Assessment Report Standard Format July 1, 2011 - June 30, 2012 PROGRAM(S) ASSESSED Religion, Philosophy, and Classics ASSESSMENT COORDINATOR: David L. Barr, Chair YEAR 4 of a 5 YEAR CYCLE 1. ASSESSMENT MEASURES EMPLOYED Briefly describe the assessment measures employed during the year. What was done? A. Exit Interviews. Each graduate was given an exit interview and an assessment questionnaire. There were a total of 11 graduates (6 in Religion, 1 in Philosophy, and 4 in Classics). Each met with individual faculty members and/or the chair to review and assess their satisfaction with and performance in the major. B. Transcript Evaluation The transcripts of all graduates were reviewed for range of courses and levels of accomplishment C. Collection of Papers Papers were collected and analyzed as part of the annual evaluation of student writing abilities. D. Assessment Meeting Held as part of regular fall faculty meeting. Who participated in the process? The chair and selected faculty did the interviews; all participated in the Assessment Meeting. What challenges (if any) were encountered? No new challenges were encountered. 2. ASSESSMENT FINDINGS List the objectives and outcomes assessed during the year, and briefly describe the findings for each. Objectives 1. Graduates will be prepared to assume their roles as effective and informed citizens of our pluralistic democracy. Self-assessment on the questionnaire indicates that the students feel well-prepared in this area: each respondent rated preparation at either a 4 or a 5 on a scale of 1-5, with and average of over 4.3. Typical Comment: especially grateful for “what I have learned in ethics.” 2. Graduates of the department will be broadly educated in the classical liberal arts tradition in order to be effective employees in diverse occupations. Assessed by transcript review for range of course taken outside the major discipline. Findings: A review of transcripts of all graduates shows mixed results in this area. Graduates averaged about 6 upper-division Liberal Arts courses outside their majors, although 4 had 5 or fewer. The numbers are worse for transfer students, who averaged only 3, but I suspect this is distorted somewhat by the way transfer courses are recorded. We will continue to try to improve in this area through advising (See Improvements below.) 3. Graduates will be prepared to pursue advanced study in their major area. Assessed by transcript review and exit interviews concerning future educational plans. Findings: All graduates took a suitable array of courses to prepare for graduate study; and 4 had GPAs above 3.3, considered requisite for graduate school admission. On the other hand 5 students graduated with a GPA below 3.0. 3 students report plans for graduate work and they report feeling well-prepared with suitable GPAs. 4. Graduates will be prepared to pursue graduate study in diverse fields outside their major, such as law, medicine and counseling. Assessed by transcript review and exit interviews. Findings: One plans for graduate work in theoretical physics and was a dual major in physics and philosophy. Outcomes 1. Graduates of the program will be effective writers. Assessed by an analysis of collected papers, looking for: Their use of proper documentation Their critical use of sources Clear statement of thesis Thesis supported with adequate arguments Findings: Review of the collected papers shows more success than last year in meeting these expectations. A summary: all papers had a clear conception of their argument, though only half had an explicit statement of thesis; about three quarters developed adequate arguments; all used proper documentation; and all showed at least some critical use of sources and the ability to construct logical arguments. 2. Graduates will acquire knowledge of major figures, movements, and traditions related to their major. Assessed by transcript review and exit interviews. Findings: All graduates took a suitable range of courses in their majors. All students who returned questionnaires claimed an increased ability to understand the world in which they live as a result of their study. 3. Graduates will acquire knowledge of historical traditions and linguistic contexts of the content of their majors. Assessed by transcript review and exit interviews. Findings: All graduates took a range of courses that explored major philosophical ideas (Philosophy majors), the broad range of religious traditions (Religion majors), and advanced knowledge of Latin and Greek (Classics majors). The Philosophy majors took 5 courses emphasizing philosophical ideas; Religion majors averaged 5 courses in diverse religious traditions; Classics majors averaged over 10 quarters of language study, having a firm foundation in at least one language. Analyzing the last term language courses shows that the average GPA was 3.71. 4. Graduates will have strong critical thinking skills. Assessed by transcript review, exit interviews, and papers. Findings: Most graduates performed well in courses requiring critical thinking skills. All papers submitted as writing samples demonstrated the ability to think abstractly and critically about their research. 3. RESPONSE TO ASSESSMENT FINDING List planned or actual changes (if any) to curriculum, teaching methods, facilities, or services that are in response to the assessment findings. The chair will convene a meeting of departmental advisors and review the degree to which we are achieving our goal of a broad Liberal Arts experience, urging them to emphasis this to their advisees. 4. ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES FOR THE COMING YEAR. Briefly describe the learning outcomes to be assessed during the upcoming year and the measures that will be used to assess them. It is time to assess our assessment and to design a new plan for the next cycle. The department will be asked to develop a new assessment plan for the coming year. 5. UNIVERSITY LEARNING OUTCOME ASSESSMENT As part of the HLC Academy project, each program of study will eventually assess two University Learning Outcomes in required courses in the major. One outcome will be assessed in 2014-15 and the second will be added in 2015-16. Identify the two ULOs that will be assessed and, if possible, the likely courses to be used. Our majors advance most of the learning objectives and we would like to remain flexible as to how we meet this assessment goal. The likely outcomes we would assess are: to demonstrate global and multicultural competence to demonstrate understanding of contemporary social and ethical issues. Other objectives should be fully discussed before making a final decision, including: to communicate effectively, to evaluate arguments and evidence critically, to apply methods of inquiry in the humanities.