THE SENATE
PATHWAY APPROVAL REPORT
(Franchised Provision)
An outcome report of the event held on Thursday 19th March 2009 to
consider the approval of the following pathways:
BSc (Hons) Accounting and Finance
BA (Hons) Business Management
BA (Hons) International Management
Ashcroft International Business School
Delivery of Pathways at FTMS Singapore
Quality Assurance Division
SECTION A – OUTCOME SUMMARY
1.
INTRODUCTION
1.1
The purpose of the event was to consider the franchise of the following Anglia Ruskin
pathways:
BSc (Hons) Accounting and Finance
BA (Hons) Business Management
BA (Hons) International Management
1.2
For curriculum management purposes the pathways are located in the Undergraduate
Programme within the Ashcroft International Business School (AIBS).
2.
CONCLUSIONS
2.3
The Panel recommends to the Senate the franchise of the following pathways to be
delivered on a 3+0 basis from September 2009:



2.2
BSc (Hons) Accounting and Finance
BA (Hons) Business Management
BA (Hons) International Management
It was agreed that there would be a maximum of two student intakes per year (in
September and February).
Approval, once confirmed, will be for a period of five years, subject to Anglia Ruskin’s
continuing quality assurance procedures and the process of curriculum review in the
Ashcroft International Business School.
The mode of attendance for each pathway will be full-time, with the possibility of part time
delivery in due course subject to a separate approval process (which may not necessarily
require an on-site visit). Minimum and maximum intake numbers for each pathway will be
20 and 60 respectively.
2.3
Conditions
Approval is subject to the following conditions which were set by the Panel. A copy of the
response must be lodged with the Executive Officer by the date(s) detailed below:
2.3.1
Details of Condition
Deadline
Response to
be considered
by
FTMS Singapore shall review and update the
content of the Student Handbooks and shall
consider the use of a single Student Handbook
to cover the three undergraduate pathways in
business to be delivered at FTMS Singapore.
31 May 2009
Chair and
Executive
Secretary
31 May 2009
Chair and
Executive
Secretary
[see paragraph 8.1]
2.3.2
FTMS Singapore shall provide a staff
development strategy to support delivery of
Anglia Ruskin’s pathways which shall include:

Quality Assurance Division
pedagogical support and development for
teaching staff prior to, and during, the first
2
Draft/Unconfirmed/Confirmed


year of curriculum delivery
input from AIBS staff on Anglia Ruskin’s
assessment processes and the use of
assessment criteria
input from AIBS staff on the management
and supervision of the Major Project
This staff development strategy shall be
additional to the staff development event, to be
held in August 2009, set as a condition of the
Institutional Approval process (condition 2.2.5)
[see paragraphs 5.3, 5.4, 6.3]
2.3.3
FTMS Singapore shall develop a Personal
Tutoring Scheme which makes explicit to
students the nature and level of academic
support available to students (including
academic staff office hours, email contact,
processes for feedback on assessed work) and
which takes into account the particular
circumstances arising from the fact that
approximately 30% of the teaching staff will be
“flying Faculty” based at FTMS Malaysia, not
Singapore. [see paragraph 6.1, 6.7]
31 May 2009
Chair and
Executive
Secretary
2.3.4
FTMS Singapore shall provide
31 May 2009
Chair and
Executive
Secretary

projected student numbers for each
intake and at different levels
(i.e.incorporating direct entry to an
agreed level of learning, subject to the
outcome of a mapping exercise) for a
three year period commencing
September 2009 [see paragraph 4.2]

an associated Resources Action Plan
showing timelines for the expansion of
office/teaching facilities, Library stock, IT
laboratories and academic staff
(expressed as full time equivalent posts)
to support student number growth [see
paragraph 6.6]
.
