OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND ASSESSMENT
INSTRUCTOR COURSE EVALUATION
SUBJECT
PHIL
NUMBER
205
SECTION
1
TOTAL ENROLLMENT
25
INSTRUCTOR:
Arts & Sciences
ACADEMIC TERM:
CATEGORY
Humanities
Response Rate:
#RESPONSES
Instructor Teaching Effectiveness
1 The Instructor was well prepared for the class.
2 The Instructor was knowledgeable about the subject.
3 The Instructor was readily available for consultation outside of class.
4 The Instructor Communicated his/her subject well.
5 The Instructor Stimulated interest in the course subject.
6 The Instructor demonstrated favorable attitude towards students.
7 The Instructor Encouraged students to think for themselves.
8 The Instructor Evaluated work fairly.
9 The Instructor Provided helpful feedback.
10 Rate instructor's overall teaching effectiveness.
Instructor Teaching Effectiveness SECTION STATISTICS
Minimum 4.5
Course Evaluation
11 The Course Objectives and requirements were clearly presented.
12 The Course Covered stated objectives.
13 The Course Organization was adequate and logical.
14 The Course Amount of work required appropriate for the credits received.
15 The Course Was appropriately paced.
16 The Course Material was not too difficult.
17 Rate the overall quality of the course.
Course Evaluation SECTION STATISTICS
Minimum 4.1
Learning Outcomes
18 The Course increased my interest in the subject.
19 In this course I have learned something that I consider valuable.
Learning Outcomes SECTION STATISTICS
Minimum 4.6
Additional Items
20 The instructor kept the balance between discussion and lecture well suited to this type of course.
21 Class discussion contributed positively to learning in this course.
22 The grading system was clearly explained to students.
23 The examination content is representative of course content and objectives.
24 Instructor was concerned about students¿ progress in the course.
25 Instructor related various topics of the course to each other.
26 The course helped to improve my critical thinking skills.
Additional Items SECTION STATISTICS
Minimum 4.3
Richard Dean
Spring 2003-04
84%
SA
-----------Percentiles------------
A
U
D
SD AVG:
20
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
Maximum 4.9
18
2
0
0
0
19
2
0
0
0
18
3
0
0
0
18
3
0
0
0
18
3
0
0
0
17
4
0
0
0
13
8
0
0
0
12
7
2
0
0
14
7
0
0
0
16
5
0
0
0
Average 4.8______ Stdev 0.1
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.8
4.6
4.5
4.7
4.8
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
Maximum 4.8
11
10
0
0
0
12
9
0
0
0
16
5
0
0
0
9
10
2
0
0
10
10
1
0
0
6
11
4
0
0
14
7
0
0
0
Average 4.5______ Stdev 0.2
4.5
4.6
4.8
4.3
4.4
4.1
4.7
13
7
1
0
0
13
8
0
0
0
Average 4.6______ Stdev 0
4.6
4.6
16
5
0
0
0
15
6
0
0
0
14
6
1
0
0
14
7
0
0
0
8
12
1
0
0
11
10
0
0
0
13
8
0
0
0
Average 4.6______ Stdev 0.2
4.8
4.7
4.6
4.7
4.3
4.5
4.6
21
21
Maximum 4.6
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
Maximum 4.8
OVERALL SCORE 4.6
CATEGORY
FACULTY
UNIVERSITY
97
96
99
97
97
96
89
90
95
98
96
94
97
97
98
96
90
91
95
97
97
95
97
98
98
95
91
90
95
97
99
98
98
87
94
98
78
86
72
97
87
93
98
81
88
79
97
89
94
98
82
89
79
98
93
94
95
92
89
93
90
92
90
90
91
91
587
994
99
96
96
97
68
84
90
95
Pool Size: 250
OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND ASSESSMENT
INSTRUCTOR COURSE EVALUATION
SUBJECT
PHIL
NUMBER
210
SECTION
6
TOTAL ENROLLMENT
25
INSTRUCTOR:
Arts & Sciences
ACADEMIC TERM:
CATEGORY
Humanities
Response Rate:
