2010 International Symposium on Mechatronic and Biomedical Engineering & Applications 2010 年機電&醫學工程與應用國際研討會 Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 正修科技大學 臺灣、高雄 2010/11/09 The biological reactions of Paramecium in the different ultrasonic frequencies exposed Yi-Cheng Huang Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cheng Shiu University E-mail: huang@csu.edu.tw (NSC 95-2221-E-230-005) dynamic, Paramecium Abstract 1. Introduction The effects of ultrasonic irradiation at different frequencies, i.e. 0.5, 1, and 2.25 MHz, on the activation The use of ultrasound in the biological or medical of the single cell creature biological reaction have been application has been a subject of research and investigated. The ability shown by ultrasound in development for many years. Under appropriate promoting and/or accelerating many reactions has been conditions, ultrasound can produce profound biological shown to be a useful field. In this paper, it is necessary effects through its action on specific tissues. The to ascertain an appropriate frequency value of interactions ultrasound, capable of driving an obviously biological mammalian tissues reaction; thus, the oscillation of the cells in response to investigation of growth and structural alterations. The the using lower or higher order animals, much interest has arisen Rayleigh-Plesset’s bubble activation theory and the in regarding the ultrasound induced biological effects, numerical analysis. According to the simulation, the which have demonstrated the potential both to damage resonant frequency of the Paramecium vacuole is and/or stimulate tissues. Reporting on the effects of among 0.54 ~ 1.24 MHz. In the experiments, the ultrasound on Paramecium, Yang noted that the resonant (1 MHz), approach the resonant (0.5 MHz) and maximum relative growth rate was increasing 18% with non-resonant (2.25 MHz) frequencies of various 1MHz ultrasound exposure under certain conditions [1]. intensities were employed. Thus, by careful regulation of the acoustic parameters, ultrasound radiation is simulated between ultrasonic have frequencies and been reported on the The samples irradiated from different frequencies the damaged or beneficial results could be available. of ultrasound are likely to cause the changes of the cell The acoustic parameters are including the frequency, proliferation. When the 1 MHz frequencies of lower intensity, waveform or exposure time and so on. This intensities of ultrasound was irradiated in the samples, paper is to seek the correlation between ultrasonic the cell numbers was higher than that of exposed to the frequencies exposure and the Paramecium biological other frequencies. For the non-resonant frequency reaction, as an indication of fundamental interactions ultrasound exposure, the increase or decrease of cell between proliferation was observed which did not depend upon suspensions. the irradiated intensity range in the experiments. Keywords: ultrasound, biological effects, bubble the acoustic parameters and cells in The most important approach to the study of bioeffects of physical agents is the mechanistic one. For 2010 International Symposium on Mechatronic and Biomedical Engineering & Applications 2010 年機電&醫學工程與應用國際研討會 Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 正修科技大學 臺灣、高雄 2010/11/09 ultrasound, this approach leads to consideration of non-viable cells into the medium during the first 24 thermal and nonthermal mechanisms. The thermal hours. mechanism involves the conversion of ultrasonic energy The purpose of this study is then to explore the into heat, and the resulting elevated temperatures cause relationship between the ultrasonic frequencies and the the harmful bioeffects. Nonthermal mechanisms depend activation of the Paramecium cells at its growth on whether or not the cavitation phenomenon occurs. condition. The Paramecium, which possesses many Cavitation can be defined as the interaction between the features typical of higher-order animal cells, is an ultrasonic field and the gas filled structure in the appropriate choice for this study. The vacuole medium. For convenience, cavitation may include the organelles of the specific structure of Paramecium are two types: (1) gas body activation (or stable cavitation) the subjects to study the resonant effects in ultrasonic and (2) inertial cavitation (or transient cavitation) [2]. system. Additionally, cells in vitro can be exposed to a Gas body activation only requires a lower level of carefully setup of ultrasonic field under conditions ultrasound intensity to