HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Baltimore, Maryland
KATHRYN GONZALES
Penn State Architectural Engineering
Construction Management
Advisor| Dr. Somayeh Asadi
Spring 2015
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Project Team
Project Information
Building Name
Building Location
Size
Number of Stories
Construction Date
Construction Cost
Delivery Method
Health Sciences Facility III
Baltimore, MD
435,000 GSF
11 above grade, 2 below
July 2013-September 2017
$206 Million
CM at Risk
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
System
Demolition/Excavation
Structure
Envelope
Mechanical/Plumbing
Electrical
Fire Protection
Sitework
Other
General Conditions
Total
Amount
$7,616,000
$21,297,000
$34,726,000
$62,903,000
$32,357,000
$1,965,000
$2,672,800
$42,956,200
$10,130,300
$ 206,493,000
|Site Logistics
Construction Cost
|Critical Path
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
|Pile and Lagging
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
.712 miles
Shoring
$1,480,000
Dewatering
$650,000
Issues
New Total
$2,130,000
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Structural Breadth
Assumed Values
Soil Property
Water Table
Angle of Friction, 
Moist Unit Weight, 
Sat Unit Weight, SAT
Construction surcharge, q
Allowable bearing, qa
Soil Type
Amt
20
35
125
145
250
5000
SM
Calculated Values
Property
’=SAT -w
ka
kp
Amt
82.6
.271
3.69
Unit
pcf
Unit
ft
Degrees ()
pcf
pcf
psf
psi
--
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Structural Breadth
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Assumed Values
P1= 1.355 k
P2= 6.775 k
P3= 8.943 k
P4=6.105 k
L3= 6.24 ft
P5= 5.501 k
Soil Property
Water Table
Angle of Friction, 
Moist Unit Weight, 
Sat Unit Weight, SAT
Construction surcharge, q
Allowable bearing, qa
Soil Type
Amt
20
35
125
145
250
5000
SM
Calculated Values
Property
’=SAT -w
ka
kp
Amt
82.6
.271
3.69
Unit
pcf
Unit
ft
Degrees ()
pcf
pcf
psf
psi
--
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Structural Breadth
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Assumed Values
P1= 1.355 k
P2= 6.775 k
P3= 8.943 k
P4=6.105 k
L3= 6.24 ft
P5= 5.501 k
Soil Property
Water Table
Angle of Friction, 
Moist Unit Weight, 
Sat Unit Weight, SAT
Construction surcharge, q
Allowable bearing, qa
Soil Type
Amt
20
35
125
145
250
5000
SM
Calculated Values
Property
’=SAT -w
ka
kp
Amt
82.6
.271
3.69
Unit
pcf
Without Tiebacks
Unit
ft
Degrees ()
pcf
pcf
psf
psi
--
H= 24.4 ft
Total height= 62.64 ft
With Tiebacks
H= 5.5 ft
Total height= 44 ft
Tieback Force= 24k/ft
Shear and Moment
Mu=239ft ∙k
Vu= 23.3 k
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
|Sheet Piles
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Structural Breadth
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
|Slurry Wall
Structural Breadth
|Sheet Piles
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Shoring System
Price
Pile and Lagging $2,130,000
Sheet Piles $1,640,000
Slurry Wall $3,029,810
114 Days
90 Days
363 Days
|Recommendations
|Cost
Comparison Matrix
|Schedule
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Sheet Piles
Recommended ✔
Pile and
Lagging
Availability ✔
Constructability
Cost ✔
Schedule ✔
Sheet
Piles
✔
✔
✔
✔
Slurry
Wall
✔
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Analysis 2 | Motivation
?
Question: What are the drivers of
motivation and how does that
correlate with team performance?