2.3.5
FTMS Singapore shall update the Pathway
Specification Forms in consultation with AIBS,
with particular emphasis on the accuracy of the
structure diagram and the semester in which
designated modules are delivered, ensuring
synchronicity with the timing of delivery at Anglia
Ruskin. [see paragraph 8.2]
31 May 2009
Chair and
Executive
Secretary
2.3.6
FTMS Singapore shall urgently draft for
consideration by Anglia Ruskin’s Curriculum
31 May 2009
Chair and
Executive
Quality Assurance Division
3
Draft/Unconfirmed/Confirmed
Revisions Subcommittee a Taxation of
Singapore Corporate Organisations module to
replace the existing module with a focus on
Malaysia [see paragraph 4.5]
2.3.7
FTMS Singapore shall provide a detailed
Academic Calendar for the 2009/10 academic
year setting out the precise dates for each
student intake (September and February),
module delivery, assessment points and
examination periods and which demonstrates
synchronicity of assessment processes with
those at Anglia Ruskin (as set as a condition of
the Institutional Approval process). [see paragraph
Secretary
31 May 2009
Chair and
Executive
Secretary
31 May 2009
Chair and
Executive
Secretary
4.6]
2.3.8
2.4
FTMS Singapore and AIBS shall urgently submit
proposals to the appropriate standing committee
of the Senate to resolve the issue of direct entry
to an agreed level of learning within the Anglia
Ruskin pathways. [see paragraph 4.5]
Recommendations
The following recommendations for quality enhancement were made by the Panel. A copy
of the responses to the recommendations listed below must be lodged with the Executive
Officer. The Faculty Board for the Ashcroft International Business School will consider the
responses at its meeting in October 2009:
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.5
Details of Recommendation
FTMS Singapore shall identify a member of staff to undertake at
FTMS Singapore a role equivalent to an Anglia Ruskin Student
Adviser. [see paragraph 6.8]
Deadline
11
September
2009
FTMS Singapore and AIBS are strongly encouraged to develop
opportunities for staff and student exchange between the two
institutions. [see paragraph 7.3]
11
September
2009
Issues Referred to the Senate (or appropriate standing committee)
The Panel did not identify any institution-wide issues as requiring the attention of the
Senate or the appropriate standing committee of the Senate.
Quality Assurance Division
4
Draft/Unconfirmed/Confirmed
SECTION B – DETAIL OF DISCUSSION AND PANEL CONCLUSIONS
3
RATIONALE
3.1
Following a successful Institutional Approval visit, conducted in January 2009, FTMS
Singapore seeks the franchised delivery of Anglia Ruskin undergraduate pathways in
Business to commence in September 2009. Through such franchise activity FTMS
Singapore seeks to enhance its reputation as a provider of high quality education and
training programmes which cater for the demand for professional education. The franchised
delivery of Anglia Ruskin’s pathways is subject to approval by the Singapore Ministry of
Education.
4
CURRICULUM DESIGN, MANAGEMENT AND DELIVERY
4.1
The Proposal Team provided an introduction to the franchise proposal by outlining the key
features of the relationship. Each undergraduate pathway would be subject to a minimum
and maximum intake of 20 and 60 students respectively. It was confirmed that there would
be two intakes per year to the pathways at FTMS Singapore and that these intakes would
be in February and September of each academic year, thus ensuring synchronicity with the
standard intake points at Anglia Ruskin. It was envisaged that the first intake to each
pathway would occur in September 2009, with a further intake in February 2010. It was
also confirmed that the mode of delivery for the undergraduate pathways at FTMS
Singapore would be full-time, with the possibility of introducing part-time delivery in due
course. The Panel noted that the introduction of part-time delivery would require separate
approval, but would not necessarily require a further on-site approval visit (see paragraph
2.2 above).
4.2
The Panel noted a degree of confusion around the issue of the projected student numbers.
