Policy.ppt

advertisement

Policy and Legislation

Morgan Goodspeed

Avi Mayer

Mark Hall

3 Focus Points

What We Have Now

Why This Is Insufficient

What Needs to Be Done

WHAT WE HAVE NOW

The Energy Policy Act of 2005

$14.5 billion new and extended tax breaks

Nuclear: greater federal backing and insurance for construction of new plants

Low-carbon: wind, biomass, landfill, geothermal tax incentives

Coal: $1.8 billion clean-coal and gasification technologies

Oil: SPR expanded from 700 mil to 1 bil

Energy Policy Act, CON

Transportation: fuel additives increase according to Renewable Fuel Standards, tax credits for hybrids, clean-diesel, hydrogen

Efficiency: federal buildings 20% reduction

Uranium: 100 pounds weapons-grade may be exported annually

Renewable: 7.5% increase by 2013 is the objective

Daylight-Saving Time (DST)

A policy, first instituted in 1918, aimed at better-utilizing daylight hours and conserving energy by setting-ahead have the

-s in order to rise and set later in the day.

DST

Background

Concept first suggested by

Adopted by a number of European countries during World War I.

1918 – First DST law enacted in the

Established standard time zones.

Set DST to commence March 31.

Repealed in 1919 due to

Reinstituted during

WWII.

Repealed following the war.

DST

Background

I am not a crook!

1973 – OPEC oil embargo!

Emergency Daylight Saving Time

Energy Conservation Act signed by

Instituted year-round DST for 2 years.

1975 - Congress refused to renew the Act, again due to

1986 – Public Law

99-359 signed by

Instituted DST from first Sunday in April through last Sunday in October.

Win one for the Gipper!

DST

Advantages

DoT and DoE studies suggest 10,000 barrels were saved daily during the 1974 and 1975 trial years.

Current daily use: 20 million barrels (savings would equal 0.05% of current daily use)

BUT serious problems with making current determinations based on that data

To be continued…

Energy Infrastructure Siting

Federal government final say on LNG terminal siting authority through FERC

FERC request for eminent domain for onshore sites

Kelo v. City of New London

(public purpose over public use interesting applications for the energy industry)

Energy Siting, CON

October House bill gave the President authority to site refineries in old military bases

Greater number of projects exempted from traditional environmental testing under the Energy

Act

EPA

The Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) is concerned with the country’s energy usage.

Fuel Economy

Energy Star Program

Fuel Economy

Test created in 1972

Calculates fuel consumption by using formulas and equations

Test does not directly measure fuel consumption

Energy Star

Created in 1992

Focuses on getting products to be more energy efficient

Saved 10 billion dollars in 1994

WHY THIS IS INSUFFICIENT

National Security

The territorial integrity, sovereignty, and international freedom of action of the

National Security

Background

Oct. 6, 1973 – Yom Kippur War

Soviets ship billions of $ worth of arms to the

Arab states

Oct. 8 – OPEC members demand 100% increase on posted oil prices

Oct. 17 - OPEC announces it will halt exportation of oil to countries that support Israel

National Security

Background

Oct. 19 – Nixon requests funding for airlift to Israel

Same day – King Faisal of Saudi Arabia announces embargo of oil shipments to the U.S.

Embargo extended to the Netherlands, Portugal,

Rhodesia and South Africa

Nov. 5 – OPEC members announce 25% output cut and threaten further cuts

National Security

Background

Price of oil quadruples overnight to $12 a barrel ($52.98 today)

Price of 1 gallon of gasoline rises from national average of 38.5 cents to 55.1 cents ($2.43 today)

NYSE shares lose $97 billion ($428.3 billion

today) in value in six weeks

Nov. 27 - Nixon signs Emer. Petroleum

Allocation Act

National speed limit of 55 MPH imposed

Recession

National Security

Quotations

”Now we have a choice. But if we wait, we will live in fear of embargoes. We could endanger our freedom as a sovereign nation to act in foreign affairs.”

