d.1 Early Childhood Learning Community The Early Childhood Leaning Community offering the Child Development Credential (not included in this review), the associate degree in early childhood care and education with the associated associate license, and a continuation program through to the bachelor’s degree in early childhood with a specialized in children ages birth to five. Due to the integrated relationship of these programs, assessments are shared, with an additional capstone project required in the bachelor’s degree. Coursework for this program is offered in English and Spanish, with an additional agreement with the Department of Defense to support professionals serving military bases to complete coursework. Requirements for the Ohio Pre-Kindergarten Associate Licensure Overall GPA of 2.5 or greater. Grade of “C” or better (“C-“ or below not allowed) in all education courses. Grade of “B-“ or better in Preschool Internship (18ECE243). “Good moral character,” negative dispositions may result in ineligibility. Ohio BCI and FBI background checks. Praxis II Pre-Kindergarten Education #0530 with a qualifying score of 550 or higher is required for the state to grant licensure. Application to the University of Cincinnati Licensure office and receive recommendation by the ECLC Academic Director. Bachelor’s Degree: ECLC’s ONLINE bachelor degree does not carry teacher licensure for a K-12 setting. The curriculum also includes ONLINE coursework in English, Math, the Humanities, and Social Sciences. Additional coursework includes an emphasis working with infants and toddlers. Assessment 1: Portfolio Assessment/ Praxis II Prek-Associate 1. Description of the assessment. Though a portfolio has been historically used for this assessment, it has been replaced with Praxis II Pre-Kindergarten when that test was required by the state. 2. Description of how the assessment aligns with the standards. The portfolio assessment was designed to address content knowledge for each standard. The Praxis II test is aligned in this way: Alignment of Praxis Assessments with Standards Standard Praxis II 2010-11 Praxis II 2011-2012 1. Promoting child development and learning Development of young children and contribution of theory to educational practice I. Early Childhood Development 2. Building family and community relationships II. Teaching and Supporting Diverse Children 3. Observing, documenting and assessing to support young children and families Development of young children and contribution of theory to educational practice III. Creating a Developmentally Appropriate Learning Environment 4. Teaching and learning Planning, Impelmenting, and evaluating instruction for prek children IV. Teaching and Learning 5.Becoming a professional V. Professionalism, Family, and Community 3. A brief analysis of data findings Data indicate that candidates who completed the Praxis exam scored 75% or above in every category in both 2010 and 2011. This indicates that students possess content knowledge around each of the standards to which the Praxis is aligned. This provides strong evidence for each of the NAEYC Standards. 4. Data: 2010-2011 Praxis (Four candidates; initial Praxis II Test) Percent correct of items in each topic Development of young children and contribution of theory to educational practice Planning, Implementing, and evaluating instruction for prek children 2011-2012 (one candidate at this time) Percent correct of items in each topic: I. Early Childhood Development II. Teaching and Supporting Diverse Children III. Creating a Developmentally Appropriate Learning Environment IV. Teaching and Learning V. Professionalism, Family, and Community 75 75 82.5 82.5 87.5% 90.0% 75% 82.5% 92.3 100 93.3 90.9 94.1 Portfolio Data: Assessment 1: Portfolio Assessment 2008-09 2009-10 Organization 4.8 3.7 Mechanics 4.7 2.7 Table of contents 4.8 2.8 I ntroductory cover letter 4.8 4.8 1. Promoting child development and learning 1.0 1 Introduction to standard 4.9 3.9 Two activity plans 4.9 4.8 Documentation panel or other curriculum 4.9 4.9 Release forms 5.0 N/A 2. Building family and community relationships 1.0 1 Introduction to standard Parent newsletter, parent brochure, or, power point presentation for parents 5.0 4.0 4.7 4.0 Presentations, grants, fundraisers, projects & media connections 4.5 4.1 3. Observing, documenting and assessing to support young children and families 1.0 1 Introduction to standard 4.9 4.0 Anecdotal notes, narrative summary 9.6 9.1 Release forms 1.0 1 4. Teaching and learning 4.9 4.0 Introduction to standard U. C. supervisor evaluation, mentor evaluation, self evaluation, positive disposition statement Release forms 2.5 6.7 1.0 2.3 6.9 1 5.Becoming a professional 4.9 4 Philosophy statement, evidence of being an advocate for children and families, resume 7.7 7.5 Mentor evaluation 242 a and/or b 1.7 1.3 N 39 40 Assessment 2: Educational Impact Assessment Description of the assessment: Following the implementation of the activity and materials planning (Assessment 3) each candidate selects three students for specific assessment and documentation of their educational growth as a result of the activity. Description of how the assessment aligns with the standards: The following chart documents the alignment between the assessment and activity. Assessment ___ Provides specific anecdotal information that is clearly aligned with plan’s objectives/standards ___ Makes general comments that are somewhat aligned with plan’s objectives and standards 4.1 Candidates participate in classroom and program evaluation, and assess and utilize data to inform instruction. 4.2 Candidates select, construct, and utilize a variety of formative and summative assessment strategies and instruments as part of the instructional process appropriate to the learning outcomes being ___ Omitted, vague, or unrelated to plan’s objectives and standards Educational Impact Assessment evaluated. 4.3 Candidates accurately define the characteristics, uses, advances, and limitations of different types of student assessments, including, but not limited to, state value-added dimension reports and data. 4.4 Candidates collect and use assessment information with the assistance of parents and other professionals. 4.5 Candidates demonstrate use of systematic data to individualize and adapt practices to meet each child's changing needs. ___Clearly identifies 3 children using anecdotal information to support meeting, exceeding, or failing objectives ___Missing or inaccurate content to clearly identify 3 children using anecdotal information to support meeting, exceeding, or failing objectives ___Failure to clearly identify 3 children using anecdotal information to support meeting, exceeding, or failing objectives 4.4 Candidates collect and use assessment information with the assistance of parents and other professionals. 