Ants from forests and agriculture landscapes of West Sumatra
Henny HERWINA1, YAHERWANDI2, Rijal SATRIA3
Department of Biology Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Andalas University, Padang,
West Sumatra, Indonesia, 25163 1, 3 Email: herwina@gmail.com
Faculty of Agriculture, Andalas University, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia, 25163
Introduction
Since most ant species are stationary and have a perennial nest with a restricted
foraging range, they are useful as indicators of environmental conditions (Hashimoto
et al., 2001, Andersen et al., 2002). Knowledge of diversity of ants in an area can
provide a great deal of useful information for conservation planning. An inventory
of the species of ants in an area will provide data on their distribution and will
document the present of any rare, threatened, or ecologically important species
(Alonso and Agosti, 2000). The information about ants in Indonesia is still limited.
This study aimed to investigate the species composition and abundant of ground
foraging ant in three secondary forests and agriculture landscape of West Sumatra.
Materials and Methods
The ALL Protocol (Agosti and Alonso, 2000) was used to collect the ants from three
secondary forests sites (MinangVillage Padang Panjang City (last of March 2008),
Cauang Pariaman District (early May 2009) and Marak Island (early March 2009)).
The ALL Protocol applied by using 20 mini Winkler extractor and 20 pitfall traps for
48 hours process in each site. At agriculture landscapes, the foraging ant workers
were collected by using pitfall traps only at mid of July 2008 in Aia Batuambuak
vegetable field of Solok Distric (950 asl.), mid of September 2009 in Batu Palano
Agam District (900 asl.) and at the end of July 2008 in Sungai Sariak paddy field (80
asl.). In the laboratory, all samples were sorted and identified by using available
taxonomic keys. Ant data was analyzed by using PRIMER 5 for Windows V5.2
programs.
1
Results and Discussion
Collected samples from three sites of secondary forests were composed of 4 sub
families, 14 tribes, 19 genera and 47 species and 1955 individuals of ants. Meanwhile
from the three agriculture landscapes were composed of 5 sub families, 11 tribes, 17
genera, 30 species and 3818 individuals, respectively. Myrmicinae, Formicinae,
Ponerinae and Dolichoderinae were found in both forests and agriculture landscapes
but Pseudomyrmicinae was found only in agriculture area. Eight species were found
similar between the forest and agriculture landscape. The two most species rich
genera were Paratrechina (7 and 4 species at forest and agriculture landscapes,
respectively) and Pheidole (10 and 7 species in forest forest and agriculture landscapes,
respectively) in both field. These two genera were also found as the species rich
genera in the study by Ito, et al. (2001) and Herwina and Nakamura (2007) in Bogor
Botanical Garden, West Java, Indonesia in the study about ground and species
composition, abundance and seasonality.
Figure 1 showing the comparison of cumulative number of ant species collected
in each study site. In the secondary forest, the number of ant species collected by
pitfall traps seems plateau at some number of sampling/traps, increase again, and
reminded with no improvement (Figure 1; a-c). The number of ant species in three
forest sites collected by using mini Winkler extractor was always improved with
sampling number, except at the last sampling number in Cauang (Figure 1; d-e).
Meanwhile, the ants collected by using 100 pitfall traps in each sampling site at
vegetable and paddy field showed that in Batu Palano vegetable field, representative
of complex landscape, the number of ant species was always improve by the
improvement of the sampling/traps number (Figure 1; f). At Sungai Sariak paddy
field and Aia Batumbuak vegetables field as therepresentative of simple landscapes,
the number of ant species only improved until samples/trap number 35-45, and then
reminded without addition of new species.
