Mental Health and Supporting Students

advertisement

Mental Health and Supporting

Students

Dr Niamh Farrelly

Consultant Psychiatrist TCD

An Integrated Approach

How Disability Services can communicate with college-based and external health services and ensure best use of resources?

Overview

• 75% of mental health problems emerge before the age of 25

• 25% of 18-25 year olds experience MH problems each year : ¼ of whom access help

Estimate 20,000 students

25% = 5,000 students have MH problems

= 1,250 (25%) Actively access help (6% all stds)

Changing student profile

• more college students meet criteria for some form of learning disability .

• Lifestyle habits— eating patterns, sexual activity, sleeping and drinking—we also see evidence of markedly increasing maladaptive patterns.

More students, more complex needs…

Models of Support

Authoritarian

Autonomous: Age / maturity /Separation / individuation

Collaborative Care: blend of

‘authority’ (training, knowledge, experience) and

‘autonomy’ (knowledge , preference, experience)

Autonomy

• Do we hide behind autonomy (right to refuse recommendation) rather than attempt to recognise the clinical problem that lies at the root of the refusal

• Autonomy can be made an acceptable way of passing burdensome problem or decisions over to the student

• Abdication of responsibility for decisions from the college to the student

Collaborative Care

• blending of professional cultures: achieved though sharing skills and knowledge to improve the quality of patient care

• There are important characteristics that determine team effectiveness, including

members seeing their roles as important to the team, open communication, the existence of autonomy, collaborative education

Collaborative Care

• Individual becomes active partner

• Takes appropriate responsibility

• Agree joint decision

– At times balance between authority and collaboration may need to shift

– Emergencies trump collaboration but true collaboration plans for these exigencies

Friends

Student

Service supports

Academic supports

Student

Family supports

Extern al

Self help resource s

Collaborative Care Planning

• Student at the helm, support etc. crew

• Concordance on destination

• Concordance on route

• Concordance on contingency planning

– Advance directives/ planning if temporary absence of captain

• e.g. discussion re ‘what do you want me to do if you DNA?’

Outcome of collaborative care?

– Greater treatment concordance

– Better mental health outcomes

– Reduced hospitalisation

– Reduced time to relapse

– Reduced frequency of relapse

– Greater student retention

Consider perspective of all agencies

• Student *

• Disability officer *

• Tutor

• Academic supports

• Counselling supports

• Friends

• Doctor*

• OT

• Family*

What is competing with what?

• Student : academic / finances / relationship/

• Academic: funding / placement integrity

• Family: domestic issues / concerns/ isolation

• Friends : social life / formation of friendships

• Student Services: how is service shared/ how efficiently is this done

• Doctor

Medical role

• On site medical service

– Advantages: experienced in age group

– Disadvantages: lack 24/7 care access model

• Off site medical service

• May be most appropriate care setting especially if enduring difficulties likely to persist beyond college

• Provide continuity of care

• Broader scope to access service

• Emergency treatment provisions 24/7

Off site care

• Ability to be fully aware of demands and environmental challenges student faces?

• Day care facility

– notional structure and routine

– Inappropriate expectations of pastoral care

– Lack of awareness of financial implications of failure

– Assumptions made wrt. intellect and comparisons made with different core cohort of patients

– Educational experience of external provider

– Confidentiality

– Access to speak to somebody

External Care Provider

• How do you identify yourself?

• Most people do not know what a disability officer is?

• Concerns wrt confidentiality

• Speaking to somebody who knows individual

• Difficulties with continuity of care

• 450 points

• Articulate

• Likely higher SEG

CMHT

– Behavioural activation strategy

– Development of goal

– ? Full consideration of range of skills required to function as student who is unwell

Family

• Expectation to continue

• Assumptions to return

• ? Understanding of options

• Often

– left out in the cold

– Misinformed

– Lacking in knowledge of what is really going on

• Collaborative Care

– Sharing the same vision

– Aiming for the same destination

– Recognition of crew and their roles

– Contingency planning in event of a storm

COMMUNICATION

Communication

• Not just with student but with each other

• Attempting to understand different perspectives

• Development of relationships with core personnel / working out best person to speak with

• Meeting regularly / forming relationships

• Relationship with family

• Remember who you are dealing with!

• Pick up the phone!

• Networking

• Go and visit service

Download