Basic Electron Microscopy Arthur Rowe The Knowledge Base at a Simple Level Introduction These 3 presentations cover the fundamental theory of electron microscopy In presentation #3 we cover: – requirements for imaging macromolecules _ – – the negative staining method the metal-shadowing method _ – – aids such as gold-labelled antibodies Including high-resolution modifications vitritied ice technology examples of each type of method requirements for imaging macromolecules • sufficient CONTRAST must be attainable, but > bio-molecules are made up of low A.N. atoms > & are of small dimensions (4+ nm) > hence contrast must usually be added • sufficient STABILITY in the beam is needed > to enable an image to be recorded > low dose ‘random’ imaging mandatory for any high resolution work ways of imaging macromolecules • ADDING CONTRAST (with heavy metals) > negative contrast + computer analysis + immunogold labels > metal shadowing + computer enhancement • USING INTRINSIC CONTRAST > particles in thin film of vitrified ice + computer acquisition & processing ways of imaging macromolecules • using immunogold labels to localise epitopes > widely used in cell biology > beginning to be of importance for macromolecules Au sphere Mab epitope macromolecule negative staining particles Electron dense negative stain negative staining • requires minimal interaction between particle & ‘stain’ • to avoid binding, heavy metal ion should be of same charge +/as the particle • positive staining usually destructive of bio-particles • biological material usually -ve charge at neutral pH • widely used negative contrast media include: anionic cationic phosphotungstate uranyl actetate/formate molybdate (ammonium) (@ pH ~ 4) metal shadowing - 1-directional metal shadowing - 1-directional • Contrast usually inverted to give dark shadows > resolution 2 - 3 nm - single 2-fold a-helix detectable - historic use for surface detail - now replaced by SEM > detail on ‘shadow’ side of the particle can be lost > apparent ‘shape’ can be distorted > problems with orientation of elongated specimens - detail can be lost when direction of shadowing same as that of feature > very limited modern use for macromolecular work metal shadowing - rotary metal shadowing - rotary • Contrast usually inverted to give dark shadows > resolution 2 - 3 nm - single DNA strand detectable - historic use for ‘molecular biology’ (e.g. heteroduplex mapping) > good preservation of shape, but enlargement of apparent dimensions > in very recent modification (MCD - microcrystallite decoration), resolution ~1.1 nm particle in vitrified ice: low contrast particle particles examined at v. low temperature, frozen in a thin layer of vitrified (structureless) ice - i.e. no contrast added particle in vitrified ice: low contrast average of large numbers (thousands +) of very low contrast particles enables a structure to be determined particle in vitrified ice: low contrast average of large numbers (thousands +) of very low contrast particles enables a structure to be determined: • resolution may be typically 1 nm or better • this is enough to define the “outline” (or ‘envelope’) of a large structure • detailed high resolution data give us models for domains (or sub-domains) which can be ‘fitted into’ the envelope • ultimate resolution of the method ~0.2 nm, rivalling XRC/NMR particle in vitrified ice: the ribosome particle in vitrified ice: phage T4 & rotavirus case study : GroEL-GroES • important chaperonins • hollow structure • appear to require ATP (hydrolysis ?) for activity particle in vitrified ice: low contrast the chaperonin protein GroEL visualised in vitrified ice (Helen Saibil & co-workers) GroEL GroEL + ATP GroEL+GroES +ATP DLS as a probe for conformational change in GroEL/ES 10.19 11 9.15 10 9 8.54 8.49 8.48 8 Rh(nm) D20w (x10-7) 7 6 5 5.40 3.91 4 3 2.60 2.55 2.51 2.41 2.20 2 ES EL ELES ELES+ ATPgam ma-s ELES+ 0.5mMATP ELES+ 2mMATP GroEL GroEL + ATP GroEL+GroES +ATP case study : pneumolysin • 53 kD protein, toxin secreted from Pneumococcus pneumoniae • among other effects, damages membrane by forming pores • major causative agent of clinical symptoms in pneumonia electron micrographs of pores in membranes caused by pneumolysin RBC / negative staining membrane fragment metal shadowed Pneumolysi n Homology model based upon the known crystallographic structure of Perfringolysin Pneumolysin - homology model ± domain 3, fitted to cryo reconstruction Pneumolysin - EM by microcrystallite decoration (MCD) reveals orientation of domains Pneumolysin - monomers identified within the oligomeric form (i.e. the pore form) case study : myosin S1 • motor domain of the skeletal muscle protein myosin • 2 S1’s / myosin, mass c. 120 kD • ‘cross-bridge’ between myosin and actin filaments, thought to be source of force generation myosin is a 2-stranded coiled-coil protein, with 2 globular (S1) ‘heads’ S1 unit Each S1 unit has a compact region, & a ‘lever arm’ connected via a ‘hinge’ to the main extended ‘tail’ Myosin S1 imaged by Microcrystallite Decoration (no nucleotide present) Effect of nucleotide (ADP) on the conformation of myosin S1 as seen by MCD electron microscopy -ADP +ADP case study : epitope localisation in an engineered vaccine • a new vaccine for Hepatitis B contains 3 antigens, S, S1 & S2, with epitopes on each • but does every particle of ‘hepagene’ contain all 3 of these epitopes ? • Mabs against S, S1 & S2 have been made & conjugated with gold: S 15 nm S1 10 nm S2 5 nm immunolabelling of one epitope (S1) in hepagene using 10 nm-Au labelled Mab triple labelling of 3 epitopes on hepagene Basic Electron Microscopy Arthur Rowe End