It was noted that the minimum and maximum intakes were stated as being 20 and 60
respectively for each pathway. The Panel sought clarification as to whether these figures
applied to each intake point and to recruitment at each Level of the pathways (allowing for
the possibility of direct entry to an agreed Level). It was noted that if the maximum intake
was reached for each Level of each pathway at each intake, the total student numbers
would very quickly multiply to a level that would have significant implications in terms of
curriculum management, staffing and learning resources. The Panel agreed to set as a
condition the requirement that FTMS Singapore clarify the projected student numbers for
each Level and each intake over a three-year period from the first intake in September
2009. [see condition 2.3.4, and paragraph 6.6 below]
4.3
The Proposal Team noted that the three undergraduate pathways shared a common
curriculum throughout Level 1 and that divergence occurred at the beginning of Level 2. It
was noted that the curriculum structures proposed for FTMS Singapore were consistent
with the Pathway Specification Form for each pathway. It was also noted that the sequence
of modules had been carefully planned to ensure that modules were delivered in the same
semester at FTMS Singapore as their delivery at Anglia Ruskin. Whilst it was noted that the
cohorts for each pathway would undertake a common curriculum at Level 1, the Panel
expressed a concern that the student numbers for each pathway may not be sufficiently
high to justify the number of designate modules offered at Levels 2 and 3 of the two
Business pathways (Business Management and International Business). It was agreed that
students should not initially be offered the full range of designate modules that in practice
may not be delivered. It was further agreed that the list of designate modules for these two
pathways would be rationalised.
4.4
The Panel noted that the curriculum for the BSc (Hons) Accounting and Finance pathway
was compulsory throughout and therefore there were no issues in terms of the range of
designate modules. The Panel noted that the curriculum structure included a Level 3
Quality Assurance Division
5
Draft/Unconfirmed/Confirmed
module entitled Taxation for Malaysian Corporate Organisations. This module had been
specifically developed for Malaysian franchise partners as an alternative to the Taxation for
UK Corporate Organisations module which was offered at Anglia Ruskin. The Panel noted
that the module may not be of such significance for students studying in Singapore and
agreed that FTMS Singapore should develop an equivalent module focussing on the
Singaporean tax system. The Panel agreed to set this as a condition. [see condition 2.3.6]
4.5
In discussing issues related to the recruitment of students, the timing of intakes and
curriculum management, the Panel noted that FTMS Singapore would be seeking direct
entry to an agreed point within the undergraduate pathways for those students who had
successfully completed the FTMS Diploma and Higher Diploma programmes. The Proposal
Team stated that a preliminary mapping exercise has suggested that the Higher Diplomas
would not enable students to gain direct entry to Level 3 of the undergraduate pathways.
The meeting discussed the possibility of revising the Higher Diplomas to ensure that they
covered more of the content included in Level 2 modules of the Anglia Ruskin
undergraduate pathways. The Panel noted the importance of this issue for student
recruitment and agreed to set a condition requiring the Proposal Team urgently to submit
proposals to the appropriate standing committee of the Senate to resolve this issue. [see
condition 2.3.8]
4.6
In discussing issues related to curriculum management the Panel stressed the importance
of ensuring that delivery at FTMS Singapore synchronised with delivery at Anglia Ruskin,
particularly at the assessment stage. Whilst noting that the modules would be delivered in
the same semester at FTMS Singapore as at Anglia Ruskin, the Panel noted that the
documentation made reference to the examinations taking place in August of each year. It
was noted that this was not correct, and that all summative assessment would need to
synchronise with Anglia Ruskin assessment processes. The Panel were concerned that the
precise timing of the proposed delivery at FTMS Singapore was unclear within the
documentation. It was therefore agreed that a condition of approval would be the provision
of a detailed Academic Calendar for the 2009/10 academic year which clearly articulated
the timing of student intakes, module delivery and assessment. [see condition 2.3.7]
5
ASSESSMENT
5.1
The Proposal Team stated that discussion of the detailed management of the assessment
process was ongoing. The assessment process at FTMS Singapore will follow the same
schedule and pattern as assessment at Anglia Ruskin. The Proposal Team stressed the
importance of strong links between Module Leaders at both Anglia Ruskin and the partner
institution. In setting assessed work the Module Leader at Anglia Ruskin consults with
Module Leaders at partner institutions and this allows some limited scope for localisation of
the assessment task. The example given by the Proposal Team was in the writing of an
examination paper. In response to a question from the panel as to how requests for
localisation were handled the Proposal Team stressed that that the Module Leader at
Anglia Ruskin would retain ultimate responsibility for the design of assessment tasks. Each
assessment task has a marking scheme which compliments the assessment criteria.
