Center for Teaching and Learning Pedagogy Enhancement Awards Program ABSTRACT/SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Project Title: Integrated Studies: Interdisciplinary Science and Diversity ________________________________________________ Submitted by: Name: Lynn M. Tashiro _____________________________________ Department: Physics and Astronomy _____________________________________ Award year: 2005/2006 ________________________________________________ Abstract/Summary of Findings (will be posted on the CTL website): (No more than 250 words) This project developed an “integrated studies component” for Physics 107, Conceptual Physics and Scientific Inquiry, that integrated physics with other academic disciplines. Physics 107 is the capstone science course for Liberal Studies majors and future elementary school teachers. In addition to instruction that focuses on K-8 CA State Science Standards for physics, curriculum was designed to engage students in opened ended investigations that applied physics to chemistry, biology, and music. The P107 course was resequenced so that open-ended investigations would coincide with instruction on waves, sound, and light since these concepts connect readily to biology and music. Concept maps were used to brainstorm investigation questions and facilitate the connection of physics to other disciplines. A sample student concept map connecting physics and music is shown to the right: Although open-ended investigations empower students to take control of their learning, they do not allow the instructor to control the science content of the investigation. As a result about half of the 12 group inquiry projects conducted over the 2005-06 AY were interdisciplinary the other half were conducted within the discipline of physics. In addition to the group projects each student was required to submit an individual project summary at the end of the semester. Two excerpts from student projects are shown below: 1. Interdisciplinary investigation of Sound and Music Investigation question: Why do musical instruments sound different when they play the same note? 2. Interdisciplinary investigation on Light and Biology: Inquiry Question: Do plants/seeds grow faster in a specific color light? Note: Please return this form and your final report to the CTL Office, mail zip (6084) or email ctl@csus.edu by October 9th, 2006. Center for Teaching and Learning Pedagogy Enhancement Awards Program ABSTRACT/SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Project Title: Personalized-Feedback Learning and Testing Web-Based Application for Different Subjects and Languages Submitted by: Name: ___Thian-Huat Ong_____________________ Department: ___College of Business Administration______ Award year: __2005-2006_____________________________________ Abstract/Summary of Findings (will be posted on the CTL website): (No more than 250 words) Most of the traditional web-based learning and testing systems such as WebCT are passive systems in which students are given online quizzes and then the correct answers are shown to let students know their results. In this research, a personalized-feedback learning and testing web-based system was developed to let students get personalized feedback by asking them similar questions that they did not answer correctly so that they have a better chance to practice on their problem areas and thus improve their learning. A pilot study was conducted to examine the effects of the proposed system on students’ learning. The study showed that experiment group of students who use the proposed system received higher scores than the control group who did not use the proposed system. Although the results were from a small study, it was believed that the results could be further supported by a larger experiment. On the other hand, the experiment group generally expressed higher satisfaction in the process because they were able to practice on the problems that they had difficulty in so that they could improve on their own. The proposed system used open-sourced software component, including database, web server and client, and multilingual Unicode standards, so that it is able to be used in many versatile educational environments, including different subjects such as mathematics and sciences and different languages such as English and Chinese. Note: Please return this form and your final report to the CTL Office, mail zip (6084) or email ctl@csus.edu by October 9th, 2006. Center for Teaching and Learning Pedagogy Enhancement Awards Program ABSTRACT/SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Project Title: Submitted by: Award year: Pilot program for training and using learning assistants in an inquiry-based physics course Name: ____Frank Hicks Department: ____Physics & Astronomy 2005-06 Abstract/Summary of Findings (will be posted on the CTL website): (No more than 250 words) This project was a pilot effort to establish a continuing program of placing physics majors as learning assistants (LAs) in Physics 107, a physics course for liberal studies majors. Two physics majors served as Learning Assistants in Spring 2006: one expressed an interest in teaching at the community college level as a career, and the other was already enrolled in a teacher credentialing program. Here is a brief summary of the results of the project: ► LA duties. The LAs met their obligations as