Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Page Number:2
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Contents
1.
Introduction and Background ....................................................... 4
2.
Communications ......................................................................... 6
3.
Surveys, Questionnaires & Consultations Summary ......................... 7
4.
5.
6.
3.1
Introduction ..................................................................... 7
3.2
Summary of Consultations and Surveys ............................... 7
Informal Public Consultations and Surveys ................................... 10
4.1
Initial Public Consultation ................................................. 10
4.2
Surveys ......................................................................... 10
4.3
NDP Questionnaire 2014 .................................................. 10
4.4
GRCC Housing Needs Survey ............................................ 11
4.5
Potterton Associates – Landscape Character Assessment ..... 11
Public Consultations .................................................................. 12
5.1
Pre-Submission Consultation Event – 27th June 2015 ........... 12
5.2
Pre-Submission Consultation Event – 3rd October 2015 ........ 12
5.3
Statutory Consultation ..................................................... 12
Human Rights Considerations ..................................................... 13
Appendices ..................................................................................... 14
A1
Stroud District Council – Local Plan Adoption Notification ..... 14
A2
Designation Area Application ............................................ 16
A3
Designation Area Certificate ............................................. 17
A4
Communications Strategy ................................................ 18
A5
Summary of Evidence Base Surveys .................................. 19
A6
Evidence Base Surveys – Sample Documents ..................... 20
A6.1
Evidence Base Surveys – Local Economy Survey ................. 21
A7
NDP Steering Group – Standing Orders .............................. 22
A8
Questionnaire 2014 ......................................................... 23
A9
Questionnaire Area Map ................................................... 27
A10
Questionnaire - Responses Summary ................................ 28
A11
Housing Needs Survey 2014 ............................................. 31
A12
Housing Needs Survey - Responses Summary .................... 35
A13
Pre-Submission Local Community Consultation – 27/06/15 .. 36
A14
Pre-Submission Local Community Consultation – 03/10/15 .. 40
A15
Statutory Consultation Responses ..................................... 41
Page Number:3
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
1.
1.1
Introduction and Background
This Consultation Statement has been prepared in accordance with The
Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (SI No. 637) Part 5 Paragraph
15 (2) which defines a “consultation statement” as, a document which –
(a) contains details of the persons and bodies who were consulted about the
proposed neighbourhood development plan;
(b) explains how they were consulted;
(c) summarises the main issues and concerns raised by the persons consulted; and
(d) describes how these issues and concerns have been considered and, where
relevant, addressed in the proposed neighbourhood development plan.
1.2
The Whiteshill and Ruscombe Neighbourhood Development Plan has been prepared
in response to The Localism Act 2011, which gives parish councils and other
relevant bodies, new powers to prepare statutory Neighbourhood Plans to help
guide development in their local areas. These powers give local people the
opportunity to shape new development, as planning applications are determined in
accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), the Local District
Development Plan, and now Neighbourhood Development Plans where in force.
Other new powers include Community Right to Build Orders whereby local
communities have the ability to grant planning permission for new buildings.
1.3
On 11th April 2013 Whiteshill and Ruscombe Parish Council formally approved the
preparation of a neighbourhood plan and with help from Gloucestershire Rural
Community Council (GRCC) plans were drawn up for an initial informal presentation
to the parishioners of Whiteshill and Ruscombe in the Village Hall.
1.4
During July 2013 an application was made to Stroud District Council for the
Whiteshill and Ruscombe parish to be designated as a neighbourhood planning area
(see Designated Area Map at the start of this document). Following the required six
week consultation period the application was approved by Stroud District Council’s
Environment Committee on 12th September 2013.
see Appendix A2 Designation Application Letter and
Appendix A3 Designation Area Certificate
1.5
On the 23rd January 2014 a meeting of all parishioners who had previously
indicated a willingness to join the NDP Steering Group took place. As a result of this
meeting the NDP Steering Group was formed and charged with overseeing public
consultations, organising further evidence gathering surveys and ultimately
undertaking the preparation of the Plan. The formation of the Steering Group
consisted primarily of Whiteshill and Ruscombe parishioners together with
Page Number:4
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
representatives from the parish council. It was resolved that the Group would meet
in the Village Hall on a monthly basis.
1.6
At the NDP Steering Group Meeting held on the 24th April 2014 it was resolved to
form a smaller core Sub-Group consisting of five members from existing steering
group with the objective of driving the project forward more quickly.
1.7
The Sub-Group was charged with the drafting of the Neighbourhood Development
Plan document based upon evidence collected from all the surveys. The Draft NDP
was presented to the full Steering Group on a regular basis. In addition, as the
Draft Plan was produced it was updated to the website making it available to all
interested parties.
Page Number:5
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
2.
Communications
2.1
At the start of the project to produce a Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP), it
was resolved to create a website (wr-neighbourhood-plan.co.uk) and this site has
been updated regularly throughout the Plan development process. The evolving
NDP has therefore been available for scrutiny and comment by parishioners of
Whiteshill and Ruscombe and other interested parties throughout the duration of
the project. The success of this site can be judged by the fact that shortly before
submission of the final Plan to Stroud District Council the web site had had over
850 visitors.
2.2
In addition, a “Communications Strategy” for the Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan was produced, see Appendix: A4
Communications Strategy. It has been this strategy that has defined the manner in
which interested parties have been kept aware of the progress being made with the
NDP.
2.3
The WaRbler is a quarterly magazine that is distributed free of charge to every
household in the parish and the use of this medium has enabled the NDP Steering
Group to ensure that details of the evolving Plan are available to all residents.
Page Number:6
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
3.
Surveys, Questionnaires & Consultations Summary
3.1
Introduction
3.1.1
The following paragraphs summarize the surveys, questionnaires and consultations
that have generated the evidence used to develop the policies contain in the final
Neighbourhood Development Plan documents.