#RESPONSES
Instructor Teaching Effectiveness
1 The Instructor was well prepared for the class.
2 The Instructor was knowledgeable about the subject.
3 The Instructor was readily available for consultation outside of class.
4 The Instructor Communicated his/her subject well.
5 The Instructor Stimulated interest in the course subject.
6 The Instructor demonstrated favorable attitude towards students.
7 The Instructor Encouraged students to think for themselves.
8 The Instructor Evaluated work fairly.
9 The Instructor Provided helpful feedback.
10 Rate instructor's overall teaching effectiveness.
Instructor Teaching Effectiveness SECTION STATISTICS
Minimum 3.9
Course Evaluation
11 The Course Objectives and requirements were clearly presented.
12 The Course Covered stated objectives.
13 The Course Organization was adequate and logical.
14 The Course Amount of work required appropriate for the credits received.
15 The Course Was appropriately paced.
16 The Course Material was not too difficult.
17 Rate the overall quality of the course.
Course Evaluation SECTION STATISTICS
Minimum 3.9
Learning Outcomes
18 The Course increased my interest in the subject.
19 In this course I have learned something that I consider valuable.
Learning Outcomes SECTION STATISTICS
Minimum 3.8
Additional Items
20 The instructor kept the balance between discussion and lecture well suited to this type of course.
21 Class discussion contributed positively to learning in this course.
22 The grading system was clearly explained to students.
23 The examination content is representative of course content and objectives.
24 Instructor was concerned about students¿ progress in the course.
25 Instructor related various topics of the course to each other.
26 The course helped to improve my critical thinking skills.
Additional Items SECTION STATISTICS
Minimum 3.9
Richard Dean
Spring 2003-04
84%
SA
-----------Percentiles------------
A
U
D
SD AVG:
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
Maximum 4.6
13
7
1
0
0
11
10
0
0
0
11
9
1
0
0
10
9
2
0
0
10
9
2
0
0
10
9
1
0
1
8
10
3
0
0
4
13
3
0
1
8
9
4
0
0
10
9
2
0
0
Average 4.3______ Stdev 0.2
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.2
3.9
4.2
4.4
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
Maximum 4.3
10
8
3
0
0
10
8
3
0
0
8
11
2
0
0
5
9
7
0
0
7
10
4
0
0
5
11
5
0
0
7
12
2
0
0
Average 4.2______ Stdev 0.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
3.9
4.1
4.0
4.2
21
21
Maximum 4
21
21
21
21
21
20
11
Maximum 4.5
OVERALL SCORE 4.2
3
12
5
0
1
5
12
4
0
0
Average 3.9______ Stdev 0.1
10
8
3
0
0
11
7
3
0
0
11
9
1
0
0
5
10
5
1
0
6
7
8
0
0
7
10
3
0
0
3
6
2
0
0
Average 4.2______ Stdev 0.2
3.8
4.0
4.3
4.4
4.5
3.9
3.9
4.2
4.1
CATEGORY
FACULTY
UNIVERSITY
73
56
79
65
69
61
51
41
57
70
76
59
81
69
77
65
58
42
62
75
79
62
82
71
77
66
59
43
63
78
59
66
68
67
68
70
49
59
61
75
69
69
72
51
67
72
80
72
72
74
52
68
73
80
70
76
77
53
52
49
50
46
48
52
49
46
587
994
64
76
91
28
32
57
51
61
Pool Size: 250
OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND ASSESSMENT
INSTRUCTOR COURSE EVALUATION
SUBJECT
PHIL
NUMBER
210
SECTION
7
TOTAL ENROLLMENT
24
INSTRUCTOR:
Arts & Sciences
ACADEMIC TERM:
CATEGORY
Humanities
Response Rate:
#RESPONSES
Instructor Teaching Effectiveness
1 The Instructor was well prepared for the class.
2 The Instructor was knowledgeable about the subject.
3 The Instructor was readily available for consultation outside of class.
4 The Instructor Communicated his/her subject well.
5 The Instructor Stimulated interest in the course subject.
6 The Instructor demonstrated favorable attitude towards students.
7 The Instructor Encouraged students to think for themselves.
8 The Instructor Evaluated work fairly.
9 The Instructor Provided helpful feedback.
10 Rate instructor's overall teaching effectiveness.
Instructor Teaching Effectiveness SECTION STATISTICS
Minimum 4.3
Course Evaluation
11 The Course Objectives and requirements were clearly presented.
12 The Course Covered stated objectives.
13 The Course Organization was adequate and logical.
14 The Course Amount of work required appropriate for the credits received.
15 The Course Was appropriately paced.
16 The Course Material was not too difficult.
17 Rate the overall quality of the course.
Course Evaluation SECTION STATISTICS
Minimum 4.3
Learning Outcomes
18 The Course increased my interest in the subject.
19 In this course I have learned something that I consider valuable.
Learning Outcomes SECTION STATISTICS
Minimum 4
Additional Items
20 The instructor kept the balance between discussion and lecture well suited to this type of course.
21 Class discussion contributed positively to learning in this course.
22 The grading system was clearly explained to students.
23 The examination content is representative of course content and objectives.
24 Instructor was concerned about students¿ progress in the course.
25 Instructor related various topics of the course to each other.
26 The course helped to improve my critical thinking skills.
Additional Items SECTION STATISTICS
Minimum 4.3
Richard Dean
Spring 2003-04
83%
SA
-----------Percentiles------------
A
U
D
SD AVG:
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Maximum 4.7
14
5
1
0
0
13
5
2
0
0
13
5
2
0
0
12
5
3
0
0
10
8
2
0
0
11
7
1
0
1
10
6
4
0
0
10
10
0
0
0
10
7
3
0
0
12
7
1
0
0
Average 4.5______ Stdev 0.1
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.5
4.4
4.6
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Maximum 4.6
10
8
2
0
0
8
10
2
0
0
11
9
0
0
0
11
7
2
0
0
11
8
1
0
0
7
11
2
0
0
12
6
2
0
0
Average 4.4______ Stdev 0.1
4.4
4.3
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.3
4.5
20
20
Maximum 4.3
20
20
20
20
20
20
4
Maximum 4.6
OVERALL SCORE 4.4
6
9
3
2
0
10
7
2
0
1
Average 4.2______ Stdev 0.2
11
7
2
0
0
12
7
1
0
0
11
9
0
0
0
11
6
3
0
0
11
4
5
0
0
9
9
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
Average 4.5______ Stdev 0.1
4.0
4.3
4.5
4.6
4.6
4.4
4.3
4.4
4.5
CATEGORY
FACULTY
UNIVERSITY
84
70
86
75
69
71
63
90
76
87
85
71
87
78
77
74
69
91
78
89
86
73
88
80
77
75
70
90
80
91
79
82
84
75
68
93
92
93
83
92
78
69
93
92
93
88
94
81
72
94
93
94
89
94
88
89
90
66
77
65
76
62
73
74
73
69
587
994
84
91
96
80
68
73
81
89
Pool Size: 250
OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND ASSESSMENT
INSTRUCTOR COURSE EVALUATION
Arts & Sciences
ACADEMIC TERM:
Spring 2003-04
INSTRUCTOR:
Richard Dean