Morgan Goodspeed
Avi Mayer
Mark Hall
$14.5 billion new and extended tax breaks
Nuclear: greater federal backing and insurance for construction of new plants
Low-carbon: wind, biomass, landfill, geothermal tax incentives
Coal: $1.8 billion clean-coal and gasification technologies
Oil: SPR expanded from 700 mil to 1 bil
Transportation: fuel additives increase according to Renewable Fuel Standards, tax credits for hybrids, clean-diesel, hydrogen
Efficiency: federal buildings 20% reduction
Uranium: 100 pounds weapons-grade may be exported annually
Renewable: 7.5% increase by 2013 is the objective
Daylight-Saving Time (DST)
A policy, first instituted in 1918, aimed at better-utilizing daylight hours and conserving energy by setting-ahead have the
-s in order to rise and set later in the day.
DST
Background
Concept first suggested by
Adopted by a number of European countries during World War I.
1918 – First DST law enacted in the
Established standard time zones.
Set DST to commence March 31.
Repealed in 1919 due to
Reinstituted during
WWII.
Repealed following the war.
DST
Background
I am not a crook!
1973 – OPEC oil embargo!
Emergency Daylight Saving Time
Energy Conservation Act signed by
Instituted year-round DST for 2 years.
1975 - Congress refused to renew the Act, again due to
1986 – Public Law
99-359 signed by
Instituted DST from first Sunday in April through last Sunday in October.
Win one for the Gipper!
DST
Advantages
DoT and DoE studies suggest 10,000 barrels were saved daily during the 1974 and 1975 trial years.
Current daily use: 20 million barrels (savings would equal 0.05% of current daily use)
BUT serious problems with making current determinations based on that data
To be continued…
Federal government final say on LNG terminal siting authority through FERC
FERC request for eminent domain for onshore sites
Kelo v. City of New London
(public purpose over public use interesting applications for the energy industry)
October House bill gave the President authority to site refineries in old military bases
Greater number of projects exempted from traditional environmental testing under the Energy
Act
The Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) is concerned with the country’s energy usage.
Fuel Economy
Energy Star Program
Test created in 1972
Calculates fuel consumption by using formulas and equations
Test does not directly measure fuel consumption
Created in 1992
Focuses on getting products to be more energy efficient
Saved 10 billion dollars in 1994
National Security
The territorial integrity, sovereignty, and international freedom of action of the
National Security
Background
Oct. 6, 1973 – Yom Kippur War
Soviets ship billions of $ worth of arms to the
Arab states
Oct. 8 – OPEC members demand 100% increase on posted oil prices
Oct. 17 - OPEC announces it will halt exportation of oil to countries that support Israel
National Security
Background
Oct. 19 – Nixon requests funding for airlift to Israel
Same day – King Faisal of Saudi Arabia announces embargo of oil shipments to the U.S.
Embargo extended to the Netherlands, Portugal,
Rhodesia and South Africa
Nov. 5 – OPEC members announce 25% output cut and threaten further cuts
National Security
Background
Price of oil quadruples overnight to $12 a barrel ($52.98 today)
Price of 1 gallon of gasoline rises from national average of 38.5 cents to 55.1 cents ($2.43 today)
NYSE shares lose $97 billion ($428.3 billion
today) in value in six weeks
Nov. 27 - Nixon signs Emer. Petroleum
Allocation Act
National speed limit of 55 MPH imposed
Recession
National Security
Quotations
”Now we have a choice. But if we wait, we will live in fear of embargoes. We could endanger our freedom as a sovereign nation to act in foreign affairs.”
(April 18, 1977)
”Declining domestic oil production, rising oil imports, and growing Free World dependence on potentially insecure sources of supply raise a number of concerns, including vulnerability to a major supply disruption.”
(January 3, 1989)
National Security
Stats
The United States currently imports some
58% of the oil it consumes, most of it from Canada, Saudi Arabia,
Mexico and Venezuela.
National Security
Quotations
37:30
”We value an America that controls its own destiny because it’s finally and forever independent of
Mideast oil. What does it mean for our economy and our national security when we have only 3 percent of the world's oil reserves, yet we rely on foreign countries for 53 percent of what we consume? I want an America that relies on its ingenuity and innovation, not the Saudi royal family.
And our energy plan for a stronger America will invest in new technologies and alternative fuels and the cars of the future so that no young American in uniform will ever be held hostage to our dependence on oil from the Middle East.”
(July 29, 2004)
National Security
Quotations
12:20
”To keep our economy growing, we also need reliable supplies of affordable, environmentally responsible energy. Nearly four years ago, I submitted a comprehensive energy strategy that encourages conservation, alternative sources, a modernized electricity grid, and more production here at home, including safe, clean nuclear energy…
Four years of debate is enough! I urge Congress to pass legislation that makes America more secure and less dependent on foreign energy .”
(February 2, 2005)
Oil: total refining capacity lower than 1981 levels due in part to oil companies’ business tactics
Nuclear: no new plants have been ordered since
1978, and none since 1973 have been completed, mostly for perceived safety risk
LNG: landlocked states outvote the coastal states that will be most affected
Electric grid: local opposition to state and federal projects often because unsightly, perceived as lowering neighborhood value
Climate-change issues notoriously absent from most pieces of legislation, environmentalists unhappy about the disregard for greenhouse gases
Requirements or recommendations? Lacking teeth behind reduction suggestions and putting resources into production, exacerbating the problem
BIGGEST: Where are the increased CAFÉ standards?
