DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGES
OFFICE OF THE CHANCELLOR
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
REFERENCE:
INDEX NUMBER
Title 5, C.C.R. Section 55002
ISSUE DATE:
CHANGES:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
1.
E-65
TOPIC:
Curriculum Development and Approval:
Standards and Procedures
July 18, 1983
Instructional and Student
Support Services Division
DATES OF CHANGES: July 18, 2001
INITIATED BY:
Section 3 (b)
BACKGROUND FOR CURRICULUM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
The Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges has adopted regulations
establishing distinct sets of standards for courses, which may or may not be applied for
credit toward the associate degree. In addition, the Board of Governors requires that
noncredit courses be approved through the same local curriculum review and approval
process as that required for credit courses. Title 5, sections 55000-55202 provide the
regulatory framework for curriculum approval. The college and/or district curriculum
committee shall be established by mutual agreement of the college and/or district
administration and the academic senate. The committee shall either be a committee of
the academic senate, or a committee, which shall include faculty and may otherwise be
comprised in any way that is mutually agreeable to the college and/or district and the
academic senate. Regulations require that all courses at a community college be reviewed
and approved for recommendation by a college curriculum committee, and/or when
applicable a district curriculum committee be established in a manner that is acceptable to
the local academic senate, as well as the campus or district administration. This means
that the academic senate must approve the process and structure of the committee charged
with curricular review and approval. Once the process and structure of the curriculum
committee have been established, this committee will then serve as the required body to
which all course and program changes for the college will be submitted. The curriculum
committee will also serve as the body that determines the appropriateness of prerequisites
for all college courses and pre-collegiate basic skills courses.
2.
DISTRICT CURRICULUM COMMITTEE
A District Curriculum Committee shall be established to recommend policies and
procedures concerning curriculum development, oversee the curriculum approval process,
and in certain instances, to make recommendations to the District Senate on curriculum
proposals.
These instances shall be cases in which technical or other problems are identified in
curriculum proposals approved and recommended by the College Curriculum Committee,
Page 1 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
Senate, and the College President, as described in Section B., Curriculum Development,
below.
The District Curriculum Committee will be a standing committee of the District
Academic Senate.
The composition of the Committee is as follows:
* The nine local college faculty chairs of the college curriculum committees (9)
*The President and Vice President of the DAS (2)
*A faculty member representing AFT (Article 32, C Agreement) (1)
Student (1) selected by Student Affairs Committee
An Articulation Officer (1) selected by college Articulation Officers
Academic Affairs Vice President (1)
Educational Services Instructional and Student Support Services representative (1)
(* Indicates voting member)
A quorum will consist of 7 voting members. Other Academic Vice Presidents or faculty
may serve as resource persons. The committee will be chaired by the Vice President of
the District Academic Senate.
3.
CURRICULUM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
This regulation applies to proposals for new, added, reinstated and/or archived courses
and to proposals for changes in course number, title, units, or hours. These procedures are
the recognized curriculum procedures of the LACCD as required by Title 5 of the
California Code of Regulations. These procedures are recognized as the exclusive
curriculum development and approval procedures for the Los Angeles Community
College District.
a. New Courses
1. Approval Criteria
In reviewing and recommending a course, the college curriculum committee shall
consider whether the proposed course meets the following criteria:
Page 2 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
a. Appropriateness to college mission. The stated goals and objectives of the
proposed course are consistent with the mission and master plan of the
college. The course provides systematic instruction in a body of content or
skills whose mastery forms the basis of the student grade.
b. Need. There must be a demonstrable need for a course that meets the stated
goals and objectives of the college’s Educational Master Plan.
c. Quality. The course meets the standards and criteria contained in Title 5,
section 55002.
d. Feasibility. The college has the resources necessary to support the course at
the level of quality presupposed in the course design.
e. Compliance. The course complies with all other laws applicable to it,
including federal regulations, licensing requirements and any legal
requirements that may exist for a particular course or courses
2. Procedures
STEP 1: A new course proposal will be initiated by a faculty member/faculty
members and approved by a majority of faculty within the discipline at the college.