As already stated above, at the start of the project to produce a Neighbourhood
Development Plan (NDP), it was resolved to create a website (wr-neighbourhoodplan.co.uk) and this site has been updated regularly throughout the Plan
development process.
3.2
Summary of Consultations and Surveys
3.2.1
Initial Public Consultation:Date Held: Saturday 20th April 2013,
Location: Village Hall
Duration: 10:00 to 15:00
Style:
Drop-In Consultation
Purpose: This consultation was advertised in the WaRbler magazine and by the
placement of posters located throughout the parish. The purpose of the
event was to provide parishioners with an introduction to
neighbourhood development plans and to recruit volunteers to carry
out the various surveys.
Comment: As a result of this consultation 25 volunteers were recruited to
undertake the various surveys necessary and 12 of these volunteers
came forward to form a Steering Group for the project.
3.2.2
NDP Surveys:Date Held: From May 2013 to January 2014
Location: Throughout Whiteshill & Ruscombe together with surrounding areas
Duration: Variable
Style:
The initial surveys covering Streets, Landscape Character and Parish
Boundaries were devised by GRCC. These were subsequently enhanced
by the NDP Steering Group to include surveys covering the Natural
Environment and the Local Economy.
Purpose: To gather evidence on how the community viewed the environment in
which they live, what they value about that environment and how they
believe it should be developed in the future. This evidence, together
with comments made by parishioners during the various public
consultations, was used to develop the Neighbourhood Plan policies.
Comment: The full evidence base resulting from the work carried out on these
surveys can be viewed on the Neighbourhood Development Plan
website (wr-neighbourhood-plan.co.uk).
Page Number:7
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Based upon the comments arising from the various surveys, it was
apparent that the overriding resolve of parishioners was to ensure that
the villages of Whiteshill and Ruscombe remain distinctly separate from
Stroud and other surrounding built environments. Further, they should
retain their unique Cotswold character and that any new development
should seek to employ “in-fill” and “brown field” sites rather than erode
the surrounding countryside that defines the character of this AONB
area.
The policies devised by the NDP Steering Group seek to achieve those
objectives.
3.2.3
Whiteshill & Ruscombe NDP Questionnaire 2014 and the
Whiteshill & Ruscombe Housing Needs Survey 2014:Date Held: May 2014 to 20th June 2014,
Location: 485 questionnaires were hand delivered to all properties along with a
Freepost envelop for returning the completed surveys. 171 completed
NDP Questionnaires were returned together with 168 Housing Need
Surveys giving a response rate of approximately 35%.
Duration: 25 days to complete and return questionnaires (additional time was
allowed for late returns).
Style:
Printed questionnaires. NDP Questionnaire / Housing Needs Survey
Purpose: This consultation, involving two questionnaires, was devised to gauge
the views and needs of as many families in the parish as possible. The
subjects covered in the NDP Questionnaire were derived from earlier
responses to the 2010 Parish Plan questionnaires together with
parishioners views expressed during informal discussions with members
of the Steering Committee.
Comment: As a result of this consultation the Steering Group were able to confirm
the forward likely requirement for affordable housing in the parish. In
addition they were able to confirm the desire for the villages of
Whiteshill and Ruscombe remain distinctly separate from Stroud and
other surrounding built environments.
The results of the NDP Questionnaire can be found in Appendix A10
and the Housing Needs Survey results can be viewed from Appendix A12
3.2.4
Pre-Submission Consultation:Date Held: Saturday 27th June 2015,
Location: Village Hall
Duration: 10:00 to 15:00
Style:
Drop-In Consultation
Purpose: Development of the NDP reached the stage by June 2015 were it was
deemed appropriate by the Steering Committee for the document and
the policies it contained to be presented to parishioners for their
Page Number:8
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
comment.
Comment: The consultation attracted 74 visitors and the comments made and
actions taken by the Steering Group as a result of those comments can
be viewed in Appendix A13.
3.2.5
Final Pre-Submission Consultation:Date Held: Saturday 3rd October 2015,
Location: Village Hall
Duration: 10:00 to 15:00
Style:
Drop-In Consultation
Purpose: By early October 2015 the revised NDP had been updated to allow for
amendments suggested by parishioners in the earlier consultations and
also to reflect changes recommended by Rosemary Kidd of NPIERS.
Finally, responses to the Statutory Consultation that can be viewed in
Appendix 15, were incorporated into the NDP. At this stage the Steering
Group decided to hold one further public consultation to allow the final
NDP document to be viewed by parishioners prior to being accepted by
the Parish Council and being submitted to Stroud District Council.
Comment: This final public consultation attracted 42 visitors and the comments
made can be viewed in Appendix A14.
Page Number:9
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
4.
Informal Public Consultations and Surveys
4.1
Initial Public Consultation
4.1.1
Following the parish council decision to proceed with a neighbourhood development
plan for Whiteshill and Ruscombe and with the assistance of GRCC a “Drop-In”
event was held on Saturday 20th April 2013 in the Village Hall with the aim of
involving as many from the local community as possible in the project.
4.1.2
In addition to identifying parishioners who would be willing to join a Steering
Group, this initial “Drop-In” consultation event established those individuals
prepared to undertake the numerous surveys needed to accumulate the required
evidence base.
4.2
Surveys
4.2.1
With support from local parishioners (including children from the local primary
school together with the Whiteshill and Ruscombe Cubs and Beavers) we undertook
surveys covering the following topics;

Serial Vision

Local Landscape Character Survey

Street Survey

Neighbourhood Boundaries

Natural Environment and Habitat Survey

Natural Environment - Garden Survey

Local Economy Survey
4.2.2
These surveys took some seven months to complete and it was not until January
2014 that all the surveys were finished. Details of all these surveys are available on
the Neighbourhood Development Plan website (wr-neighbourhood-plan.co.uk).