activate a pre-existing gas body. which minimize thermal effects and enhance the The gas body may be supported by the cellular nonthermal mechanisms of action. In this study, the structures. Inertial cavitation needs a higher ultrasound physical theory for the oscillation of the bubble mode in intensity to induce the microbubble. response to the ultrasound radiation is adapted from Cell suspensions have been used in many studies Rayleigh-Plesset’s bubble activation theory [7] and is of the mechanisms of ultrasound on the cells and their compared to the numerical analysis results. This theory components [3-4]. The cell suspension systems offer can calculate the resonant frequency of the bubbles in many advantages, including considerable control of the liquid medium. However, the stable cavitation does environmental, biological and exposure parameters. not exist in most cell structure. It still raises a question: Coakley and Hampton [5] used the 1 MHz ultrasound to Is it possible that the bubble-like structure can be irradiate the suspension of amoeba. It possesses many activated in the resonant frequency of ultrasonic fields? features typical of higher-order animal cells. The To find out the evidence is the main objective in this samples were irradiated the ultrasound at 515 W/cm2 for paper. Though the target organelle: the contractile 10 minutes. The cavitations produced by ultrasound vacuoles of the Paramecium do not match the were found the correlation between the number of assumptions cavitations occurring and the decrease in cell numbers. completely (the contractile vacuoles are not filled with Kaufman and Miller [6] used the continuous ultrasound air totally). It can provide an initial direction to study of 1 MHz and the axial intensity of 2.5 W/cm2 to expose the resonant biological effects of the ultrasound in the the suspensions of Chinese hamster V-79 cells for 1 particular organelles of the cell structure. Studies of this minute. They found that the attached cells were little kind are likely to provide new insights in the resonant increased in the cell growth rate for 24 hours after effects of the cells. Based on the dimensions of the sonication. Then the cell numbers will return to normal vacuoles, the theoretical resonant frequencies of the growth approximately 36 hours after sonication. The vacuoles can be calculated. According to the theoretical cell growth would slow down due to an approximate solution, the exposure frequency of the ultrasound can balance between proliferation of viable cells and loss of divide into two parts; that is, resonant and non-resonant of the Rayleigh-Plesset’s theory 2010 International Symposium on Mechatronic and Biomedical Engineering & Applications 2010 年機電&醫學工程與應用國際研討會 Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 正修科技大學 臺灣、高雄 2010/11/09 frequencies. There are three different ultrasonic the effects of ultrasonic irradiation at different transducers were employed in the experiment, which frequencies and intensities on the activation of bubbles were operated at central frequencies of 0.5, 1, and 2.25 are the important factors to induce a change of inside MHz, respectively. the cells. The basic dynamical problem of the activation Throughout the above-mentioned review, effects of bubbles is to determine the fluid medium system, of ultrasound on creatures have been reported for the together with the motion of bubble wall (the bubbles’ most part. Not only the exposure frequency of field), when under the influence of an acoustic pressure ultrasound, but the intensity is an important factor to (the acoustic field) [7]. induce the bioeffects. It must be realized that by careful The liquid medium is only one phase present and regulation of the ultrasonic intensity, the inhibitive or the liquid can be characterized by physical parameters, beneficial bioeffects could be available. In the such as temperature (T), viscosity (η), density (ρ) and experiments, each of the ultrasonic transducers was surface tension (σ), etc. The acoustic field comprised operated at several intensities varied from 0 to 0.5 of acoustic waves traveling through the liquid medium, mW/cm2 (SPTP). The cell proliferation analysis was and it can be characterized by the frequency f = ω/2π used as a model to discuss the biological effect of and by the pressure P = PAsinωt where PA is the peak ultrasound. The growth conditions for each of the acoustic pressure amplitude value. The bubbles’ field populations constitutes the population of gas filled cavities. A examined are described predictions obtained by the