STEP 2:The District Office’s Instructional and Student Support Services Division
will assign a course number and, if necessary, a subject code and/or TOP code.
STEP 3: Curricular proposals will be forwarded to the chair of the college
Curriculum Committee and the Vice President of Academic Affairs or designee for
technical review. The proposals will then be forwarded to the Curriculum
Committee for action.
STEP 4: The proposed new course will be placed on the agenda of the college
curriculum committee for action in accordance with the college’s curriculum
approval process. Each proposal, approved by the Curriculum Committee, will be
forwarded to the college Academic Senate for consideration. Senate
recommendations will be forwarded to the Vice President of Academic Affairs.
STEP 5: Following all approvals, the college’s Vice President of Academic
Affairs, or designee, will forward the approved Course Outline (electronically or in
hard-copy) to the Instructional and Student Support Services Division for
notification through the District's wide area network.
Page 3 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
STEP 6: The Instructional and Student Support Services Division will conduct a
technical review and notify the Vice President of Academic Affairs, the
Curriculum Committee Chair, and the Articulation Officer at the other colleges in
the District, as well as appropriate Discipline Committee Chairs, Senate Presidents
and local Curriculum Committee Chairs of the proposed new course(s). These
parties have twenty (20) working days to forward any comments to the college
proposing the course. These parties do not have the authority to stop the approval
of the course, but they may express concerns they would like the initiating college
to consider.
STEP 7: A Districtwide Discipline Committee or any member of the District
Curriculum Committee can request to have a new course proposal reviewed by the
District Curriculum Committee prior to review of the Board of Trustees. Concerns
will be in writing and will be sent (either electronically or in hard-copy) to the
Chair of the DCC, with a copy to the Associate Vice Chancellor for Instructional
and Student Service Support. Concerns from a Discipline Committee must be in
the form of a letter signed by a majority of the members of the Districtwide
Discipline Committee or in minutes from a Districtwide Discipline Committee
meeting, where there was a quorum and a majority of the members present voted
for the action.
STEP 8 Upon receipt of the written concerns, the Chair of the DCC will place
the matter on the next agenda of the DCC. Upon receipt of the concerns, the
clock on the 20-day review period will stop. If the concerns were raised by a
Districtwide Discipline Committee, the Chair of the DCC will notify the
Districtwide Discipline Committee Chair as to the date when the committee’s
concerns will be reviewed by the DCC. The Chair of the Curriculum Committee
at the college proposing the new course may also invite faculty from the college to
address the concerns.
STEP 9: During the DCC meeting when the concerns are discussed, the DCC will
review the written concerns, listen to comments from both the college proposing
the course and the Chair of the Districtwide Discipline Committee. The DCC will
discuss the concerns and formulate possible recommendations.
If the DCC has any recommendations, the DCC Chair will forward those
recommendations to the Senate President and College President of the college
proposing the course (with copies to the Vice President of Academic Affairs and
the Curriculum Committee Chair). The DCC will then either take action to restart
the clock on the 20-day review process or extend the review process by up to an
additional 20 days. If the DCC extends the review period, it will do so with
Page 4 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
explicit recommendations for actions to be taken by the college, Districtwide
discipline committee or both.
STEP 10: At either the end of the initial 20-day review period (less the time taken
for DCC review) or at the end of the extended review period, the new course will
be placed on the next available agenda of the Board of Trustees
STEP 11 If After twenty (20) working days, no requests (see STEP 7) are received
for DCC/DAS review, the Chair of the District Curriculum Committee will notify
the District Senate President and the Associate Vice Chancellor of Instructional
and Student Support Services Division, who will place the proposed new course on
the next available agenda of the Board of Trustees
STEP 12: Following Board Action, the Instructional and Student Support Services
Division will enter the new course(s) into the course database and provide
appropriate notification to the DAS President and Vice President, Senate
Presidents and Curriculum Committee Chairs, Vice Presidents of Academic
Affairs, and appropriate discipline committee chairs.
NOTE: Course Content Equivalency (cross-listing with a course in another subject)
may not be included as a course attribute of a new course approval. Requests for
the cross listing of courses must be done in accordance with the provisions of
section 3(b) of this regulation, once the new course has been approved in
accordance with the provision of section 3(a)
b.