4.3
NDP Questionnaire 2014
4.3.1
Gloucestershire Rural Community Council (GRCC) assisted Whiteshill & Ruscombe
in the development and printing of their NDP Questionnaire which was distributed
to all relevant parties including every residential and commercial property in the
parish. Analysis of the responses to the Questionnaire was carried out by GRCC and
provided the counts, percentages and summary report detailed in Appendix A10.
The results of this analysis were used by the NDP Steering Group when formulating
the policies contained within the Neighbourhood Development Plan document.
Page Number:10
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
4.3.2
Analysis of the questions concerning “open countryside” locations surrounding
Whiteshill and Ruscombe was undertaken by the Neighbourhood Development Plan
Steering Group. (Questions - 9.1, 9.2 and 11). Details of this analysis can be found
on the Neighbourhood Development Plan website (wr-neighbourhood-plan.co.uk).
4.4
GRCC Housing Needs Survey
4.4.1
In March 2014 Whiteshill & Ruscombe Parish Council agreed to engage the services
of the Rural Housing Enabler from GRCC to carry out a local Housing Needs Survey
at the same time as Neighbourhood Development Plan. The Parish Council agreed
to distribute the questionnaires to all residential properties in Whiteshill &
Ruscombe Parish in May 2014. Analysis of the responses to the House Needs
Survey was again carried out by GRCC and provided the counts, percentages and
summary report detailed in Appendix A12. As with the NDP Questionnaire, the
results of this analysis were used by the NDP Steering Group when formulating the
policies contained within the Neighbourhood Development Plan document.
4.5
Potterton Associates – Landscape Character Assessment
4.5.1
In April 2014 Whiteshill & Ruscombe Parish Council agreed to engage the services
of Potterton Associates to carry out a formal Landscape Character Assessment of
the NDP Designated Area. This survey was carried out during May 2014 and the
final results of the survey were presented to the NDP Steering Group at the end of
June 2014.
4.5.2
The community of Whiteshill & Ruscombe believes firmly that the landscape and
public vistas surrounding the parish need to be conserved. This belief is endorsed
by the Potterton Associates Limited - Landscape Appraisal which emphasises the
importance of public vistas and conserving the AONB together with green-field sites
(Report pages 7, 9, 10).
4.5.3
The full results of the Potterton Associates Survey can be viewed on the
Neighbourhood Development Plan website (wr-neighbourhood-plan.co.uk).
Page Number:11
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
5.
Public Consultations
5.1
Pre-Submission Consultation Event – 27th June 2015
5.1.1
With the Neighbourhood Development Plan nearing the stage where it would be
ready for a pre-submission presentation to Stroud District Council, we arranged to
hold a Consultation Event for residents of the parish.
5.1.2
This event took place on Saturday 27th June 2015 between the hours of 10:00 am
to 3:00 pm in the Whiteshill & Ruscombe Village Hall.
5.1.3
Following extensive advertising that included emails being sent via the parish
electronic mailing list, posters located throughout the parish and two large 2 metre
banners we attracted over seventy residents to the “drop-in” event.
See Appendix A13
5.2
Pre-Submission Consultation Event – 3rd October 2015
5.2.1
At the beginning of October 2015 the Neighbourhood Development Plan has
reached a stage where it is about to be submitted to Stroud District Council. Prior
to submission we arranged to hold a Final Consultation Event for residents of the
parish.
5.2.2
This event took place on Saturday 3rd October 2015 between the hours of 10:00 am
to 3:00 pm in the Whiteshill & Ruscombe Village Hall.
5.2.3
Following similar advertising as undertaken for the initial pre-submission
consultation we attracted over forty residents to the “drop-in” event. It was
encouraging that the residents attending this second event included very few who
came in June which meant that we had reached a far wider audience.
See Appendix A14
5.3
Statutory Consultation
5.3.1
A list of all statutory consultees that needed to be consulted regarding the
Whiteshill & Ruscombe Neighbourhood Development Plan was provided by Stroud
District Council. These consultees were supplied with copies of the draft plan,
where possible by email. In those cases where no email address was supplied they
were contacted via the postal service. Where no response was received, towards
the end of the statutory consultation period a follow-up reminder letter was sent.
5.3.2
The replies from the statutory consultees together with the responses from the
Whiteshill & Ruscombe NDP Steering Group can be viewed at Appendix A.15.
Page Number:12
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
6.
Human Rights Considerations
With regard to Human Rights legislation and the consultation opportunities of “hard to reach
groups”, information concerning the neighbourhood development plan has been advertised in
the WaRbler, when relevant. In addition all meetings relating to the Plan have been advertised
on the village notice boards at least one week prior to the meeting taking place.
The WaRbler is a quarterly parish magazine that is hand delivered to every property in the
parish. The telephone number of the chair of the NDP Steering Committee has appeared in the
magazine enabling those without access to a computer or the internet and who are housebound
to make contact with the NDP Steering Group as necessary.
Page Number:13
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Appendices
A1
Stroud District Council – Local Plan Adoption Notification
Page Number:14
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Page Number:15
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A2
Designation Area Application
Page Number:16
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A3
Designation Area Certificate
Page Number:17
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A4
Communications Strategy
Page Number:18
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A5
Summary of Evidence Base Surveys
Page Number:19
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A6
Evidence Base Surveys – Sample Documents
Page Number:20
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A6.1 Evidence Base Surveys – Local Economy Survey
A6.1.1 There are limited employment opportunities within the parish. The majority of the
present day working population is employed in the service industries with a
substantial proportion in managerial or professional roles. As a result the majority
of the working population travel outside the parish to their place of work.