resonant theory. physical description of such cavities can be achieved by taking into account their volume, and the parameters of 2. Theory their fluid content; i.e., the pressure, density and the The low amplitude oscillations of bubbles were politropic ratio γ of the gas. able to characterization by linear resonance theory of The acoustic wave traveling through the medium simplified model system. The model describes the low will induce the bubbles that will pulsate with a radial amplitude pulsation of free spherical bubbles as motion of their walls. The bubble’s wall motion can be discussed by Coakley and Nyborg [8]. Since the bubble described by the Rayleigh-Plesset equation: activation is typically studied under low power oscillation conditions, the relatively simple linear theory is adequate for analyzing most experimental results. RR 3 2 1 2 R 0 3 2 4R R [( P0 )( ) P ] 2 R0 R R R (1) Where R0 is the bubbles’ radius at equilibrium, P 0 A reasonable definition of bubble dynamics is: the is the gas pressure above the surface of the liquid and induction and maintenance of oscillation by the the P∞ is the pressure in the liquid far from the bubble. interaction of an ultrasonic field with stabilized volumes By using the suitable approximations, for example, in a liquid. The oscillations are often associated more substituting R = R0 + r, where r/R0 > 1, expanding in with the structure than with the pulsation of the bubbles. powers of 1/R0 and retaining only the first-order terms, This relationship needs to study carefully what effects Equation (1) can reduce to the more concise form: would appear in the surroundings of the activated bubbles, including the quantitative comparisons between theory and experimental results. In this study, r r2 r PA R0 sin t . Where the resonant frequency (2) r, under the 2010 International Symposium on Mechatronic and Biomedical Engineering & Applications 2010 年機電&醫學工程與應用國際研討會 Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 正修科技大學 臺灣、高雄 2010/11/09 undamped linear oscillations, is given by: ( r ) 2 raised the following question: Whether the ultrasound 1 2 2 [3 ( P0 ) ] 2 R0 R0 R0 . induce the resonant effects in the cavitation-like (3) structure. The objective of this paper is to investigate The eigen-frequency of this equation is similar to the biological effects of growth conditions of that referring to a linear oscillation system under an Paramecium in a cavitation-like cell structure induced impressed sinusoidal pressure. If one considers the by the ultrasound. For the theoretical results, as this viscous forces of the bubble surface, the resonant phenomenon can be considered as a form of biological frequency becomes catalysis, it can be used to accelerate the cell division 2 2 ( r ) 2 r 2 R0 2 . and induce a activation reaction, and to ensure assuring maximum efficiency. This work was to demonstrate the (4) If a bubble of equilibrium radius R0 is submitted relationship between the theoretical vacuole oscillation to an acoustic field, its wall will pulsate steadily with system and the activation reaction of Paramecium cell the same frequency of the driving field. As this growth. frequency approaches the eigen-frequency ω γ , resonant effects would occur. In this research, the physical parameters are measured such as the temperature T = 20.0 ℃, the politropic ratio γ = 1.4, the surface tension σ = 1.63~2.57 × 104 dyn/cm, the density of the liquid ρ= 0.99821g/cm3 , the hydrostatic pressure P0 = 760 torr, and the viscosity factor η= 1.002 × 10-2 g/cm•s. By using the values of above parameters, the resonant frequency of Paramecium can be obtained. The resonant frequency may be calculated and falls into the range of 0.54 ~ 1.24 MHz for the Figure 1. The numerical analysis of the Paramecium cells by using the ANSYS software. vacuole radius R0 of the Paramecium in the range of 3~7 μm. The contractile vacuoles of Paramecium are composed of pools of distinct membranes which are associated sequentially in space. Compared to the the theoretical results, the numerical analysis is used the ANSYS software to calculate the resonant frequencies. The model of the contractile vacuoles are illustrated in the Figure 1. The resonant frequency can be calculated and falls into the range of 0.24 ~ 1.45 MHz. Unlike the spherical bubble mode, the contractile vacuole is filled with fluid more than air. However, the contractile vacuoles are the observed and stable structure inside the cell, it can be treated as a cavitation-like model. It also 3. Methods Cell culture and proliferation The cell types used