5.2
Marking and second marking will be conducted at FTMS Singapore with a sample of the
marked work being forwarded to Anglia Ruskin for internal and external moderation by
Faculty staff and the relevant External Examiner respectively. The Proposal Team stressed
that the purpose of the internal moderation (by Anglia Ruskin staff) was to confirm the level
of marking rather than to agree marks for individual pieces of work. Any discrepancy or
issue arising from the moderation would be discussed directly with the Module Leader at
the partner institution. The Panel also noted that students would not be informed of their
provisional mark until the work had been moderated by Anglia Ruskin staff and the External
Examiner.
Quality Assurance Division
6
Draft/Unconfirmed/Confirmed
5.3
In order to support staff at the partner institution, and to ensure the smooth running of the
assessment process, staff from AIBS at Anglia Ruskin will be undertaking further
discussion with FTMS staff over the precise content of individual modules and their
associated assessment tasks. Staff development sessions based around the Anglia Ruskin
assessment process will take place before the first delivery of the pathways. These
sessions will be in addition to the staff development event to be held in August 2009, as
outlined in the Institutional Approval process. [see paragraph 6.3]
5.4
The meeting discussed the measures in place to support staff at the partner institution in
their supervision of the Major Project module. The Proposal Team stated that FTMS
Singapore staff have some experience of supervising major projects from previous
collaborative links with UK universities. In addition FTMS staff have acted as mentors to
support graduates from the ACCA-accredited FTMS Higher Diploma who wish to complete
their studies towards the BSc (Hons) Applied Accounting with Oxford Brookes.* The
Proposal Team stated that a tentative development plan is already in place and that an
existing pack of materials, produced by Anglia Ruskin, will be made available to staff at the
partner institution to support delivery of the Major Project module. [see paragraph 6.3]
* Secretary’s Note- the BSc (Hons) Applied Accounting is an award of Oxford Brookes University
under a direct collaborative link between the University and the Association of Chartered
Certified Accountants (ACCA). Students completing an ACCA-accredited Diploma can
complete a Research and Analysis Project in order to qualify for the BSc (Hons) Applied
Accounting.
6
STAFFING, LEARNING RESOURCES AND STUDENT SUPPORT
6.1
In consultation with the external subject specialist panel members, the Panel believed that
the qualifications and expertise of the staff at FTMS were sufficient to deliver the
undergraduate pathways being proposed. In addition, the Panel had been provided with a
list identifying the staff member provisionally scheduled to deliver each module. The Panel
noted that some of the staff due to deliver modules at FTMS Singapore are based
permanently in Kuala Lumpur. The Proposal Team confirmed this but commented that such
activity had been successfully managed both in previous collaborative partnerships and
within the FTMS Diplomas currently offered in both Singapore and Malaysia. The Panel
expressed some concern as to whether the current levels of staffing would prove sufficient
if recruitment to the pathways was as successful as the initially projected student numbers.
[see paragraphs 4.2 and 6.6]
6.2
The Panel asked what provision was made at FTMS Singapore for the development of its
staff. The Proposal Team stated that all staff receive twice-yearly appraisals which consider
both performance and development needs. Those staff wishing to pursue additional
qualifications are encouraged and supported where possible, and staff are regularly
informed of upcoming conferences in the region. In addition, most part-time staff are
currently employed in relevant industries, and many of the full-time staff regularly engage in
professional practice by contributing to training sessions in industrial settings.
6.3
In discussing the qualifications and expertise of the staff, the Panel enquired about the
support that will be provided by Anglia Ruskin. The Proposal Team emphasised the
importance of additional support prior to, and during, the first year of delivery, and to
ongoing staff development within FTMS Singapore. Whilst noting the work undertaken thus
far, including the sessions outlined above with regard to assessment, and the staff
development sessions scheduled for August 2009 as a result of the Institutional Approval
process, the Panel felt that the range of staff development work needed to be brought
together and captured in a formal document. It therefore agreed to set a condition of
Quality Assurance Division
7
Draft/Unconfirmed/Confirmed
approval that the Proposal Team produce a staff development action plan that includes
pedagogical support and development for teaching staff; management and supervision of
the Major Project module; guidance on the Anglia Ruskin assessment processes and the
use of assessment criteria. [see paragraphs 5.3, 5.4 and condition 2.3.2]
6.4
In considering the physical resources to support the pathways the Panel noted FTMS
Singapore’s plans to extend the Library. The Proposal Team stated that FTMS Singapore
would purchase recent editions of every key text identified within the modules to be
delivered. Each key text would be purchased to a ratio of one copy to every six registered
students and a reference copy of each key text would be held within the Library. The Panel
noted that the key texts could be purchased via the Anglia Ruskin bookshop to enable
prompt purchasing. The Library currently uses the Emerald and Pro-quest databases to
enable electronic access to relevant journal articles. Subscriptions to relevant journals will
be made following successful validation and the Proposal Team also noted that students at
FTMS Singapore would have access to Anglia Ruskin’s electronic learning resources.
