ILF: Interim Progress Report Jess Kaizar, Hong Tran, Tariq Islam Agenda • Problem Statement • Technical Approach • WBS Status – – – – Background Research Metrics Scenarios Technologies • EVM Chart 2 Problem Statement This project will serve to provide a background study on past wars in terms of their fuel usage, and compare them to the metrics of modern day warfare. What is needed, and what will be answered here subsequently is that given various future warfare scenarios, how will helicopters be leveraged and used in those scenarios? The largest issue being fuel efficiency, the efficiency of helicopters from a tactical perspective as well as a design perspective will need to be applied to each of the future scenarios to provide feasibility guidance in the next 10 to 20 years of helicopter production by vendors, specifically Sikorsky. Approach and Methodology 1. Survey the use of energy in warfare throughout history and develop energy consumption metrics 2. Identify a range of representative scenarios • • Primary missions Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force 3. Identify technologies for inspection and characterization 4. Conduct cost estimation of fuel prices in 2021 and 2031 5. Model Scenarios 6. Analysis • • • Vary fuel price Apply technologies Conduct excursions for potential changes in future warfare 7. Provide insight and recommendation for the impact of fuel efficiencies and rotary aircraft WBS Status Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Optimization of Liquid Fuel Decisions 1.0 Project Management 1.1 Project Structure 1.1.1 WBS/Task Creation 1.1.2 Project Schedule Derivation 1.1.3 Team Meetings 1.1.3.1 Peer Review of Deliverables 1.1.3.2 Dry Run of Interim Progress/Final Presentation 1.1.4 Sponsor Meetings 1.1.5 Website Design 1.2 Proposal Deliverable 1.2.1 Project Definition 1.2.2 Project Proposal 1.3 Delivery of Final Product 1.3.1 Completion of Final Report 1.3.2 Completion of Final Presentation 2.0 Project Design 2.1 Background Research and Metrics 2.1.1 Scoping fuel consumption 2.1.2 MoE/MoP Metrics 2.2 Identify Representative Scenarios 2.2.1 Scope missions Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 5 9 2 1 1 15 5 1 3 2 3 1 2 1 3 2 3 1 2 1 3 2 3 1 2 1 3 2 3 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 1 5 5 9 9 18 18 15 5 15 3 2.2.2 Map missions to forces (Army, Navy, Air Force) 2.2.3 Choose representative set 2.3 Identify Technologies for Inspection 2.3.1 Scope viable fuel technologies 2.3.2 Eliminate unsuitable solutions 2.3.2 Characterize technologies for modeling 2.4 Develop Fuel Cost Estimation 2.4.1 Project future cost of fuel 2.4.2 Bound the cost with a confidence interval 2.5 Model Development 2.5.1 Model fuel consumption in scenarios 10 2 10 10 10 2 3 5 5 2 10 3 10 3 10 9 3 3 5 3 5 2.5.2 Create user interface for variables and sensitivity analysis 2.5.3 Create output for MoE 3.0 Analysis 3.1 Baseline 3.1.1 Run baseline analysis 3.1.1.1 2021 Fuel cost estimation 3.1.1.2 2031 Fuel cost estimation 3.1.2 Verify model and output 3.2 Application of Technologies 3.1.1 2021 with projected fuel efficiency 3.1.2 2031 with projected fuel efficiency 3.3 Sensitivity Analysis 3.3.1 Run parametric sensitivity with fuel efficiency 3.4 Analyze Potential Cost Savings 5 5 5 10 10 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 2 5 2 5 10 3 3.4.1 Determine require fuel efficiency to pace inflation 3.4.2 Evaluate potential techinical and operation impacts 3.5 Insights 3.5.1 Cyber warfare ramifications 3.5.2 Role of rotary aircraft Totals 20 22 38 37 32 34 34 31 33 35 5 9 1 3 7 1 3 7 33 34 41 43 Planned Total 467 Background Research • 175% Increase in Gallon of Fuel Consumed per Soldier per Day since Vietnam War • Fuel Consumption of 22 Gallons/Soldier/Day in Iraq/Afghanistan War w/ a Projected Burn Rate of 1.5%/Year through 2017 Background Research • Defense Energy Support Center (US Military's Primary Fuel Broker) • • • • • • has contracts with the International Oil Trading Company; Kuwait Petroleum Corporation and Turkish Petrol Ofisi, Golteks and Tefirom. Contracts with these companies range from $1.99 a gallon to $5.30 a gallon. DESC sets fuel rates paid by military units. $3.51 a gallon for diesel $3.15 for gasoline $3.04 for jet fuel Avgas -- a high-octane fuel used mostly in unmanned aerial vehicles -- is sold for $13.61 a gallon Fuel Protection (from Ground & Air) Accidents/Pilferage/Weather IEDs Inventory/Storage Due to Many Types of Fuel Final Delivery Cost of $45 -$400/gallon to Remote Afghanistan (lack of infrastructure, challenging geography, increased roadside attacks) Background Research • 2001 DSB Report Recommends the Inclusion of • • fuel efficiency in requirements and acquisition processes. Target fuel efficiency improvements through investments in Science and Technology and systems design The Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense signed a memo stating “…include fuel efficiency as a Key Performance Parameter (KPP) in all Operational Requirements Documents and Capstone Requirements Documents.” Background Research Metrics Metrics capture how fuel is expended and any benefits of increased fuel efficiency • Time to complete mission – Reduced mission time by removing the need to refuel eliminating delays – Lighter aircraft may move faster • Lift capacity – Carrying less fuel or building a lighter aircraft may allow additional lift capacity (up to the structural limitations of the aircraft) • Time on station (TOS) – Move efficient fuel/aircraft may extend legs or increase TOS • Cost – Less fuel burned = lower cost – Alternate fuel = lower price? – All metrics will be translated into cost as well • $/mile • $/lb lift • $/flight hour Identify Representative Scenarios FORCE US Army US Navy US Marine Corps US Air Force UH-60 Airborne Assault MH-60 ASW HH-60 CSAR (Anti-Submarine Warfare) CH-53E Heavy Lift Shore Assault CAS ASuW (Close-in Air Support) (Anti-Surface Warfare) HELO MISSION POTENTIAL EXCURSION (Combat Search and Rescue) HADR (Humanitarian Aid and Disaster Relief) N/A Identify Technologies for Inspection Alternate Energy Sources 1. Electricity 2. Hydrogen Fuel Cells 3. Biofuels • • • Convert fuel consumption cost into energy (Joules) cost, create a common metric Map alternate energy outputs back to liquid fuel efficiencies gained This will provide parameters for the executable model – What if we hit a scenario where hydrogen fuel cells give an increased energy output? Rotary Craft Design -- Trending technologies, progress, feasibility 1. Air-hybrid engine 2. Diesel-Electric Propulsion system To-Date EVM Chart References • http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=aer • • • • • • • ospacedaily&id=news/FUEL111109.xml&headline=Report%20Says%20 DOD%20Fuel%20Use%20A%20Security%20Concern http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/ADA477619.pdf http://www.envirosagainstwar.org/know/read.php?itemid=593 http://www.dtic.mil/cgibin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA233674 http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-04-022602932101_x.htm http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/63407-400gallon-gasanother-cost-of-war-in-afghanistanhttp://www.trackpads.com/forum/point-counterpoint-politics/154121helicopter-units-revert-vietnam-era-tactics.html http://www.ndia-mich.org/workshop/Papers/NonPrimary%20Power/Roche%20%20Fuel%20Consumption%20Modeling%20And%20Simulation%20(M& S)%20to%20Support%20Military%20Systems%20Acquisition%20and% 20Planning.pdf