Welcome It’s About Time: A Model for Transformative Professional Development Presented by Ivan Cheng and Mary Olson National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics April 24, 2006 It’s About Time Agenda • Background • The SITTE model What we did What we found How we did it What we learned How you can do it Background What Teachers Need “To improve their mathematics instruction, teachers must be able to analyze what they and their students are doing and consider how those actions are affecting students’ learning.” NCTM Principles and Standards, p. 18 Background What Teachers Experience “The environments in which most teachers work have been structured in ways that actually work against the kind of sustained collaboration that we have suggested is needed for significant and steady improvement.” Stigler and Hiebert (1999), p. 172 Background Problem • Algebra success rate in high schools is low using traditional teaching practices. • Teachers need time to reflect on their practices and rehearse new strategies. • Current structure of schools do not give teachers the time they need to reexamine their teaching practices. Background Problem • Algebra success rate in high schools is low using traditional teaching practices. • Teachers need time to reflect on their practices and rehearse new strategies. • Current structure of schools do not give teachers the time they need to reexamine their teaching practices. Background Problem • Algebra success rate in high schools is low using traditional teaching practices. • Teachers need time to reflect on their practices and rehearse new strategies. • Current structure of schools do not give teachers the time they need to reexamine their teaching practices. Background Old Approach • “Fix” the teachers to improve student achievement. • Focus on student learning to foster teacher learning. Background New Approach • “Fix” the teachers to improve student achievement. • Focus on student learning to foster teacher learning. What We Did New Approach • Pilot project conducted in 2004 as the Inter-session Teaching and Training (ITT) project • Student Improvement Through Teacher Empowerment (SITTE) project in 2006 What We Found How did ITT affect what teachers know about what their students know or don’t know? • • Teachers increased their awareness of student thinking: – Acquaintance with alternative solutions – Watchfulness of student misconceptions – Attentiveness to student attitudes – Responsiveness to student reasoning – Expectation of trajectories in student thinking Teachers increased the application of their knowledge of student thinking: – Guiding principles for lesson design What We Found How did the ITT professional development experience affect teacher beliefs and practices? • • • Teachers increased their flexibility and resourcefulness – Departing from the textbook – Designing lessons based on student learning needs Teachers increased in their sense of efficacy and confidence to find instructional solutions – Attitudes about students – Attitudes about self Teachers increased their interdependence and teamwork What We Found How did the ITT professional development experience affect student achievement? • • • Test scores improved – Significant improvement in MDTP – Small gains in District Quarterly Assessment Grades improved – Pass rate increased (60.4%) – Perceptions of teachers improved In-class performance and dispositions improved – Greater participation and higher engagement – Increased sense of efficacy and perseverance What We Found How did the ITT professional development experience affect student achievement? 100 • 90Test scores improved 80– Significant improvement in MDTP 70 – Small gains in District Quarterly Assessment 60 • 50Grades improved 40– Pass rate increased (60.4%) 30– Perceptions of teachers improved • 20In-class performance and dispositions improved 10 0– Greater participation and higher engagement Fail D C B perseverance A – Increased sense of efficacy and Spring 2004 Inter-session 2003/2004 ITT Algebra 1A What We Found How did the ITT professional development experience affect student achievement? • • • Test scores improved Spring 2004 – Significant improvement in MDTP 25% – Small gains in District Quarterly Assessment Grades improved – Pass rate increased (60.4%) – Perceptions of teachers improved 75% In-class performance and dispositions improved Fail and Pass – Greater participation higher engagement – Increased sense of efficacy and perseverance What We Found How did the ITT professional development experience affect student achievement? • • • Test scores improved Inter-session – Significant improvement '03/'04 in MDTP – Small gains in District Quarterly Assessment 39% Grades improved – Pass rate increased (60.4%) – Perceptions of teachers improved 61%performance and dispositions improved In-class Fail and Pass – Greater participation higher engagement – Increased sense of efficacy and perseverance What We Found How did the ITT professional development experience affect student achievement? • • • Test scores improved Algebrain1A – SignificantITT improvement MDTP – Small gains in District Quarterly Assessment 40% Grades improved – Pass rate increased (60.4%) – Perceptions of teachers improved 60% In-class performance and dispositions improved Fail and Pass – Greater participation higher engagement – Increased sense of efficacy and perseverance What We Found How did the ITT professional development experience affect student achievement? • Test scores improvedof Comparison ofPass Pass Rates Rates Comparison – Significant improvement in MDTP – Small gains in District Quarterly Assessment • ITTGrades improved Algebra 1A – Pass rate increased (60.4%) Inter-session – Perceptions of teachers improved '03/'04 • In-class performance and dispositions improved –SpringGreater participation and higher engagement 2004 – Increased sense of efficacy and perseverance 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 What We Found • How did the SITTE professional development experience affect student achievement? Comparison of Pass/Fail Rates Test scores improved – Significant improvement in MDTP – 2006 Small gains in District Quarterly PassAssessment SITTE • Grades Inter-session 2005 improved – Pass rate increased (60.4%) – 2006 Perceptions of teachers improved SITTE Inter-session 2005 performance and dispositions improved • In-class Fail – Greater participation and higher engagement – Increased sense of efficacy and perseverance How We Did It Discussion • What are some ways that schools can foster teacher learning? Ways to Foster Teacher Learning Groups of teachers looking at discussing student work Videotape colleagues and serve as critical friends Collaboration built into teachers’ schedule Analyze common assessments Doing Lesson Study with teachers Common lesson planning Summer academies, sharing lesson plans Saturday math content sessions Math coaches work with teachers (cognitive/content coaching) Work on mathematics together National Board certification How We Did It PD Deficit “Empty Vessel” Model How We Did It Student Learning Focus on student learning to foster teacher learning How We Did It Professional Development as