4.5 Candidates demonstrate use of systematic data to individualize and adapt practices to meet each child's changing needs. ___ Plan has some grammatically errors, but is easy to read and submitted on time ___ Plan has many grammatically errors, is hard to follow, and/or is submitted late A brief analysis of data indicates that candidates are … Data (documented on the scoring rubric itself): Item and Indicator↓ Means → Assessment ___ Provides specific anecdotal information that is clearly aligned with plan’s objectives/standards ___ Makes general comments that are somewhat aligned with plan’s objectives and standards 2008 2009 Eng. 2009 Span 2.83 2.7 2.75 2.57 3 3 2010 Eng 2.84 ___ Omitted, vague, or unrelated to plan’s objectives and standards Educational Impact Assessment ___Clearly identifies 3 children using anecdotal information to support meeting, exceeding, or failing objectives ___Missing or inaccurate content to clearly identify 3 children using anecdotal information to support meeting, exceeding, or failing objectives ___Failure to clearly identify 3 children using anecdotal information to support meeting, exceeding, or failing objectives Number of Responses 7 31 4 Assessment 3: Activity Plans Description of the assessment: The lesson plan assessment is used to assess the candidate’s ability to create lesson plans that effectively and accurately teach content based on age appropriate standards, instructional strategies, and prior/background knowledge. The instructional strategies should be based on relevant theory and best practices. The lesson plan must demonstrate that the candidate can write 2.77 39 measurable objectives that align with the instruction and assessments included within the plan. It also requires candidates to demonstrate an understanding of the cultural diversity in the classroom where the plan will be implemented and use this to create meaningful learning activities that connect to the daily lives of the children in that class. The lesson plan is introduced in methods courses during the second year of the program to guide candidates in appropriately completing the plan. Formal assessment of the lesson plan begins during the Student Teaching and Internship experiences, with data being collected during the final clinical experience of Internship. The design of the plan and corresponding rubric was simplified for 2011 to allow candidates to focus more fully on the other aspects of the lesson/activity plan. Description of how this assessment specifically aligns with the standards: Indicator Description Rationale 1. Discuss why you are planning this activity at this particular time? Rubric ___Provides details about the design of the activity including its relevance to the children’s abilities and teacher’s knowledge needed to implement the activity ___Makes general reference to the design, children’s abilities and teacher’s knowledge needed to implement the activity ___Missing information or vague description of the design, children’s abilities and teacher’s knowledge needed to implement the activity ___ Strong in content knowledge & fully addresses classroom planning, DAP, curriculum area, and theoretical perspective 2. How is this activity/center relevant to overall classroom planning? ___ Satisfactory content knowledge in addressing classroom planning, DAP, curriculum area, and theoretical perspective 3. How is this activity/center developmentally appropriate? 4. How does this activity/center relate to the curriculum area you cited above? ___ Weak, missing, or inaccurate content knowledge in addressing classroom planning, DAP, curriculum area, and theoretical perspective 5. How does this activity reveal your knowledge about theory in practice? Standards ___ 3 to 5 standards are clearly recorded and accurately connect the activity with Ohio Department of Education’s (ODE) curriculum guidelines &/or Head Start Outcomes ___ Too many or too few standards are identified to realistically manage curriculum content Alignment 1.2 Candidates know and understand theoretical concepts and are able to apply that knowledge in pre-kindergarten curriculum and environment 1.4 Candidates demonstrate use of knowledge of how children develop and learn to provide opportunities that support the physical, social, emotional, language, cognitive, and aesthetic development of all children from birth to 8. 1.1 Candidates know and understand theoretical concepts and are able to apply that knowledge to pre-kindergarten curriculum and environments. 1.2 Candidates demonstrate their understanding of developmentally effective appropriates to teaching and learning. 2,2 Candidates demonstrate use of developmental knowledge and approaches to create healthy and safe learning environments.2.5 Candidates utilize connections and build upon the student's individual experiences, prior learning talents, culture, and family and community values, as a way of improving performance 3.1 Candidates design, implement, and evaluate meaningful and challenging curriculum to engage all students 6.1 Candidates understand the importance of and engage in continuous learning and professional development by using appropriate professional literature, organizations, resources, and experiences to inform and improve practice. Objectives Materials 1. Made by student (not commercial) 2. Listed on plan 3. Photograph provided Teacher Interactions 1. Questions 2. Scaffolding Methods/Procedures 1. Preparation of the Environment 2. Guidance Strategies 3. Introduction ___ Missing or incorrect alignment of standards with the activity addressed in this plan ___ All objectives are specific, aligned to standards & meet DAP principles ___ Some objectives are specific, aligned to standards & meet DAP principles ___ Objectives are absent, unclear, too general, do not meet DAP principles ___attractive, durable, academically correct, designed to help children explore concepts addressed in this plan ___ somewhat attractive and relevant to learning objectives addressed in this plan __ nonprofessional appearance, incorrect based on content taught in curriculum courses, not effective for developing the concepts developed in this plan ___Appropriate questions/comments engage children in learning based on the objectives and standards cited earlier in the plan ___Relatively appropriate questions/comments somewhat follow through with objectives and standards cited earlier in the plan ___Inappropriate questions/comments do not follow through with objectives and standards cited earlier in the plan Preparation of the Environment: ___Clearly explains how the activity/center will be set up and involve children ___Gives incomplete information about set up and involvement of children ___Fails to tell how the activity/center will be set up and/or how children will be involved ___Clearly identifies appropriate guidance strategies to be used throughout the activity ___Gives incomplete information about guidance strategies to be used throughout the activity ___Fails to discuss appropriate guidance strategies used throughout the activity ___Clearly discusses strategies for inviting participation and bridging gap between current and future knowledge ___Makes general comments for inviting participation and bridging gap between current and future knowledge ___Omit information for inviting participation and bridging gap between current future knowledge ___Missing or inaccurate content to clearly identify 3 children using anecdotal information to support meeting, exceeding, or failing objectives 3.1.1 Candidates provide integrated learning experiences in curriculum content areas. 3.2 Candidates integrate goals from IEPs and IFSP into daily activities and routines. 3.5 Candidate demonstrates use of instructional strategies, activities, resources, materials, and technologies that engage students in their learning and support content.3.4 Candidates demonstrate the use of a variety of instructional strategies, resources, and technology to support the learning needs of young children. 3.1.2 Candidates interact with children in ways that facilitate the development of expressive language and thought in all children. 3.5 Candidates demonstrate use of instructional strategies, activities, resources, materials, and technologies that engage students in their learning and support content. 3.3 Candidates demonstrate use of individual and group guidance techniques to encourage positive social interaction among children and to foster a sense of security, promote self-control, and develop positive strategies to resolve conflict. 