A6.1.2 The Local Businesses & Trade Survey was circulated to every property in the parish
via the Autumn 2014 edition of The WaRbler and as such all of the following
community organisations received copies of this survey together with the
Neighbourhood Development Plan Questionnaire:
Ruscombe and Whiteshill Community Shop
St Paul’s Church
Ruscombe Chapel and School Room
Whiteshill Primary School
Whiteshill Scout Hut (Whiteshill & Ruscombe Cubs, Beavers and Brownies)
Whiteshill and Ruscombe Allotments Association
The Star Inn
Whiteshill Village Hall
A6.1.3 There were only 7 responses to the Local Businesses & Trade Survey with the
broadband speed in the area being the greatest cause for concern. The Parish
Council continues to address this issue with the appropriate authorities.
A6.1.4 Whilst the Neighbourhood Development Plan seeks to encourage development that
will increase employment opportunities, there are only limited options available in
the parish to make this an achievable objective.
Page Number:21
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A7
NDP Steering Group – Standing Orders
Page Number:22
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A8
Questionnaire 2014
With the help of GRCC an NDP Questionnaire was produced and hand delivered to
all properties in the parish towards the end of May 2014. The deadline for the
return of completed questionnaires via the supplied freepost envelop was Friday
20th June 2014. A total of 171 responses from the 485 questionnaires delivered
giving 35% response.
Page Number:23
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Page Number:24
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Page Number:25
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Page Number:26
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A9
Questionnaire Area Map
Page Number:27
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A10 Questionnaire - Responses Summary
Page Number:28
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Page Number:29
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Page Number:30
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A11 Housing Needs Survey 2014
GRCC undertook a Housing Needs Survey that was hand delivered to all properties
in the parish at the same time as the NDP Questionnaire towards the end of May
2014. The deadline for the return of completed questionnaires via the supplied
freepost envelop was Friday 20th June 2014. A total of 168 responses from the 485
questionnaires delivered giving 35% response.
Page Number:31
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Page Number:32
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Page Number:33
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Page Number:34
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A12 Housing Needs Survey - Responses Summary
A12.1 The 2014 Whiteshill and Ruscombe Housing Needs Survey was formulated and
carried out by Gloucestershire Rural Communities Council on behalf of the NDP
Steering Group. Their analysis of responses to the survey indicates that at the time
of the survey there would be a possible need for 5 additional affordable homes in
the parish during the coming 5 years.
A12.2 Whiteshill & Ruscombe parish currently has a total of 42 affordable dwellings
available for rent from Stroud District Council and one dwelling managed by a
Housing Association. During the 5 years when the identified possible need could
occur it is very likely that a number of the existing affordable dwellings will become
available. Given that none of the respondents who indicated they may be in need of
affordable housing were registered with Gloucestershire Homeseeker service it is
probable that the existing affordable housing stock in Whiteshill and Ruscombe will
be able to satisfy demand for the foreseeable future.
A12.3 The full Responses Summary can be accessed from the website by clicking on the
following link: (Housing Needs Responses Summary)
Page Number:35
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A13 Pre-Submission Local Community Consultation – 27/06/15
A13.1 The following table details the un-edited written comments submitted by those
attending the Pre-Submission Consultation Event held in the Village Hall on
Saturday 27th June 2015:
Comment Number
Un-edited Visitor Comments
NDP Steering Group
Comment
Built Environment Policies - Comments
Comment BE-1:
The priority for Whiteshill / Ruscombe is to retain the rural character
of the area.
New development in and around the villages should not be
permitted.
The priority should be for new development to be located in Stroud
/ Stonehouse where it can contribute to regeneration or exploit
accessibility to transport infrastructure.
Comments noted
Comment BE-2
The Map Area Results are dangerous (and statistically
questionable!!) because they give the impression that lower rated
areas are somehow suitable for development.
Comment noted however
the Steering Group do not
agree with this conclusion.
Comment BE-3
There needs to be a policy to control the boundary treatment
of properties (particularly where they adjoin the highway).
High wooden fences are beginning to spring up on highway
boundaries detracting from the traditional dry-stone wall
boundaries that are part of the area’s visual character.
Comment noted
Comment BE-4
Small number of new houses built to blend in with existing
buildings are needed to keep the village growing with more
opportunities of housing for younger people.
Comment noted
Comment BE-5
The development in Cashes Green by the architect from
“Grand Designs” is worth emulating. It has a warm and
inviting feeling and a sense of community.
Comment noted
Comment BE-6
Need houses that can be bought on low incomes, not
necessarily rented or shared ownership.
Comment noted
Local Facility Policies - Comments
Comment LF-1
Existing facilities for cultural, leisure, community and social
needs could also include The Star (Public House).
Comments noted and
reference included in NDP
Comment LF-2
Need to recognise The Star (Public House) as an important
community facility. (At least four others agreed with this
comment).
Comments noted and
reference included in NDP
Page Number:36
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Comment LF-3
The Village Shop and The Star (Public House) are also village
facilities. Loss of either would greatly affect the other facilities
(chair Village Shop Committee).
Comments noted and
reference included in NDP
Comment LF-4
The Playing Field opposite the shop is also a village facility.
Lovely play area for the younger children. More needed for
older children and perhaps adults. Static exercise bikes and
equipment which would fit in with the natural look. I have
seen this done successfully abroad.
Comments noted and as at
November 2015 these
suggestions are being
investigated by the parish
council.
Comment LF-5
Facilities for senior citizens needed - user friendly access to
bespoke housing of smaller type properties near village shop.
A thriving community hub for social and sports events.
