OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTOR COURSE EVALUATION SUBJECT PHIL NUMBER 205 SECTION 1 TOTAL ENROLLMENT 25 INSTRUCTOR: Arts & Sciences ACADEMIC TERM: CATEGORY Humanities Response Rate: #RESPONSES Instructor Teaching Effectiveness 1 The Instructor was well prepared for the class. 2 The Instructor was knowledgeable about the subject. 3 The Instructor was readily available for consultation outside of class. 4 The Instructor Communicated his/her subject well. 5 The Instructor Stimulated interest in the course subject. 6 The Instructor demonstrated favorable attitude towards students. 7 The Instructor Encouraged students to think for themselves. 8 The Instructor Evaluated work fairly. 9 The Instructor Provided helpful feedback. 10 Rate instructor's overall teaching effectiveness. Instructor Teaching Effectiveness SECTION STATISTICS Minimum 4.5 Course Evaluation 11 The Course Objectives and requirements were clearly presented. 12 The Course Covered stated objectives. 13 The Course Organization was adequate and logical. 14 The Course Amount of work required appropriate for the credits received. 15 The Course Was appropriately paced. 16 The Course Material was not too difficult. 17 Rate the overall quality of the course. Course Evaluation SECTION STATISTICS Minimum 4.1 Learning Outcomes 18 The Course increased my interest in the subject. 19 In this course I have learned something that I consider valuable. Learning Outcomes SECTION STATISTICS Minimum 4.6 Additional Items 20 The instructor kept the balance between discussion and lecture well suited to this type of course. 21 Class discussion contributed positively to learning in this course. 22 The grading system was clearly explained to students. 23 The examination content is representative of course content and objectives. 24 Instructor was concerned about students¿ progress in the course. 25 Instructor related various topics of the course to each other. 26 The course helped to improve my critical thinking skills. Additional Items SECTION STATISTICS Minimum 4.3 Richard Dean Spring 2003-04 84% SA -----------Percentiles------------ A U D SD AVG: 20 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 Maximum 4.9 18 2 0 0 0 19 2 0 0 0 18 3 0 0 0 18 3 0 0 0 18 3 0 0 0 17 4 0 0 0 13 8 0 0 0 12 7 2 0 0 14 7 0 0 0 16 5 0 0 0 Average 4.8______ Stdev 0.1 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.6 4.5 4.7 4.8 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 Maximum 4.8 11 10 0 0 0 12 9 0 0 0 16 5 0 0 0 9 10 2 0 0 10 10 1 0 0 6 11 4 0 0 14 7 0 0 0 Average 4.5______ Stdev 0.2 4.5 4.6 4.8 4.3 4.4 4.1 4.7 13 7 1 0 0 13 8 0 0 0 Average 4.6______ Stdev 0 4.6 4.6 16 5 0 0 0 15 6 0 0 0 14 6 1 0 0 14 7 0 0 0 8 12 1 0 0 11 10 0 0 0 13 8 0 0 0 Average 4.6______ Stdev 0.2 4.8 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.3 4.5 4.6 21 21 Maximum 4.6 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 Maximum 4.8 OVERALL SCORE 4.6 CATEGORY FACULTY UNIVERSITY 97 96 99 97 97 96 89 90 95 98 96 94 97 97 98 96 90 91 95 97 97 95 97 98 98 95 91 90 95 97 99 98 98 87 94 98 78 86 72 97 87 93 98 81 88 79 97 89 94 98 82 89 79 98 93 94 95 92 89 93 90 92 90 90 91 91 587 994 99 96 96 97 68 84 90 95 Pool Size: 250 OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTOR COURSE EVALUATION SUBJECT PHIL NUMBER 210 SECTION 6 TOTAL ENROLLMENT 25 INSTRUCTOR: Arts & Sciences ACADEMIC TERM: CATEGORY Humanities Response Rate: #RESPONSES Instructor Teaching Effectiveness 1 The Instructor was well prepared for the class. 2 The Instructor was knowledgeable about the subject. 3 The Instructor was readily available for consultation outside of class. 4 The Instructor Communicated his/her subject well. 5 The Instructor Stimulated interest in the course subject. 6 The Instructor demonstrated favorable attitude towards students. 7 The Instructor Encouraged students to think for themselves. 8 The Instructor Evaluated work fairly. 9 The Instructor Provided helpful feedback. 10 Rate instructor's overall teaching effectiveness. Instructor Teaching Effectiveness SECTION STATISTICS Minimum 3.9 Course Evaluation 11 The Course Objectives and requirements were clearly presented. 12 The Course Covered stated objectives. 13 The Course Organization was adequate and logical. 14 The Course Amount of work required appropriate for the credits received. 15 The Course Was appropriately paced. 16 The Course Material was not too difficult. 17 Rate the overall quality of the course. Course Evaluation SECTION STATISTICS Minimum 3.9 Learning Outcomes 18 The Course increased my interest in the subject. 19 In this course I have learned something that I consider valuable. Learning Outcomes SECTION STATISTICS Minimum 3.8 Additional Items 20 The instructor kept the balance between discussion and lecture well suited to this type of course. 21 Class discussion contributed positively to learning in this course. 