Lecture No.3-4

advertisement

Medical Imaging Systems 2

Computed

Tomography

Lecture No.3-4

Early History

 “tomos”

 Greek word meaning section

 Sectional imaging methods first developed in

1920’s

Early History:

Conventional Tomography

 first used in 1935

 image produced on film

 Image plane oriented parallel to film

 Anatomy in plane of fulcrum stays in focus

 anatomy outside of fulcrum plane mechanically blurred

Conventional vs Axial

Tomography

Conventional Cut

CT Axial Cut

Conventional Tomography Blurring

 Image produced on film

 Objects above or below fulcrum plane change position on film & thus blur

CT Image

 Not produced on film

 Mathematically reconstructed from many projection measurements of radiation intensity

 Digital Image calculated

Acme

Mini-

Computer

Digital Image

How Did We Go From…

The story concerns these men.

What was their Link?

???

Geoff

Paul, Ringo, George, & John

It Was the Late 1960’s

A lot of the money was going here

Follow the Money

Measure Intensity of a Pencil Beam

X-Ray

Source

Radiation

Detector

CT Image

 Measure a bunch of pencil beam intensities

CT Image

 Now make measurements from every angle

CT Image

 When you get done, multiple pencil beams have gone through every point in body

Image Reconstruction

X-Ray

Source

Projection

(raw)

Data

Radiation

Detector

Acme

Mini-

Computer

Pixel

(calculated)

Data

Digital Image

 2-dimensional array of individual image points calculated

 each point called a pixel

 picture element

 each pixel has a value

 value represents x-ray transmission

(attenuation)

Digital Image Matrix

125 25

199 192

311 111 182 222 176

85 69 133 149 112

77 103 118 139 154 125 120

145 301 256 223 287 256 225

178 322 325 299 353 333 300

Numbers / Gray Shades

 Each number of a digital image corresponds to a gray shade for one pixel

Image Reconstruction

 CT math developed in 1910’s

 Other Applications

 astronomy (sun spot mapping)

 electron microscope imaging

 Nuclear medicine emission tomography

 MRI

CT History

 First test images in 1967

 First clinical images ~ 1971

 First commercial scanner 1972

CT History

 CT math developed in 1910’s

 First commercial scanner 1972

 What took so long?

CT History

 CT made possible by high speed minicomputer

CT Computers

 Old mainframe computers too expensive & bulky to be dedicated to CT

The 1

st

Computer Bug

CT history - Obsolete

Terminology

 CTAT

 computerized transverse axial tomography

 CAT

 computerized axial tomography

 CTTRT

 computerized transaxial transmission reconstructive tomography

 RT

 reconstructive tomography

Data Acquisition

 cross sectional image reconstructed from many straight line transmission measurements made in different directions

Tube

Detector

Translate / Rotate

CT Early Units

4 minute scans

5 minute reconstruction

80 X 80 matrix head only

 water bag fit tightly around head

Beam Translation

 beam collimated to small round spot

 collimated at tube and collimator

X-ray

Tube

Detector

Beam Translation

 Tube/detector translates left to right

 Entire assembly rotates 1 o to right

 Tube/detector translates right to left

X-ray

Tube

Detector

Translate - Rotate

 180 translations in alternate directions

 1 degree rotational increments between translations

Projection Measurements

 Radiation detector generates a voltage proportional to radiation intensity

Image Reconstruction

 Minicomputer does its thing

Analog to Digital

(A to D) conversion

Digital Image Matrix

 Digital Matrix contains many numbers which may be

 Displayed on CRT

Manipulated

Stored

125 25 311 111 182 222 176

199 192

77 103

85

118

69

139

133

154

149

125

112

120

145 301 256 223 287 256 225

178 322 325 299 353 333 300

Digital Image Manipulation

 Window

 Level

 Smoothing

 Edge enhancement

 Slice reformatting

 3D

 derived from multiple axial slices

Digital Image Storage

 Magnetic Disk

 CD

 Tape

 Optical Disk

 PACS archive

 picture archival and communications system

 not part of CT contains images from many modalities allows viewing on connected computers

CT - Improvements

 all CT generations measure same multi-line transmission intensities in many directions

Improvements

Protocol for obtaining many line transmissions

# of line transmissions obtained simultaneously detector location

Overall acquisition speed

2nd Generation CT

 arc beam used instead of pencil beam

 several detectors instead of just one

 detectors intercepted arc

 radiation absorbent septa between detectors

 reduced scatter acted like grid

Tube

Detectors

2nd Generation CT

 arc beam allowed 10 degree rotational increments

 scan times reduced

 20 sec - 2 min

 2 slices obtained simultaneously

 double row of detectors

10 o

3rd Generation CT

 Wide angle fan beam

 rotational motion only / no translation

 detectors rotate with tube

 30 o beam

 Many more detectors

 scan times < 10 seconds

3rd Generation CT

Z-axis orientation perpendicular to page

Patient

4th Generation CT

 Fixed annulus of detectors

 tube rotates (no translation) inside stationary detector ring

 only a fraction of detectors active at once

3 rd & 4 th Generation (Non-spiral) CT

 Tube rotates once around patient

 Table stationary

 data for one slice collected

 Table increments one slice thickness

 Repeat

 Tube rotates opposite direction

3 rd / 4 th Generation Image

Quality Improvements

 Faster scan times

 reduces motion artifacts

 Improved spatial resolution

 Improved contrast resolution

 Increased tube heat capacity

 less wait between scans / patients

 better throughput

Spiral CT

 Continuous rotation of gantry

 Patient moves slowly through gantry

 cables of old scanners allowed only

360 o rotation (or just a little more)

 tube had to stop and reverse direction

 no imaging done during this time

 no delay between slices

 dynamic studies now limited only by tube heating considerations

Spiral CT

Z-axis orientation perpendicular to page

Patient

Multi-slice CT

 Multiple rows of fan beam detectors

 Wider fan beam in axial direction

 Table moves much faster

 Substantially greater throughput

Computer Improvements

 Reconstruction time

 Auto-printing protocols

 Image manipulation

 Backup time

 Slice reformatting

 3D reconstruction

And the ability to do it all simultaneously

Cine CT (Imatron)

 four tungsten target rings surround patient

 replaces conventional x-ray tube

 no moving parts like 4 moving focal spots electron beam sweeps over each annular target ring

 can be done at electronic speeds

2 detector rings

 2 slices detected

 maximum scan rate

 24 frames per second

Imatron Cine CT

(scanned from Medical Imaging Physics, Hendee)

CT Patient Dose

 In theory only image plane exposed

 In reality adjacent slices get some exposure because

 x-ray beam diverges

 interslice scatter

Dose Protocols

 Plain X-ray

 entrance skin exposure

 Mammography

 mean glandular dose

 CT

 Computer tomography dose index (CTDI)

 Multiple-scan average dose (MSAD)

CT Dose depends on

 kVp

 mA

 time

 slice thickness

 filtration

• Noise

• detector efficiency

• collimation

• matrix resolution

• reconstruction algorithm

CT Patient Dose

 Typically 2 - 4 rad

 AAPM has single slice protocol for measuring head & body doses

 More dose required at higher resolution for same noise level

 More dose required to improve noise at same spatial resolution

Resolution

Noise

Dose

Fundamental CT Tradeoff

To improve one requires compromise on another

Noise

Resolution

Dose

New Stuff

 CT Angiography

 CT fluoroscopy

 CT virtual endoscopy / colonoscopy / ??scopy

http://www.iacionline.net/ScannerCTDemo/CTScannerSimulator.html

Download