in the experiments were Paramecium samples. The cells were grown in suspension using distilled water supplemented with essential medium. They were cultured in the incubator at 28 ± 0.1℃ and were harvested for approximately 7 days before they could be collected for experimental use. The cell suspensions were diluted by the addition of growth medium to yield cell densities of 0.15 × 103 cells/ml. From this moment, the samples would transfer 2010 International Symposium on Mechatronic and Biomedical Engineering & Applications 2010 年機電&醫學工程與應用國際研討會 Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 正修科技大學 臺灣、高雄 2010/11/09 to the exposure chamber with 5 ml volumes. The visible positioning system, with the beam directed exposure chamber consisted of a cylindrical shape hole horizontally from one end of the tank toward an at the center. A 2 mm thick plastic plate sealed the front absorptive material which covered the far end. The and the back of the chamber. Following the transfer of Neoprene, used as a wave absorber was placed in the the samples to the exposure chamber, the suspensions tank opposite the transducer to minimize reflections. were then used directly in the experiments. In the Three different narrow band transducers (Panametrics) exposure duration, the variation of the temperature in were employed for this study, which were operated at the chamber was detected and maintained at the range frequencies of 0.5, 1, and 2.25 MHz. of ±0.1℃; therefore, the thermal mechanisms would The light microscope fitted with a digital video not appear in the experiments. After exposure, the cells camera was compatible of taking the static state and the were maintained in the same chamber to prevent the movement picture. The acoustic fields were measured environment change of the cell culture. with a bilaminar polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) A light microscope fitted with a graticule eyepiece hydrophone (Miniature PVDF Ultrasonic Hydrophone was used to measure the cell numbers. Relative growth Probe MH28-10). The intensity at the position of the number is defined as the ratio of the cell numbers of sample chamber was obtained by measuring in a plane irradiated samples to the numbers of control samples. perpendicular to the axis of the beam. The sample Counts of the numbers of control samples and the chamber was placed near the transition zone away from numbers of irradiated samples were made before and the near field region of the beam. The function after the ultrasonic exposure. Sampling mode was generator was a HP 33120A unit, produced by Hewlett among the ten randomly selected regions of each Packard. This apparatus can be set to work with chamber. Each region was obtained a volume of arbitrary waveform. approximately 5 μl. The sampling rate is defined as the In the experiments, the exposure intensities are ratio of the sampling volume of the cell suspension to important for understanding the bioeffects of ultrasound. the total volume of the cell suspension in the chamber. Figure 3 shows the flow chart of the experimental In the experiment, the sampling rate was about 0.016. procedure. The waveform in this experimental series To find out the conditions of cell proliferation of each was set to the tone pulse mode, pulsing 1:1. The pulse period in the chamber, the chamber was set to culture in repetition frequency of each pulse was 25 kHz. incubator at the temperature 28 ± 0.1℃, the humidity Treatments were of 5 minutes exposure duration and was about 70 %. were given one time. After irradiation for one hour, the Instrumentation number of the Paramecium cells in the treated and The sonications were carried out in a water-filled control samples were counted. In addition, the tank. An exposure system comprised of ultrasound controlled and treated cells would be re-incubated up to transducer operating in alternating pulses was devised, 12 hr. The next counting procedure was at 12 hr (the and is illustrated in Figure 2. In Figure 2, the exposure double time of the Paramecium was about 11.22 hr) chamber was constructed from thin wall plastic after exposed. In the experiments, the different containers. The ultrasound transducers and the loaded intensities of ultrasound were used to expose the sample chambers were mounted and positioned on a samples and the change of the relative growth number 2010 International Symposium on Mechatronic and Biomedical Engineering & Applications 2010 年機電&醫學工程與應用國際研討會 Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 正修科技大學 臺灣、高雄 2010/11/09 was observed. The observation