explained in the original PEA proposal. Each taught in one session per week, prepared for class, read weekly assignments, and kept a weekly journal of their experiences. The LAs planned and team-taught a lesson at the end of the semester, and each LA wrote an essay describing strategies for how to interact with students and groups in the Physics 107 classroom. ► Useful "products" and dissemination. One of the teaching strategy essays has already been used by a new Physics 107 instructor as a training resource. The project was also described at the 2006 Conference of the Physics Teacher Education Coalition in Fayetteville, AR. ► Student and LA benefits. Physics 107 students responded well to having an extra instructor in the classroom and supported the LAs, even when it was clear that the LA was sometimes "learning on the job." While both students and LAs benefited from the project, it was clear that LA teaching skills and attitudes benefited more than student learning. As such, using LAs should be viewed primarily as a recruitment tool for majors and future high school teachers. Center for Teaching and Learning Pedagogy Enhancement Awards Program ABSTRACT/SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Project Title: _______Computer mapping for Geolgy Majors_________ Submitted by: Name: __Dr. Kevin Cornwell_________________ Department: __Geology____________________________ Award year: ____2005-2006___________________________________ Abstract/Summary of Findings (will be posted on the CTL website): (No more than 250 words) This abstract and following report outlines the progress made in building a 3 unit elective course in the Department of Geology titled “Computer mapping for Geology majors”. The need for a course of this nature had become apparent as map making software (ESRI – ARCGIS) have become so available in the market place and so in demand in the professional community. Many of the career paths that our graduates take utilize these computer-driven tools and are asking potential employees for these skills. This work effort consists of three tasks: Task 1. - identify the skill set that we wanted undergraduate geology majors to be able to competently grasp Task 2. - evaluate potential materials and develop content material that addresses Task 1, and Task 3. - constructed a syllabus for the course. Task 1 focused on developing a course that would offer practical instruction using components of the ARCGIS software (industry standard) that would have high value for geology. The course is developed around this software. Task 2 did not find a text that adequately function as a tutorial with geological aplications but the help menu’s in the software were full of “how to” sections. Those sections and the instructor’s experience became the gist of the course materials. Course content has been constructed as a series of modules that address the different tasks necessary to build maps and extract data from them. Task 3 incorporates the philosphy of Task 1 with the structure of Task 2. Center for Teaching and Learning Pedagogy Enhancement Awards Program ABSTRACT/SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Project Title: INTEGRATION OF CLINICAL ANATOMY INTO THE PHYSICAL THERAPY CURRICULUM Submitted by: Name: B. STOCKERT1 AND W. LANCASTER2 Departments: 1PHYSICAL THERAPY and 2BIOLOGY Award year: 2005-2006 academic year Abstract/Summary of Findings (will be posted on the CTL website): (No more than 250 words) PURPOSE: The Department of Physical Therapy eliminated the requirement for a second anatomy course for admission into the Physical Therapist Professional Program. Students in the professional program are required to take Gross Human Anatomy. In previous years Gross Human Anatomy was treated as a review course based on completion of two prerequisite anatomy courses. The purpose of this study was to determine if a more active learning style would counteract the impact of reducing the number of prerequisite anatomy courses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The unit value and lecture portion of the course were unchanged. We redesigned the labs for Gross Human Anatomy to include clay modeling, drawing and/or writing in addition to the lab activities that occurred in previous years. We compared scores in Gross Human Anatomy to the previous two years. We compared scores of students in the active learning group who had 2+ anatomy courses to students with one anatomy course. ANALYSES: We compared scores in Gross Human Anatomy using a one-way ANOVA. Students in the active learning group with 2+ vs. 1 anatomy course were compared using a t-test. RESULTS: Students in the active learning group did as well or better in Gross Human Anatomy than students from the previous two years. Mean scores in Gross Human Anatomy were 83.4 & 85.4 for the control period vs. 87.2 for the active learning group. Students in the active learning group with 2+ anatomy courses did not score significantly better than students with one anatomy course. CONCLUSIONS: We reduced the number of prerequisite courses in anatomy without having a negative impact on scores in Gross Human Anatomy. Student feedback regarding the use of active learning activities to enhance learning was strongly favorable. Note: Please return this form and your final report to the CTL Office, mail zip (6084) or email ctl@csus.edu by October 9th, 2006.