PHYS 3313 – Section 001
Lecture #10
Monday, Oct. 1, 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Monday, Oct. 1, 2012
Importance of Bohr’s Model
X-ray Scattering
Bragg’s Law
De Broglie Waves
Bohr’s Quantization
Electron Scattering
Wave Properties
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
1
Announcements
• Reading assignments: CH4.6 and CH4.7
• Mid-term exam
– In class on Wednesday, Oct. 10, in PKH107
– Covers: CH1.1 to what we finish this Wednesday, Oct. 3
– Style: Mixture of multiple choices and free response problems which are more
heavily weighted
– Mid-term exam constitutes 20% of the total
• Homework #3
– End of chapter problems on CH4: 5, 14, 17, 21, 23 and 45
– Due: Monday, Oct. 8
• Colloquium this week
– 4pm, Wednesday, Oct. 3, SH101
– Dr. Hongxing Jiang of Texas Tech
Monday, Oct. 1, 2012
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
2
Special Project #3
•
•
•
•
A total of Ni incident projectile particles of atomic
number Z1 kinetic energy KE scatter on a target of
thickness t, atomic number Z2 and with n atoms per
volume. What is the total number of scattered
projectile particles at an angle  ? (20 points)
Please be sure to define all the variables used in
your derivation! Points will be deducted for missing
variable definitions.
This derivation must be done on your own. Please
do not copy the book or your friends’.
Due is Monday, Oct. 8.
Monday, Oct. 1, 2012
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
4
Importance of Bohr’s Model
• Demonstrated the need for Plank’s constant in
understanding atomic structure
• Assumption of quantized angular momentum which
led to quantization of other quantities, r, v and E as
follows
4 0 h2 2
2
a
n
• Orbital Radius: rn 
n  0
2
me e
• Orbital Speed:
nh
1
v

mrn ma0 n
• Energy levels:
e2
E0
En 
 2
2
8 0 a0 n
n
Monday, Oct. 1, 2012
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
5
Successes and Failures of the Bohr Model
• The electron and hydrogen nucleus actually revolved about their
mutual center of mass  reduced mass correction!!
• All we need is to replace me with atom’s reduced mass.
me M
me
e 

m e  M 1  me M
• The Rydberg constant for infinite nuclear mass, R∞ is replaced
by R.
e
1
e e 4
R
R 
R 
2
3
me
1  me M
4 ch 4 0 
For H: RH  1.096776  10 7 m1
Monday, Oct. 1, 2012
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
6
Limitations of the Bohr Model
The Bohr model was a great step of the new quantum
theory, but it had its limitations.
1) Works only to single-electron atoms
–
–
Even for ions  What would change?
1
1
2  1

Z
R

The charge of the nucleus 
 n 2 n 2 
l
u
2) Could not account for the intensities or the fine
structure of the spectral lines
–
–
Fine structure is caused by the electron spin
When a magnetic field is applied, spectral lines split
3) Could not explain the binding of atoms into
molecules
Monday, Oct. 1, 2012
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
7
X-Ray Scattering
 Max von Laue suggested that if x rays were a form of
electromagnetic radiation, interference effects should be
observed. (Wave property!!)
 Crystals act as three-dimensional gratings, scattering the
waves and producing observable interference effects.
Monday, Oct. 1, 2012
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
8
Bragg’s Law
 William Lawrence Bragg interpreted the x-ray scattering as the reflection of the
incident x-ray beam from a unique set of planes of atoms within the crystal.
 There are two conditions for constructive interference of the scattered x rays:
1) The angle of incidence must
equal the angle of reflection of
the outgoing wave. (total
reflection)
2) The difference in path lengths
between two rays must be an
integral number of wavelengths.
 Bragg’s Law:
•
nλ = 2d sin θ
•
(n = integer)
Monday, Oct. 1, 2012
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
9
The Bragg Spectrometer
 A Bragg spectrometer scatters x rays from
several crystals. The intensity of the
diffracted beam is determined as a function
of scattering angle by rotating the crystal and
the detector.
 When a beam of x rays passes through the
powdered crystal, the dots become a series
of rings due to random arrangement.
Monday, Oct. 1, 2012
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
10
Ex 5.1: Bragg’s Law
X rays scattered from rock salt (NaCl) are observed to have an intense maximum at an
angle of 20o from the incident direction. Assuming n=1 (from the intensity), what must be
the wavelength of the incident radiation?
•
•
•
•
Bragg’s law: nλ = 2d sin θ
What do we need to know to use this? The lattice spacing d!
We know n=1 and 2θ=20o.
We use the density of NaCl to find out what d is.



6.02  10 23 molecules mol  2.16 g cm 3
N molecules N A  NaCl



V
M
58.5 g mol
22 atoms
28 atoms
22 molecules
 4.45  10
 2.22  10
 4.45  10
3
3
cm
m3
cm
1
1
28 atoms
d

 0.282nm

4.45

10
3
28
4.45  10
d3
m3
  2d sin   2  0.282  sin10 o  0.098nm
Mon., Sept. 17, 2012
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
11
De Broglie Waves
• Prince Louis V. de Broglie suggested that mass particles
should have wave properties similar to electromagnetic
radiation  many experiments supported this!
• Thus the wavelength of a matter wave is called the de
Broglie wavelength:
h

p
• Since for a photon, E = pc and E = hf, the energy can be
written as
E  hf  pc  p f
Monday, Oct. 1, 2012
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
12
Bohr’s Quantization Condition
• One of Bohr’s assumptions concerning his hydrogen atom
model was that the angular momentum of the electron-nucleus
system in a stationary state is an integral multiple of h/2π.
• The electron is a standing wave in an orbit around the proton.
This standing wave will have nodes and be an integral number
of wavelengths.
h
2 r  n  n
p
• The angular momentum becomes:
h
nh
L  rp 
 nh
pn
2
2 p
Monday, Oct. 1, 2012
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
13
Ex 5.2: De Broglie Wavelength
Calculate the De Broglie wavelength of (a) a tennis ball of mass 57g traveling 25m/s
(about 56mph) and (b) an electron with kinetic energy 50eV.
•
•
What is the formula for De Broglie Wavelength?
(a) for a tennis ball, m=0.057kg.
h

p
h 6.63  10 34
 
 4.7  10 34 m
p
0.057  25
•
(b) for electron with 50eV KE, since KE is small, we can use non-relativistic
expression of electron momentum!
h
h
 

p
2me K
•
•
hc
2me c 2 K

1240eV  nm
 0.17nm
2  0.511MeV  50eV
What are the wavelengths of you running at the speed of 2m/s? What about your
car of 2 metric tons at 100mph? How about the proton with 14TeV kinetic energy?
What is the momentum of the photon from a green laser?
Mon., Sept. 17, 2012
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
14
Electron Scattering

Davisson and Germer experimentally observed that electrons were diffracted
much like x rays in nickel crystals.  direct proof of De Broglie wave!


D sin 
n
George P. Thomson (1892–1975), son of J. J. Thomson,
reported seeing the effects of electron diffraction in
transmission experiments. The first target was celluloid,
and soon after that gold, aluminum, and platinum were
used. The randomly oriented polycrystalline sample of
SnO2 produces rings as shown in the figure at right.
Monday, Oct. 1, 2012
PHYS 3313-001, Fall 2012
Dr. Jaehoon Yu
15