3.3 Candidates demonstrate use of individual and group guidance techniques to encourage positive social interaction among children and to foster a sense of security, promote self-control, and develop positive strategies to resolve conflict. ___Failure to clearly identify 3 children using anecdotal information to support meeting, exceeding, or failing objectives Dispositions 1. Reflection of Self 2. Reflection of Plan ___ Gives personal insight about teaching and/or the learning process that relates to professional development ___ Attends somewhat to personal thoughts and feelings about teaching based on this plan ___ Shows minimal effort in writing about thoughts, feelings and progress in teaching ___ Clearly evaluates the overall plan with regard to its strengths and weaknesses ___ Pays some attention to the plan’s strengths and weakness Mechanics ___ Does not attempt to evaluate the plan with regard to its strengths and weaknesses ___ Plan is grammatically correct, easy to read, and submitted on time ___ Plan has some grammatically errors, but is easy to read and submitted on time ___ Plan has many grammatically errors, is hard to follow, and/or is submitted late 6.1 Candidates understand the importance of and engage in continuous learning and professional development by using appropriate professional literature, organizations, resources, and experiences to inform and improve practice. 6.4. Candidates reflect on their practices, articulate a philosophy and rationale for decisions; self-assess and evaluate themselves as a basis for professional development. 5.1 Candidates demonstrate proficiency in listening, written, and verbal communication skills. A brief analysis of data finding: Data: Assessment 3 Activity Plans Indicator Description Rationale Rubric 2008 Mean 2009 Engl. 2009 Span. 2010 Eng. 2011 Eng. ___Provides details about the design of the activity including it’s relevance to the children’s abilities and teacher’s knowledge needed to implement the activity ___Makes general reference to the design, children’s abilities and teacher’s knowledge needed to implement the activity ___Missing information or vague description of the design, children’s abilities and teacher’s knowledge needed to implement the activity 2.48 2.27 2.75 2.37 2.38 ___ Strong in content knowledge & fully addresses classroom planning, DAP, curriculum area, and theoretical perspective ___ Satisfactory content knowledge in addressing classroom planning, DAP, curriculum area, and theoretical perspective ___ Weak, missing, or inaccurate content knowledge in addressing classroom planning, DAP, curriculum area, and theoretical perspective 1.86 2.1 2.5 2.36 4.18 Standards Objectives Materials Teacher Interactions 1. Questions 2. Scaffolding Methods/Procedures 1. Preparation of the Environment 2. Guidance Strategies 3. Introduction ___ 3 to 5 standards are clearly recorded and accurately connect the activity with Ohio Department of Education’s (ODE) curriculum guidelines &/or Head Start Outcomes ___ Too many or too few standards are identified to realistically manage curriculum content ___ Missing or incorrect alignment of standards with the activity addressed in this plan ___ All objectives are specific, aligned to standards & meet DAP principles ___ Some objectives are specific, aligned to standards & meet DAP principles ___ Objectives are absent, unclear, too general, do not meet DAP principles ___attractive, durable, academically correct, designed to help children explore concepts addressed in this plan ___ somewhat attractive and relevant to learning objectives addressed in this plan __ nonprofessional appearance, incorrect based on content taught in curriculum courses, not effective for developing the concepts developed in this plan 2.57 2.9 3 2.94 2.98 2.71 2.8 3 2.91 2.78 2.57 2.7 2.75 2.86 2.0 2.57 2.9 2.75 2.68 3.19 3 2.9 2.75 2.70 2.83 2.8 2.75 2.70 ___Appropriate questions/comments engage children in learning based on the objectives and standards cited earlier in the plan ___Relatively appropriate questions/comments somewhat follow through with objectives and standards cited earlier in the plan ___Inappropriate questions/comments do not follow through with objectives and standards cited earlier in the plan Preparation of the Environment: ___Clearly explains how the activity/center will be set up and involve children ___Gives incomplete information about set up and involvement of children ___Fails to tell how the activity/center will be set up and/or how children will be involved ___Clearly identifies appropriate guidance strategies to be used throughout the activity ___Gives incomplete information about guidance strategies to be used throughout the activity ___Fails to discuss appropriate guidance strategies used throughout the activity ___Clearly discusses strategies for inviting participation and bridging gap between current and future knowledge ___Makes general comments for inviting participation and bridging gap between current and future knowledge ___Omit information for inviting participation and bridging gap between current future knowledge ___ Omitted, vague, or unrelated to plan’s objectives and standards 2.27 2.5 2.8 2.75 2.70 Dispositions 1. Reflection 2. Reflection of Plan Mechanics ___ Gives personal insight about teaching and/or the learning process that relates to professional development ___ Attends somewhat to personal thoughts and feelings about teaching based on this plan ___ Shows minimal effort in writing about thoughts, feelings and progress in teaching ___ Clearly evaluates the overall plan with regard to its strengths and weaknesses ___ Pays some attention to the plan’s strengths and weakness ___ Does not attempt to evaluate the plan with regard to its strengths and weaknesses ___ Plan is grammatically correct, easy to read, and submitted on time ___ Plan has some grammatically errors, but is easy to read and submitted on time ___ Plan has many grammatically errors, is hard to follow, and/or is submitted late Number of responses 2.6 3 2.77 2.52 2.43 2.7 2 2.77 2.52 2.43 2.5 2.78 2.88 7 31 39 27 2.14 4 3. A Brief analysis of the data findings The activity/lesson plan assessment has provided strong evidence that the candidates in their field clinical experiences are able to create lesson plans which allow them to effectively implement instruction. Candidates demonstrate the ability to plan developmentally appropriate activities that respond to the interests, needs, and abilities of the children in their care. They demonstrate strong rationales, alignment to standards, appropriate objectives, and instructional strategies that respond to the diversity present in the classroom. The simplification of the plan/rubric in the methods section resulted in a lower score in 2011 than in the previous year, but other areas of the plan such as the rationale increased, which has historically been an area in which students struggled. 