22 The grading system was clearly explained to students. 23 The examination content is representative of course content and objectives. 24 Instructor was concerned about students¿ progress in the course. 25 Instructor related various topics of the course to each other. 26 The course helped to improve my critical thinking skills. Additional Items SECTION STATISTICS Minimum 3.9 Richard Dean Spring 2003-04 84% SA -----------Percentiles------------ A U D SD AVG: 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 Maximum 4.6 13 7 1 0 0 11 10 0 0 0 11 9 1 0 0 10 9 2 0 0 10 9 2 0 0 10 9 1 0 1 8 10 3 0 0 4 13 3 0 1 8 9 4 0 0 10 9 2 0 0 Average 4.3______ Stdev 0.2 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.2 3.9 4.2 4.4 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 Maximum 4.3 10 8 3 0 0 10 8 3 0 0 8 11 2 0 0 5 9 7 0 0 7 10 4 0 0 5 11 5 0 0 7 12 2 0 0 Average 4.2______ Stdev 0.2 4.3 4.3 4.3 3.9 4.1 4.0 4.2 21 21 Maximum 4 21 21 21 21 21 20 11 Maximum 4.5 OVERALL SCORE 4.2 3 12 5 0 1 5 12 4 0 0 Average 3.9______ Stdev 0.1 10 8 3 0 0 11 7 3 0 0 11 9 1 0 0 5 10 5 1 0 6 7 8 0 0 7 10 3 0 0 3 6 2 0 0 Average 4.2______ Stdev 0.2 3.8 4.0 4.3 4.4 4.5 3.9 3.9 4.2 4.1 CATEGORY FACULTY UNIVERSITY 73 56 79 65 69 61 51 41 57 70 76 59 81 69 77 65 58 42 62 75 79 62 82 71 77 66 59 43 63 78 59 66 68 67 68 70 49 59 61 75 69 69 72 51 67 72 80 72 72 74 52 68 73 80 70 76 77 53 52 49 50 46 48 52 49 46 587 994 64 76 91 28 32 57 51 61 Pool Size: 250 OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTOR COURSE EVALUATION SUBJECT PHIL NUMBER 210 SECTION 7 TOTAL ENROLLMENT 24 INSTRUCTOR: Arts & Sciences ACADEMIC TERM: CATEGORY Humanities Response Rate: #RESPONSES Instructor Teaching Effectiveness 1 The Instructor was well prepared for the class. 2 The Instructor was knowledgeable about the subject. 3 The Instructor was readily available for consultation outside of class. 4 The Instructor Communicated his/her subject well. 5 The Instructor Stimulated interest in the course subject. 6 The Instructor demonstrated favorable attitude towards students. 7 The Instructor Encouraged students to think for themselves. 8 The Instructor Evaluated work fairly. 9 The Instructor Provided helpful feedback. 10 Rate instructor's overall teaching effectiveness. Instructor Teaching Effectiveness SECTION STATISTICS Minimum 4.3 Course Evaluation 11 The Course Objectives and requirements were clearly presented. 12 The Course Covered stated objectives. 13 The Course Organization was adequate and logical. 14 The Course Amount of work required appropriate for the credits received. 15 The Course Was appropriately paced. 16 The Course Material was not too difficult. 17 Rate the overall quality of the course. Course Evaluation SECTION STATISTICS Minimum 4.3 Learning Outcomes 18 The Course increased my interest in the subject. 19 In this course I have learned something that I consider valuable. Learning Outcomes SECTION STATISTICS Minimum 4 Additional Items 20 The instructor kept the balance between discussion and lecture well suited to this type of course. 21 Class discussion contributed positively to learning in this course. 22 The grading system was clearly explained to students. 23 The examination content is representative of course content and objectives. 24 Instructor was concerned about students¿ progress in the course. 25 Instructor related various topics of the course to each other. 26 The course helped to improve my critical thinking skills. Additional Items SECTION STATISTICS Minimum 4.3 Richard Dean Spring 2003-04 83% SA -----------Percentiles------------ A U D SD AVG: 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Maximum 4.7 14 5 1 0 0 13 5 2 0 0 13 5 2 0 0 12 5 3 0 0 10 8 2 0 0 11 7 1 0 1 10 6 4 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 7 3 0 0 12 7 1 0 0 Average 4.5______ Stdev 0.1 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.4 4.6 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Maximum 4.6 10 8 2 0 0 8 10 2 0 0 11 9 0 0 0 11 7 2 0 0 11 8 1 0 0 7 11 2 0 0 12 6 2 0 0 Average 4.4______ Stdev 0.1 4.4 4.3 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.3 4.5 20 20 Maximum 4.3 20 20 20 20 20 20 4 Maximum 4.6 OVERALL SCORE 4.4 6 9 3 2 0 10 7 2 0 1 Average 4.2______ Stdev 0.2 11 7 2 0 0 12 7 1 0 0 11 9 0 0 0 11 6 3 0 0 11 4 5 0 0 9 9 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 Average 4.5______ Stdev 0.1 4.0 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.5 CATEGORY FACULTY UNIVERSITY 84 70 86 75 69 71 63 90 76 87 85 71 87 78 77 74 69 91 78 89 86 73 88 80 77 75 70 90 80 91 79 82 84 75 68 93 92 93 83 92 78 69 93 92 93 88 94 81 72 94 93 94 89 94 88 89 90 66 77 65 76 62 73 74 73 69 587 994 84 91 96 80 68 73 81 89 Pool Size: 250 OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTOR COURSE EVALUATION Arts & Sciences ACADEMIC TERM: Spring 2003-04 INSTRUCTOR: Richard Dean