Medical Imaging Systems 2
Computed
Tomography
Lecture No.3-4
“tomos”
Greek word meaning section
Sectional imaging methods first developed in
1920’s
Early History:
Conventional Tomography
first used in 1935
image produced on film
Image plane oriented parallel to film
Anatomy in plane of fulcrum stays in focus
anatomy outside of fulcrum plane mechanically blurred
Conventional vs Axial
Tomography
Conventional Cut
CT Axial Cut
Conventional Tomography Blurring
Image produced on film
Objects above or below fulcrum plane change position on film & thus blur
Not produced on film
Mathematically reconstructed from many projection measurements of radiation intensity
Digital Image calculated
Acme
Mini-
Computer
Digital Image
The story concerns these men.
What was their Link?
???
Geoff
Paul, Ringo, George, & John
A lot of the money was going here
Measure Intensity of a Pencil Beam
X-Ray
Source
Radiation
Detector
CT Image
Measure a bunch of pencil beam intensities
Now make measurements from every angle
When you get done, multiple pencil beams have gone through every point in body
X-Ray
Source
Projection
(raw)
Data
Radiation
Detector
Acme
Mini-
Computer
Pixel
(calculated)
Data
2-dimensional array of individual image points calculated
each point called a pixel
picture element
each pixel has a value
value represents x-ray transmission
(attenuation)
Digital Image Matrix
125 25
199 192
311 111 182 222 176
85 69 133 149 112
77 103 118 139 154 125 120
145 301 256 223 287 256 225
178 322 325 299 353 333 300
Each number of a digital image corresponds to a gray shade for one pixel
CT math developed in 1910’s
Other Applications
astronomy (sun spot mapping)
electron microscope imaging
Nuclear medicine emission tomography
MRI
First test images in 1967
First clinical images ~ 1971
First commercial scanner 1972
CT math developed in 1910’s
First commercial scanner 1972
What took so long?
CT History
CT made possible by high speed minicomputer
Old mainframe computers too expensive & bulky to be dedicated to CT
st
CT history - Obsolete
Terminology
CTAT
computerized transverse axial tomography
CAT
computerized axial tomography
CTTRT
computerized transaxial transmission reconstructive tomography
RT
reconstructive tomography
cross sectional image reconstructed from many straight line transmission measurements made in different directions
Tube
Detector
4 minute scans
5 minute reconstruction
80 X 80 matrix head only
water bag fit tightly around head
Beam Translation
beam collimated to small round spot
collimated at tube and collimator
X-ray
Tube
Detector
Beam Translation
Tube/detector translates left to right
Entire assembly rotates 1 o to right
Tube/detector translates right to left
X-ray
Tube
Detector
180 translations in alternate directions
1 degree rotational increments between translations
Projection Measurements
Radiation detector generates a voltage proportional to radiation intensity
Minicomputer does its thing
Analog to Digital
(A to D) conversion
Digital Image Matrix
Digital Matrix contains many numbers which may be
Displayed on CRT
Manipulated
Stored
125 25 311 111 182 222 176
199 192
77 103
85
118
69
139
133
154
149
125
112
120
145 301 256 223 287 256 225
178 322 325 299 353 333 300
Digital Image Manipulation
Window
Level
Smoothing
Edge enhancement
Slice reformatting
3D
derived from multiple axial slices
Magnetic Disk
CD
Tape
Optical Disk
PACS archive
picture archival and communications system
not part of CT contains images from many modalities allows viewing on connected computers
CT - Improvements
all CT generations measure same multi-line transmission intensities in many directions
Improvements
Protocol for obtaining many line transmissions
# of line transmissions obtained simultaneously detector location
Overall acquisition speed
arc beam used instead of pencil beam
several detectors instead of just one
detectors intercepted arc
radiation absorbent septa between detectors
reduced scatter acted like grid
Tube
Detectors
arc beam allowed 10 degree rotational increments
scan times reduced
20 sec - 2 min
2 slices obtained simultaneously
double row of detectors
10 o
3rd Generation CT
Wide angle fan beam
rotational motion only / no translation
detectors rotate with tube
30 o beam
Many more detectors
scan times < 10 seconds
3rd Generation CT
Z-axis orientation perpendicular to page
Patient
Fixed annulus of detectors
tube rotates (no translation) inside stationary detector ring
only a fraction of detectors active at once
3 rd & 4 th Generation (Non-spiral) CT
Tube rotates once around patient
Table stationary
data for one slice collected
Table increments one slice thickness
Repeat
Tube rotates opposite direction
3 rd / 4 th Generation Image
Quality Improvements
Faster scan times
reduces motion artifacts
Improved spatial resolution
Improved contrast resolution
Increased tube heat capacity
less wait between scans / patients
better throughput
Spiral CT
Continuous rotation of gantry
Patient moves slowly through gantry
cables of old scanners allowed only
360 o rotation (or just a little more)
tube had to stop and reverse direction
no imaging done during this time
no delay between slices
dynamic studies now limited only by tube heating considerations
Spiral CT
Z-axis orientation perpendicular to page
Patient
Multi-slice CT
Multiple rows of fan beam detectors
Wider fan beam in axial direction
Table moves much faster
Substantially greater throughput
Computer Improvements
Reconstruction time
Auto-printing protocols
Image manipulation
Backup time
Slice reformatting
3D reconstruction
And the ability to do it all simultaneously
four tungsten target rings surround patient
replaces conventional x-ray tube
no moving parts like 4 moving focal spots electron beam sweeps over each annular target ring
can be done at electronic speeds
2 detector rings
2 slices detected
maximum scan rate
24 frames per second
Imatron Cine CT
(scanned from Medical Imaging Physics, Hendee)
In theory only image plane exposed
In reality adjacent slices get some exposure because
x-ray beam diverges
interslice scatter
Plain X-ray
entrance skin exposure
Mammography
mean glandular dose
CT
Computer tomography dose index (CTDI)
Multiple-scan average dose (MSAD)
kVp
mA
time
slice thickness
filtration
• Noise
• detector efficiency
• collimation
• matrix resolution
• reconstruction algorithm
Typically 2 - 4 rad
AAPM has single slice protocol for measuring head & body doses
More dose required at higher resolution for same noise level
More dose required to improve noise at same spatial resolution
Resolution
Noise
Dose
To improve one requires compromise on another
Noise
Resolution
Dose
New Stuff
CT Angiography
CT fluoroscopy
CT virtual endoscopy / colonoscopy / ??scopy
http://www.iacionline.net/ScannerCTDemo/CTScannerSimulator.html