4. An interpretation of how that data provides evidence for meeting standards The activity/lesson plan assessment has provided strong evidence that the candidates in the final clinical experiences are able to create lesson plans which allow them to effectively implement instruction. Candidates demonstrate the ability to plan developmentally appropriate activities that respond to the interests, needs, and abilities of the children in their care. They demonstrate strong rationales, alignment to standards, appropriate objectives, and instructional strategies that respond to the diversity present in the classroom. This provides evidence that candidates meet standards for teaching and learning. Assessment 4: Assessment of candidate’s professionalism in pre-kindergarten learning environments: Candidate’s Performance in Field Experience Description of the assessment: The assessment of Candidate’s Performance in Field Experience is a comprehensive assessment of the candidate’s performance in the pre-k classroom setting during the clinical experiences of Student Teaching A, B, and Internship. The assessment covers a variety of areas including curriculum planning, creating an environment that builds relationships and stimulates learning, teaching for student learning, teacher professionalism, and communication/management skills. The assessment rates candidates on a scale of 1-4. Description of how this assessment specifically aligns with the standards: 6.6 Candidates participate in 300 hours of field experiences in a variety of settings in which young children from birth through age 8 are served. 6.6.1 Candidates participate in field-based experiences in culturally, racially, and socioeconomically diverse settings, and include opportunities to work with a range of student abilities. Curriculum Planning Plans activities that reflect awareness of the developmental levels of children (A-1) Ohio Standard 1.1 Candidates know and understand theoretical concepts and are able to apply that knowledge in Pre-Kindergarten curriculum and environments. Plans activities relevant to children's life experiences and cultural diversity (A-1) 2.3 Candidates apply knowledge of their children’s cultural and linguistic diversity to create learning environments and experiences that affirm and value diversity. Aligns curriculum goals and objectives with Ohio's Early Learning Content Standards (A-4) 6.3 Candidates understand legal and procedural requirements (e.g., Division of Early Childhood (DEC) Recommended Practices, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Effectively states clear goals and rationals for activities based on understanding of constructivist theory (A-2) 1.2 Candidates demonstrate their understanding of developmentally effective approaches to teaching and learning (e.g., play, small group projects, open-ended questioning, group discussion, problem-solving, cooperative learning, and inquiry experience) 1.3 Candidates develop lessons/units of study to promote a high degree of learning for all students. Observes strengths and interests of children and builds on them either by extending current activities or planning related ones (A-3) Reflectively evaluates activities and uses personal observation and mentor feedback to plan future curriculum activities (A-5) 4.1 Candidates participate in classroom and program evaluation, and assess and utilize data to inform instruction in Pre-Kindergarten learning environments. 4.2 Candidates select, construct, and utilize a variety of formative and summative assessment strategies and instruments as part of the instructional process appropriate to the learning outcomes being evaluated. 4.3 Candidates accurately define the characteristics, uses, advantages and limitation of different types of student assessments, including, but not limited to state value-added dimension reports and data. 4.4 Candidates collect and use assessment information with the assistance of parents and other professionals. Exhibits respect for all children and adults through language and actions (B-1) 2.3 Candidates apply knowledge of their children’s cultural and linguistic diversity to create learning Exhibits enthusiasm and warmth (B-2) Uses encouragement rather than praise when responding to children (B-1) Focuses attention on the classroom situation rather than on personal needs during class (B-2) Converses about interests which are important to the specific child (B-2) (E) Regulates rates and duration of speaking to meet listener's needs (B-2) Makes comments and asks questions which stimulate and extend thinking (B-3) (C-3) Introduces activities in a positive, enthusiastic manner Kneels to child's level when speaking with him or her (B-2) (E) Establishes eye contact with child or adult to whom he or she is speaking (B-2) Helps children verbalize feelings (B-2) Reinforces routine and manages transitions in a confident and positive manner (B-4) environments and experiences that affirm and value diversity. Positions self according to cues of children for maximum group awareness (B-5) 3.1.2 Candidates interact with children in ways that facilitate the development of expressive language and thought in all children. Checks for safety of materials and equipment (B-5) 2.2 Candidates demonstrate use of developmental knowledge and approaches to create healthy and safe learning environments. 3.1.2 Candidates interact with children in ways that facilitate the development of expressive language and thought in all children. 2.1 Candidates practice classroom management techniques; maximize time on task, treat all students fairly, and establish an environment that is respectful, supportive, and caring. 2.2.1 Candidates know and apply effective sanitation procedures, recognize signs and symptoms of communicable diseases, and follow medication administration policies. Assumes an adult (rather than a playmate) role in the classroom (C-5) (D-2) Allows children opportunities for independent exploration of materials and environment (C-2) Listens and responds to children's comments and questions in a timely, appropriate manner (C-1) Adjusts activities in response to children's interests and use (C-4) Asks open ended questions which stimulate thinking and discovery (C-3) Intervenes or facilitates only when it will enhance the child's exploration (C-3) 2.2.2 Candidates understand and comply with local, state, and federal emergency procedures. 5.3 Candidates demonstrate use of strategies to connect with Pre-Kindergarten children, and collaborate with families. 3.4 Candidates demonstrate the use of a variety of instructional strategies, resources, and technology, to support the learning needs of young children. 3.5 Candidates demonstrate use of instructional strategies, activities, resources, materials, and technologies that engage students in their learning and support content. Extends children's language and thinking through carefully timed comments and questions, I.e. uses scaffolding techniques (C-3) 1.4 Candidates demonstrate use of knowledge of how children develop and learn to provide opportunities that support the physical, social, emotional, language, cognitive, and aesthetic development of all children from birth to age eight. Dresses appropriately for the classroom (D-2) Follow specific rules and policies of the school (D-2) Complete assignments and tasks on time (D-2) Exhibits cooperation and rapport with mentor, instructors and colleagues (D-3) Uses reflective practice as evidenced by journal and conferencing (D-3) 6.5 Candidates demonstrate professional work habits including confidentiality, dependability, and time management. Accepts constructive feedback appropriately (D-1) 5.4 Candidates establish and maintain positive, collaborative relationships with colleagues, other professionals, and families and work effectively as part of an educational team Exhibits a sense of responsibility and dependability (D-3) Exhibits a willingness to go beyond requirements (D-2) Exhibits cooperation and rapport with mentor, cooperating teacher, and staff (D-3) 6.5 Candidates demonstrate professional work habits including confidentiality, dependability, and time management. Evaluates the effectiveness of activities in written assignments and in conversation with mentor and/or instructor (D-1) 6.4 Candidates reflect on their practices, articulate a philosophy and rationale for decisions; selfassess and evaluate themselves as a basis for professional development Initiates conversation and asks questions of mentor in order to further learning (D-3) 5.4 Candidates establish and maintain positive, collaborative relationships with colleagues, other professionals, and families and work effectively as part of an educational team Establishes appropriate relationships with parents reflecting an understandingof the student teacher's role (D-5) 4.4.1 Candidates recognize families’ contributions identifying their children’s various strengths and use this information to construct appropriate learning goals. Kneels to child's level when speaking with him or her 3.1.2 Candidates interact with children in ways that facilitate the development of expressive language and thought in all children. Establishes eye contact with child to who he/she is speaking Models appropriate grammar, language and tone Adjusts volume and tone of voice to suit the situatuion 5.1 Candidates demonstrate proficiency in listening, written and verbal communication skills. 