6.5
The Panel noted the current provision of IT laboratories and available software to support
delivery of the Anglia Ruskin pathways. The Proposal Team accepted that demand for the
current IT provision would expand with the projected increase in student numbers and
stated that further resources would be allocated to the IT provision once a clearer indication
of the anticipated student numbers was available.
6.6
The Panel noted the tentative plans to expand the physical resources to support the
pathways and noted that the physical space would quickly become insufficient if
recruitment to the pathways was successful. The Proposal Team indicated that there was
an opportunity to rent additional space in the building if that became necessary. The Panel
agreed to set a condition that the Proposal Team submit a learning resources action plan
which provided timelines and actions for the expansion of the teaching facilities, Library
stock, IT laboratories and academic staff in the context of the projected student numbers
[see paragraph 4.2 and condition 2.3.4]
6.7
The Panel noted that staff based in Kuala Lumpur would be delivering modules in
Singapore (see paragraph 6.1). Whilst it was accepted that this model had proved effective
in the past the Panel indicated some concern about the ability of those staff to support
students at a distance. This prompted the Panel to ask the Proposal Team to elaborate on
the arrangements for the provision of academic guidance and personal tutoring. The
Proposal Team stated that much of the contact would be conducted via email, and that
lecturing staff commit to three hours per week of direct communication with the students.
Personal tuition is undertaken in lecture rooms and can be conducted as either individual or
group sessions. Students would also have access to the advice of a local support lecturer.
The Panel noted this provision for student support and guidance but felt that the measures
in place should be formalised. The Panel therefore agreed to set a condition asking the
Proposal Team to develop a Personal Tutoring policy which makes explicit to students the
nature and level of academic support and which takes into account the particular
circumstances arising from the fact that some staff will be based in Kuala Lumpur. [see
condition 2.3.3]
6.8
The meeting noted the significance of the role of the Student Adviser within Anglia Ruskin’s
provision. The Proposal Team stated that an individual had been identified to act as the
Student Adviser at FTMS Singapore and that further thought was being given as to how
this role would be managed. The meeting also noted the importance of contact between
the responsible individual at FTMS Singapore and the Students Adviser at Anglia Ruskin.
The Panel agreed to make a recommendation that FTMS Singapore identify a member of
staff to undertake a role equivalent to the role of the Student Adviser. [see recommendation
2.4.1]
Quality Assurance Division
8
Draft/Unconfirmed/Confirmed
7
MANAGEMENT OF THE FRANCHISE PARTNERSHIP
7.1
The meeting noted that, in addition to the links operating at module and pathway level, the
franchise partnerships would be managed at an institutional level by the Academic
Manager at FTMS Singapore. The institutional level link person at each institution would be
the appropriate contact point for strategic issues that relate to the partnership as a whole
rather than specifically to individual modules or pathways.
7.2
The Panel noted that AIBS would be conducting a review of its entire curriculum in the
2009/10 academic year, and asked the Proposal Team what effect this might have on the
Faculty’s collaborative partnerships. The Proposal Team noted that the pathways currently
under consideration were unlikely to be amended substantially as they remained popular
pathways. It was noted that the possible introduction of a placement module would create
difficulties as Singaporean law forbade full-time international students from obtaining work
placements. However it was explained that any placement module would remain an option
on the pathway rather than a compulsory module.