Changes to Existing Courses
1.
Procedures
The procedures in this section apply to changes to course attributes of existing
courses with the same subject title and subject number, approved at more than
one college. The course attributes subject to these procedures are as follows:








Course Title
Units
TOP Code
Course Classification (Liberal Arts & Sciences, Occupational,
Developmental, etc.)
CSU Transferability
Associate Degree Applicable
Special Class Status (for disabled students)
Basic Skills Indicator
Page 5 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243

Course Content Equivalency (cross-listing with a course in another
subject)
NOTE: Subjects placed in disciplines with minimum qualifications that
require a master’s degree may not be cross-listed with subjects placed in a
discipline that have minimum qualifications that do not require a master’s
degree.
Changes to these attributes, approved through the procedures listed below
shall be applied to the course at all colleges in the District where the course is
offered. All other changes to existing courses will be made in accordance
with established college curriculum approval procedures and may vary by
college. To the extent possible, the college will maintain and update these
local changes in the District course database.
STEP 1: Changes to the course attributes (data elements) listed above shall be
initiated and approved at the college level by the faculty in the discipline
STEP 2: Proposals for course changes will be forwarded to the chair of the
College Curriculum Committee and the Vice President of Academic Affairs
for appropriate action, as determined by college curriculum approval
procedures.
STEP 3: The proposed course revisions will be placed on the agenda of the
college curriculum committee for action. Each proposal, approved by the
Curriculum Committee, will be forwarded to the college Academic Senate for
consideration, in keeping with college curriculum approval procedures. Senate
recommendations will be forwarded to the Vice President of Academic
Affairs.
STEP 4: The Vice President will forward his/her recommendation, along with
the recommendation of the Senate to the College President.
STEP 5: Following all approvals, the college’s Vice President of Academic
Affairs, or designee, will forward the approved Course Change form
(electronically or in hard-copy) to the Instructional and Student Support
Services Division for notification through the District's wide area network.
STEP 6: The Instructional and Student Support Services Division will conduct
a technical review and notify the Vice President of Academic Affairs, the
District Curriculum Committee Chair, and the Articulation Officer at the other
colleges in the District, as well as appropriate Discipline Committee Chairs,
Page 6 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
Senate Presidents and local Curriculum Committee Chairs of the proposed
course change(s). These parties have twenty (20) working days to request that
the proposal be placed on the Agenda of the District Curriculum Committee
for discussion. Such Agenda requests must be made in writing to the Chair of
the District Curriculum Committee (VP DAS) within 20 working days of
receipt of proposal. The District Curriculum Committee Chair and Associate
Vice Chancellor of Instructional and Student Support Services Division will
log receipt of requested changes for the purpose of defining this time period.
STEP 7: If, after twenty (20) working days no Agenda requests are received,
the Chair of the District Curriculum Committee will so indicate on the
proposal and will advise the District Senate President who will present the
item to the Associate Vice Chancellor of Instructional and Student Support
Services Division so that the recommended changes can be made to the
course(s). Future Changes to District standard course attributes will be
effective in the next available semester. An available semester is one where
schedule production has not commenced at a college where the course is
approved.
If District Curriculum Committee Agenda requests are received within the
twenty (20) working day period they will be placed on the Agenda of the next
meeting. The Agenda will be prepared and distributed by the Chair of the
District Curriculum Committee after consultation with the Associate Vice
Chancellor of Instructional and Student Support Services Division, and with
the assistance of staff provided by Instructional and Student Support Services
Division. The District Curriculum Committee, will then review the proposed
changes and either accept or deny the requested change. If the District
Curriculum Committee denies the request, the college can appeal the decision
to the District Academic Senate.
c.
Added Courses
The Addition of existing District courses to a college’s curriculum shall be
initiated and approved at the college level by the faculty in the discipline and or
department/division/cluster in consultation with the college administration, and
college articulation officer.
Proposals for added courses, which are recommended by the college faculty in the
discipline or department/division/cluster, the college curriculum committee, and
the college Senate, shall be forwarded by the college President to Instructional and
Page 7 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
Student Support Services Division, which will place the course in the District
course database.
d.
