Dr. Praveen Srikantachary 12.05.2015 •A fixed dental prosthesis that is luted to tooth structures, primarily enamel, which has been etched to provide mechanical retention for the resin cement (GPT-8) Primary goal of resin retained FPD is the replacement of missing teeth and maximum conservation of tooth structure. Introduction : Acid etch bridge is an alternative procedure to conventional fixed partial denture. Acid etch fixed partial denture lead to ultraconservative replacement of missing tooth. History : Introduction of acid etch technique was done by Buonocore in 1955. Bowen in 1962 developed BIS-GMA composite resin which can adhere to etched enamel. Alain L. Rochette in 1973 first time combined mechanical retention with silane coupling agent to produce adhesion to metal. He developed a bridge called Rochette bridge in which he used wing like retainer with funnel shaped perforations through them to enhance resin retention. Virginia bridge was described by Moon and Hudgins where they produced a rough retainer by incorporating salt crystals into retainer pattern. Maryland bridge was given by Livaditis and Thompson where they used a 3.5% solution of nitric acid with a current of 250 mA /cm2 for 5 minutes followed by immersion in 18% hydrochloric acid solution in an ultrasonic cleanser for 10 minutes. Rochette resin-bonded fixed denture Maryland resin-bonded fixed partial denture To etch internal surface of solid base metal retainer for resin bonded fixed partial dentures. This type of etched metal prosthesis frequently called maryland bridge. Synonyms : 1) Adhesive bridge 2) Rochette bridge 3) Maryland bridge 4) Resin bonded retainer 5) Acid etched bridge EVOLUTION OF RESIN BONDED PROSTHESIS Resin bonded prosthesis Clinical direct Natural tooth Laboratory indirect Resin tooth Acrylic Orthodontic pads Composite Accessory retention -Undercuts -Pins -Mesh -Wire Rochette Retention Combined bead pitted/reten tion bead Mesh Pitted Macromechanical Cast porcelain Cast framework Lingual attachment Electrolyticall y etched Proximal attachment Tin plated Chemical etch Micromechanical Sandblast Porous metal copings Sandblast oxidized Silane coupling Chemical Micromechanical • Indications, • Replacement of missing anterior teeth in children and adolescents. • Short span. • Unrestored abutments. • Single posterior teeth. • Significant crown length. • Excellent moisture control. • Contraindications, • • • • • • • Parafunctional habits. Long edentulous span. Restored or damaged abutments. Compromised abutments. Significant pontic width discrepancy. Deep vertical overlap. Nickel allergy. • Advantages, • • • • • • • • • Minimal removal of tooth structure. Minimal potential for pulp trauma. Anesthesia not usually required. Supragingival preparation. Easy impression making. Provisional not usually required. Reduced chair time. Reduced patient expense. Rebond possible. • Disadvantages, • • • • • Reduced restoration longevity Enamel modifications are required. Space correction is difficult. Good alignment of abutment teeth is required. Esthetics is compromised in posterior teeth. • Types, • Cast perforated resin retained FPDs. (mechanical retention – Rochette bridge). • Etched cast Resin-retained FPDs. (Micromechanical retention- “MARYLAND BRIDGE”). • Macroscopic Mechanical retention resin retained FPDs (“Virginia bridge”). • Chemical bonding resin retained FPDs (Adhesion bridges). • Cast perforated resin retained FPDs, • Introduced by Rochette in 1973. • Replacement of posterior teeth by Livaditis. • Perforated retainers were used to increase resistance and retention. • Limitations, • Weakening of the metal retainer by the perforations. • Exposure to wear of the resins at the perforations. • Limitation adhesion of the metal provided by the perforations. • Etched cast resin retained FPDs, • Thompson and Livaditis at the at the university of Maryland. • Developed a technique for the electrolytic etching of Ni-Cr and Cr-Co alloys. • Advantages, • Retention improved because the resin-to-etched metal bond can be substantially stronger than the resin-to-etched enamel. The retainer can be thinner and still resist flexing. • The oral surface of the cast retainers is highly polished and resists plaque accumulation. • Macroscopic Mechanical Retention Resin Retained FPDs, • Developed at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry. • Involves a “lost salt crystal” technique. • An alternative technique for the macroscopic retention is the use of a cast mesh pattern on the internal surface of the retainers. • Fiber-Reinforced Composite Fixed Prostheses, • The restoration consists of a fiber reinforced composite (FRC) substructure veneered with a particulate composite material. • Indications, • Optimal esthetic result. • Need to decrease wear of the opposite dentition. • Conservative abutment preparation. • Desire for a metal free, nonporcelain prostheses. • Potential for bonding the prosthesis retainer to the abutment teeth. • Contraindications, • • • • • Inability to maintain good fluid control. Long span. Parafunctional habits. Patients with unglazed opposing porcelain. Patients who abuse alcoholic substances. Occlusal marking articulation paper Occlusal clearance small wheel diamond Lingual reduction small wheel diamond Countersinks : flatend tapered diamond Proximal reduction : flat-end tapered diamond Proximal reduction : flat-end tapered diamond Lingual axial reduction : round-end tapered diamond Cingulum groove : short needle diamond Proximal groove : short needle diamond Single path of insertion and removal of prosthesis Basic concept of wrap around design Practical example of wrap around design concept