7.3
In discussing the management of the link the meeting discussed the possibility of
introducing both staff and student exchange programmes between the two institutions. The
Panel agreed to set a recommendation that the Proposal Team seek to develop these
opportunities for both staff and students. [see recommendation 2.4.2]
8
DOCUMENTATION
8.1
In considering the Student Handbooks produced as part of the approval documentation, the
Panel noted that there appeared to be very little localisation of content. Many references in
the Handbook were to individuals, resources and facilities at Anglia Ruskin. In considering
how to produce a more user-friendly document the Panel agreed to set a condition asking
that the content of the Student Handbooks be reviewed and updated and that the Proposal
Team consider the introduction of one Handbook to cover all three undergraduate
pathways to be offered at FTMS Singapore. [see condition 2.3.1]
8.2
In relation to discussion about curriculum management issues detailed above (paragraph
4.3) the Panel noted that some additions to the Pathway Specification Forms would be
required. It was agreed to set a condition of approval asking the Proposal Team to update
the Pathway Specification Forms to provide a clear and accurate structure diagram for
delivery at FTMS Singapore which shows the semester of delivery for each module and
clearly demonstrates synchronicity with the timing of delivery at Anglia Ruskin. [see condition
2.3.5]
Quality Assurance Division
9
Draft/Unconfirmed/Confirmed
SECTION C – DETAILS OF PANEL MEMBERSHIP, COLLABORATIVE PARTNER AND
ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY PARTICIPANTS
Internal Panel Members:
Lesley Dobree (Chair)
Deputy Vice Chancellor
Anglia Ruskin University
Malcolm Morrison
Director of the Academic Office
Anglia Ruskin University
Shaun Le Boutillier
Director of Studies
Faculty of Arts, Law and Social Sciences
Anglia Ruskin University
External Panel Members:
Scott Raeburn
Senior Lecturer, School of Computing
Napier University
Ashif Tejani
Senior Academic, Harrow School of Computer Science,
University of Westminster
Executive Officer:
Peter Worker
Deputy Head of Quality
Academic Office
Anglia Ruskin University
Course Team:
Jasbir Singh
General Manager
FTMS Singapore
Balbeer Singh Mangat
Chairman and CEO
FTMS Global
Trevor Ward
Academic Manager
FTMS Malaysia
Sajilal Divakaran
General Manager
FTMS Malaysia
Graham Webster
Senior Lecturer
Ashcroft International Business School
Anglia Ruskin University
John Summers
Senior Lecturer
Ashcroft International Business School
Quality Assurance Division
10
Draft/Unconfirmed/Confirmed
Anglia Ruskin University
Sirjit Gill
Marketing Manager
FTMS Singapore
Jacqueline Low
Corporate Services Director
FTMS Singapore
Melody Tan
Finance Manager
FTMS Singapore
Idhawati Md Kamari
Administrative Manager
FTMS Singapore
Bankim Sohal (Ben)
Student Services Manager
FTMS Singapore
B Pushpa Rani
Academic Head/Senior Lecturer/Module Leader
FTMS Singapore
Mohamed Arif
Senior Lecturer/Programme Leader
FTMS Singapore
Neil Han
Lecturer/Programme Leader
FTMS Singapore
Naresh Punjabi
Senior Lecturer/Programme Leader
FTMS Singapore
Fung Chee Kong
Senior Lecturer
FTMS Singapore
Uma Jeyaram
Lecturer/Module Leader
FTMS Singapore
Levi Jackson
Lecturer
FTMS Singapore
Joey Teh
Systems Manager
FTMS Malaysia
Rosmahaiza Roslan
Librarian
Quality Assurance Division
11
Draft/Unconfirmed/Confirmed
FTMS Malaysia
Rozana Ismail
Lecturer
FTMS Malaysia
Anjana Bedi
Lecturer
FTMS Malaysia
Quality Assurance Division
12
Draft/Unconfirmed/Confirmed
SECTION D – OUTCOME DATA
Programme
