Resolution 41-22 Faculty Personnel Policies Articles 3 9 (Appendix 10) Clarification of Faculty Advising Responsibilities [1st reading]

advertisement
1
2
3
4
5
6
Additions are bolded, underlined and italicized
First Reading
Campus Senate Meeting
November 4, 2011
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD
CAMPUS SENATE AY 2011/2012
RESOLUTION 41-22
Clarification of Faculty Advising Responsibilities
WHEREAS, the UIS Faculty Personnel Policies indicate that faculty advising of students is a
component of faculty duties; and
16
17
WHEREAS, according to the April 1, 2011 UIS Undergraduate Advising Task Force Report and
18
Recommendations, academic advising is critical to the recruitment, retention, and success
19
of students at UIS; and
20
WHEREAS, the UIS Faculty Personnel Policies provide little guidance to faculty and to
21
personnel committee evaluators with regard to how faculty advising activities should be
22
conducted, documented, and evaluated;
23
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Campus Senate of the University of Illinois at
24
Springfield approves the following changes to Article 3, Article 9, and Appendix 10 of
25
the UIS Faculty Personnel Policies.
26
27
ARTICLE 3
28
29
PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION AND ADVANCEMENT
30
Section 2. Criteria for Tenured and Tenure-track Faculty
31
A.
Teaching, Advising, and Enhancing Teaching and Learning
32
Because “teaching remains the central function and excellence in teaching continues as
33
the overriding goal” at the University of Illinois at Springfield (Vision Statement), those
34
activities related to the academic development of students have the highest priority in the
35
evaluation of faculty. Advising of students is a critical component of faculty duties, and
36
advising activities and outcomes are an important consideration in the evaluation of
37
faculty.
38
Teaching and advising will be assessed through a variety of means.
39
assessments such as student evaluations of teaching and advising must be evaluated in
40
the context of qualitative measures such as documented comments by students and
41
colleagues, reports on student advising activities, course syllabi, and other relevant
42
materials. Contributions to the enhancement of teaching and learning will be assessed by
43
the former means as well as other relevant documentation. See Appendix 10, UIS
44
Portfolio Guidelines for more details.
Quantitative
45
46
ARTICLE 9
47
48
49
PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES
50
Section 3. Workload Plan and Guidelines
51
52
M.
Academic advising of students is a regular part of the responsibilities of a full-time
53
faculty member. To that end, the full-time faculty member shall be available to meet
54
with her/his students at regular, consistent, and mutually convenient times and places.
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
APPENDIX 10
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD
PORTFOLIO GUIDELINES1
V. ACTIVITIES TO DOCUMENT
1) TEACHING























teaching groups, classes, seminars, workshops, etc.
advising and mentoring students
availability for student advising, including office hours held online, face-toface, and by phone
number of students advised and activities conducted in advising duties,
including outreach and individual student contacts
advising feedback and assessments from students and colleagues
handling diverse and challenging teaching loads and course assignments
guest lecturing, speaking, master classes, etc.
teaching individuals in tutorials, or independent or directed studies
supervising students and others in field placements, clinical placements, applied
study terms, internships, co-ops, student teaching, applied music, theses, etc.
chairing and serving as a reader on students’ masters’ theses, masters’ projects,
and doctoral dissertations
advising and mentoring peers and others about teaching and learning
developing and revising instructional programs, courses, curriculum materials,
tests, assignments, etc.
creating and updating syllabi
assessing instructional and advising effectiveness
utilizing multiple methods for assessment of teaching effectiveness
engaging in pedagogical innovation and experimentation
setting goals for instructional and advising improvement
using results of evaluations for professional growth and improvement
earning recognition and awards for distinguished teaching
assessing and documenting student learning
incorporating appropriate instructional technology
maintaining currency in instructional content and delivery
maintaining a teaching portfolio

1
Much of the framework and language for these guidelines come from Kennesaw State University in (metro Atlanta) Georgia.
http://www.kennesaw.edu/academicaffairs/tenure/reveval.htm
Download