e_interviews_PERC04.ppt

advertisement

Piaget-style interviews conducted both face-to-face and electronically

DJ Wagner

1,2

, JJ Rivera

1

, Fran Mateycik

1

, and Sybillyn Jennings

3

1

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,

2

Grove City College,

3

Russell Sage College

Context:

The Science of Information Technology (ScIT) introduces students of all majors to the physical principles behind the operation of information systems. NSF is supporting current efforts to make

ScIT materials useful to a large audience. As part of that effort, we are designing diagnostic questions addressing the topics covered in ScIT.

Diagnostic questions are most useful when they address student preconceptions and distinguish between different cognitive models [1]. Clinical Interviews have long been regarded as an effective means of eliciting students’ conceptual frameworks [1-3]. Piaget [3] developed the method of critical exploration to see what thoughts lay behind a child’s initial answer to a question, and the PER community has used this method extensively [1-2]. We used Piagetstyle interviews to study students’ understanding of total internal reflection (TIR) and how TIR relates to the operation of optical fibers.

Study:

• “What is an optical fiber and what does it do?”

• Follow-up questions included “How does the fiber keep the light from escaping?” and “What can you tell me about refraction?”

2 Physics Faculty

• Faculty

,

REU students

, and

inservice (non-physics) teachers

were interviewed in a traditional (face-to-face) form in the Summer of 2002.

5

Physics

Students

(REU)

5 In-Service

Teachers 22 ScIT Pre-

Instruction

• ScIT students (both pre - and

post-instruction

) were interviewed via WebCT’s Chat

Room in the Spring of 2003.

8 ScIT Post-

Instruction

Demographics of Interviewees

Laser light trapped in a plastic fiber.

Air serves as the cladding.

• E-interviews can provide valuable information about cognitive models. They provide some advantages over face-to-face interviews but have their own set of limitations.

• Instructor time is smaller in e-interviews, due to decrease in transcription time; student time is greater in e-interviews.

• Several students called the e-interview “fun” or “interesting”

Optical Fiber next to sewing needle.

The core of the fiber is 62 microns in diameter; the cladding is 125 microns.

Comparing E-Interviews with Traditional Face-to-Face Interviews

E-Interviews (22 interviewees)

Can be conducted from wherever, whenever, and however is convenient (at home, listening to music, eating ice cream, in jammies, etc.).

Can hold 2 or 3 interviews simultaneously, typing questions for student 3 while students 1 and 2 are typing their responses. (4 at a time is a bit much.)

Typed thoughts often come across more coherently than spoken thoughts.

Interviewer does not need to worry about their gestures giving away their thoughts about the students answers.

Apparent anonymity lets students express their lack of knowledge with less embarrassment.

Interviewees generally created work-arounds to constraints they experienced. (drew pictures, used keyboard symbols, etc)

Language used to convey interviewees confidence in their answer or description. (umm, I don’t reall know, I guess…, iirc,

I could take a wild stab, etc)

Minimal transcription needed!!! (WebCT records conversations in Chat Rooms 1-4.)

Face-To-Face Interviews (12 interviewees)

Utilize multiple communication channels. (words, gestures, tone of voice, etc)

Substantial transcription time

Transcription difficult to convey gestures, tone of voice.

Scratch Pad (Draw figures, write equations, etc)

Demonstration equipment (optical fiber)

1 interview at a time

Participants do not need a familiarity with internet technology

Fiber Optic Network

Face-to-Face Interviews

E- Interviews

[1] Lillian C. McDermott, “Bridging the Gap Between Teaching and Learning: The Role of Research,”

The Changing Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities

: Proceedings of

ICUPE, ed. by E. F. Redish and J.S. Rigden.

[2] E. Hunt and J. Minstrell, “A Cognitive Approach to the Teaching of Physics,”

Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice

, ed. by McGilly (MIT Press, 1994).

[3] J. Piaget,

The child’s conception of the world

, trans. by J. & A. Tomlinson. (Littlefield, NJ, 1926/1972).

RPI work supported in part by NSF CCLI Program under grant DUE-0089399.

Thanks as well to Leo Schowalter for access to ScIT students, and to the rest of the ScIT advisory committee: Karen

Cummings, Toh-Ming Lu, Saroj Nayak, Jim Napolitano, Peter Persans, and Wayne Roberge.

Download