1 2 3 4 5 6 Additions are bolded, underlined and italicized First Reading Campus Senate Meeting November 4, 2011 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD CAMPUS SENATE AY 2011/2012 RESOLUTION 41-22 Clarification of Faculty Advising Responsibilities WHEREAS, the UIS Faculty Personnel Policies indicate that faculty advising of students is a component of faculty duties; and 16 17 WHEREAS, according to the April 1, 2011 UIS Undergraduate Advising Task Force Report and 18 Recommendations, academic advising is critical to the recruitment, retention, and success 19 of students at UIS; and 20 WHEREAS, the UIS Faculty Personnel Policies provide little guidance to faculty and to 21 personnel committee evaluators with regard to how faculty advising activities should be 22 conducted, documented, and evaluated; 23 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Campus Senate of the University of Illinois at 24 Springfield approves the following changes to Article 3, Article 9, and Appendix 10 of 25 the UIS Faculty Personnel Policies. 26 27 ARTICLE 3 28 29 PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION AND ADVANCEMENT 30 Section 2. Criteria for Tenured and Tenure-track Faculty 31 A. Teaching, Advising, and Enhancing Teaching and Learning 32 Because “teaching remains the central function and excellence in teaching continues as 33 the overriding goal” at the University of Illinois at Springfield (Vision Statement), those 34 activities related to the academic development of students have the highest priority in the 35 evaluation of faculty. Advising of students is a critical component of faculty duties, and 36 advising activities and outcomes are an important consideration in the evaluation of 37 faculty. 38 Teaching and advising will be assessed through a variety of means. 39 assessments such as student evaluations of teaching and advising must be evaluated in 40 the context of qualitative measures such as documented comments by students and 41 colleagues, reports on student advising activities, course syllabi, and other relevant 42 materials. Contributions to the enhancement of teaching and learning will be assessed by 43 the former means as well as other relevant documentation. See Appendix 10, UIS 44 Portfolio Guidelines for more details. Quantitative 45 46 ARTICLE 9 47 48 49 PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES 50 Section 3. Workload Plan and Guidelines 51 52 M. Academic advising of students is a regular part of the responsibilities of a full-time 53 faculty member. To that end, the full-time faculty member shall be available to meet 54 with her/his students at regular, consistent, and mutually convenient times and places. 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 APPENDIX 10 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD PORTFOLIO GUIDELINES1 V. ACTIVITIES TO DOCUMENT 1) TEACHING teaching groups, classes, seminars, workshops, etc. advising and mentoring students availability for student advising, including office hours held online, face-toface, and by phone number of students advised and activities conducted in advising duties, including outreach and individual student contacts advising feedback and assessments from students and colleagues handling diverse and challenging teaching loads and course assignments guest lecturing, speaking, master classes, etc. teaching individuals in tutorials, or independent or directed studies supervising students and others in field placements, clinical placements, applied study terms, internships, co-ops, student teaching, applied music, theses, etc. chairing and serving as a reader on students’ masters’ theses, masters’ projects, and doctoral dissertations advising and mentoring peers and others about teaching and learning developing and revising instructional programs, courses, curriculum materials, tests, assignments, etc. creating and updating syllabi assessing instructional and advising effectiveness utilizing multiple methods for assessment of teaching effectiveness engaging in pedagogical innovation and experimentation setting goals for instructional and advising improvement using results of evaluations for professional growth and improvement earning recognition and awards for distinguished teaching assessing and documenting student learning incorporating appropriate instructional technology maintaining currency in instructional content and delivery maintaining a teaching portfolio 1 Much of the framework and language for these guidelines come from Kennesaw State University in (metro Atlanta) Georgia. http://www.kennesaw.edu/academicaffairs/tenure/reveval.htm