Comments noted and
reference included in NDP
Comment LF-6
The Playing Field / Children’s Play Area is an essential part of
the village, as an open space, social sports facility, school
sports and a focal point for our (all too occasional) village
parties.
Comments noted
Comment LF-7
Should the school also be listed under local facilities or is it
counted elsewhere? The small, friendly village school is far
more important than just the “pupil capacity” - which could
be all that county level decisions look at.
Comments noted and as at
November 2015 is under
investigation by the parish
council.
Comment LF-8
Better signposting for the Village Shop and Playing Fields to
promote the fantastic views.
This is being investigated by
the village shop committee
Comment LF-9
Outside seating area for the Village Shop.
Comments noted
Local Economy Policies - Comments
Comment LE-1
Improved Broadband speed would be appreciated. Agree,
high speed broadband would be useful.
November 2015 being
investigate by parish council
Comment LE-2
Superfast Broadband essential!
As above
Transport & Communications Policies - Comments
Comment TC-1
As the village shop is important as a hub for the villages, it
would help enormously to have access improved via the
footpath from Ruscombe. Especially for push-chairs as people
travelling to the school from Ruscombe currently have to
drive. Can access be made through the farm or styles
removed?
Comment noted
Comment TC-2
20mph speed limit is a good thing but needs enforcing or
additional traffic calming.
Comment noted
Page Number:37
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Comment TC-3
20mph should be enforced through a camera - even the buses
speed! More 20mph signs should be placed around
Ruscombe, drivers forget it covers such a large area.
Comment noted
Comment TC-4
We had approx. 1 minute walk down Main Road to get to the
village hall and got passed by 3 very fast cars in that short
time. The maximum speed has improved a little since the
reduced limit, but still needs enforcement.
Comment noted
Comment TC-5
Continue 20mph and support further traffic calming
measures.
Comment noted
Comment TC-6
20mph limit at the top of the village should start at Hill Farm
and be 30mph from the Bird-in-Hand.
Comment noted
Comment TC-7
Also need to consider the number of large vehicles that pass
down Main Road. Applying width / weight restrictions
between Edge and Paganhill might address this problem.
Comment noted
Comment TC-8
Adequate provision of off-road parking in new developments
means applying higher parking standards than generally
provided in Gloucester County Council policies, given the lack
of suitable on-road parking in most of this area.
Comment noted
Comment TC-9
Strongly support the need to retain frequent bus services to
Stroud / Gloucester. There is a need for later services to meet
evening trains from London.
Comment noted
Comment TC-10
Bus services needed later than 18:30 to Stroud.
Comment noted
Comment TC-11
Support the ½ hour bus service. Seating is needed at bus stop
just up from the village shop, passengers are often elderly.
Comment noted
Comment TC-12
Maintenance of existing paths is necessary- Bishop’s Walk
especially which is over-grown and dangerous (potentially)
due to uneven surface.
Comment noted
Comment TC-13
Visibility and the narrowness of roads could be improved by
the removal of weeds / plants in walls and verges that should
be trimmed back to wall lines and pavements.
Comment noted
Comment TC-14
More public parking spaces needed, either in a new
configuration of the parking area by the village shop or
elsewhere if necessary.
Comment noted
Page Number:38
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Landscape Character Policies - Comments
Comment LC-1
It is important to retain dry-stone walls and other traditional
field boundaries - both within the villages and the wider
countryside. High wooden fences on the boundary between
properties and the highway should not be permitted.
Comment noted
Comment LC-2
In order to maintain stone walls the weeds and vegetation
must be removed or they will bring the wall down
Comment noted
Natural Environment Policies - Comments
Comment NE-1
The village playing field has lots of biodiversity including
orchids. Can it be a local nature reserve?
Comment noted, already
protect by Fields in Trust
Comment NE-2
Like the natural look in the churchyard. (Comment on NE1
above)
Comment noted
Comment NE-3
Can the clarity of the 2 maps be improved?
Comment noted and map
has been revised to give
more clarity.
General Comments
General Comment 1
Just that I agree with the Proposed Plan and all the very good
comments made. Thank you for all your hard work in putting
on this display.
Comment noted
Page Number:39
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A14 Pre-Submission Local Community Consultation – 03/10/15
A14.1 The following table details the un-edited written comments submitted by those
attending the Pre-Submission Consultation Event held in the Village Hall on
Saturday 3rd October 2015:
Comment Number
Un-edited Visitor Comments
NDP Steering Group
Comment
Local Facility Policies - Comments
Comment LF-1:
The Chapel Schoolroom is surely outside the remit of the
Parish Council being on land owned by the U.R. Church? Isa
the schoolroom fully utilised anyway?
Comment noted
Comment LF-2
Is the Village Shop included in the “Local Facilities Policy”?
The Village Shop is included
in the Local Facilities Policy
Landscape Character Policies - Comments
Comment LC-1:
2 a) b) & c) is an interesting aim but the reality is that any past
support by the Parish Council has been very weak. I suspect
this is due to the fact that our village council has very little
“power” when it comes to planning outcomes.
Comment noted
Comment LC-2
In order to maintain stone walls the weeds and vegetation
must be removed or they will bring the wall down
Comment noted
Page Number:40
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
A15 Statutory Consultation Responses
A15.1 The following table details the responses received from the list of Statutory
Consultees. This consultation took place for the statutory six weeks from 10th
September 2015 to 23rd October 2015:
Statutory Consultees
Neighbourhood
Planning Regs. 2012
(a) where LPA is a
London borough
council,
(b) a local planning
authority, county
council or parish
council any part of
whose area is in or
adjoins the area of
the LPA;
Organisation
Contacts & Comments Received
Not applicable
Not applicable
Gloucestershire Fire and
Rescue Service
Fire Service HQ
Waterwells Drive
Quedgeley
Gloucester
GL2 2AX
Community Engagement
Gloucestershire Constabulary
Police Headquarters
No 1 Waterwells
Quedgeley
Gloucester
GL2 2AN
01452 753 333
fire@glosfire.gov.uk
No comment received
Mark Murphy (Crime Prevention Design Advisor)
01452 752363
Mark.Murphy@gloucestershire.pnn.police.uk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------Helen,
Thank you for the opportunity to read and review the proposed
plan.
