FEATURE (Chapter 7) 15 POINTS Content & Development 3 Points Organization & Structure 3 Points Format, Punctuation & Spelling 3 Points Grammar & Vocabulary 3 Point Poor Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. Little use of direct quotes indicates weaknesses in interviewing. Excellent Content is comprehensive and accurate with a compelling lead. Major points are stated clearly and are well supported with vivid details. Content and purpose of the writing are clear. Direct and indirect quotations are used to add authority to the writing. Details show evidence of effective interviewing. Facts are presented objectively with a lack of editorializing. Good Organization and structure detract from the content. Paragraph transitions require improvement. Poor Article lacks many elements of the correct format. Frequent errors in spelling/accentuation or punctuation. Article is inadequate/excessive in length. Minimal reader interest. Uses weak, past tense verbs. Provides little content information. Excellent Standard rules of grammar and usage are followed. Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure. Writing employs strong use of precise vocabulary. Good Only the final deadline was met. Poor Excellent Article is the appropriate length as described for the assignment. No faults with respect to spelling/accentuation or punctuation. Copy adheres to AP style. Good Article contains few grammatical errors. Vocabulary somewhat limited. Poor The final deadline was not met. Excellent Article deviates from the inverted pyramid if necessary to stimulate and maintain reader interest. Paragraphs are short enough to maintain visual interest. Transitions allow information to flow from a compelling lead to a logical conclusion. Flow of ideas makes the article easy to read. Use of direct and indirect quotations is balanced. Good Article follows most guidelines. Occasional faults in spelling/accentuation or punctuation. Poor Numerous grammatical and mechanical errors interfere with readability. Headline Bonus Point Good Content is not comprehensive. Lead is adequate. Major points are addressed, but not well supported. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought. Limited use of quotations demonstrates weakness in interviewing. Poor Structure of the article interferes with readability. Article is disjointed and lacks transition of thoughts. Deadlines 3 Points NAME Excellent All deadlines were met. Good Moderate reader interest. Lapses into use of past tense, infinitives and weak verbs. Somewhat summarizes story content. Excellent Effectively engages the reader. Written in present tense. Accurately summarizes the content of the story. Strong verbs are used.