Would do the most to decrease reliance on foreign energy
CAFÉ given only $6 million over 5 years
Politicians claim job loss and safety as their primary concerns
Test is outdated
Requirements are too easy
Greenhouse gases aren’t taken into enough consideration
DST
Proposals
Reps. Markey (D-Mass.) and Upton (R-Mich.) introduce amendment to Energy Policy Act
Would extend DST by two months.
Claim that measure would save 100,000 barrels per day
”The beauty of daylight saving time is that it just makes everyone feel sunnier. In addition to the benefits of energy saving, less crime, fewer traffic fatalities, more recreation time and increased economic activity, day light saving just brings a smile to everybody’s faces.”
DST
Eh… nope
Estimates based on thirty-year-old data
”I want to note that these studies are over 25 years old and were limited in scope. Congress captured many of the benefits identified in our studies in the legislative changes to daylight saving time enacted in 1986. There have been dramatic changes in lifestyle and commerce since we completed our studies that raise serious questions about extrapolating conclusions from our studies into today’s world.”
- Linda Lawson, DoT
DST
Eh… nope
2001 – California energy crisis
State studies potential benefits of DST
”Our report indicated that if we [extended] daylight saving time through all of March, there would be a decline of electricity use at peak hours of about 3.5 percent. However, overall electricity use would only decline about one half of a percent. You're basically shifting noncritical energy use to later in the day.”
- Claudia Chandler, Calif. Energy Commission
DST
Eh… nope
Objections to the Markey/Upton proposal…
National PTA
United States Conference of Bishops
Jewish groups
Air Transport Association
Private utilities
Groups representing Oracle and Yahoo!
Dairy farmers
NASA
Others…
DST
Outcome
Markey/Upton amendment reduced by one month and passed
Implementation contingent upon DoE study
Set to kick in no earlier than March 2007
Benefits still murky
DST
Our Verdict
We are
any further extension of DST, unless it is proven that such an extension would provide substantial energy savings and determined that those benefits would outweigh any costs.
National Security
Proposals
Key Points
Use technology to improve conservation and efficiency
Energy Star
Increase domestic energy production in environmentally responsible ways
ANWR drilling
Clean Coal Program
Expanding nuclear power
National Security
Proposals
Diversify the nation’s energy supply
Stimulate development of renewable fuels via tax credits
Hydrogen, ethanol, biodiesel
Modernize the domestic energy infrastructure
Repeal hindrances to investment
Encouraging development of new infrastructure, incl. superconducting power lines
National Security
Proposals
Key Points
Short-Term
Release of oil from strategic reserves
Work with OPEC to increase supply
FTC investigation of market manipulation
Long-Term
Development of alternative energies
Improve fuel economy standards
27.5 mpg across the board
Increase conservation efforts
National Security
Proposals
H.R. 2730
The United States-Israel Energy Cooperation Act
Establishment of an international grant fund for R&D of reliable energy sources
‘Findings’ include
The United States’ dependency on “nations that do not share the interests and values of the
United States”
DoE projections that see dependence increasing by 33% over next twenty years
45 cosponsors
The big 5--Exxon Mobil, BP Amoco, Royal
Dutch Shell, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips--
$33 BILLION third quarter profits: price gouging?
Windfall Profits Rebate Act: 3-year, 50% tax on profits on oil sold at above $40 a barrel, with exemption for development/exploration
Revenue to be returned to consumers in a rebate check for taxpayers
YES, implement a tax—be it on profits or a gasoline tax at the pumps (forcing oil companies to lower prices and thus reduce profits that way)
Higher prices will curtail demand and reduce shortage
BUT, do not return the revenue and increase consumption: invest in alternative fuels
Created in 1997
156 member nations
The protocol is an agreement to bring greenhouse gas emission levels down to levels relative to those in 1990
Encourages the world to work towards a goal that will benefit us all
Has goals that would significantly affect the environment in a positive manner
Lack of power to make nations comply
Weak on developing nations
Goals may not be attainable
Similar to the proposal made by the
National Commission on Energy Policy
Puts a price on polluting
Companies are rewarded for using energy more efficiently
Companies are encouraged to do more research of alternate energies
If successful, will have a positive impact on the environment
Helps bring about the goals of Kyoto
Too many allowances are being issued
EU-ETS system only covers 40% of carbon dioxide emissions
Some companies feel that they are at a competitive disadvantage
International Cooperation
Int’l Cooperation
Background
Cold War
Solidifying relationships with allied countries
Presenting opportunities for stability and cooperation with “adversaries”
Post Cold-War
Developing the United States’ economic competitiveness by granting U.S. scientists access to foreign research
Vital for the solution of such large-scale contemporary problems as AIDS, global climate change and the proliferation of nuclear materials.
Int’l Cooperation
Background
Augments shrinking public research budgets by leveraging publicly funded research through information sharing and technology cooperation
Int’l Cooperation
Support
“The United States will pursue international cooperation to affect a more rapid, coordinated advance for this technology that could lead to the elimination of air pollutants and a significant reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector worldwide.”
(2003 State of the Union Address)
Int’l Cooperation
Support
“Despite [large-scale domestic efforts and initiatives], our administration knows that such steps, though important, are not enough. It is critical that we collaborate with you on an international basis to address challenges that face all of us in the 21st century.”
(IAEA Conference, April 2003)