The Whiteshill and Ruscombe Neighbourhood Development Plan is a
very comprehensive document which addresses numerous planning
requirements. Having read through the document I found the
opening description of the two villages and the surrounding area
would be complimented by the inclusion of photographs of the
listed buildings, the community resources and public spaces.
Not knowing the area with any depth, it took me a while to establish
where the villages are and their relationship with other
conurbations. Anyone looking to use this plan for development
purposes would also find it difficult to know the boundaries of your
parish, could I propose the inclusion of a map detailing the location
and boundary of the policy area.
The informative section relating to the history and local
characteristics was interesting but could be improved with
photographs of each building and a map showing their position
within each village. Not only would this illustrate the location and
the character detail of these important buildings, but it would set a
visual palette for any future planning proposals.
I am concerned by the lack of any crime prevention or security
requirements within the plan. Especially when you consider that in
the last 2 years, 39 crimes have been reported in and around both
villages ranging burglary, criminal damage, assault and possession of
drug. With this in mind the NDP should offer a policy or
requirement to ensure the safety of each resident or visitor and the
security of every property. I would be happy to meet with you to
discuss this further should you need further information.
Regards
Page Number:41
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Mark Murphy
Crime Prevention Design Advisor
Community Engagement, Police Headquarters, Gloucester
01452 752363
(Comments re maps & photos noted & changes included in Final
NDP Version. With regard to crime prevention, the NDP supports
the Local Plan Policy BE1 Clause 6 that “new development takes
account of the need to reduce crime” also see the following link
http://www.securedbydesign.com/ web site)
Office of the Police and Crime
Commissioner for
Gloucestershire
No.1 Waterwells,
Waterwells Drive
Quedgeley, GL2 2AN
Gloucestershire County Council
Shire Hall
Westgate Street
Gloucester
GL1 2TG
PCC Martin Surl
01452 754348
pcc@gloucestershire.police.uk
No comment received
Mr Nigel Riglar (nigel.riglar@gloucestershire.gov.uk)
Mr Robin Drake (robin.drake@gloucestershire.gov.uk)
Mr Robert Niblett (robert.niblett@gloucestershire.gov.uk)
Mr Simon Excell (simon.excell@gloucestershire.gov.uk)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------16th October
Dear Madam
Thank you for consulting Gloucestershire County Council (GCC) on
the above matter I have the following officer level comments to
make.
Archaeology Comments
No comments
Ecology Comments
Given the proposals in the draft consultation version of the NDP the
need for a SEA or HRA appears unlikely. We can see that a natural
environment review of the area has formed part of the evidence
base which included contact with the Local Records Centre, GCER.
The main objectives include items for the natural environment are
worthy and appropriate. This is an area of important county
biodiversity as is evident by the land that is designated as Key
Wildlife Sites, extent of priority habitat and the large number of
priority species recorded. The retention of green space, landscape
character, ecological networks (wildlife corridors) are being given
high value in the proposed NDP. The proposals have consistency
with the Local Nature Partnerships Strategic Framework for Green
Infrastructure and there is reference to the Gloucestershire Nature
Map (Whiteshill SNA but also note there is a small part of Standish
Park SNA relevant to the NDP too).
Proposed Policy W&R-BE1: Built Environment: Open Spaces includes
encouragement for new landscaping and habitat conservation and
enhancement. Proposed Policy W&R-LC1: Landscape Character
seems reasonable given the AONB presence. Proposed policy W&RNE1: Natural Environment is quite comprehensive and is appropriate
given the assets the NDP area has which should be protected and
enhanced in any future but modest development.
Highway Comments
Some suggested modifications to the policies:W&R-TC1: Transport and Communications Policy:
Page Number:42
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
1. Future developments will mitigate any identified severe significant
impacts on highway infrastructure the transport network.
2. Developments should be compatible with:
a) should not have a severe impact on the existing road
infrastructure;
b) that are likely to significantly increase traffic movements should
contribute towards the the need for provision of turning points and
passing places on the parish’s narrow lanes;
c) should promote sustainable transport by providing the access to
public transport facilities and services, where it is practical to do so;
d) should provide adequate provision of off-road parking where
displaced parking demand is likely to result in highway safety
problems and;
e) should promote sustainable transport by providing ready access to
local facilities especially on by foot or and by bicycle, where it is
practical to do so.
3. Opportunities will be sought to improve pedestrian safety,
particularly on the Main Road north of the crossroads with Kitesnest
and Ruscombe Road.
The draft plan needs a map - at least a location map and ideally one
showing major land uses - and B) there is no ref to the fact that
Whiteshill and Ruscombe are located in a north/ south corridor
which local traffic between Brookthorpe and Stroud resorts to when
the M5 corridor or other major roads are congested, and that this
may become more frequent as Stroud District, including
Stonehouse, accommodate projected growth. This has implications
for quiet road characteristics in the area which may need to be
identified or safeguarded.
Flood Risk Comments
The LLFA will, if requested to do so, provide advice to Local Planning
Authorities on the management of surface water and associated
flood risk relating to major planning applications.
