Methods of Promoting Academic, Business and Community Partnerships for Rural Community Colleges

advertisement
Methods of Promoting Academic, Business,
and Community Partnerships
Dr. Peg Morelli
Colorado Community College System
Tuesday, October 8, 2002
10:45 - 12:15
Topics for discussion
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Overview of Colorado System
Colorado Rural Development Council
Rural Telecommunications Summit
Opening Windows
Rural Education Access Program
Rural Colorado E-Commerce Initiative
Rural New Economy Initiative
Academic Workshops
Challenges and Conclusions
Replicating Successes
Overview of Colorado System
• Individual community colleges for decades
• CCCOES created by Colorado General Assembly (1967)
– Governing board appointed by governor
– has full governing authority over 13 community colleges
– regulation and administration of all CTE at Area Vocational
schools (8) and public secondary system (154 school districts)
– coordination of two local district colleges
• Colorado Community College System operates under the authority of
the Colorado Commission on Higher Education (CCHE)
• Name changed to Colorado Community College System (2002)
Colorado Rural Development
Council (1993)
• Is part of National Rural Development Partnership
• Began formation in 1993
– 30 member interim steering committee created
– Interim steering committee hired the council’s executive director
– Partnerships
• Each CRDC sector has two private, two non-profit, and two
local government representatives
• Denver supplied ten federal liaisons
• Governor appointed ten state partners at cabinet level
• 2 tribal nations have seats
• 1 general member
• Full CRDC Board meets in rural communities around
Colorado each quarter.
• Executive Committee meets 8 times each year in rural
communities.
• Each meeting is preceded by a community forum.
• CRDC Benefits to Rural Colorado
– Facilitates statewide networking and idea sharing.
– Serves as rural representation to numerous organizations and
initiatives to encourage accountability to grass roots.
– Forum for information sharing between rural communities and
governmental agencies.
– Provides educational opportunities at request of rural
communities.
– Directly involves state and federal agencies in rural issues.
– Encourages partnerships to address challenges.
– Addresses rural policy issues at the federal level through
involvement with the Rural Development Council and National
Rural Development Partnership.
Rural Telecommunications
Summit (1997)
• CRDC compiled partnerships to sponsor
and host a summit on current and future
status of rural access to
telecommunications and technology.
• Established resources data base.
Opening Windows (1998-2000)
• Theater and human services project that
addresses adolescent health and behavior
issues.
• CRDC brought Opening Windows to Colorado and
purchased exclusive rights for two years.
• Play was made available, at minimal cost, to rural
theater/drama groups for performance
throughout Colorado.
• Reached about 600 people in five performances.
Rural Education Access Program
(2001)
• The Rural Education Access Program (REAP)
provides financial support to four-year colleges
to deliver degree completion programs on the
campuses of rural community colleges.
• The student earns an Associate Degree and stays
to earn an advanced degree.
Rural Colorado E-Commerce
Initiative (RCECI) (1999)
• CCHE leveraged 1.3 million dollars in
Colorado technology funds.
• RCECI included seven community colleges.
• Community colleges are now working with
local businesses and individuals.
• Community colleges share resources and
products with each other
• Results of RCECI:
– Small business development center programs
– All seven community colleges to offer 30 hour
program designed to promote development of
business networking
– Emphasis on local accountability
– Colleges offer customized programs to meet
employer needs
– When local programs are in place, colleges
focus on bringing them to scale by sharing
programs and curricula
• RCECI Strengths:
– Shared governance
– Increased resources because of pooling,
shared networking, and leadership support
– Responding to local needs
Rural New Economy Initiative
(2001)
• Includes fourteen colleges:
–
–
–
–
Seven state-run rural colleges
Four four-year colleges
Two local district colleges
One area vocational center
• Present outcomes of Rural New Economy
Initiative (RNEI) project:
– More than 500 participants currently in RNEI workshops.
– Local needs and gaps in available programs and resources have
been pinpointed to decide how to best address them.
• Focus
– Educate elected officials
– Fulfill need for healthcare workers
– Increase offerings to small business
– Pilot a leadership development effort to address the digital age
– Local resources are being gathered in a common statewide
pool
– One of the four-year colleges is formatting outlines/ curriculum
in a database that other institutions can access
– RNEI will fund curriculum development for areas of interest that
have not been addressed
Academic Workshops
(2001 - Present)
• Provided throughout Colorado for secondary and
post-secondary teachers
• Topic is: Incorporating E-Commerce Into
Curriculum
• Four days training, participants receive resource
materials, curriculum notebooks and CD’s, lesson
plans to facilitate incorporation into programs at
participants’ home sites.
Challenges and Conclusions
• Role (s) identification:
– Provision of business services
– Customized training based upon specific
local/regional needs
– Community training
– Industry certification programs
– Skills upgrades
– Language and employability skills for immigrants
– Entrepreneurial training
– E-Business, E-Commerce
• Keys:
– Clear mission identification, particularly as it relates
to rural identity
– Rather than all things to all people, need to fulfill
mission that will compliment and supplement own
strengths
• Leadership:
– Is critical to identification, fulfillment of, and
improvement upon roles
– Must be devoid of self-grandisement, truly cognizant of
needs and how to leverage multiplicity of partnerships
to meet those needs
Replicating Successes
• Community colleges are important to rural
economic development
• Quality of leadership is critical
• A state system influences the nature of
replication
• Finding money to replicate innovative
practices can be difficult
Download