138 Pre-engineering Students (E101 participants) F’99 and W’00 19 38 81 Pre-engineering Students (E201 participants) F’99 26 later advanced to at least one co-op assignment 7 19 5 admits who had E201 waived or took in another year (F’99) 5 53 58 Students Admitted to Engineering status Start Co-op I S’01 70 stopped advancing (grade issues, switched majors, left school) 6 1 student did not find a co-op S’01 19 3 53 2 54 Students participated in Co-op II (50 with same company as Co-op I) W’02 50 1 incoming Co-op III from out of sequence 1 51 Students participated in Co-op III (44 with same company as Co-op I & II) F’02 7 Incoming graduates from out of sequence (did all 3 Co-ops at same company) 7 Graduates don’t know where they work 8/03 4 26 later graduated with an engineering degree 45 55 Graduates August ‘03 24 Graduates hired by company where Co-op I, II & III were performed 8/03 Figure 3: Summer 2001 co-op start group 2 22 Graduates hired by company did not co-op at 8/03 2 Graduates hired by company did last co-op at (but not all 3 co-ops) 8/03 Table 2 Summary of Student Movement through the GSU Engineering Program Category ENTRY TO PROGRAM Starting in E101 Total students entering IN PROGRAM Progressed to E201 on schedule Progressed to E299 (Co-op I) on schedule Progressed to E399 (Co-op II) on schedule Progressed to E499 (Co-op III) on schedule EXIT FROM PROGRAM Did not graduate from program Graduated on schedule Graduated, but later Total that graduated Hired by company where conducted at least one co-op Hired by company where did not conduct any co-op Went to graduate school Unemployed Graduate employment status is unknown Summer 2000 co-op start Student Groups Summer 2001 co-op start Summer 2002 co-op start 148 167 138 151 157 173 61 (41.2%) 81 (58.7%) 69 (43.9%) 56 (35.4%) 58 (40.6%) 53 (32.3%) 55 (34.2%) 54 (37.8%) 51 (30.9%) 52 (31.7%) 51 (35.4%) 50 (29.8%) 91 (55.5%) 70 (48.6%) 94 (56.0%) 53 (31.7%) 23 (14.0%) 76 (45.5%) 16 (45.7%) 55 (36.4%) 26 (18.1%) 81 (53.6%) 26 (54.2%) 49 (28.3%) 29 (17.3%) 78 (45.1%) 14 (40.0%) 17 (48.6%) 22 (45.8%) 14 (40.0%) 2 (5.7%) 0 (0.0%) 18 (34.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 7 (12.7%) 2 (5.7%) 5 (14.3%) 14 (28.6%) OUTSIDE Topic of Interest-level IN IN Education: Education organization-level OUT IN IN Education: Degree Program-level OUT Education: Co-op Program Socialization to Organization-level IN Education: Co-op Program Socialization to Role-level Co-op IN Post-Graduation: Full-time Work Accelerated Socialization Organization INSIDE Role Profession Figure 7: Entry into Profession: “Leaky Funnel” – with co-op OUTSIDE Topic of Interest-level IN IN Education: Education organization-level OUT IN IN Education: Degree Program-level OUT Socialization Post-Graduation Organization Role Profession INSIDE Figure 7: Entry into Profession: “Leaky Funnel” – no co-op (experiential education) Stage 1: Pre-Entry Student Origin: Interest in Engineering Location Related Prior Experience Related Network Education: Education Organization Degree Program Co-op Preparation Expectations: Definition Accuracy Education Organization Employer Education Organization Purpose: Cost/Benefit Recruiting Screening Altruism Control of Academic Training Degree Program Need/Vacancy Co-op Preparation Expectations: Entry: Prior Skills and Knowledge Technical Personal Exit: Developed Skills and Knowledge Technical Personal Organizational Expectations: Developed Skills and Knowledge Technical Personal Organizational Figure 8: Pre-entry for student, education organization, and employer Stage 2: Match-Making Co-op Position Education Organization Employer Solicit Interest Communicate Interest Send Resumes of Students Network Receive/Review Resumes Student Network Send Resumes Search Select Interview CandidatesDC Selection Request Interview Agree to Interview OR Screening Interview Phone Practice On-campus OR Formal Interview On-site Multiple OR Check References Select Candidate(s)DC Receive Offers Evaluate OffersDC Make Offer Agreement on Employment Figure 12: Match-making for the co-op position Stage 2: Match-Making Co-op Position Selection Decision Criteria Student Employer Location Pay Company/Work Type People at the Organization Number of Employment Offers Perception of Relationship Motivation Level Interpersonal Skills Demeanor Ability Location Figure 11: Selection decision criteria for co-op position Summary of Stage 3: Entry/Socialization Co-op Position Outside (Role) Organization: New Hire Role: Engineering Student Strategies Organization: Regulative Orientation Company-wide Normative Orientation Company-wide Workgroup-level Student-Workgroup Activ. Workplace Environment Cultural-Cognitive Student-Workgroup Activ. Workplace Environment Workplace Attitudes Role: Regulative Workgroup Interactions Employer-driven Normative Workgroup Interactions Employer-driven Work Assignments Cultural-Cognitive Workgroup Interactions Employer-driven Student-driven Work Assignments Inside (Role) Organization: Functioning Employee Role: New or JuniorLevel Engineer Eight Stage Process: 1. Unsure Student Hire 2. Aware Student Employee 3. Functioning Tech. Employee 4. Aspiring Apprentice Engin. 