If you would to discuss any of the points raised above please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Thank you
Rob Niblett
Planning Officer
Harescombe Parish Council
14 Marefiled Close
Barnwood
Glos
GL4 3TU
Pitchcombe Parish Council
Wayside
Whiteway
Stroud
Glos
(Comments noted & changes included in Final NDP Version)
Debbie Hill - Clerk
Email: harescombepc@aol.com
No comment received
Ms L Pitchford – Clerk
Tel: 01285 821992
Email: clerkpitchcombepc@hotmail.com
No comment received
Page Number:43
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Painswick Parish Council
Town Hall
Victoria Square
Painswick
Stroud, Glos
Mr R Balgobin - Clerk
Tel: 01452 812722
Fax: 01452 812722
Email: clerkpainswickpc@hotmail.com
No comment received
Stroud Town Council
Thanet House
58 London Road
Stroud
GL5 2AD
13th October 2015
Hello Helen
Your plan was discussed at our Consultations Committee meeting
last night. They had no comments or objections.
Regards
Helen Bojaniwska
Town Clerk, Stroud Town Council, Thanet House, 58 London Road,
Stroud GL5 2AD
Tel: 01453 762817
www.stroudtown.gov.uk
No comment.
Randwick Parish Council,
Rising Sun Cottage
Chapel Fields
Randwick
Stroud
Gloucestershire, GL6 6HT
Cainscross Parish Council,
85 Westward Road
Ebley
Stroud
Gloucestershire
GL5 4JA
Mr B Parsons - Clerk
07930 548529
clerk.randwick@btinternet.com
No comment received
Mrs Jeni Marshall - Clerk
01453 756036
clerk.cpc@btconnect.com
Helen
I am sorry this is the first time I have seen the document so I
apologise for not replying. My next Full Council meeting is not until
the 26 October and therefore too late for your deadline. Many
apologies but I have just checked my old emails and can’t find
anything about this.
Jeni Marshall
Clerk to Cainscross Parish Council
01453 756036
www.cainscross-pc.gov.uk
No comment received
Standish Parish Council
Mulberries
Post Office Hill
Amberley
Stroud, Gloucestershire
Haresfield Parish Council
The Forge
Haresfield
Stonehouse
Ms Jo Barber – Clerk
07817 377640
clerkatstandishpc@hotmail.co.uk
No comment received
Ms M King – Clerk
Tel: 01452 721635
Email: haresfieldpc@gmail.com
No comment received
Page Number:44
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Stroud District Council
Ebley Mill
Ebley Wharf
Stroud
GL5 4UB
Mr Ricardo Rios – Neighbourhood Planning Officer
01453754339
Ricardo.rios@stroud.gov.uk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------Black = NDP Section or Policy
Blue = Comment
Red = Recommendation
Green = Action
General Comment
The Emerging Stroud District Local Plan is very close to adoption.
Until the plan is adopted, it is important to note that it may be
subject to change. Whilst the advice we give you is based on the
most up-to-date information we have, it is still subject to change in
the future.
You should avoid repeating and/or referring to local plan policies,
wherever possible, to ensure your NDP does not refer to incorrect
information following modifications and/or the adoption of the
Local Plan.
Comment Noted
………………………………………………………………………………………
The Objectives
Conserve the open spaces that separate Whiteshill and Ruscombe
from other settlements.
It is unclear what is meant by the term “open spaces”. This is usually
meant to refer to recreation areas, but it appears from the rest of
the sentence that open spaces actually means countryside, and not
the usual definition.
Replace the term “open spaces” with “open countryside”.
“Open spaces” changed to “open countryside” with a definition of
“open countryside” included at the start of the NDP.
………………………………………………………………………………………
Community Feedback
Any new housing developments comprising 4 or more properties
should consist of at least 50% affordable homes (61% agreed).
Although laudable as an ambition, 50% affordable housing is unlikely
to be viable on sites other than rural exception sites, hence the Local
Plan policy seeking 30%.
The aspiration should reflect policy CP9 or evidence that 50% is
viable should be provided.
Policy changed to 30%
………………………………………………………………………………………
Page Number:45
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Types of Housing
The community supports the precept that when several houses are
to be built on a given site a suitable mix of homes should be offered
ranging from accommodation for single people to family homes See
emerging Local Plan CP7. When a development constitutes more
than 5 properties then 30% should be in the form of affordable (low
cost) housing.
Affordable’ and ‘low cost’ have separate and distinct definitions in
the NPPF. Local Plan Core Policy CP9 seeks affordable housing
provision on sites of 4 or more dwellings, not 5 as stated.
Please delete reference to low cost and amend wording of this
section to:
When a development constitutes 4 or more properties then 30%
should be in the form of affordable housing.
Requested change applied.
………………………………………………………………………………………
Types of Housing
It should be noted that there are 43 existing houses in the parish
providing low cost rented accommodation offered by Stroud District
Council and a Housing Association. This represents nearly 9% of the
total number of dwellings in Whiteshill & Ruscombe.
‘Affordable’ and ‘low cost’ have separate and distinct definitions in
the NPPF. Rents for council properties and housing association
properties are usually referred to as ‘social rent’ or ‘affordable rent’.
Please delete reference to low cost and amend wording of this
section to:
It should be noted that there are 43 existing houses in the parish
providing social and affordable rented accommodation offered by
Stroud District Council and a Housing Association. This represents
nearly 9% of the total number of dwellings in Whiteshill &
Ruscombe.
Requested change applied.
………………………………………………………………………………………
W&R-BE1: Built Environment Policy: Open Spaces
1. Developments that erode the green spaces which separate the
settled areas of the Parish and neighbouring parishes will not be
permitted*.
The Council does not support policies that seek to introduce blanket
restrictions to rural areas that go beyond normal countryside
policies.
