Economics for Future Leaders Lecture 1 – The Functions of Leadership, June 26, 2012 The Functions of Leadership in Organization “Leadership is a process of social influence in which one person is able to enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task.” Key points: Leadership is a group activity. Leadership is based on social influence. Leadership revolves around a common task. The Functions of Leadership in Organization The specification seems simple, but the reality of leadership is complex. Intrapersonal factors (i.e., thoughts and emotions) interact with; Interpersonal processes (i.e., attraction, communication, influence) to have effects on; A dynamic external environment. Organizational Functions Groups and organizations are by nature inefficient. If one person could accomplish a job, the creation or assignment of a group would not be warranted. Groups require coordination of the efforts of their members. Organizational Functions The time and energy spent in that coordination are diverted from productive activity. Organizations, which are groups of groups, demand even greater resources applied to coordination. Organizational Functions But, most of the productive activities in society cannot be accomplished by individuals. Organizations are essential to the realization of the goals of productive endeavor, and leaders are essential to organizational coordination. Organizational Functions Internal maintenance. The primary function that an organization must achieve is the regularization of activities to provide a stable base for productive operation Reliability – recurrent events are responded to in the same way every time they occur. Organizational Functions Internal maintenance (contd.). Predictability – members of the organization know what is likely to occur and when. Accountability – reliability and predictability allows leaders to allocate responsibility for errors and identify methods of correction. Organizational Functions External adaptability. Organizations must know what is going on around them and adapt to changes in the environment. Sensitivity. Flexibility. Responsiveness. Organizational Functions Balancing contradictory demands. Problem: procedures that ensure reliability and predictability reduce flexibility and responsiveness. Organizational survival is a question of balance. Organizations with stable environments will benefit from the efficiencies of regularized processes. Organizations with competitive, unstable environments will need to sacrifice reliability to enhance responsiveness. The Organizational Functions of Leadership In an orderly, structured, and wellunderstood environment, the primary responsibilities are guidance and motivation. Assign people to tasks or responsibilities, to outline what is expected, and to facilitate and encourage goal attainment. The Organizational Functions of Leadership In a less orderly environment calling for external adaptability, the crucial functions are problem solving and innovation. The leader must create the kind of atmosphere that encourages sensitivity, flexibility, and creativity. The leader must be a change agent. Status Differentiation The concept of leadership implies a differentiation of authority and responsibilities between group members. This differentiation is known as status. The Functions of Status Bestowal Positive functions. The The The The The elevation of competence. assignment of authority. distribution of rewards. modeling of normative expectancies. facilitation of innovation. The Functions of Status Bestowal Negative functions. Means-end reversal (status for its own sake). Distortion of communication. Rigidification of the status structure. Primogeniture. Territoriality, cronyism, and petty competition. The Cultural Evolution of Effective Leadership The desirability of leadership characteristics will be influenced by social context. Every culture (whether religious, national, or organizational) prescribes which behaviors are normative in a social context. Culture is the way in which a social unit adapts to its environment over time. The culture is first determined by external adaptability, then internal maintenance processes are brought into coherence. The Cultural Evolution of Effective Leadership Examples: if climate or lack of arable land make hunting and gathering more feasible than agriculture, hunting and gathering will tend to be adopted as the primary means of subsistence. Hunting and gathering cultures must encourage cooperation while developing independent and resourceful members. The Cultural Evolution of Effective Leadership Democratic political structures (e.g., tribal councils) and egalitarian religious systems help to encourage the growth of self-sufficient and cooperative group members. An unpredictable supply of food makes creativity in resource use important and making sharing necessary to reduce the problems of temporary shortages. The Cultural Evolution of Effective Leadership A premium on cooperation and a penalty for competition. Leadership is situational (temporary roles for particular tasks) or generalized (roles determined by progress through the life cycle). The Cultural Evolution of Effective Leadership The transition to horticulture increased the opportunities for the society to exploit its environment to generate surpluses. Created a type of semiegalitarian leadership called managerial leadership with power over redistribution of goods and services. Primary skills are persuasion and negotiation. The redistributor model may lead to more autocratic structures. The Cultural Evolution of Effective Leadership Large scale agrarian societies tend to develop hierarchical power structures and restrict access to leadership roles. Agrarian economies place a primary premium not on resourcefulness but on reliability. The Cultural Evolution of Effective Leadership The most prized personality trait of the masses is obedience. Autocratic leadership style, high on direction and low on participation combined with “benevolent paternalism.” The Cultural Evolution of Effective Leadership Many modern organizations reflect the experiences of the hunter-gatherer or agrarian cultures. Organizations with complex and unpredictable environments draw on hunter-gatherer leadership structures. Organizations with stable and predictable environments more closely reflect agrarian societies. Leadership Question #1 Looking out at the real world of private, nonprofit, and public organizations, would you say that most of them draw on the huntergathering tradition or the agrarian tradition of leadership? That is, do most organizations have complex and unpredictable or stable and predictable environments? Or are other factors relevant?