Department
Faculty
Collaborative Partner
New/amended Awards
Approved (nb intended awards
Cambridge; Chelmsford
n/a
Ashcroft International Business School
FTMS Singapore
Title(s) of Named Pathway(s)
Attendance mode
and duration
only, not intermediate awards)
BSc (Hons)
BA (Hons)
BA (Hons)
Accounting and Finance
Business Management
International Management
Validating body (if not Anglia Ruskin University)
Professional body accreditation
Proposal Team Leader
Month and Year of the first intake
Standard intake points
Maximum and minimum student numbers
Date of first Conferment of Award(s)
Any additional/specialised wording to appear on
transcript and/or award certificate
Date of next scheduled Periodic Review
Awards and Titles to be deleted (with month/year of last
regular conferment)
Full-time: 3 years
n/a
n/a
John Summers/Graham Webster
September 2009 (all)
February and September
(per pathway) Max: 60, Min: 20
July 2011
None
To be confirmed
n/a
FOR FRANCHISE APPROVALS ONLY: LIST OF MODULE TUTORS AND MODULE CODES &
TITLES
(FOR INCLUSION IN THE REGISTER OF TEACHING STAFF)
Module Code
Module Title
Tutor(s)
LEVEL ONE:
BC115001S
BC130001S
BB115002S
BC115004S
BD130002S
BB115004S
Analysis of Business
Business Environment
Introduction to Business Law
Learning & Skills Development in Business
Managing People, Finance & Marketing
Web Design for Business
Jasila Banu
Neil Han
S Thavaraj A/L S Subramaniam
Neil Han
K.Jayaprakash
Mohamed Arif
LEVEL TWO:
BB215001S
BB215007S
BC215001S
BD215001S
BD215010S
BB215003S
Advanced Financial Accounting
Budgeting, Planning & Control
Business Economics
Business Psychology
Consumer Behaviour
Database Systems for Business
Naresh Punjabi
Rengasamy Tambu Doraisamy
Thiagurajah @ M Thangarajah
Mridula Mennon Kunnekkat
Simon Yong Chee Joon
Anjana Bedi
Quality Assurance Division
13
Draft/Unconfirmed/Confirmed
BB215004S
BB215005S
BC230001S
BB215006S
BC215008S
BD215018S
BD215011S
BD215012S
BD215004S
BC215010S
LEVEL
THREE:
BB315001S
BC315001S
BB315003S
BD315019S
BB315004S
BC315003S
BC315020S
BD315002S
BC315006S
BB315005S
BD315010S
BD315011S
BD315005S
BC315013S
BB315008S
BC315017S
BB315009S
BD315016S
BB315012S
BD315017S
BC330998D
Financial Accounting
Information Systems
International Business
Management Accounting
Management Decision Making
Marketing Communications
Marketing Management
Marketing Research
Principles of Human Resource Management
Research Skills
Naresh Punjabi
Uma Jeyaram
Neil Han
Daniel Ho Ngan Keat
Francis Pularendran
Manoharan A/L Muthiah
K.Jayaprakash
Khor Siak Kim
Neil Han
Trevor Stuart Ward
Advanced Corporate Reporting
Advanced Strategic Management
Auditing, Control & Communication
Business-to-Business Marketing
Creative Problem Solving
Cross-Cultural Issues in International
Business
Development Economics
Employee Relations
Ethics & Governance
Financial Management
International Marketing
Internet Marketing and e-Commerce
Management Development
Operations Management
Project Planning & Control
Strategic Management
Strategic Management Accounting
Strategic Marketing: A Contemporary Review
Taxation of Singapore Corporate
Organisations
The Practice of Marketing
Undergraduate Major Project
Spencer Cheah Ewe Leong
Puspavathy Rassiah
Fung Chee Kong
Domnic Danaraj Peter
Simon Yong Chee Joon
Isai Amuthan s/o Krishnan
Quality Assurance Division
14
Thiagurajah @ M Thangarajah
Isai Amuthan s/o Krishnan
Fung Chee Kong
Naresh Punjabi
Khor Siak Kim
Rozana Ismail
Puspavathy Rassiah
Domnic Danaraj Peter
Paranjothy Sundram
Puspavathy Rassiah
Siow Hui Jen
Domnic Danaraj Peter
Chan Chung Wai
Khor Siak Kim
Naresh Punjabi
Draft/Unconfirmed/Confirmed