The Digital Divide: Development Issues for Rural Areas Edward J. Malecki The Ohio State University Prepared for the conference, E-COMMERCE: Impacting the Way We Do Business, Nashville, TN, October 1-2, 2001 The Digital Economy The digital economy is related to several of the major challenges facing rural America: Tapping digital technology Encouraging entrepreneurs Improving human capital Technological Changes: Signs of Promise Flexible manufacturing and smaller plants and firms provide possibilities for rural firms against giant competitors Telecommunications technologies and the Internet erase the tyranny of space and distance (“the rural penalty”) Continuing population growth promises a needed upgrade of skills for the new economy Rural Prosperity Is Not Assured The most recent technology will be replaced by newer ones in urban areas Deregulation, in favor of the market, has diminished the likelihood of universal service The apparent ease of reaching distant markets via the Internet can cause business owners to neglect long-established rules of sound business practice Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Rural Development Necessary conditions: Basic physical infrastructure Human resources with minimal training Sufficient conditions (“intangibles”): Ability of firms to innovate Quality of management Business culture supportive of entrepreneurs Inter-firm and public-private cooperation Finance for innovation and new economic activity Source: Landabaso (2000) Rural America is Digital [Source: NTIA (2000), Figure I-3] Percent of U.S. Households Percent of U.S. Households with Internet Access, by U.S., Rural, Urban, and Central Cities, 1998 and 2000 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 42.3 41.5 38.9 37.7 26.2 US 27.5 Urban 24.5 Central City 22.2 Rural 1998 2000 What we do on the Internet Source: E. Duncan (2000) Thrills and Spills: A Survey of E-Entertainment, The Economist, October 7. Internet: Supply and Demand Internet service providers (ISPs) are found almost everywhere Access is helped by extended Area Service or Extended Local Calling in states that permit it “The debate over universal service has shifted from supply to demand” – Shane Greenstein “Access is available but at an additional cost” – Sharon Strover “Rural citizens often lack the skills or knowledge to assure digital infrastructure in their areas” – Sharon Strover Lone Eagles and High Fliers Not all – and maybe very few – communities have attracted “freelance teleworkers” Rural areas can – and must – attract migrants relocating for quality-of-life reasons New residents bring knowledge, experience, and market contacts Supply of Digital Infrastructure Telecommunications has changed from being a homogeneous public utility to a highly variable factor of production for businesses 20 years ago: absent from all lists of business location factors By the late 1990s: in the top 3, often #1 What is Digital? Little Agreement Technology has exploded the options available Deregulation has permitted competition There is no publicly available database of present infrastructure nationwide, or in many communities Firms do not have to disclose their technology, nor the locations where it is implemented (“trade secrets”) Rural America: Digital, but not Broadband Pe r ce nt of U.S. Hous e holds w ith Inte r ne t Acce s s [Source: NTIA (2000), Figure I-16] High Speed Internet Access by U.S., Rural, Urban, and Central Cities, 2000, as Percent of U.S. Households with Internet Access 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 10.7 11.8 12.2 7.3 US Urban Central City Rural Universal Service: What Is It? What Should It Be? Internet access Not just access devices, but applications and services Personal computer? Personal digital assistant? Wireless telephone? Not the same ones for everyone Only schools, hospitals, and libraries “should, generally, have access” – FCC The Status of Rural Telecommunications Infrastructure Points of presence (POPs) are needed for access to Internet backbone networks Digital switches are needed for direct transfer of data Both are found in rural communities, and some places have urban-level infrastructure Points of Presence of 4 Major Telecom Firms, 2000 Urban Rural 1395 316 POPs/million population 6.4 5.8 Communities with more than 1 POP % of communities with all 3 major inter-exchange carriers 264 224 65.3% 7.6% Total POPs Rural Locations with 3 or More POPs Helena MT Harrisonburg VA Winchester VA Bluefield WV Clarksburg WV Mason City IA Couer d’Alene ID Carbondale IL Galesburg IL Quincy IL Columbus IN Richmond IN Junction City KS Madisonville KY Jefferson City MO Rolla Mo Grand Island NE Chambersburg PA Staunton VA Wytheville VA Rural Locations of Digital Infrastructure and POPs, 2000 US Total Rural Total % Rural 2598 321 12.4 Wire centers with packet 784 gateway switches 86 11.0 Wire centers with POPs 224 13.9 Wire centers with digital switches 1610 States with 10 or More Rural Locations Served by Digital Switches Tennessee Ohio Michigan Wisconsin Virginia Pennsylvania Oklahoma Texas Kentucky 61 50 34 21 17 15 13 11 10 14 States with Rural Locations Not Served by Digital Switches, 2000 Arizona Colorado Georgia Iowa Idaho Minnesota Montana North Dakota New Mexico Nevada South Dakota Utah Vermont Wyoming Rural Digital Infrastructure Is Very Uneven Telecommunications providers differ State regulatory agencies differ State capitals and college towns tend to be better served than other rural communities Is Wireless the Answer? Not yet And that’s all we know Rural Demand for a Digital Economy Demonstrating effective demand in rural areas: Infrastructure investment Appropriate services and applications Awareness of users Adoption and effective use Creating competitive advantage A Rural Success Story: LaGrange, Georgia 60 miles southwest of Atlanta City-owned fiber-optic network 40 large commercial, institutional, and industrial customers Large companies said they needed digital switching and a POP LaGrange now has POPs of 5 interexchange carriers Most other rural “success stories” have municipallyowned utilities Lessons from LaGrange and Elsewhere Systematic strategic planning Aggregate demand Learn local telecommunications inventory Talk to local firms, large and small, to learn their needs Especially of users with leased lines Public-private partnerships Federal, state and local governments should not be on a separate network, but should be part of local demand Doing Business Digitally The issues: Migration can enhance both Entrepreneurs and human capital Return migrants (former residents) Tourists and others “shopping” for amenities Migration and retirement are not one-shot events Jobs follow people Skilled and experienced new residents are digital Niche manufacturing and global markets Economically Viable Communities Support for those starting new businesses Community strategic economic development plan Show openness to new ideas Newcomers bring contacts and links to distant markets Public-private collaborations are a critical part of the supportive structures that adapt and change for rural development Digital Business All firms need a Web site Without one, many young people will believe the firm does not exist All firms need more than a Web site Real people Consumer choice Customized products, information, and services No Magic Bullet Telecommunications technology is not the magic bullet for rural development More fruitful: to build and the enhance capabilities of local firms To attract a share of experienced migrants Rural communities need skilled people, both through local training and education and from in-migrants Networks of businesses will boost rural demand, increase knowledge, and reduce isolation