5. New Apprentice Engineer 6. Advanced Apprentice Engin. 7. New Engineer 8. Junior Engineer Figure 16: Stage 3 - Entry/socialization for the co-op position (summary) Stage 3: Entry/Socialization for the Co-op Position Organization-Level Strategies/Tactics During Co-op Location: Outside Target Organization Student Role: New Hire Regulative: Symbolic Systems Train for safety Test for drugs Routines Review benefits Artifacts Fill out paperwork Train for specific tasks Normative: Symbolic Systems Tour facilities Provide presentations Review expectations Relational Systems Assign a mentor Learn together Artifacts Observe physical work setting Overview of office systems/tools Cultural-Cognitive: Relational Systems Introduce people Participate in organized meals Observe workplace atmosphere Learn workplace personalities Understand employee demographics Routines Eat together Play games together Artifacts Train on computer systems Figure 17: Entry/socialization for the co-op position Location: Inside Target Organization Student Role: Functioning Employee Stage 3: Entry/Socialization for the Co-op Position Role-Level Strategies/Tactics During Co-op Location: Outside Engineering Workgroup Student Role: Engineering Student Regulative: Relational Systems Haze the student Isolate the student Routines Meet formally Normative: Symbolic Systems Include in meetings Expect without guidance Provide more responsibility Relational Systems Mentor the student Support/assist with work Routines Provide initial assignments Assign simple tasks Artifacts Read materials Learn software Work on floor Cultural-Cognitive: Relational Systems Converse informally Meet people Connect with peers Observe others Find things to do Ask questions Routines Eat together Figure 17: Entry/socialization for the co-op position (continued) Location: Inside Engineering Workgroup Student Role: New or Junior–level Engineer Stage 3: Entry/Socialization for the Co-op Position Role-Level Stages During Co-op Location: Outside Engineering Workgroup Student Role: Engineering Student 1. Unsure Student Hire Cultural-Cognitive 2. Aware Student Employee Regulative Normative 3. Functioning Technical Employee Normative 4. Aspiring Apprentice Engineer Regulative 5. New Apprentice Engineer Regulative Normative 6. Advanced Apprentice Engineer Normative Cultural-Cognitive 7. New Engineer Regulative Normative 8. Junior Engineer Normative Figure 17: Entry/socialization for the co-op position (continued) Location: Inside Engineering Workgroup Student Role: New or Junior–level Engineer Stage 4: Match-Making Post-Graduation Position Education Organization Employer Provide Networking Opportunities Inquire with Co-op Student Send Resumes of Students Communicate Interest Student Network Inquire with Co-op Employer Receive/Review Resumes Network Send Resumes Search Selection Request Interview Agree to Interview OR Select Interview CandidatesDC Screening Interview Phone On-campus OR Formal Interview On-site Multiple OR Check References Select Candidate(s)DC Receive Offers Evaluate OffersDC Make Offer Agreement on Employment Figure 21: Match-making for the post-graduation position Stage 4: Match-Making Post-Graduation Selection Decision Criteria and Reasons for Retaining a Co-op Student Co-op Position Student Decision Criteria Employer Decision Criteria Comfort-level with People/Organization Easier not to Look Elsewhere Location Pay/Benefits Interest in Company/Work Type Stability of the Employer People Known at the Organization Number of Employment Offers Perception of Relationship Motivation Level Interpersonal Skills Demeanor Ability Location Prior Related Experience Employer Retention Reasons Position Opening Familiarity with Student Student Knowledge Timing of Contribution to Employer Return on Investment Cost of Hiring Process Figure 20: Selection decision criteria and reasons for retaining a co-op student for post-graduation position Stage 5: Accelerated Entry/Socialization for the PostGraduation Position Strategies/Tactics Staying with Same Employer Organization: none Location: Outside Engineering Workgroup as Full-Time Employee Role: Engineering Graduate with Related Work Experience Role: Regulative Workgroup Interactions Normative Workgroup Interactions Work Assignments Cultural-Cognitive Workgroup Interactions Work Assignments Location: Inside Engineering Workgroup as Full-Time Employee Role: Full-Time Engineer Joining a New Employer Organization: Regulative Orientation Normative Orientation Workgroup Activities Workplace Environment Cultural-Cognitive Workgroup Activities Workplace Environment Workplace Attitudes Role: Regulative Workgroup Interactions Normative Workgroup Interactions Work Assignments Cultural-Cognitive Workgroup Interactions Work Assignments Figure 18: Accelerated entry/socialization for the post-graduation position