Humanities
GE Assessment Process
 Develop instructions and example rubrics to go to all





instructors about data collection (Spring)
Review mapping data (Spring)
Review outcomes and refine as necessary (Spring)
Review data and summarize, analyze, and report on
results (Fall)
Facilitate college-wide discussion of the results and
recommendations (Fall)
Complete a final evaluation report on the results and
the process (Fall)
Outcome Refinement
Current
Proposed
Exhibit an understanding of the
ways in which people through
the ages in various cultures have
created art.
Exhibit an understanding of
the ways in which people in
diverse cultures and eras
have produced culturally
significant works
Outcome Refinement
Current
Proposed
Demonstrate an aesthetic
understanding
Communicate effectively the
meanings and intentions of
creative expression.
Outcome Refinement
Current
Proposed
Make informed value
judgments.
Use analytical techniques to
assess the value of human
creations in meaningful
ways.
Outcome Refinement
Current
Proposed
Create an example of linguistic
expression or philosophical
reasoning
Demonstrate an
understanding of the human
condition through language,
reasoning, or artistic
creation
Outcome Refinement
Current
Proposed
Contribute to the disciplines of
fine and performing arts and
analytical or creative writing
DELETED
General Education Area E | Humanities
9
37
87
141
2,321
Proficient
83%
Developing
12%
No Evidence
5%
Common
Rubric
Prong 1: ~1,491
Exhibit an
understanding
of the ways in
which people
through the
ages in various
cultures have
created art.
5% No Evidence
8% Developing
86% Proficient
Prong 2:~1,243
Demonstrate
an aesthetic
understandin
g.
5% No Evidence
14% Developing
81% Proficient
Prong 3:~817
Make
informed
value
judgments
5% No Evidence
13% Developing
83% Proficient
Prong 4:~678
Create an
example of
linguistic
expression or
philosophical
reasoning
2% No Evidence
12% Developing
86% Proficient
Prong 5: ~399
Contribute to
the
disciplines of
fine and
performing
arts and
analytical or
creative
writing.
4% No Evidence
10% Developing
86% Proficient
Overall Pass Rate Comparison
ALL AREAS - SPRING 2014
PASS
NOT PASS
74.5%
11.4%
WITHDRAW Eliminates PASS
W
14.1%
86.7%
NOT PASS
13.3%
AREA E - SPRING 2014
PASS
NOT PASS
73.0%
11.5%
WITHDRAW Eliminates PASS
Ws
15.5%
86.4%
NOT PASS
13.6%
Disaggregated Achievement Data
Ethnicity
PASS
NOT
PASS
WITHDRAW
G
Disproportionate
A Impact (below 80% =
P
Yes)
African American / Non
Hispanic
57.6%
20.5%
21.9%
Y
73.27%
American Indian /
Alaskan Native
60.7%
10.7%
28.6%
Y
77.21%
Asian
78.6%
8.6%
12.8%
N
100.00%
Filipino
76.6%
9.6%
13.9%
N
97.36%
Hispanic/Latino
68.1%
14.7%
17.2%
N
86.55%
Other Non-White
63.4%
12.2%
24.4%
?
80.64%
Pacific Islander
64.9%
27.0%
8.1%
N
82.48%
SouthEast Asian
76.3%
11.3%
12.4%
N
97.01%
Unknown/No Response
69.7%
13.2%
17.0%
N
88.69%
White/Non-Hispanic
75.7%
9.1%
15.2%
N
96.32%
Disaggregated Achievement Data
Ethnicity
Pass Rate - Area E
Pass Rate - All Areas
African American /Non Hispanic
57.6%
62.2%
American Indian /Alaskan Native
60.7%
63.0%
Asian
78.6%
81.3%
Filipino
76.6%
72.8%
Hispanic/Latino
68.1%
68.1%
Other Non-White
63.4%
75.3%
Pacific Islander
64.9%
67.3%
SouthEast Asian
76.3%
77.3%
Unknown/No Response
69.7%
72.0%
White/Non-Hispanic
75.7%
77.9%
Other subpopulation analysis
 Age-no achievement gap
 Gender-no achievement gap
 Basic Skills-Math and English
placement are predictors of success;
Math more predictive.
 ESL-ESL students pass at higher rates
Area E Pass Rates at Centers
Center
PASS - Area
E
PASS - All
Areas
Ocean Campus Only
74.2%
73.4%
All Other Centers & Sites
69.5%
77.0%
Small Group Discussion
In groups of 3, please discuss the questions on the
handout.
Select a Recorder that will turn in feedback to work
group.
Select a Reporter that will share “take aways” with whole
group.
Small Group Discussion
In groups of 3, please discuss the questions on the
handout.
Select a Recorder that will turn in feedback to work
group.
Select a Reporter that will share “take aways” with
whole group.