certain processes,
techniques, or formulas were used?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Not effective
10. How well did the instructor handle students’ questions and comments?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not at all
11. How well did the instructor pace lectures and presentations to allow for note
taking?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not at all
12. How effective was the instructor as a classroom leader?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Not effective
13. How effective was the instructor as a speaker?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Not effective
14. How well did the instructor organize classroom activities?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not at all
15. How well did the instructor use a variety of teaching methods?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not at all
16. How clear were the instructor’s demonstrations and explanations?
Very clear
Clear
Somewhat clear
Not at all clear
17. How clear were the instructor’s interpretations of abstract ideas and theories?
Very clear
Clear
Somewhat clear
Not at all clear
18. How well did the instructor use examples and illustrations?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not at all
19. How effective were the instructor’s discussions of the implications of various
theories?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Not effective
20. How well did the instructor communicate at an appropriate level for students?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not at all
21. How effective were the instructor’s demonstrations to illustrate the principles
being used?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Not effective
22. How clear were the instructor’s explanations of effective writing principles?
Very clear
Clear
Somewhat clear
Unclear
23. How clear were the instructor’s explanations of writing assignments?
Very clear
Clear
Somewhat clear
Unclear
24. How frequently was the instructor available during posted office hours?
Always available
Available
Sometimes available
Unavailable
25. How willing was the instructor to help students make progress?
Very willing
Willing
Somewhat willing
Unwilling
26. How receptive was the instructor to students asking questions or expressing
opinions?
Very receptive
Receptive
Somewhat receptive
Unreceptive
27. How skilled was the instructor in using student opinion to vary the pace of the
course?
Very skilled
Skilled
Somewhat skilled
Unskilled
28. How receptive was the instructor to students’ questions?
Very receptive
Receptive
Somewhat receptive
Unreceptive
29. How skilled was the instructor to responding to signs of misunderstanding or
lack of interest?
Very skilled
Skilled
Somewhat skilled
Unskilled
30. How willing was the instructor to help students find other sources of
information?
Very willing to help
Willing to help
Willing to help only slightly
Unwilling to help
31. How skilled was the instructor in maintaining a positive atmosphere for
learning?
Very skilled
Skilled
Somewhat skilled
Unskilled
32. How skilled was the instructor at attending to all students equally?
Very skilled
Skilled
Somewhat skilled
Unskilled
33. How effective was the instructor’s advice on how to study for the course?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
34. How skilled was the instructor in creating a climate conducive for learning?
Very skilled
Skilled
Somewhat skilled
Unskilled
35. How as the instructor’s attitude towards students?
Very respectful
Respectful
Somewhat respectful
Very disrespectful
36. How available was the instructor for help and consultation?
Always available
Available
Sometimes available
Unavailable
37. How much did the instructor encourage students to improve?
Encouraged improvement greatly
Encouraged improvement
Encouraged improvement only slightly
Did not encourage improvement
38. How much did the instructor motivate students to do their best?
Motivated students greatly
Motivated students
Motivated students only a little
Did not motivate students
39. How interested was the instructor in whether students understood the course
content?
Interested greatly
Interested
Somewhat interested
Disinterested
40. How effective were the instructor’s responses to questions?
Very effective responses
Effective responses
Somewhat effective responses
Ineffective responses
41. How confident was the instructor in his or her knowledge of the subject matter?
Instructor was very confident
Instructor was confident
Instructor was somewhat confident
Instructor lacked confidence
42. How skilled was the instructor in relating the course material to other
discipline?
Very skilled
Skilled
Somewhat skilled
Unskilled
43. How frequently did the instructor reference other experts to support his or her
opinions?
Very frequently
Frequently
Sometimes
Infrequently
44. How adequate was the number of instructor references to the related research?
Very adequate
Adequate
Somewhat adequate
Inadequate
45. How well did the instructor relate his or her personal experience with the
subject matter?
Instructor related personal experience very well
Instructor related personal experience
Instructor related personal experience somewhat
Instructor did not relate personal experience
46. How effective was the instructor in relating skill analysis to coaching cues?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
47. How well did the instructor reference other experts with different opinions?
Instructor referenced other opinions very well
Instructor referenced other opinions
Instructor sometimes references other opinions
Instructor never referenced other opinions
48. How skilled was the instructor in stimulating students to use the library and
other reference materials?
Very skilled
Skilled
Somewhat skilled
Unskilled
49. How skilled was the instructor in teaching computer-aided problem solving
techniques?
Very skilled
Skilled
Somewhat skilled
Unskilled
50. How effective was the instructor in discussions of professional ethics and
responsibilities?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
51. How skilled was the instructor in relating cases and other exercises to practical
situations?
Very skilled
Skilled
Somewhat skilled
Unskilled
52. How organized was the course material?
Very organized
Organized
Somewhat organized
Disorganized
53. How prepared for class was the instructor?
Very prepared
Prepared
Somewhat prepared
Unprepared
54. How clear were the instructor’s expectations of what students were expected to
learn?