Experimental/Emergency Action
Colleges may offer an experimental/emergency course as a “99” on a provisional
basis for one full academic year if the course is approved by the college's
curriculum approval process. Courses will be given a “99” number designation.
Copies of the course description shall be sent to District Instructional and Student
Support Services Division for distribution as listed above.
During the second semester, the college must submit a complete course proposal
with a regular course number. The “99” course shall be terminated at the end of
the second semester.
e.
Modules
The modularization of existing courses shall be initiated and approved at the
college level by the faculty in the discipline and/or department/division/cluster in
consultation with the college administration.
Proposals for modularized courses which are recommended by the college faculty in the
discipline or department/division/cluster, the college curriculum committee, and the college
Senate shall be forwarded by the College President to the Instructional and Student Services
Support Division which will place the modules in the District course database and on the
Agenda of the District Curriculum Committee as information items.
4.
DISTRICTWIDE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEES
Districtwide discipline committees, formed according to District Senate guidelines and/or
otherwise approved by the District Academic Senate, may be consulted by Disciplines at a
college, by College Curriculum Committees, the Chancellor (or designee), the District
Curriculum Committee, and/or by the District Senate, as needed. Topics which may be
referred to a discipline committee by any of these constituencies might include, but are not
limited to, renumbering of courses, restructuring of graduation requirements, restructuring
of competency requirements, uniformity of course content across the district, and
articulation with four year colleges and high schools.
District Discipline Committees may also initiate the discussion of these or other issues and
make recommendations in turn to any of these groups as the need arises. However,
recommendations on the curriculum as listed above must be initiated at the college level as
described.
Page 8 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
5. REVIEW OF CURRICULUM PROCESS
The procedures described in this regulation may be reviewed, changed, or adjusted subject
to the mutual agreement of the DAS and the Chancellor.
6. DEFINITIONS
“Working day”: a day when the majority of the colleges in the District are in session,
excluding Saturdays, Sundays, holidays and summer and winter session days.
b. “Subject” is a general title used to describe the content of courses. Courses are placed in
subjects and are listed with course identification numbers given by the State
Chancellor’s Office.
a.
c. “Discipline” refers to the determination of preparation needed to teach a subject or
perform a defined purpose. Discipline relates to State Minimum Qualifications. (Note:
Faculty qualified for a single discipline may be able to teach multiple subjects. Faculty
are qualified to teach in disciplines).
Page 9 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
346
347
348
349
350
FLOW CHART OF LACCD COURSE APPROVAL PROCESS
(Each college Senate will determine local curriculum approval
process within guidelines established by Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations)
351
Step
STEP 1:
STEP 2:
STEP 3:
STEP 4:
Individual or
Body
Faculty
member/faculty
members
A majority of
faculty within the
discipline at the
college.
The District
Office’s
Instructional and
Student Support
Services Division
Department Chair
Action
Initiates a new course proposal
Approves proposal
Assigns a course number and, if necessary, a subject code
and/or TOP code.
Forwards Curricular proposals to the chair of the college
Curriculum Committee and the Vice President of Academic
Affairs or designee for technical review.
Curriculum
Committee Chair
Curriculum
Committee Chair
Forwards proposal to the Curriculum Committee for action.
Curriculum
Committee Chair
Forwards proposal, approved by the Curriculum Committee,
to the college Academic Senate for consideration.
Places proposed new course on the agenda of the college
curriculum committee for action in accordance with the
college’s curriculum approval process.
Page 10 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
STEP 5:
STEP 6:
STEP 7:
STEP 8
College Senate
President
Vice President of
Academic Affairs,
or designee
The Instructional
and Student
Support Services
Division
Forwards Senate recommendations to the Vice President of
Academic Affairs.
Forward the approved Course to the Instructional and Student
Support Services Division for notification through the
District's wide area network.
Conducts a technical review and notifies the Vice
President of Academic Affairs, the Curriculum Committee
Chair, and the Articulation Officer at the other colleges in
the District, as well as appropriate Discipline Committee
Chairs, Senate Presidents and local Curriculum
Committee Chairs of the proposed new course(s). .
