Data Analysis Part of Course Proteomics Class, Summer, 2001 M. Lawrence Clevenson

advertisement

Data Analysis Part of Course

Proteomics Class, Summer, 2001

M. Lawrence Clevenson

Edward J. Carroll

Goals

1. To expose students to a wellreplicated proteomic (gel) data set

2. To lead students to explore criteria for comparing models for this data set

3. To guide students working in groups to prepare a presentation of their analysis and results

General Approach

Hands-On Activity with Computers for

About Two Hours after Lunch

Afternoon Computer Activities Amplified

Morning Lectures

Elementary Statistical and Graphing

Examples—Model Fitting, Residuals

Early Exposure to Proteomic Data

Gas Used vs Heaing Degree Days

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

0 y = 0.189x + 1.0892

R

2

= 0.9906

10

Average Gas (100 ft^3) per day

Predicted Gas Usage from Linear Model

Linear (Average Gas (100 ft^3) per day)

20 30

Average Degree Days

40 50 60

Fuel used (liters/100 km)

25

20

15

10

5

0

0 20 40 60 80

Spe e d in km/hr

100 120 140 160

GE L ID cm Interface-D ye Front cm band 1 cm band 2 cm band 3 cm band 4 cm band 5 cm band 6 cm band 7 cm band 8 cm band 9

3-28-01 # 1

3-28-01 # 2

3-28-01-# 3

4-4-01 # 1

4-4-01 # 2

4-4-01 # 3

4-4-01 # 4

4-4-01 # 5

4-l7-01 # 1

4-17-01 # 2

4-17-01 # 3

4-17-01 # 4

4-18-01 # 1

4-18-01 # 2

4-18-01 # 3

4-18-01 # 4

4-18-01 # 5

4-18-01 # 6

4-18-01 # 7

4-18-01 # 8

6.90

6.90

6.90

7.00

7.00

7.15

7.00

7.15

6.35

6.35

6.35

6.35

6.20

6.20

6.20

6.20

6.20

6.20

6.20

6.20

1.10

0.90

0.85

0.85

0.80

0.90

0.90

0.80

1.10

0.90

1.05

0.70

0.80

0.80

0.80

0.90

1.05

1.05

0.80

0.80

1.85

1.75

1.65

1.65

1.50

1.75

1.85

1.50

1.85

1.70

1.85

1.55

1.60

1.55

1.55

1.70

1.80

1.85

1.55

1.50

2.65

2.50

2.50

2.55

2.45

2.60

2.70

2.40

2.55

2.35

2.50

2.35

2.35

2.35

2.25

2.35

2.45

2.55

2.25

2.15

2.15

2.00

1.95

1.95

1.85

2.05

2.15

1.85

2.10

1.95

2.10

1.85

1.85

1.85

1.85

1.95

2.05

2.10

1.80

1.80

3.35

3.20

3.30

3.30

3.25

3.50

3.60

3.30

3.20

3.05

3.15

3.10

3.05

3.05

2.95

3.00

3.05

3.20

3.00

2.85

4.20

4.05

4.15

4.25

4.20

4.45

4.50

4.20

3.90

3.80

3.80

3.85

3.80

3.80

3.65

3.65

3.75

3.85

3.65

3.55

4.90

4.80

4.90

5.10

5.10

5.45

5.40

5.05

4.50

4.45

4.25

4.55

4.35

4.35

4.25

4.25

4.35

4.40

4.25

4.15

5.30

5.30

5.35

5.60

5.60

6.10

5.90

5.50

4.95

4.90

4.75

5.00

4.75

4.75

4.60

4.60

4.75

4.75

4.65

4.50

5.60

5.60

5.60

5.90

5.95

6.35

6.20

5.75

5.20

5.20

5.05

5.30

5.00

5.00

4.85

4.80

5.05

5.00

4.90

4.75

Protein Bio-Rad Given Mol Wt Log

(daltons) Mol Wt

Myosin 200,000 5.30

beta-Galactosidase 116,250 5.07

Phosphorylase B 97,400 4.99

Serum albumin 66,200 4.82

Ovalbumin 45,000 4.65

Carbonic anhydrase 31,000 4.49

Trypsin inhibitor 21,500 4.33

Lysozyme 14,400 4.15

Aprotinin 6,500 3.81

200000.00

116250.00

97400.00

66200.00

45000.00

31000.00

21500.00

14400.00

6500.00

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.7

0.6

0.9

0.8

0.1

3.70

3.90

4.10

4.30

4.50

4.70

Log Moledular Weight

4.90

5.10

5.30

3-28-01 #1

3-28-01 #2

3-28-01-#3

4-4-01 #1

4-4-01 #2

4-4-01 #3

4-4-01 #4

4-4-01 #5

4-l7-01 #1

4-17-01 #2

Computer Laboratory Format

Specific spreadsheet tasks were demonstrated with detailed instructions

Example if desired

Work Files Evolved During First Two

Weeks in Preparation for Projects

Example if desired

Marks of Success

1. During the week of preparation of final presentations, activity level was high.

2. Presentations were excellent.

3. Students were proud of their accomplishment.

Download