Very clear
Clear
Somewhat clear
Unclear
55. How well did announced objectives correspond to what was taught?
Corresponded very well
Corresponded
Corresponded somewhat
Did not correspond
56. How clearly did the instructor summarize the main points of lectures and
discussions?
Very clearly
Clearly
Somewhat clearly
Unclearly
57. How clearly did the syllabus state course objectives, course outline, and criteria
for grades?
Very clearly
Clearly
Somewhat clearly
Unclearly
58. How well did the instructor keep the course on schedule?
Kept it on schedule very well
Kept it on schedule
Kept it on schedule only somewhat
Did not keep it on schedule
59. How well did the instructor adjust the course schedule as conditions warranted?
Adjusted the schedule well
Adjusted schedule
Adjusted schedule only sometimes
Never adjusted the schedule
60. How useful was the time spent in class?
Very useful
Useful
Somewhat useful
Not at all useful
61. How organized were the lectures as part of a coherent structure?
Very organized
Organized
Somewhat organized
Disorganized
62. How well did the instructor pace the presentation of course material?
Course material was very well paced
Course material was adequately paced
Course material was somewhat adequately paced
Course material was inadequately paced
63. How effective was the integration of instructional materials (textbooks,
handouts, films, etc.)?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
64. How skilled was the instructor at using the facilities available to maximize
instruction?
Used facilities well
Used facilities adequately
Used facilities adequately only sometimes
Did not use facilities well
65. How effectively was class time allotted for various course activities?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
66. How effectively did the homework and out-of-class assignments contribute to
your learning?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
67. How skilled was the instructor at encouraging team strategies in the handling of
complicated assignments?
Very skilled
Skilled
Somewhat skilled
Unskilled
68. How skilled was the instructor at converting experimental difficulties into
positive learning experiences?
Very skilled
Skilled
Somewhat skilled
Unskilled
69. How well was the subject matter developed into a logical sequence?
Very well developed into a logical sequence
Developed into a logical sequence
Only somewhat developed into a logical sequence
Not at all developed into a logical sequence
70. How integrated was this course with other courses in the program?
Very integrated
Integrated
Somewhat integrated
Not integrated
71. Did the main textbook correspond with the material covered in the course?
Definitely
Yes
Somewhat
No
72. How useful were papers and term projects in adding value to the course?
Very useful
Useful
Somewhat useful
Not useful
73. How effective was this course in generating interest in the subject matter?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
74. How enthusiastic was the instructor about the subject matter?
Very enthusiastic
Enthusiastic
Somewhat enthusiastic
Unenthusiastic
75. How effective was the instructor in demonstrating the significance of the subject
matter?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
76. Did the instructor enjoy teaching the course?
Very much so
Yes
Somewhat
No
77. Did the instructor appear concerned about the quality of his/her teaching?
Definitely
Yes
Somewhat
No
78. Did the instructor’s attitude contribute to a positive attitude about course
content?
Definitely
Yes
Somewhat
No
79. The instructor’s skill in pointing out interesting aspects of the topics covered
was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
80. Did the instructor appear to be interested in teaching the course?
Definitely
Yes
Somewhat
No
81. How useful were the instructor’s comments on papers and exams in indicating
errors?
Very useful
Useful
Somewhat useful
Not useful
82. The instructor’s explanations of how student performance would be evaluated
were:
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
83. Did the exams correspond with the important aspects of the course?
Definitely
Yes
Somewhat
No
84. How clear were the exam questions?
Very clear
Clear
Somewhat clear
Not clear
85. The instructor’s suggestions of ways in which the students could improve were:
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
86. The instructor’s suggestions to students about their progress were:
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
87. Were graded exams, reports and other materials returned promptly?
Definitely
Yes
Sometimes
No
88. The standards set by the instructor for students were:
Very appropriate
Appropriate
Somewhat appropriate
Inappropriate
89. The instructor’s explanations of how grades would be derived were:
Very clear
Clear
Somewhat clear
Not clear
90. How skillful was the instructor in motivating students to do their best work?
Very skillful
Skillful
Somewhat skillful
Not skillful
91. The difficulty of exams was:
Very appropriate
Appropriate
Somewhat appropriate
Inappropriate
92. The instructor’s explanations of test grades were:
Very clear
Clear
Somewhat clear
Not clear
93. The instructor’s definition of a good performance was:
Very realistic
Realistic
Somewhat realistic
Not realistic
94. How well were exams integrated into the course content?
Very well integrated
Well integrated
Somewhat well integrated
Not well integrated
95. Exams in terms of difficulty were:
Very fair
Fair
Somewhat fair
Not fair
96. The instructor’s standards of academic integrity were:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
97. How effective were exams in testing understanding and not memorization?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
98. The overall grading system in the course was:
Very fair
Fair
Somewhat fair
Not fair
99. How aware was the instructor of your progress in the course?
Very aware
Aware
Somewhat aware
Not aware
100. How open was the instructor to discussion of other viewpoints?
Very open
Open
Somewhat open
Not open
101. Teaching methods used to accommodate individual differences were:
Very flexible
Flexible
Somewhat flexible
Not flexible
102. How well did the instructor change approaches to meet new situations?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not well