of the experiments can illustrated in Figures 4 ~ 6. The cell number is defined define the relationship between the cell proliferation and as the ratio of the cell numbers of the treated samples to the irradiated frequency. For a given frequency, that of the control samples. All the results are reported exposures of the Paramecium were made over a range as the arithmetic mean + standard deviation of the mean. of intensities spanning 0 to 0.5 mW/cm2. The power The uncertainty for each point is shown by the vertical amplifier (Amplifier Research 25A250A) was used to bars in all figures. To further observe the long-term generate the transducer output intensities of 0.1, 2, 4, 6 effect of ultrasound, the cell numbers were counted in 1 and 8 levels. Nevertheless, the cell counting method was and 12 hours after exposure. checked by comparing pairs of counts from the three containers operated at the same procedures. camera The samples after irradiated at different frequencies or exposure intensities in the culture containers are shown as a relative cell number and illustrated in Figures 4 ~ 6. All the results are reported PVDF hydrophone PC as the arithmetic mean + standard deviation of the mean. The uncertainty for each point is shown by the vertical Cell Samples microscope bars in all figures. To further observe the long-term ultrasonic transducer effect of ultrasound, the cell numbers were counted in 1 and 12 hours after exposure. water tank absorptive material Figure 4 shows the cell number of the Paramecium cells after irradiated at 0.5 MHz frequency oscilloscope function generator power amplifier of ultrasound. It should be noted that the range of Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the isonation and resonant frequency was from 0.54 to 1.24 MHz (the measurement apparatus used. theoretical result is about 0.24 ~ 1.45 MHz); therefore, chosen exposure intensity controlled samples the irradiation frequency of 0.5 MHz was approached to the resonant range. For the case of one hour after treated samples exposure, it was observed that as the intensity increased, sham exposure the harmful or beneficial effects were not apparently 5 minutes exposure 1 hr incubate 1 hr incubate occurred. As can be seen in the figure, the cell numbers appear to change slowly after 1 hour ultrasonic exposed. count the cells The exposed cell numbers is lower than the control cells 12 hr incubate count the cells in the period. It seems that irradiating at 0.5 MHz Figure 3. The flow chart of the experiment used to study frequency and increasing the intensities to 0.5 mW/cm2 the ultrasonic biological effects. would not reveal any greater variation in the cell proliferation. The inhibition effects are slightly better 4. Results and discussion The samples after irradiated at than that of the increase effects. The other result in this different figure is the cell numbers measured for approximately frequencies or exposure intensities in the culture 12 hr after exposure. As noted in the figure, the cell containers are shown as a relative cell number and numbers for 12 hr after exposure was better than the 2010 International Symposium on Mechatronic and Biomedical Engineering & Applications 2010 年機電&醫學工程與應用國際研討會 Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 正修科技大學 臺灣、高雄 2010/11/09 control cells (except the level 0.1 and 2, the difference frequency. Twelve hours later after exposure, the trend at the other levels are almost double than the control of the cell proliferation was not reveal at all exposure cells). It is obviously that the cell creature has the level. In view of the above fact, it is clear that the capability to maintain the cell density to a certain degree Paramecium cells were not sensitive to ultrasound in the suspension. If the cell numbers were influenced exposure at non-resonant frequencies. by external factor, the cell growth would return to exposure frequency 0.5 MHz normal growth situation approximately 12 hr after Kaufman and Miller’s works [6]. The cell suspensions irradiated by 1 MHz ultrasound with different intensity levels are shown in cell numbers(*1000) 10 sonication. The same results are reported in the 8 6 1hr after exposure 4 12hr after exposure 2 0 control Figure 5. This frequency is in the range of theoretical 0.1 2 4 6 8 power amplifer output level resonant frequency. It can be seen that the relative cell numbers appear apparently variation. The maximum cell Figure 4. Paramecium cell numbers as a function of the number is at level 8 of the power amplifier output. It exposure intensity, by