Vice President of
Academic Affairs,
the Curriculum
Committee Chair,
and the
Articulation
Officer at the
other colleges in
the District, as
well as appropriate
Discipline
Committee Chairs,
Senate Presidents
and local
Curriculum
Committee Chairs
A Districtwide
Discipline
Committee or any
member of the
District
Curriculum
Committee
DCC Chair
Forward any comments to the college proposing the course
within twenty (20) working days. These parties do not have
the authority to stop the approval of the course, but they may
express concerns they would like the initiating college to
consider.
DCC Chair
Notifies the Districtwide Discipline Committee Chair as to the
May request to have a new course proposal reviewed by the
District Curriculum Committee prior to review of the Board of
Trustees.
Upon receipt of the written concerns, places the matter on the
next agenda of the DCC. Upon receipt of the concerns, the
clock on the 20-day review period will stop.
Page 11 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
STEP 9:
DCC
DCC Chair
Forwards those recommendations (if any) to the Senate
President and College President of the college proposing the
course (with copies to the Vice President of Academic Affairs
and the Curriculum Committee Chair).
DCC
Takes action to restart the clock on the 20-day review process
or extend the review process by up to an additional 20 days.
If the DCC extends the review period, provides explicit
recommendations for actions to be taken by the college,
Districtwide discipline committee or both.
At either the end of the initial 20-day review period or at the
end of the extended review period, places the new course on
the next available agenda of the Board of Trustees
DCC
STEP 10:
ISSSD
STEP 11
DCC Chair
If after twenty (20) working days, no requests (see STEP 7)
are received for DCC/DAS review, notifies the District Senate
President and the Associate Vice Chancellor of Instructional
and Student Support Services Division,
ISSSD
Places the proposed new course on the next available agenda
of the Board of Trustees
ISSSD
Following Board Action, enters the new course(s) into the
course database
ISSSD
Provides appropriate notification to the DAS President and
Vice President, Senate Presidents and Curriculum Committee
Chairs, Vice Presidents of Academic Affairs, and appropriate
discipline committee chairs.
STEP 12:
352
353
354
date when the committee’s concerns will be reviewed by the
DCC, if the concerns were raised by a Districtwide Discipline
Committee.
Reviews the written concerns, listen to comments from both
the college proposing the course and the Chair of the
Districtwide Discipline Committee. The DCC will discuss the
concerns and formulate possible recommendations.
NOTE: Course Content Equivalency (cross-listing with a course in another subject) may not be
included as a course attribute of a new course approval. Requests for the cross listing of courses
Page 12 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
355
356
must be done in accordance with the provisions of section 3(b) of this regulation, once the new
course has been approved in accordance with the provision of section 3(a)
Page 13 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
357
358
359
LACCD FLOW CHART FOR COURSE CHANGES
Individual or Body
Action
Faculty member or members
Initiates recommended course change
Majority of Faculty within the discipline
Approves recommended course change
Discipline/Dept./
Division/Cluster
Reviews and forwards recommended
change proposal to:
College Curriculum Committee
Reviews and forwards recommended
course change to:
College Academic Senate
Approves course change
College President
via VP Academic Affairs
Signs and sends proposed course change
to Instructional and Student Services
Support Division (ISSSD):
1. Places course on Districtwide
curriculum agenda and District
WAN (new courses) for 20 days.
Instructional and Student Support Services
Division
2. After 20 days, inputs change into
course database (unless change is
challenged)
3. Places on DCC agenda (challenged
changes)
DCC
Reviews challenge and make decision to
accept or reject recommended change
DAS
Hears appeals of DCC decision not to
accept recommended change and makes
final decision
Page 14 of 15
DRAFT: 6/6/2006:
Revised 9/25/2006
Revised by DCC: 10/20/2006
Revisited CIOs: 1/12/2007
Approved DCC (w/o CIO changes): 3/16/2007
Revised DCC: 9/21/2007
Instructional and Student Support Services
Division
Inputs course into District database if
DCC decision is overruled on appeal
360
361
Page 15 of 15