2
a
b
7
Species Count (Cumulative)
Species Count
(Cumulative)
6
15
10
5
c
20
Species Count (Cumulative)
20
5
4
3
15
10
5
2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
0
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
d
e
3
4
5
6
7
8
20
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
f
10
8
Species Count (Cumulative)
30
10
5
6
4
10
2
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
0
1
20
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Samples
Samples
Number of Species
Species Count (Cumulative)
2
Samples
15
Species Count (Cumulative)
40
Species Count (Cumulative)
1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Samples
Samples
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Samples
2
0
1
5
g
1
0
5
0
1
3
2
5
4
7
6
8
9
1
1
1
3
1
5
1
7
1
9
2
1
2
3
2
5
2
7
2
9
3
1
3
3
3
5
3
7
3
9
4
1
4
3
4
5
4
7
4
9
5
1
5
3
5
5
5
7
5
9
6
1
6
3
6
5
6
7
6
9
7
1
7
3
7
5
7
7
7
9
8
1
8
3
8
5
8
7
8
9
9
1
9
3
9
5
9
7
9
9
1
0
1
2
1
4
1
6
1
8
2
0
2
2
2
4
2
6
2
8
3
0
3
2
3
4
3
6
3
8
4
0
4
2
4
4
4
6
4
8
5
0
5
2
5
4
5
6
5
8
6
0
6
2
6
4
6
6
6
8
7
0
7
2
7
4
7
6
7
8
8
0
8
2
8
4
8
6
8
8
9
0
9
2
9
4
9
6
9
8 1
0
0
Samples
h
25
Species Count (Cumulative)
20
15
10
5
0
1
3
2
5
4
7
6
8
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
39
41
43
45
47
49
51
53
55
57
59
61
63
65
67
69
71
73
75
77
79
81
83
85
87
89
91
93
95
97
99
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98 100
Samples
i
2
0
Species Count (Cumulative)
1
5
1
0
5
0
1
3
2
5
4
7
6
9
8
1
1
1
0
1
3
1
2
1
5
1
4
1
7
1
6
1
9
1
8
2
1
2
0
2
3
2
2
2
5
2
4
2
7
2
6
2
9
2
8
3
1
3
0
3
3
3
2
3
5
3
4
3
7
3
6
3
9
3
8
4
1
4
0
4
3
4
2
4
5
4
4
4
7
4
6
4
9
4
8
5
1
5
0
5
3
5
2
5
5
5
4
5
7
5
6
5
9
5
8
6
1
6
0
6
3
6
2
6
5
6
4
6
7
6
6
6
9
6
8
7
1
7
0
7
3
7
2
7
5
7
4
7
7
7
6
7
9
7
8
8
1
8
0
8
3
8
2
8
5
8
4
8
7
8
6
8
9
8
8
9
1
9
0
9
3
9
2
9
5
9
4
9
7
9
6
9
9
9
8
1
0
0
Samples
Samples
Figure 1. The total number of ant species collected by pitfall trap (a-c: Minang
village, Marak Island, Cauang) and extracted by mini Wingkler (d-f:
Minang village, Marak Island, Cauang) in forest and collected by
pitfall traps in Agriculture landscapse (g –i: Batu Palano, Sei. Sariak,
Aia Batumbuak) at every sampling unit/traps numbers.
3
Conclusion
The total of 69 species belong to 19 genera, 14 tribes and 5subfamilies of the ants was
collected from three sites of secondary forest and three agriculture landscape of West
Sumatra. Eight species were similar between the two sites. The combination pitfall
traps and mini-Winkler extraction as well as the application pitfall trap alone for ant
collection showed a certain trend of cumulative number of species.
Acknowledgement
This study was supported by the Directorat General of Higher Education of
Indonesia through Hibah Bersaing Fund for Andalas University 2008. We greatly
appreciate many individuals that have supported our work in the field and
laboratory, particularly to the Head of Research Center of Andalas University, Dr. Ir.
Syafrimen Yasin, MS, MSc.
References
Alonso, L. E. & Agosti. 2000. In Agosti, D., Majer., J. D., Alonso, L. E. & Schultz. T. R.
Ants. Standard method for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. (Eds). 1-8.
Smithtonian Institution Press. Washington, U. S. A
Andersen, A. N., Hoffman, B. D., Muller, W. J. & Griffiths, A. 2002. Using ants as
bioindicators in land management: simplifying assessment of ant community
responses. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 8-17.
Hashimoto, Y., Yamane, S. & Mohamed, M. 2001. How to design an inventory
method for ground-level ants in tropical forest. Nature and Human Activities 6: 2530.
Herwina, H and K. Nakamura. 2007. Ant species diversity studied using pitfall traps
in a small yard in Bogor Botanical Garden, West Java, Indonesia. Treubia 35: 99-116
4