22748 version 2 Page 1 of 5 Demonstrate knowledge of safe ship management on a seafood vessel Level 4 Credits 10 Purpose People credited with this unit standard are able to explain, for a seafood vessel: the safety theory behind the application of systems for the management of safety; the purpose of a documented system for the management of safety; the process for implementing a Safe Ship Management system; the processes of review and audit that apply to a Safe Ship Management system; the responsibilities of company management and personnel within a Safe Ship Management system; and the hazard review process of an occupational safety and health incident or potential incident. Subfield Seafood Domain Seafood Vessel Operations Status Registered Status date 11 December 2009 Date version published 11 December 2009 Planned review date 31 December 2014 Entry information Open. Accreditation Evaluation of documentation and visit by NZQA and industry. Standard setting body (SSB) Primary Industry Training Organisation Accreditation and Moderation Action Plan (AMAP) reference 0123 This AMAP can be accessed at http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/framework/search/index.do. Special notes 1 Legislation relevant to this unit standard includes but is not limited to – Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992 and subsequent amendments; Ship Registration Act 1992, Maritime Transport Act 1994, Maritime Rules and Marine Protection Rules and advisory circulars issued under the Act. New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016 22748 version 2 Page 2 of 5 2 Definitions Safe Ship Management systems on seafood vessels means any documented systems on a vessel, which are in place to comply with the Maritime Transport Act 1994, Maritime Rules Part 21, Marine Protection Rules, and the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992 and subsequent amendments. Systems for the management of safety include any documented or undocumented policies or procedures (including the Safe Ship Management system) that impact on the safety of the crew and any other person who has contact with the vessel. Elements and performance criteria Element 1 Explain the safety theory behind the application of systems for the management of safety on a seafood vessel. Performance criteria 1.1 The explanation identifies the personal and financial advantages provided by a Safe Ship Management system. Range 1.2 The explanation outlines the attitudes and behaviours that should be promoted by a safety culture on a seafood vessel. Range 1.3 accident prevention; safety culture; emergency preparedness; planned maintenance; hazard identification, minimisation, elimination, and/or isolation; documented procedures. accident prevention, safety awareness, emergency preparedness, safety management, full crew cooperation and involvement, continuous improvement, use of appropriate personal protective equipment. The explanation outlines how good crew management contributes to the prevention of accidents. Range management by owner, management by skipper. Element 2 Explain the purpose of a documented system for the management of safety on a seafood vessel. Performance criteria 2.1 The purpose is explained in terms of support for crews managing their own safety. 2.2 The purpose is explained in terms of the establishment of vessel specific procedures. New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016 22748 version 2 Page 3 of 5 2.3 The purpose is explained in terms of the provision of evidence to authorities that the vessel and crew are, and remain, safe and fit for purpose. 2.4 The purpose is explained in terms of the requirements of the Health and Safety in Employment Act, and Maritime Rules Part 21. Element 3 Explain the process for implementing a Safe Ship Management system on a seafood vessel. Performance criteria 3.1 The explanation identifies the parties involved in implementing a Safe Ship Management system. 3.2 The explanation outlines the scope of the Safe Ship Management system on seafood vessels in terms of the types of machinery, safety equipment, and operating systems included in the schedule. 3.3 The explanation outlines the scope of the Safe Ship Management system on seafood vessels in terms of the types of hazards included in the hazard register. 3.4 The explanation outlines the way the vessel’s crew demonstrates compliance with a Safe Ship Management system on seafood vessels in terms of ensuring the records are complete. Element 4 Explain the processes of review and audit that apply to a Safe Ship Management system on a seafood vessel. Performance criteria 4.1 The explanation outlines the roles of the vessel’s skipper and crew, owner, and Safe Ship Management Company in the review and internal audit of the Safe Ship Management system on seafood vessels. 4.2 The explanation outlines the role of the Safe Ship Management Company and Maritime New Zealand in the external audit of the Safe Ship Management system on seafood vessels. New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016 22748 version 2 Page 4 of 5 Element 5 Explain the responsibilities of company management and personnel within a Safe Ship Management system on a seafood vessel. Range owner, skipper, Search and Rescue (SAR) contact person, crew. Performance criteria 5.1 The explanation outlines the responsibilities in terms of establishing and implementing the system. 5.2 The explanation outlines the responsibilities in terms of skipper and crew appointments and training. 5.3 The explanation outlines the responsibilities in terms of the maintenance of documentation. 5.4 The explanation outlines the responsibilities in terms of communication systems. 5.5 The explanation outlines the responsibilities in terms of personal commitment to the safety of self and others. Element 6 Explain the hazard review process of an occupational safety and health incident or potential incident on a seafood vessel. Performance criteria 6.1 The explanation includes the process of gathering information concerning the incident in accordance with Safe Ship Management system requirements. 6.2 The explanation includes the process of sorting data into chronological order in accordance with Safe Ship Management system requirements. 6.3 The explanation includes the process of determining the root cause from gathered data in accordance with Safe Ship Management system requirements. 6.4 The explanation includes the formulation of corrective actions in accordance with Safe Ship Management system requirements. 6.5 The explanation includes the process for determining control measures to prevent re-occurrence based upon the outcome of the investigation in accordance with Safe Ship Management system requirements. 6.6 The explanation includes the process for documenting and circulating the incident investigation report in accordance with Safe Ship Management system requirements. New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016 22748 version 2 Page 5 of 5 6.7 The explanation includes the process for determining the effectiveness of the actions implemented as a result of monitoring and reporting in accordance with Safe Ship Management system requirements. Please note Providers must be accredited by NZQA, or an inter-institutional body with delegated authority for quality assurance, before they can report credits from assessment against unit standards or deliver courses of study leading to that assessment. Industry Training Organisations must be accredited by NZQA before they can register credits from assessment against unit standards. Accredited providers and Industry Training Organisations assessing against unit standards must engage with the moderation system that applies to those standards. Accreditation requirements and an outline of the moderation system that applies to this standard are outlined in the Accreditation and Moderation Action Plan (AMAP). The AMAP also includes useful information about special requirements for organisations wishing to develop education and training programmes, such as minimum qualifications for tutors and assessors, and special resource requirements. Comments on this unit standard Please contact the Primary Industry Training Organisation at standards@primaryito.ac.nz if you wish to suggest changes to the content of this unit standard. New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016