Rubric for Ranking Resource Allocation Requests
To be completed by School Dean or Supervisor in December 2012
Department Name:
_____________________________________________
Project Title (per Program Review):
________________________________
Project Priority (as cited in Program Review): __________________________
Directions: Circle or highlight the rating for each category below.
CATEGORY
Zero (0)
Low (1)
Medium (2)
High (3)
Linked to Board
Priorities and Approved
College Plans
N/A
Negligible linkage
to priorities and/or
plans and limited
rationale
Moderate linkage
to priorities and/or
plans and some
rationale
Directly linked to
priorities and/or
plans and strong
rationale
Student Success Oriented
(i.e. Learning and/or
Achievement Outcomes)
N/A
Negligible linkage
to student success
Moderate linkage
to student success
Strongly linked to
student success
Cost/Benefit
(e.g., many students
positively affected using
low-cost approach)
N/A
Low value
compared to cost
Medium value
compared to cost
High value
compared to cost
Data Based Rationale
N/A
Little or no data
suggesting the
need for or
feasibility of the
project
Some data
suggesting the
need for or
feasibility of the
project
A lot of data
suggesting the
need for or
feasibility of the
project
Measurable Outcomes
N/A
Limited measures
suggested for
determining
success of
implementation
Vague measures
suggested for
determining
success of
implementation
Clear measures
delineated to
determine success
of implementation
Health and Safety
N/A
Low health and
safety concern
Medium health
and safety concern
High health and
safety concern
Add by Column, Then
Insert Total Score Here:
City College of San Francisco, revised 9/18/2012 (Adapted from Gavilan College)