6.4 Candidates reflect on their practices, articulate a philosophy and rationale for decisions; selfassess and evaluate themselves as a basis for professional development. 5.2 Candidates understand the importance of building positive and supportive relationships with families and communities to enhance learning experiences. Uses effective whole group transition such as songs, finger plays and movement activities as part of the regular classroom routine 3.3 Candidates demonstrate use of individual and group guidance techniques to encourage positive social interaction among children and to foster a sense of security, promote personal self-control, and develop positive strategies to resolve conflict. Follows a consistent cleanup routine that is effective in engaging the children in cleaning up quickly and moving on to the next activity with ease Demonstrates active listening skills 2.2.3 Candidates demonstrate understanding of emotional distress, stress and trauma, basic health and nutrition, and safety management practices. Avoids giving unintentional choices to children Initiates and extends conversations which are natural and relevant Demonstrates ability to interact with individual or small groups while maintaining total group awareness 3.1.2 Candidates interact with children in ways that facilitate the development of expressive language and thought in all children. Uses facial expressions, voice level, and other communication techniques to maintain the attention of an individual child or the group depending on the situation Uses clearly stated, positive redirections Uses problem solving techniques to manage interpersonal conflicts Allows children to assume responsibility for solving interpersonal conflicts when possible Takes the role of mediator to facilitate problem solving when necessary n 2.2.3 Candidates demonstrate understanding of emotional distress, stress and trauma, basic health and nutrition, and safety management practices. A brief analysis of data findings: Data indicate that candidates in the clinical experience demonstrate an expected level of performance for the associate degree level. Data across the years indicate a slightly upward trend, indicating that coursework experiences have prepared and continue to prepare students to be effective teachers in the field. Scores are strong in most areas, with the weakest scores showing in areas of communicating with young children, including extending thinking through questions and problem solving, as well as reinforcing routines and managing transitions. It should be noted, however, that all scores with the exception of one are 3.16 or above on a 1-4 scale, indicating an appropriate level of knowledge for associate degree candidates. Data: 05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.7 3.7 3.52 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.48 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.39 3.3 3.2 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.38 3.3 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.56 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.68 3.7 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.68 3.5 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.32 3.2 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.64 3.1 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.52 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.72 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.64 3.2 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.52 3.4 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.52 3.7 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.5 2.72 Positions self according to cues of children for maximum group awareness (B-5) 3.5 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.64 Checks for safety of materials and equipment (B-5) 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.32 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.54 3.2 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.56 3.1 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.56 3.1 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.44 Plans activities that reflect awareness of the developmental levels of children (A-1) Plans activities relevant to children's life experiences and cultural diversity (A-1) Aligns curriculum goals and objectives with Ohio's Early Learning Content Standards (A-4) Effectively states clear goals and rationales for activities based on understanding of constructivist theory (A-2) Observes strengths and interests of children and builds on them either by extending current activities or planning related ones (A-3) Reflectively evaluates activities and uses personal observation and mentor feedback to plan future curriculum activities (A-5) Exhibits respect for all children and adults through language and actions (B-1) Exhibits enthusiasm and warmth (B-2) Uses encouragement rather than praise when responding to children (B-1) Focuses attention on the classroom situation rather than on personal needs during class (B-2) Converses about interests which are important to the specific child (B-2) (E) Regulates rates and duration of speaking to meet listener's needs (B-2) Makes comments and asks questions which stimulate and extend thinking (B-3) (C-3) Introduces activities in a positive, enthusiastic manner Kneels to child's level when speaking with him or her (B2) (E) Establishes eye contact with child or adult to whom he or she is speaking (B-2) Helps children verbalize feelings (B-2) Reinforces routine and manages transitions in a confident and positive manner (B-4) Assumes an adult (rather than a playmate) role in the classroom (C-5) (D-2) Allows children opportunities for independent exploration of materials and environment (C-2) Listens and responds to children's comments and questions in a timely, appropriate manner (C-1) Adjusts activities in response to children's interests and use (C-4) 10 11 Asks open ended questions which stimulate thinking and discovery (C-3) Intervenes or facilitates only when it will enhance the child's exploration (C-3) Extends children's language and thinking through carefully timed comments and questions, I.e. uses scaffolding techniques (C-3) Dresses appropriately for the classroom (D-2) Follow specific rules and policies of the school (D-2) Complete assignments and tasks on time (D-2) Exhibits cooperation and rapport with mentor, instructors and colleagues (D-3) Uses reflective practice as evidenced by journal and conferencing (D-3) Accepts constructive feedback appropriately (D-1) Exhibits a sense of responsibility and dependability (D-3) Exhibits a willingness to go beyond requirements (D-2) Exhibits cooperation and rapport with mentor, cooperating teacher, and