103. How receptive was the instructor to constructive criticism?
Very receptive
Receptive
Somewhat receptive
Not receptive
104. How well did the instructor devise ways to encourage student participation?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not well
105. How willing was the instructor to involve students in instructional decisions?
Very willing
Willing
Somewhat willing
Not willing
106. How creative was the instructor in the teaching-learning process?
Very creative
Creative
Somewhat creative
Not creative
107. The instructor’s assistance in the development of artistic interpretation was:
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
108. The instructor’s encouragement of student participation and discussion was:
Very appropriate
Appropriate
Somewhat appropriate
Inappropriate
109. The instructor’s encouragement of creative solutions to assigned tasks was:
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
110. The expressiveness in the instructor’s voice was:
More than adequate
Adequate
Somewhat adequate
Inadequate
111. The volume of the instructor’s voice was:
More than adequate
Adequate
Somewhat adequate
Inadequate
112. Did the instructor establish and maintain eye contact with students?
Definitely
Yes
Somewhat
No
113. How skillful was the instructor in using rhetorical questions to gain students’
attention?
Very skillful
Skillful
Somewhat skillful
Not skillful
114. How skillful was the instructor in varying the pace of presentations to keep
students alert?
Very skillful
Skillful
Somewhat skillful
Not skillful
115. Were the instructor’s presentations free of annoying mannerisms?
Definitely
Yes
Sometimes
No
116. How skillful was the instructor’s use of humor to keep students attentive?
Very skillful
Skillful
Somewhat skillful
Not skillful
117. Did the instructor select instructional strategies that increase student
motivation?
Definitely
Yes
Somewhat
No
118. How skillful was the instructor in handling disruptive behavior (inattention,
talking during class, etc.)?
Very skillful
Skillful
Somewhat skillful
Not skillful
119. The instructor’s rate of speech to allow time for note taking was:
Very appropriate
Appropriate
Somewhat appropriate
Inappropriate
120. How skillful was the instructor in handling the presentational aspects of
teaching?
Very skillful
Skillful
Somewhat skillful
Not skillful
121. How aware was the instructor of the effects of his/her teaching strategies?
Very aware
Aware
Somewhat aware
Not aware
122. The instructor’s gestures were:
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
123. How skillful was the instructor in using the blackboard/overhead projector?
Very skillful
Skillful
Somewhat skillful
Not skillful
124. The amount of student participation in the course was:
Very appropriate
Appropriate
Somewhat appropriate
Inappropriate
125. The instructor’s demonstrations were:
Very appropriate
Appropriate
Somewhat appropriate
Inappropriate
126. How skillful was the instructor in stressing important material?
Very skillful
Skillful
Somewhat skillful
Not skillful
127. How skillful was the instructor in encouraging class participation and
discussion?
Very skillful
Skillful
Somewhat skillful
Not skillful
128. How much interest was generated by the instructor’s style of presentation?
A lot of interest
A good amount of interest
A fair amount of interest
Little interest
129. The instructor’s presentations were:
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
130. To allow students to achieve course objectives, the instructor’s teaching
methods were:
Very appropriate
Appropriate
Somewhat appropriate
Inappropriate
131. How skillful was the instructor in motivating you to participate in drills?
Very skillful
Skillful
Somewhat skillful
Not skillful
132. How effective were the audio-visual materials in enhancing lectures?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
133. How appropriate was the instructor's encouragement of student participation
and discussion?
Very appropriate
Appropriate
Somewhat appropriate
Inappropriate
134. How effective was the instructor's encouragement of creative solutions to
assigned tasks?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
135. How effective were the learning expectations of the course communicated?
Very effective
Effective
Somewhat effective
Ineffective
136. How collaborative was the learning atmosphere in this course?
Very collaborative
Collaborative
Somewhat collaborative
Not collaborative
137. How fair was the evaluation methods used in this course?
Very fair
Fair
Somewhat fair
Unfair
138. How integrated were the learning activities in this course?
Very integrated
Integrated
Somewhat integrated
Not integrated
139. How close were the stated course objectives and what was actually covered?
Very close (if not the same)
Close
Somewhat different
Different
140. How adequately were the course requirements (projects, papers, exams)
explained?
More than adequate
Adequate
Somewhat adequate
Inadequate
141. How adequate were the physical facilities (classroom/lab space, structure,
furnishings, etc.)?
More than adequate
Adequate
Somewhat adequate
Inadequate
142. How well did the course materials (lecture notes, readings, etc.) contribute to
learning the subject matter?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not at all
143. How much knowledge did you acquire in this course?
Acquired great amounts of knowledge
Acquired some knowledge
Acquired only a little knowledge
Acquired almost no knowledge
144. How well did this course develop your creative capacities?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not at all
145. How well did this course develop your skill in expressing yourself orally or in
writing?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not at all
146. How well did this course develop your understanding of, and commitment to,
personal values?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not at all
147. How well did this course help develop your skills in working on a team?
Very well
Well
Somewhat well
Not at all