presenting the data for the means that the treated cells were increased almost four frequency of 0.5 MHz. Error bars represent the standard times than the controlled cells. It seems possible that the errors of the means. resonant effects might occur in the living cells. If the exposure frequency 1MHz exposure intensity of the resonant frequency was fall in 10 and increase the proliferation. It should be noted that the results of 12 hr after exposure from Figure 5 was different to that of the results shown in Figure 4. The cell numbers between the results of 12 hr are smaller than that of the results of 1 hr. It is possible that the cell numbers(*1000) this intensity range, the cell division would rise rapidly 8 6 1hr after exposure 4 12hr after exposure 2 0 control 0.1 2 4 6 8 power amplifier output level proliferation of Paramecium cell was apparently increased after 1 hr in the experiment. The density of Figure 5. Paramecium cell numbers as a function of the cell suspension was increased rapidly. Thus, the cell exposure intensity, by presenting the data for the growth would slow down due to an approximate balance frequency of 1 MHz. between proliferation of viable cells and loss of non-viable cells during the first 12 hours. The cell numbers of exposed to 2.25 MHz ultrasonic frequency are presented in Figure 6. It was observed that the cell numbers at all exposure levels are lower than control cells; however, the difference was not apparently. It means that the inhibitive effects of ultrasonic irradiation were not apparently at higher 2010 International Symposium on Mechatronic and Biomedical Engineering & Applications 2010 年機電&醫學工程與應用國際研討會 Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 正修科技大學 臺灣、高雄 2010/11/09 gratefully acknowledged. exposure frequency 2.25MHz cell numbers(*1000) 10 References 8 [1] S.K. Yang and Y.C. Huang, Biological Effect of 6 1hr after exposure 12hr after exposure 4 Paramecium in Diffused Ultrasonic Fields, Ultrasonics 39 (2002) 525-531. 2 [2] M.W. Miller, D.L. Miller and A.A. Brayman, A 0 control 0.1 2 4 6 8 Review of in Vitro Bioeffects of Inertial Ultrasonic power amplifer output level Cavitation from a Mechanistic Perspective, Figure 6. Paramecium cell numbers as a function of the Ultrasound in Med. & Biol 22(9) (1996) 1131-1154 exposure intensity, by presenting the data for the [3] Miller D.L., Bao S. and Morris J. E., Sonoporation frequency of 2.25 MHz. of Cultured Cells in the Rotation Tube Exposure System, Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 25(1) (1999) 143-149 5. Conclusion [4] Böhm H., Anthony P., Davey M.R., Briarty L.G., In this study, it is assumed that the growth Power J.B., Lowe K.C., Benes E. and Gröschl M., conditions for any frequency represents a stable Viability of Plant Cell Suspensions Exposed to activation, thus the cell growth would be enhanced or inhibited apparently at the resonant frequency range. If the irradiated frequencies were not in the resonant range, the cell growth would be less active. Comparing the theoretical mode and the experimental results, the data is generally similar to the theoretically expected form. The maximum cell growth numbers correspond to the expected resonant frequencies of the vacuole, and the cell number appeared no significant difference outside the resonant range. The theory for the oscillation of the cell organelles is therefore a useful guide in predicting the most efficiency sonication frequencies, and Homogeneous Ultrasonic Fields of Different Energy Density and Wave Type, Ultrasonics 38(1-8) (2000) 629-632 [5] Coakley W.T. and Hampton D., Quantitative relationships between ultrasonic cavitation and effects upon Amoebae at 1MHz, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 50 (1971) 1546-1553 [6] Kaufman G.E. and Miller M.W., Growth retardation in Chinese Hamster V-79 cells exposed to 1 MHz ultrasound, Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 4 (1978) 139-144 presumably for other unicellular creature. It appeared [7] Cum G., Galli G., Gallo R., and Spadaro A., Role of the possibility to elucidate the complex etiology of the frequency in the ultrasonic activation of chemical effects of ultrasound on Paramecium. reactions, Ultrasonics 30 (1992) 267-270 [8] Coakley W.T., Nyborg W.L., Cavitation: Dynamics of Gas Bubbles; Application. Ultrasound: Its Acknowledgement The financial support by the National Science Council, Republic of China, through Grant NSC 95-2221-E-230-005 of the Cheng Shiu University is Applications in Medicine and Biology, Fry F.J. Editor, Elsevier, New York (1978) 77-159