staff (D-3) Evaluates the effectiveness of activities in written assignments and in conversation with mentor and/or instructor (D-1) Initiates conversation and asks questions of mentor in order to further learning (D-3) Establishes appropriate relationships with parents reflecting an understanding of the student teacher's role (D-5) Kneels to child's level when speaking with him or her Establishes eye contact with child to who he/she is speaking Models appropriate grammar, language and tone Adjusts volume and tone of voice to suit the situation Uses effective whole group transition such as songs, finger plays and movement activities as part of the regular classroom routine Follows a consistent cleanup routine that is effective in engaging the children in cleaning up quickly and moving on to the next activity with ease Demonstrates active listening skills Avoids giving unintentional choices to children Initiates and extends conversations which are natural and relevant Demonstrates ability to interact with individual or small groups while maintaining total group awareness Uses facial expressions, voice level, and other communication techniques to maintain the attention of an individual child or the group depending on the situation Uses clearly stated, positive redirections Uses problem solving techniques to manage interpersonal conflicts 3.7 3.4 3.3 3.6 3.5 3.48 3.7 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.5 3.24 3.6 3.3 3.2 3.5 3.4 3.16 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.4 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.24 3.64 3.71 3.5 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.72 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.5 3.2 3.6 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.68 3.56 3.54 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.71 3.7 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.54 3.4 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.54 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.50 3.1 3.6 3.8 3.9 3.7 3.52 3.4 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.68 3.0 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.3 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.68 3.64 3.0 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.4 3.6 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.44 3.2 3.1 3.4 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.4 3.6 3.4 3.48 3.40 3.0 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.48 3.1 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.4 3.58 3.1 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.5 3.56 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.28 3.0 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.3 3.36 Allows children to assume responsibility for solving interpersonal conflicts when possible Takes the role of mediator to facilitate problem solving when necessary n 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.28 3.0 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.38 137 38 19 38 59 26 An interpretation of how the data provide evidence for meeting the standard: Data indicate that candidates in the clinical experience demonstrate an expected level of performance for the associate degree level. Data across the years indicate an overall upward trend, indicating that coursework experiences have prepared and continue to prepare students to be effective teachers in the field. The program has implemented several examples of best practice videos for candidates to reflect upon to enhance candidate performance in the field experiences. The program has also strived to maintain instructor and mentor continuity throughout the practicum and internship experiences. These results provide strong evidence that candidates demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and dispositions related to the Ohio Teaching Standards indicated above. Assessment 5: Grades in Coursework Description of the assessment: This assessment includes the grades of all candidates in all coursework. Description of how this assessment specifically aligns with the standards: Alignment is provided in this table: Title Orientation to the Profession Description Designed to introduce students to problems and procedures related to schools and centers. Prearranged visits are part of the course Ohio Standard Standard 2. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates create learning environments that promote growth and development and achievement for all students. Standard 5. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates collaborate and communicate with students, families, other educators, administrators and the community to support student learning. Classroom Organization and Management Methods of guiding children in preschool settings with empathy, positive discipline strategies, and communication skills Preschool Mathematics and Science Methods Methods of teaching math and science within a developmentally appropriate, integrated, early childhood setting. Standard 6. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates demonstrate responsibility for professional growth, performance and involvement as an individual and as a member of a learning community. Standard 2. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates create learning environments that promote growth and development and achievement for all students. Standard 1. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates apply content knowledge in early childhood learning environments. Standard 2. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates create learning environments that promote growth and development and achievement for all students. Standard 3. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates know and apply instructional strategies to promote students’ learning and meet the needs of all students. Standard 4. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates construct and use varied assessments to inform instruction, evaluate, and ensure student learning in Pre-Kindergarten learning environments. Language Arts and Literacy I and II Development of young children from early reading and writing to fluent reading and writing; integrating literature into the early childhood curriculum Standard 1. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates apply content knowledge in early childhood learning environments. Standard 2. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates create learning environments that promote growth and development and achievement for all students. Standard 3. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates know and apply instructional strategies to promote students’ learning and meet the needs of all students. Standard 4. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates construct and use varied assessments to inform instruction, evaluate, and ensure student learning in Pre-Kindergarten learning environments. Preschool Student Teaching Supervised student teaching experience in a developmentally appropriate preschool setting. Placements are half days M-F. By application. AS degree Cohort only Standard 1. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates apply content knowledge in early childhood learning environments. Standard 3. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates know and apply instructional strategies to promote students’ learning and meet the needs of all students. Standard 4. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates construct and use varied assessments to inform instruction, evaluate, and ensure student learning in Pre-Kindergarten learning environments. Standard 5. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates collaborate and communicate with students, families, other educators, administrators and the community to support student learning. Standard 6. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates demonstrate responsibility for professional growth, performance and involvement as an individual and as a member of a learning community. Preschool Internship Creative Arts in Early Childhood Education Extension of Preschool Student Teaching with additional responsibilities. By application only. Placements are half days M-F An examination of art, music, movement, and dramatic play curriculum content as well as strategies and techniques for involving young children in aesthetic experiences. Standard 6. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates demonstrate responsibility for professional growth, performance and involvement as an individual and as a member of a learning community. Standard 1. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates apply content knowledge in early childhood learning environments. Standard 2. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates create learning environments that promote growth and development and achievement for all students. Standard 3. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates know and apply instructional strategies to promote students’ learning and meet the needs of all students. Standard 1. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates apply content knowledge in early childhood learning environments. Standard 2. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates create learning environments that promote growth and development and achievement for all students. Standard 4. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates construct and use varied assessments to inform instruction, evaluate, and ensure student learning in Pre-Kindergarten learning environments. Standard 5. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates collaborate and communicate with students, families, other educators, administrators and the community to support student learning. Observation and Planning Presentation of techniques for observing, recording, and assessing the behavior of young children. Discussion of strategies for data collection and use of data for longand short-term planning. Standard 3. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates know and apply instructional strategies to promote students’ learning and meet the needs of all students. Standard 4. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates construct and use varied assessments to inform instruction, evaluate, and ensure student learning in Pre-Kindergarten learning environments. Standard 5. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates collaborate and communicate with students, families, other educators, administrators and the community to support student learning. Child Development Social Development and Self Regulation Introduction to Inclusive Practices Prenatal and early growth and development through age 6. Standard 1. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates apply content knowledge in early childhood learning environments. Investigation of the building blocks for fostering mentally, emotionally, socially health children ages birth to five. Standard 2. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates create learning environments that promote growth and development and achievement for all students. Introduction to teaching practices and services for children with developmental delays, ages birth to five. Standard 1. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates apply content knowledge in early childhood learning environments. Standard 2. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates create learning environments that promote growth and development and achievement for all students. Standard 3. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates know and apply instructional strategies to promote students’ learning and meet the needs of all students. Standard 4. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates construct and use varied assessments to inform instruction, evaluate, and ensure student learning in Pre-Kindergarten learning environments. Developmental concerns Issues related to prek, kindergarten, and primary grade children (who are at risk, demonstrate developmental delays, are gifted/creative/talented, or have identified disabilities) and their families, including the identification/placement process, IEPs, parents' rights. Standard 5. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates collaborate and communicate with students, families, other educators, administrators and the community to support student learning. Standard 1. Pre-Kindergarten Associate candidates apply content knowledge in early childhood learning environments. Data: 2008-2009 A Foundations SPED Learning Early Childhood Education Online Orientation to Professional Practice Classroom Organization and Management A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D+ D D- F 51 15 14 13 6 3 5 4 1 1 2 4 12 13 11 4 4 3 2 1 3 2 6 I/F UW W 1 10 11 4 X Math and Science in Early Childhood Education 36 6 11 10 4 7 2 3 Language Arts & Literacy I 21 4 10 6 4 4 2 2 Language Arts & Literacy II 40 7 5 7 3 1 3 2 Preschool Student Teaching B 14 11 8 10 5 Preschool Internship 14 3 5 3 3 27 14 7 3 6 1 3 Integrated Preschool Curriculum Building Family and Community Partnerships Family and Culture in Early Childhood Education 28 3 6 1 1 1 50 17 7 12 6 4 3 Observation and Planning 30 7 3 1 7 3 3 1 Child Development I 59 16 11 16 11 2 4 3 Child Development II 23 19 8 10 6 3 7 1 Nealth, Safety, and Nutrition Addressing the Needs of Dual Language Learners I Working with Families in Early Childhood Education Social Development and SelfRegulation Introduction to Inclusionary Practices 21 13 8 10 2 4 4 3 44 6 2 7 2 1 8 A- B+ B B- C+ C 51 16 12 5 3 2 11 15 10 3 2 5 1 1 1 5 1 3 1 2 2 5 2 1 1 1 Preschool Student Teaching A 1 1 2 1 4 1 Infant and Family Child Care Infant and Toddler Programs Creative Arts in Early Childhood Education Administration of Early Childhood Programs 13 3 3 2 2 2 6 3 6 1 1 6 2 2 8 3 3 2 5 1 2 1 4 1 4 14 1 1 9 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 2 2 I/F UW W 3 7 3 5 5 Developmental Concerns Families in Early Childhood Special Education Assessment and Evaluation of Children Birth to 5 Number Sense and Representation for Teachers and Learners Evidence Based Practice in Early Intervention A Foundations SPED Learning Early Childhood Education Online Orientation to Professional Practice C- D+ D D- F 1 1 1 10 1 1 5 3 P Classroom Organization and Management Math and Science in Early Childhood Education 22 4 6 4 4 2 7 28 10 4 5 5 3 3 1 2 Language Arts and Literacy I and II 28 8 10 5 3 4 5 1 2 Language Arts & Literacy I 45 12 4 8 8 1 2 1 Preschool Student Teaching A 10 8 7 2 1 1 Preschool Student Teaching B 12 2 3 1 Preschool Internship 16 5 3 1 2 8 Infant and Family Child Care Infant and Toddler Programs Creative Arts in Early Childhood Education 3 5 1 1 2 1 4 1 3 1 1 4 3 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 39 13 9 6 Integrated Preschool Curriculum Building Family and Community Partnerships Family and Culture in Early Childhood Education 12 2 1 10 3 3 3 5 4 45 14 9 14 Observation and Planning Administration of Early Childhood Programs 33 9 5 4 2 Child Development I 33 10 Child Development II 14 Nealth, Safety, and Nutrition Addressing the Needs of Dual Language Learners I Working with Families in Early Childhood Education Social Development and SelfRegulation Introduction to Inclusionary Practices 18 8 6 8 2 6 2 5 4 1 3 2 6 21 