a Lever How We Did It Method • Professional development aligned with district instructional guidance systems • Professional development situated in the context of actual classroom teaching • Daily collaborative lesson planning • Reflecting and refining lessons based on ongoing recognition of student thinking How We Did It Method • Professional development aligned with district instructional guidance systems • Professional development situated in the context of actual classroom teaching • Daily collaborative lesson planning • Reflecting and refining lessons based on ongoing recognition of student thinking How We Did It Method • Professional development aligned with district instructional guidance systems • Professional development situated in the context of actual classroom teaching • Daily collaborative lesson planning • Reflecting and refining lessons based on ongoing recognition of student thinking How We Did It Method • Professional development aligned with district instructional guidance systems • Professional development situated in the context of actual classroom teaching • Daily collaborative lesson planning • Reflecting and refining lessons based on ongoing recognition of student thinking How We Did It Activity • “Scrambled Numbers” • Cover-Up Equations • Fraction Boxes How We Did It Cover-Up Equations 2x + 1 10 – =7 3 What We Learned • • • • Students need opportunities to learn in new ways and to engage in mathematical tasks that promote mathematical understanding. Teachers need practice in finding solutions to their students’ learning needs and in implementing good teaching practices. Leaders need to create and support opportunities for teacher collaboration by trusting teachers to find solutions to their students’ learning needs. Professional development must empower teachers to construct their own learning. What We Learned • • • • Students need opportunities to learn in new ways and to engage in mathematical tasks that promote mathematical understanding. Teachers need practice in finding solutions to their students’ learning needs and in implementing good teaching practices. Leaders need to create and support opportunities for teacher collaboration by trusting teachers to find solutions to their students’ learning needs. Professional development must empower teachers to construct their own learning. What We Learned • • • • Students need opportunities to learn in new ways and to engage in mathematical tasks that promote mathematical understanding. Teachers need practice in finding solutions to their students’ learning needs and in implementing good teaching practices. Leaders need to create and support opportunities for teacher collaboration by trusting teachers to find solutions to their students’ learning needs. Professional development must empower teachers to construct their own learning. What We Learned • • • • Students need opportunities to learn in new ways and to engage in mathematical tasks that promote mathematical understanding. Teachers need practice in finding solutions to their students’ learning needs and in implementing good teaching practices. Leaders need to create and support opportunities for teacher collaboration by trusting teachers to find solutions to their students’ learning needs. Professional development must empower teachers to construct their own learning. How You Can Do It Discussion • What elements of this model did you like? • What elements have we not considered? • What would it take to make this work in your school? What Elements Did You Like? Intellectual work of teachers built into the day Focused on student learning rather than fix the teacher Reflective practice which is generative Kids experience success Gave teachers alternate methods for teaching Everyone was trying the same thing What Have We Not Considered? Teachers are not at a level to understand math, not content strong and hold on to textbook as security blanket Ongoing support through the year Progression within algebra, range of strategies that students can choose, so that students end up with a toolbox How do you get all the teachers to buy in? Push teachers beyond the idea that “kids are broken” Retention of algebra students who have been through the program What Would It Take to Work? Need collaboration time Teacher commitment Administrative commitment Permission to not use the textbook Give teachers time to let it evolve Data that it works long -term Quality facilitator How You Can Do It 1. Understand local context and teacher needs 2. Use teacher knowledge to build new knowledge 3. Focus on student improvement rather than teacher development 4. Provide tools and resources 5. Focus on what works, but ask tough questions 6. Create the environment that promotes How You Can Do It 1. Understand local context and teacher needs 2. Use teacher knowledge to build new knowledge 3. Focus on student improvement rather than teacher development 4. Provide tools and resources 5. Focus on what works, but ask tough questions 6. Create the environment that promotes How You Can Do It 1. Understand local context and teacher needs 2. Use teacher knowledge to build new knowledge 3. Focus on student improvement rather than teacher development 4. Provide tools and resources 5. Focus on what works, but ask tough questions 6. Create the environment that promotes How You Can Do It 1. Understand local context and teacher needs 2. Use teacher knowledge to build new knowledge 3. Focus on student improvement rather than teacher development 4. Provide tools and resources 5. Focus on what works, but ask tough questions 6. Create the environment that promotes How You Can Do It 1. Understand local context and teacher needs 2. Use teacher knowledge to build new knowledge 3. Focus on student improvement rather than teacher development 4. Provide tools and resources 5. Focus on what works, but ask tough questions 6. Create the environment that promotes How You Can Do It 1. Understand local context and teacher needs 2. Use teacher knowledge to build new knowledge 3. Focus on student improvement rather than teacher development 4. Provide tools and resources 5. Focus on what works, but ask tough questions 6. Create the environment that promotes Implications The Challenge for Leaders Leadership needs to shift “from one of bureaucratic authority, where change is led by telling and selling, to a leadership style of protecting commitment to shared values determined by teachers engaged in a collaborative and co-creative process.” Kanold (2006), p. 32 Summary It’s Done For Teachers, Not To Teachers Professional development must be focused on what teachers want to help them improve student learning. It Takes Teamwork Professional development requires a collaborative effort for teachers to find what works for them where they’re at. It’s About Time Inter-session (or summer school) provides the place and time where teachers can work as a team to find solutions to their own professional needs. Thank You It’s About Time: A Model for Transformative Professional Development Ivan Cheng icheng@csun.edu www.csun.edu/~icheng Joe Morgan joemorgan@earthlink.net National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics April 24, 2006