Audience: Construction Managers
Method: Literature review and industry survey
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
|Drivers of Motivation
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Survey Results
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
A respectable leader
Formal recognition
Promotional opportunities
Time off
A challenging project
Money
A complex project
Not at All
Very Little
•
•
•
•
•
•
Negative consequences
Team reputation
Negative feedback
An unmotivated team leader
The team
When believe in the cause
Somewhat
Significantly
Very Significantly
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
|Drivers of Motivation
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Survey Results
Driver
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
A respectable leader
Formal recognition
Promotional opportunities
Time off
A challenging project
Money
A complex project
Not at All
Very Little
•
•
•
•
•
•
Negative consequences
Team reputation
Negative feedback
An unmotivated team leader
The team
When believe in the cause
Somewhat
Significantly
Very Significantly
Believe in Cause
Respectable Leader
A Challenging Project
Team reputation
Assuming Leadership
Position
A Complex Project
The Team
Promotional
Opportunities
Money
Time Off
Formal Recognition
Negative Consequences
Negative Feedback
Unmotivated Team
Member
%
Significant
100
97
83
80
77
%
Insignificant
Unmotivated Team Member
60
Negative Consequences
43
Negative Feedback
27
Time Off
20
Formal Recognition
7
Driver
73
63
60
Promotional Opportunities
Team Reputation
Money
7
7
3
57
53
50
37
27
A Complex Project
The Team
Respectable Leader
A Challenging Project
Assuming Leadership
Position
Believe in Cause
3
3
0
0
0
10
0
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Driver #1
Driver #2
A complex project
When believe in the
cause
The team
A challenging project
The team
Formal recognition
Promotional
opportunities
Motivated leader influences
team performance
Promotional opportunities
Time off
Degree of
Correlation
.70
.58
.54
.51
.45
|Negative Correlation
Survey Results
|Positive Correlation
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Driver #1
Driver #2
Money
Degree motivation related to team
performance
Motivated leader influences team
performance
Assuming a leadership position
Unmotivated leader influences
team performance
Motivated leaders influences team
performance
A complex project
Money
A complex project
Money
Degree of
Correlation
-.44
-.43
-.40
-.39
-.38
3.00
55-64
4.00
2.00
65+
3.00
Degree motivation is related to
team performance
Unmotivated leader influences
team performance
Motivated leader influences
team performance
0.00
A respectable leader
Formal recognition
Promotional Opportunities
Time off
A challenging project
Money
A complex project
Negative consequences
Team reputation
Negative feedback
Assuming a leadership
position
Unmotivated team
member
When believe in the cause
The team
Personal level of motivation
influence team
1.00
65+
4.00
6.00
55-64
35-44
45-54
6.00
5.00
45-54
35-44
25-34
7.00
5.00
25-34
18-24
8.00
18-24
9.00
9.00
8.00
7.00
|Age Correlation
10.00
Survey Results
10.00
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
|Open-Ended Questions
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Survey Results
What do you think is the most effective way to
motivate your team?
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Communication
Family community
Good leadership
Positive recognition
A good attitude
Be an example
Clear goals
Understand the
individuals on the team
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
|Open-Ended Questions
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Survey Results
What do you think is the most effective way to
motivate your team?
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Communication
Family community
Good leadership
Positive recognition
A good attitude
Be an example
Clear goals
Understand the
individuals on the team
How does conflict affect motivation or team
performance?
“
If handled well, conflict can become a rallying
point for a team. Conflict has a tendency to
motivate me to push harder and stake my
position on the high road.
“
Humans will not want to do something that they
do not feel comfortable doing or if conflict exists
between people. Team performance will be
affected if conflict exists because the team will not
trust each other and it will hinder communication
between the two parties.