6 7 18 3 16 12 3 7 5 6 1 11 7 4 1 1 3 61 10 5 Developmental Concerns Families in Early Childhood Special Education Assessment and Evaluation of Children Birth to 5 Number Sense and Representation for Teachers and Learners Evidence Based Practice in Early Intervention 14 2 4 4 4 3 1 1 1 4 3 3 5 1 6 7 1 8 2 1 8 1 1 1 3 2 1 5 1 21 1 10 3 8 4 1 1 3 1 1 1 6 1 1 2 1 6 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 4 2 3 1 2 1 4 1 3 3 2 2 1 2 2010-2011 A Foundations SPED Learning Early Childhood Education Online Orientation to Professional A- B+ B B- C+ C C- 13 17 4 16 8 4 1 67 20 6 6 5 3 2 D+ D D- F I 1 5 1 1 3 5 Practice Classroom Organization and Management Math and Science in Early Childhood Education 10 11 9 8 5 4 7 3 1 52 6 5 4 3 3 6 Language ARts and Literacy I and II 24 7 6 7 6 3 4 1 2 Language Arts & Literacy I 43 12 5 7 6 3 7 1 2 Preschool Student Teaching A 19 8 4 7 3 2 Preschool Student Teaching B 13 3 6 4 4 1 Preschool Internship 15 7 8 Infant and Toddler Programs Creative Arts in Early Childhood Education 19 6 4 2 4 2 2 24 12 9 5 7 2 7 Integrated Preschool Curriculum Building Family and Community Partnerships Family and Culture in Early Childhood Education 21 7 3 10 5 1 3 9 2 3 1 53 25 10 5 3 1 7 1 Observation and Planning Administration of Early Childhood Programs Child Development I Child Development II Nealth, Safety, and Nutrition Addressing the Needs of Dual Language Learners I Working with Families in Early Childhood Education Social Development and SelfRegulation Introduction to Inclusionary Practices Developmental Concerns Families in Early Childhood Special Education Assessment and Evaluation of Children Birth to 5 Number Sense and Representation for Teachers and Learners Evidence Based Practice in Early Intervention 38 7 5 6 7 2 4 2 5 30 21 14 3 16 10 10 5 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 1 4 1 3 1 4 1 1 1 Infant and Family Child Care A brief analysis of data findings: 4 1 1 15 9 12 4 4 11 3 8 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 4 10 3 5 3 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 3 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 6 1 5 1 1 2 1 1 Data indicate that most candidates do very well in classes, although in most classes a few students do not achieve the needed grade of C or above. There are several potential explanations for this. Most students in this program are non-traditional students and hold a full time position with family commitments. In addition, many students starting out in the program have not attended school in many ears. Grades for beginning courses, such as Learning Early Childhood Education Online tend to be much lower than grades for courses at the end of the program such as Preschool Internship. This indicates that as students gain experience with the program, their grades improve. The addition of the Learning Early Childhood Education Online course has resulted in an improvement in the number of students who receive a C or higher in Child Development 1. Historically, Child Development 1 was the first course that students took upon entering the program. Learning Early Childhood Education Online provides students with an introduction to online learning and includes skills that will help students make the adjustment back to school, including information on time management, study skills, APA citation information, and developmentally appropriate practice for young children. The course includes a slower pace and more hands-on instruction to help students adapt to the demands of a university course. Successful completion of this course results in more students obtaining a C or better in Child Development 1. An interpretation of how the data provide evidence for meeting the standard: Coursework is designed around the knowledge and skills statements. Candidates are successful on quizzes, projects, and on-line class activities related to these knowledge and skills statements. In this way, candidates are successful at meeting standards at a competency level. Candidates who are not successful (i.e., C or better) must repeat the course to ensure competency in the area. Assessment 6: Value Added Assessment Description of the assessment: The value added assessment is a way of analyzing test data to measure teaching and learning. Candidates are asked to read a scenario from an early childhood classroom. Candidates are then asked to complete a series of assessment questions based upon the scenario and integration of the Constructivist Philosophy. Description of how the assessment specifically aligns with the standards: This project aligns with standard 4: 4.1 Candidates participate in classroom and program evaluation and assess and utilize data to inform instruction 4.2 Candidates select, construct, and utilize a variety of formative and summative assessment strategies and instruments as part of the instructional process appropriate to the learning outcomes being evaluated 4.3 Candidates accurately define the characteristics, uses, advanced, and limitations of different types of student assessments, including, but not limited to, state value added dimension reports and data A brief analysis of data findings: Candidates are required to pass this assessment in order to complete the Internship course (18 ECE 243). As a result, students may submit multiple attempts until the assessment is completely passed. Data indicate that the majority of candidates pass the assessment on the first or second try, with few candidates needing a third attempt. Questions 2 and 3A seem to be the most difficult for students to pass on the first attempt, with approximately half of the students needing a second or third attempt. Candidates are able to answer basic questions about what the data mean and the educational decisions in relation to the data, but struggle with matching the data to the appropriate graph. After more instruction, students are able to choose the appropriate graph. An interpretation of how the data provide evidence for meeting the standards: These data indicate that students understand the varied uses of assessment and are able to use assessment to inform educational decisions. This meets Standard 4. Assessment 6: Value Added Assessment Rubric Value Added Assessment Questions Question #1-Candidate read “The About School” scenario * Question #2-Candidate selected the most appropriate graph represented by this scenario from the Identified Gain Patterns in School Diagnostic Reports and wrote out the information under the description of the graph. First Submission 2009: 33 2010: 41 2011: 38 Second Submission 2011: 11 Third Submission 2009:1 2010: 1 2011: 4 2009:14 2010: 15 2011:25 2009:17 2010:17 2011: 20 2009:3 2010: 6 2011:3 *2009 and 2010 two needed a fourth submission each year; 2011 this item was not rated for three students Question #3A-Candidate describes if the child would be a high, middle or low achieving child. 2009:27 2010: 34 2011: 26 2009: 4 2010: 5 2011: 20 2009:3 2010: 3 2011: 5 2011 this item was not rated for two students Question #3B-Candidate discusses if the teacher’s interactions helped or hindered the child’s learning. If so, why or why not? 2009: 32 2010: 39 2011: 41 2009: 2 2010: 2 2011: 8 2011: 4 Question #3C-Candidate discusses how the teacher assisted or adversely influenced the child academically. 2009: 32 2010: 39 2011: 40 2009: 2 2010: 2 2011: 9 2011: 3 Question #4-Candidate discusses what the teacher could do to change the outcome. The candidate must include information on teacher directed instruction vs. child initiated learning and teacher facilitation. The candidate’s answer must be based on both theory and practice. 2009: 31 2010: 40 2011: 33 2009: 3 2010: 2 2011: 16 2011: 4