(April 18, 1977)

”Declining domestic oil production, rising oil imports, and growing Free World dependence on potentially insecure sources of supply raise a number of concerns, including vulnerability to a major supply disruption.”

(January 3, 1989)

National Security

Stats

The United States currently imports some

58% of the oil it consumes, most of it from Canada, Saudi Arabia,

Mexico and Venezuela.

National Security

Quotations

37:30

”We value an America that controls its own destiny because it’s finally and forever independent of

Mideast oil. What does it mean for our economy and our national security when we have only 3 percent of the world's oil reserves, yet we rely on foreign countries for 53 percent of what we consume? I want an America that relies on its ingenuity and innovation, not the Saudi royal family.

And our energy plan for a stronger America will invest in new technologies and alternative fuels and the cars of the future so that no young American in uniform will ever be held hostage to our dependence on oil from the Middle East.”

(July 29, 2004)

National Security

Quotations

12:20

”To keep our economy growing, we also need reliable supplies of affordable, environmentally responsible energy. Nearly four years ago, I submitted a comprehensive energy strategy that encourages conservation, alternative sources, a modernized electricity grid, and more production here at home, including safe, clean nuclear energy…

Four years of debate is enough! I urge Congress to pass legislation that makes America more secure and less dependent on foreign energy .”

(February 2, 2005)

Bureaucratic Entanglements

Oil: total refining capacity lower than 1981 levels due in part to oil companies’ business tactics

Nuclear: no new plants have been ordered since

1978, and none since 1973 have been completed, mostly for perceived safety risk

Bureaucracy, CON

LNG: landlocked states outvote the coastal states that will be most affected

Electric grid: local opposition to state and federal projects often because unsightly, perceived as lowering neighborhood value

Legislative Shortcomings

Climate-change issues notoriously absent from most pieces of legislation, environmentalists unhappy about the disregard for greenhouse gases

Requirements or recommendations? Lacking teeth behind reduction suggestions and putting resources into production, exacerbating the problem

Shortcomings, CON

BIGGEST: Where are the increased CAFÉ standards?

Would do the most to decrease reliance on foreign energy

CAFÉ given only $6 million over 5 years

Politicians claim job loss and safety as their primary concerns

Problems with Fuel Economy

Test is outdated

Requirements are too easy

Greenhouse gases aren’t taken into enough consideration

WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE

DST

Proposals

Reps. Markey (D-Mass.) and Upton (R-Mich.) introduce amendment to Energy Policy Act

Would extend DST by two months.

Claim that measure would save 100,000 barrels per day

”The beauty of daylight saving time is that it just makes everyone feel sunnier. In addition to the benefits of energy saving, less crime, fewer traffic fatalities, more recreation time and increased economic activity, day light saving just brings a smile to everybody’s faces.”

DST

Eh… nope

Estimates based on thirty-year-old data

”I want to note that these studies are over 25 years old and were limited in scope. Congress captured many of the benefits identified in our studies in the legislative changes to daylight saving time enacted in 1986. There have been dramatic changes in lifestyle and commerce since we completed our studies that raise serious questions about extrapolating conclusions from our studies into today’s world.”

- Linda Lawson, DoT

DST

Eh… nope

2001 – California energy crisis

State studies potential benefits of DST

”Our report indicated that if we [extended] daylight saving time through all of March, there would be a decline of electricity use at peak hours of about 3.5 percent. However, overall electricity use would only decline about one half of a percent. You're basically shifting noncritical energy use to later in the day.”

- Claudia Chandler, Calif. Energy Commission

DST

Eh… nope

Objections to the Markey/Upton proposal…

National PTA

United States Conference of Bishops

Jewish groups

Air Transport Association

Private utilities

Groups representing Oracle and Yahoo!