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Analysis 2 | Motivation
|Results
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
1. Two major drivers of motivation:
• Belief in the cause
• Respectable leader
2. Negative motivators
3. Age correlation
4. Trust and communication
5. Conflict and team performance
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Fiscal Year
FY 2014
FY 2015
FY 2016
FY 2017
FY 2018
Total
Funding
(million)
$18
$59
$91.5
$53
$9.5
$231
$63 mil
$143 mil
Other
Construction
Contracts
Mechanical
Contract
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Aug-17
Jun-17
Apr-17
Feb-17
Dec-16
Oct-16
Aug-16
Jun-16
Apr-16
Feb-16
Dec-15
Oct-15
Aug-15
Jun-15
Apr-15
Feb-15
Dec-14
Oct-14
Aug-14
Aug-17
Jun-17
Apr-17
Feb-17
Dec-16
Oct-16
Aug-16
Jun-16
Apr-16
Feb-16
Dec-15
Oct-15
Aug-15
Jun-15
Apr-15
Feb-15
Dec-14
# Crews /wk
Oct-14
$143 mil
Aug-14
$63 mil
Other
Construction
Contracts
Mechanical
Contract
Manpower Cost
Equipment/Material Cost
Jun-14
Fiscal Year
FY 2014
FY 2015
FY 2016
FY 2017
FY 2018
Total
Funding
(million)
$18
$59
$91.5
$53
$9.5
$231
$4,500,000.00
$4,000,000.00
$3,500,000.00
$3,000,000.00
$2,500,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$1,500,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$500,000.00
$-
Jun-14
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Number of Crews
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Billing in Millions
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Aug-17
Jun-17
Apr-17
Feb-17
Dec-16
Oct-16
# Crews /wk
60
40
20
0
Aug-17
60
Jun-17
80
Apr-17
Feb-17
Dec-16
Oct-16
Aug-17
Jun-17
Apr-17
Feb-17
Dec-16
Oct-16
Aug-16
Jun-16
Apr-16
Feb-16
Dec-15
Oct-15
Aug-15
Jun-15
Apr-15
Feb-15
Dec-14
Oct-14
Aug-14
Jun-14
$4,500,000
$4,000,000
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$-
Aug-16
Jun-16
Apr-16
Feb-16
Dec-15
Oct-15
Aug-15
Jun-15
Apr-15
Feb-15
Dec-14
Oct-14
Aug-14
Jun-14
Number of Crews
Billing in Millions
Manpower Cost
Equipment/Material Cost
|Mechanical
Review
Aug-17
Jun-17
Apr-17
80
Feb-17
Dec-16
Oct-16
Aug-16
Jun-16
Apr-16
Feb-16
Dec-15
Oct-15
Aug-15
Jun-15
Apr-15
Feb-15
Dec-14
Oct-14
Aug-14
Jun-14
Mechanical Review of Cash Flow
$4,500,000
$4,000,000
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$-
Aug-16
Jun-16
Apr-16
Feb-16
Dec-15
Oct-15
Aug-15
Jun-15
Apr-15
Feb-15
Dec-14
Oct-14
Aug-14
Jun-14
Number of Crews
|Original
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Billing in Millions
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Manpower Cost
Equipment/Material Cost
Original
Mech Review
40
20
0
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Legend
Mechanical Review
Man-loaded Schedule
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Legend
Modified Man-loaded Schedule
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Modified Man-loaded Schedule
$2,000,000
$1,800,000
$1,600,000
$1,400,000
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000
$-
Mech Review
Modified
Number of Crews
Manpower Curve
Manpower Cost
80
Mech Review
Modified
60
40
20
Aug-17
Jun-17
Apr-17
Feb-17
Dec-16
Oct-16
Aug-16
Jun-16
Apr-16
Feb-16
Dec-15
Oct-15
Aug-15
Jun-15
Apr-15
Feb-15
Dec-14
Oct-14
Aug-14
Fiscal
Year
FY 2014
FY 2015
FY 2016
FY 2017
FY 2018
Mechanical
Funding
Review Billing
$18,000,000 $321,700
$59,000,000 $10,910,600
$91,500,000 $39,874,100
$53,000,000 $13,141,800
$9,500,000
$173,900
Modified
Billing
$321,700
$11,463,500
$37,377,100
$15,086,200
$174,000
Aug-17
Jun-17
Apr-17
Feb-17
Dec-16
Oct-16
Aug-16
Jun-16
Apr-16
Feb-16
Dec-15
Oct-15
Aug-15
Apr-15
Feb-15
Dec-14
Oct-14
Aug-14
Jun-14
0
Jun-14
Billing in Millions
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Jun-15
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Difference
-$552,900
($2,497,000)
$1,944,500
$100
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Modified Total Cash Flow
$4,500,000.00
Manpower Cost
$4,000,000.00
Equipment/Material Cost
$3,500,000.00
$3,000,000.00
$2,500,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$1,500,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$500,000.00
Aug-17
Jun-17
Apr-17
Feb-17
Dec-16
Oct-16
Aug-16
Jun-16
Apr-16
Feb-16
Dec-15
Oct-15
Aug-15
Jun-15
Apr-15
Feb-15
Dec-14
Oct-14
Aug-14
$-
Jun-14
Billing in Millions
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
$4,500,000.00
Manpower Cost
$4,000,000.00
Equipment/Material Cost
$3,500,000.00
$3,000,000.00
