University of North Dakota Staff Performance Evaluation Tool - VPFO
Employee Name:
Empl ID #:
Type of Evaluation
Functional Title:
Position #:
______ Probation
Department Name:
Dept. #:
______ Annual
Year
Annual performance evaluations are one resource used to assist in the engagement and overall development of UND Staff; in addition to ensuring
that the goals of the university are advancing in a positive and successful manner. This Staff Performance Evaluation Tool is to be used on an
annual basis (or probationary) to measure the growth and development of staff and ensure the goals established are being achieved.
How to Use This Document:
Major Responsibility: These are the brief overview statements of work to be performed, found as general headings in the employee’s official UND
Position Description. Each responsibility is a significant requirement of the job derived from an analysis of the position. These major headings
should be imported (cut and paste) onto this tool under the “Major Duties/Responsibility” section.
Comments: Each area of Major Responsibility must have comments to attribute how well the employee is performing or where an employee needs
improvement.
Rating: Each area of Major Responsibility should have a rating correlating to the specific comments/examples provided.
 Where a one “1-2” or “4-5” is given, the rating must be justified with a brief narrative description in the comments section detailing what
exactly made the performance exceed standards or not meet standards.
 When a “1-2” is given, there should be a formal corrective action plan already in place, or one must be developed and attached to this
document. This must include goals detailing what development will occur to assist the employee in being successful.
At this time, the employee’s official UND Position Description must be reviewed to ensure that there have not been any major changes in the past
year. Please ensure that UND Human Resources has the most current copy. A PDF may be emailed to: und.humanresources@und.edu.
Page 1 of 8
UND/jlw/1.29.16
University of North Dakota Staff Performance Evaluation Tool - VPFO
EVALUATION RATING CHART
5 Consistently Exceeds
4 Frequently Exceeds
3 Performance
2 Inconsistently Fulfills
1 Fails to Meet
Performance
Expectations
• Consistently exceeds
performance
expectations
Performance
Expectations
•Almost always achieves
performance
expectations and
frequently exceeds them
Expectations
Fulfilled
•Work is of high quality
in all significant areas of
responsibility
Performance
Expectations
•The employee's work
does not consistently
meet the job
requirements of the
position. While the
employee may have
performed acceptably in
some areas, job
performance needs to be
improved
•For a "Results" or
"overall" rating of 2, a
corrective action plan is
required or at least one
development goal
outlining the
improvement required
and the plan to achieve
the improvement
•Coaching from the
supervisor is required
Performance
Expectations
•The employee's work is
below the basic
requirements and
immediate and continued
improvement is required
•Demonstrates
•Demonstrates
exceptional quality of
performance of a very
work in all essential areas high level of quality
of responsibility
•Consistently fulfills
performance
expectations and
periodically may exceed
them
•Almost always makes an
exceptional or unique
contribution in
achievement of unit,
department, and
university objectives
•Any performance
concerns are resolved
through coaching,
feedback, and self
initiative
•Significantly contributes
to the success of the
services and projects they
support
•A performance
improvement plan is to
be discussed and agreed
to by the employee and
the supervisor
•Continued failure to
show improvement may
result in additional action
Page 2 of 8
UND/jlw/1.29.16
University of North Dakota Staff Performance Evaluation Tool - VPFO
MAJOR DUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES
RATING 1-5
(check box)
1
2
3
4
5
COMMENTS/EXAMPLES
MAJOR DUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES
RATING 1-5
(check box)
1
2
3
4
5
COMMENTS/EXAMPLES
Page 3 of 8
UND/jlw/1.29.16
University of North Dakota Staff Performance Evaluation Tool - VPFO
MAJOR DUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES
RATING 1-5
(check box)
1
2
3
4
5
RATING 1-5
(check box)
1
2
3
4
5
COMMENTS/EXAMPLES
MAJOR DUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES
COMMENTS/EXAMPLES
Page 4 of 8
UND/jlw/1.29.16
University of North Dakota Staff Performance Evaluation Tool - VPFO
MAJOR DUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES
RATING 1-5
(check box)
1
2
3
RATING 1-5
(check box)
1
2
3
4
5
COMMENTS/EXAMPLES
MAJOR DUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES
4
5
COMMENTS/EXAMPLES
Page 5 of 8
UND/jlw/1.29.16
University of North Dakota Staff Performance Evaluation Tool - VPFO
MAJOR DUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES
RATING 1-5
(check box)
1
2
3
4
RATING 1-5
(check box)
1
2
3
4
5
COMMENTS/EXAMPLES
MAJOR DUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES
5
COMMENTS/EXAMPLES
Page 6 of 8
UND/jlw/1.29.16
University of North Dakota Staff Performance Evaluation Tool - VPFO
MAJOR DUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES
RATING 1-5
(check box)
1
2
3
4
5
RATING 1-5
(check box)
1
2
3
4
5
COMMENTS/EXAMPLES
MAJOR DUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES
COMMENTS/EXAMPLES
Page 7 of 8
UND/jlw/1.29.16
University of North Dakota Staff Performance Evaluation Tool - VPFO
CY 2016
DISCUSS ANY AREAS WHERE PERFORMANCE HAS SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED OR DETERIORATED SINCE THE LAST EVALUATION:
POSITION DESCRIPTION (Check One):
________ Position Description has been reviewed and currently reflects the accountabilities and responsibilities of the position.
________ Position Description has been reviewed and revised and will be sent to Human Resources for approval.
EMPLOYEE COMMENTS:
This performance evaluation has been discussed with me, and I have had the opportunity to provide my input. I understand that I may include a written statement
with this form that will be retained in my personnel file.
________________________________________
Supervisor’s Signature
_______________________________________
Employee’s Signature
________________
Date
____________ _______________________________________
Date
Reviewer’s Signature
________________
Date
Page 8 of 8
UND/jlw/1.29.16