Dairy farmers

NASA

Others…

DST

Outcome

Markey/Upton amendment reduced by one month and passed

Implementation contingent upon DoE study

Set to kick in no earlier than March 2007

Benefits still murky

DST

Our Verdict

We are

AGAINST

any further extension of DST, unless it is proven that such an extension would provide substantial energy savings and determined that those benefits would outweigh any costs.

National Security

Proposals

Key Points

Use technology to improve conservation and efficiency

Energy Star

Increase domestic energy production in environmentally responsible ways

ANWR drilling

Clean Coal Program

Expanding nuclear power

National Security

Proposals

Diversify the nation’s energy supply

Stimulate development of renewable fuels via tax credits

Hydrogen, ethanol, biodiesel

Modernize the domestic energy infrastructure

Repeal hindrances to investment

Encouraging development of new infrastructure, incl. superconducting power lines

National Security

Proposals

Key Points

Short-Term

Release of oil from strategic reserves

Work with OPEC to increase supply

FTC investigation of market manipulation

Long-Term

Development of alternative energies

Improve fuel economy standards

27.5 mpg across the board

Increase conservation efforts

National Security

Proposals

H.R. 2730

The United States-Israel Energy Cooperation Act

Establishment of an international grant fund for R&D of reliable energy sources

‘Findings’ include

The United States’ dependency on “nations that do not share the interests and values of the

United States”

DoE projections that see dependence increasing by 33% over next twenty years

45 cosponsors

Windfall/Gasoline Tax

The big 5--Exxon Mobil, BP Amoco, Royal

Dutch Shell, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips--

$33 BILLION third quarter profits: price gouging?

Windfall Profits Rebate Act: 3-year, 50% tax on profits on oil sold at above $40 a barrel, with exemption for development/exploration

Revenue to be returned to consumers in a rebate check for taxpayers

Taxes, CON

YES, implement a tax—be it on profits or a gasoline tax at the pumps (forcing oil companies to lower prices and thus reduce profits that way)

Higher prices will curtail demand and reduce shortage

BUT, do not return the revenue and increase consumption: invest in alternative fuels

Kyoto Protocol Background

Created in 1997

156 member nations

The protocol is an agreement to bring greenhouse gas emission levels down to levels relative to those in 1990

Kyoto Protocol Benefits

Encourages the world to work towards a goal that will benefit us all

Has goals that would significantly affect the environment in a positive manner

Kyoto Protocol Drawbacks

Lack of power to make nations comply

Weak on developing nations

Goals may not be attainable

Carbon Credit Trading

Similar to the proposal made by the

National Commission on Energy Policy

Puts a price on polluting

Carbon Credit Benefits

Companies are rewarded for using energy more efficiently

Companies are encouraged to do more research of alternate energies

If successful, will have a positive impact on the environment

Helps bring about the goals of Kyoto

Carbon Credit Drawbacks

Too many allowances are being issued

EU-ETS system only covers 40% of carbon dioxide emissions

Some companies feel that they are at a competitive disadvantage

International Cooperation

Int’l Cooperation

Background

Cold War

Solidifying relationships with allied countries

Presenting opportunities for stability and cooperation with “adversaries”

Post Cold-War

Developing the United States’ economic competitiveness by granting U.S. scientists access to foreign research

Vital for the solution of such large-scale contemporary problems as AIDS, global climate change and the proliferation of nuclear materials.

Int’l Cooperation

Background

Augments shrinking public research budgets by leveraging publicly funded research through information sharing and technology cooperation

Int’l Cooperation

Support

“The United States will pursue international cooperation to affect a more rapid, coordinated advance for this technology that could lead to the elimination of air pollutants and a significant reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector worldwide.”

(2003 State of the Union Address)

Int’l Cooperation

Support

“Despite [large-scale domestic efforts and initiatives], our administration knows that such steps, though important, are not enough. It is critical that we collaborate with you on an international basis to address challenges that face all of us in the 21st century.”

(IAEA Conference, April 2003)

QUESTIONS?

Download