$2,500,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$1,500,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$500,000.00
Aug-17
Jun-17
Apr-17
Feb-17
Dec-16
Oct-16
Aug-16
Jun-16
Apr-16
Feb-16
Dec-15
Oct-15
Aug-15
Jun-15
Apr-15
Feb-15
Dec-14
Oct-14
Aug-14
Jun-14
$-
|Recommendations
Modified Total Cash Flow
Billing in Millions
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Resource Leveling
Recommended ✔
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Analysis 1
Shoring System
Sheet Piles
Recommended ✔
Final Remarks
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Analysis 1
Shoring System
Sheet Piles
Recommended ✔
Final Remarks
Analysis 2
Motivation
1. Two major drivers of motivation:
• Belief in the cause
• Respectable leader
2. Negative motivators
3. Age correlation
4. Trust and communication
5. Conflict and team performance
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Analysis 1
Shoring System
Sheet Piles
Recommended ✔
Final Remarks
Analysis 2
Motivation
1. Two major drivers of motivation:
• Belief in the cause
• Respectable leader
2. Negative motivators
3. Age correlation
4. Trust and communication
5. Conflict and team performance
Analysis 3
Cash Flow
Resource Leveling
Recommended ✔
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Analysis 1
Shoring System
Sheet Piles
Recommended ✔
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Final Remarks
Analysis 2
Motivation
1. Two major drivers of motivation:
• Belief in the cause
• Respectable leader
2. Negative motivators
3. Age correlation
4. Trust and communication
5. Conflict and team performance
Analysis 3
Cash Flow
Resource Leveling
Recommended ✔
|Acknowledgements
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Academic
Dr. Somayeh Asadi
Dr. Rob Leicht
Kevin Parfitt
Walt Schneider
Special Thanks
Family and Friends
Jesus Christ
Industry
HSFIII Team
Roger Stadler
Chuck Briney
Josh Kraus
Bill Gamble
Chris Brooks
Other Industry Leaders
Jason McFadden
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Baltimore, Maryland
KATHRYN GONZALES
Penn State Architectural Engineering
Construction Management
Advisor| Dr. Somayeh Asadi
Spring 2015
Questions?
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Architectural Breadth
Curtain Wall
Punch Windows
246 ft
Brick
200 ft
100 ft
Precast
Metal Panel
Granite
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Architectural Breadth
|Modified
|Original
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Omega-Lite®
Material Restrictions
• 60” width
• Limited to certain colors
R-Value
• Precast: 1.22
• Metal Panel: 2.63
Cost/SF
• $103
• $44
|Recommendations
Architectural Breadth
|Material Selection
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Metal Panel
Recommended ✔
Better R-Value
Cheaper Cost/SF
Similar Panel Layout
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
|Slurry Wall
Alternative Systems
|Sheet Piles
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Comparison Matrix
Pile and Lagging
|Constructability
|Availability
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Sheet Piles
Slurry Wall
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Literature Review
SelfActualization
Esteem
Social
Safety
Physiological
Inattention
to results
|5 Dysfunction of
a Team
|Maslow’s Hierarchy
of Needs
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Avoidance of
accountability
Lack of Commitment
Fear of Conflict
Absence of Trust
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Survey Results
|Team Performance
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management
Very
significantly
17%
To what degree do you
think your level of
motivation influences
your team?
Significantly
Somewhat
3%
Very little
4%
Somewhat
17%
Very
significantly
60%
Significantly
37%
To what degree do you
think a motivated leader
influences your team
performance?
62%
Very
significantly
41%
To what degree do you
think an unmotivated
leader would influence
your team performance?
Somewhat
14%
Not at all
Very little
7%
14%
Somewhat
3%
Significantly
35%
Very
significantly
48%
To what degree do you
think motivation is
directly related to team
Significantly
performance?
38%
HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY III
Project Information
Analysis 1 | Shoring System
Structural Breadth
Analysis 2 | Motivation
Analysis 3 | Cash Flow
Conclusion
Appendix
Legend
Original Man-loaded Schedule
Kathryn Gonzales | Construction Management