Alternate Media in the CSU Context (PPT)

advertisement

Alternate Media and the

CSU Context

Mary Cheng

California State University

AHEAD Conference

San Diego

July 18, 2006

Alternate Media

The method of making materials accessible to persons with disabilities. Common formats:

Large Print

Audio

E-Text

Braille

 Tactile Graphics

Why is alternate media important?

 Obligation of the higher education institution to provide access to its programs and services to students with disabilities (Section

504, the ADA)

 Not just mere access but effective communication access

Components of Effectiveness as interpreted by OCR

 timeliness of delivery (Fullerton, 2004)

 accuracy of the translation

 provision in a manner and medium appropriate to the significance of the message and the abilities of the individual with the disability (City

College of San Francisco

The Provision of Alternate Media in the not too distant past

 Get the tape recorded book from RFB&D

(Recordings for the Blind and Dyslexic)

Hire readers to read text aloud to student

Hire readers to read student’s books onto tape

 Enlarge the print by photocopying

Technology Impacting the

Provision of Alternate Media

Assistive technology has improved access to course materials

Screen readers: specialized software that reads the contents of a computer screen , converting the text to speech. JAWS and Outspoken are two commonly used screen readers.

Reading systems: software that enables multiple ways of interacting with text that assists the student in reading, writing and learning. Examples of such systems are

Kurzweil 3000 and

The use of assistive technology requires digital formats of materials or e-text

E-Text as a Beginning Point in

Creation of other formats

E-Text

Large Print

Audio or

Audio & Text

Braille

How do we get E-Text?

 From repositories of existing alternate media

(RFB&D, Bookshare, CAM, AMX)

 publishers (via state e-text law)

 From scanning (in-house produced)

E-text Obtained from publishers

Via state law, for example, California’s AB

422 (major publishers will supply even to states that don’t have higher ed e-text laws):

Publishers doing business in California will supply electronic file of textbook free of charge to eligible students with disabilities provided certain conditions are met (proof of purchase of book etc.)

Requesting E-Text from

Publishers

 Obtain title of book and other info (ISBN)

 Locate publisher and contact point for making request

 Send request to publisher (web form, fax, phone)

 Publishers may or may not respond

Issues with Publisher

Requests:

 Timeliness of response: 15 minutes, 2 to 6 weeks, 3 months …

 File quality: incomplete content, content in wrong order, no page numbers, unwanted character

 No response

In-house Produced E-text

Obtain the book

Debind book

Scan pages (image file)

Convert to digital text via OCR process

Edit for accuracy: spelling, page #s, columns, spacing, headers, formulas, tables, graphs

Secondary conversion to appropriate format as required (i.e. MP3)

Braille requires additional effort

Issues with In-house

Production

 Skill set and knowledge of staff

 Availability of hardware and software

 Limitation of Optical Character Recognition

(OCR) technology: not 100% accurate

 Requires editing: How much editing dependent on the type of material being converted

 Non-textual math and science, most difficult

 Copyright vs Civil Rights concerns

What’s the Big Deal?

Timeliness (or lack thereof)

Student registers during advance registration and turns in request

(student does not register during advance registration or courses are added and dropped)

Disability Services (DS) staff researches for textbook titles based upon course registration (no textbook is identified for the course)

DS staff attempts to contact instructor to find out textbook title (can’t reach instructor or don’t know who is assigned to teach the course)

1 st day of term: student buys book and brings in to DS office (usually doesn’t happen on the first day)

1 st and 2 nd week of term: DS office checks repositories for available alternate format ( not available in any repository)

Order e-text from publisher (publisher takes 2 to 6 weeks to respond)

4 th week of term: DS office receives file from publisher (file needs editing)

5 th week of term: e-text file is cleaned up and alternate format of textbook is finally ready for student

Responsibilities for Accurate &

Timely Files

Student Responsibilities

1. Early Registration

2. Request in advance

3. Communication with DS Office

Publisher Responsibilities

1. Supply accurate, complete,

Accessible files within 48 hours

2. Notify campus if unable, supply

A desk copy

Institutional Responsibilities

1. Early identification of textbook by faculty

2. Cooperation from Bookstore

3. Cooperation from Library

4. Adequate resources:Crosstrained staff, redundant systems, updated equipment for alternate media conversion

Moving Forward

Complex problem with many levels and stakeholders. Education

& training is needed at all levels

Identify where in the process the gaps exist

Identify what can be done to improve efficiencies in the identification, request, production/modification, and delivery processes.

Work with publishers on low-hanging fruit to increase current efficiencies

Possibility of linking various repositories and creating best practices for the sharing of alternate media for eligible students

Adopt a common file format that lends itself to preserving the structural integrity of the book

Responsibilities in Meeting the Timely

Provision of Instructional Materials

Students: register in advance and submit request to DS office in a timely manner

Faculty: identify textbooks in a timely manner

Bookstore: make available the book list to Disability Services (DS)

Office

DS Office: have policies and procedures in place and develop an efficient workflow for obtaining/producing/modifying and delivering alternate media requests

Publishers: provide accurate, complete, and timely files in accessible formats

Institution: ensure that the office responsible for conversion has adequate trained staffing & resources

CSU Center for Accessible Media: work with publishers to increase their level of compliance; coordinate and disseminate promising practices and resources to assist campuses in the provision of timely instructional materials

Relevant Office for Civil Rights

(OCR) Cases

California Community College (1998)

City College of San Francisco (1998)

California State College, Los Angeles (1997)

California State College, Long Beach (1999)

Loyola Marymount University (1992)

Brooklyn College (1996)

California State College, Fullerton (2004)

California State University, Los Angeles (in progress)

California State University, San Bernardino (in progress)

California State University, Channel Island (in progress)

Resources

 www.htctu.net

High Tech Center Training Unit

 http://www.htctu.net/publications/guidelines/altmedia/altme dia.htm

http://www.htctu.net/publications/guidelines/distance_ed/dis ted.htm

www.tc3.edu/bcl/altformhandbook SUNY Disability

Services Council Alternate Format Materials

Handbook www.calstate.edu/accessibility California State

University Accessible Technology Initiative (will be launched September 2007)

Download