Such approach is considered unacceptable and overly onerous. It
does not allow for special circumstances. It does not recognise the
kind of development that would not necessarily be inappropriate
development.
Page Number:46
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
The overly restrictive nature of this approach creates a significant
and fundamental conflict with the NPPF because it prohibits
development, in a particular area, having no regard to how
sustainable that development may be.
This policy is also in conflict with Local Plan policy HC4 which deals
with exception sites to meet local housing need. By definition policy
HC4 supports development outside the defined settlement limits in
exceptional circumstances.
The Council’s approach towards preventing coalescence is set out
under Policy CP15 – A Quality Living and Working Countryside.
Our approach recognises the role and function of “open
countryside” in protecting the separate identity of settlements and
the quality of the countryside.
Policy CP15 sets out guiding principles that allow for sustainable
development to take place whilst achieving the aim of protecting
the separate identity of settlements in a manner that is compatible
with national planning policy.
The information contained within your Landscape Appraisal may
allow you to identify important characteristics of the area that will
help to define the separate identity of settlements and the quality of
the countryside.
Clarify objective and review approach.
Replace the term “open spaces” with “open countryside”.
The information contained within your Landscape Appraisal may
allow you to identify important characteristics of the area that will
help to define the separate identity of settlements and the quality of
the countryside.
Policy WR-BE1 has been revised to clarify the objective in the light
of the Landscape Appraisal as suggested.
………………………………………………………………………………………
W&R-BE1: Built Environment Policy: Open Spaces
4. Development that respects and enhances local landscapes and
maintains valued public views and vistas will be supported
This section repeats criterion 2 from Policy LC1.
Delete Criterion 4 from BE1 and retain criterion 2 from LC1.
Requested change applied.
………………………………………………………………………………………
Page Number:47
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
W&R-BE2: Built Environment Policy: Building Standards and Design
6. The inclusion of Rainwater Harvesting and Utilisation Systems will
be a requirement in all new build properties in order to reduce
dependency on the existing sewage system and mitigate the risk of
flooding.
The Council considers this requirement too onerous. The NDP
evidence base does not have any information on how such a
requirement could impact on viability.
Criterion 5 of Policy W&R-NE1: Natural Environment Policy already
requires the adoption of best practice in Sustainable Drainage
Systems (SuDS) and water quality.
Delete criterion 6
Requested change applied.
………………………………………………………………………………………
Local connection criteria
The eligibility criteria are that a person who, at the date of the
affordable dwelling being advertised:
1. has been resident within the Parish of Whiteshill and Ruscombe
for a continuous period of three years within the preceding five
years or six months in the preceding twelve months other than not
of his own choice (not including serving with regular armed forces of
the Crown) or
2. is permanently employed within the Parish of Whiteshill and
Ruscombe or is moving to the Parish to take up an offer of
permanent employment or
3. has a close family member ( e.g. parent or child or sibling ) who
is living and has lived in the Parish of Whiteshill and Ruscombe for a
continuous period of five years immediately preceding the date of
advertising the Affordable Dwelling.
4. Because of special circumstances.
These eligibility requirements comply with the
Housing Act 1996 Part VI – the Allocation of Housing
Accommodation
The criteria set down could be seen as overly prescriptive and as
drafted does not allow for cascades to adjoining parishes and the
wider district. Without these cascades, development is highly
unlikely to take place.
The Council considers the local connection criteria unnecessary.
Criterion 3 from W&R-BE3 already provides adequate guidance with
the necessary flexibility to ensure the viability of development is not
compromised.
Page Number:48
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Delete Local Connection Criteria or provide evidence that local
connection criteria do not compromise affordable housing viability
in the NDP area.
Requested change applied.
………………………………………………………………………………………
W&R-LF1: Local Facilities Policy
General Comment
The health check suggested the inclusion of specific projects to be
taken forward in your policy. If you intend to do this, you could
reword your policy in a manner similar to Kingswood (see below),
which supports future provision in accordance with identified
priorities:
POLICY GSC1: PROVISION OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND
RECREATION SPACE
The provision of additional community facilities at Kingswood
Playing Field will be strongly supported, including:
• a graffiti wall
• a youth shelter
• further play equipment
• toilets for playing field users.
The extension of Kingswood Playing Field to support additional
formal recreation will be strongly supported. Improvements to and
extension of Kingswood Village Hall to provide additional space for
community activities will be strongly supported.
The provision of formal off-road parking for users of Tubbs Turf will
be supported.
Improvements and new provision should seek to provide for the
range of needs of all sectors of the community. These priorities will
be reviewed regularly in accordance with “Project List” updated and
approved following formal resolution from the Parish Council.
Please consider including specific projects to ensure the NDP policy
adds value to existing local policies
Comment has been noted but we have already included a
proposed project for future consideration under the Built
Environment – Associated Projects Section. These projects will be
taken forward by the Parish Council as and when appropriate.
………………………………………………………………………………………
Local Economy
The Council’s Regeneration Officer (Business) with a role specifically
focused on economic development made the following comments:
1. There doesn’t seem to be a lot related to economic development
within the plan due to the nature of the parish. One query would be
the distinction between the scope of the NDP and the ‘Associated
Projects’ to be taken forward by the parish council
Page Number:49
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
a) Could the NDP play a role in identifying/suggesting areas where
small business units could be set up and whether there is demand?
b) Similarly with the potential for a Community Business Hub?
2. On the broadband front, according to the Fastershire website at
www.fastershire.com a number of exchanges within the parish have
now been enabled with fibre broadband, permitting access to
superfast broadband.
Please consider whether the NDP could play a role in relation to
points a) and b).
Comment has been noted however the response to the NDP Local
Economy Survey sent to all properties in Whiteshill & Ruscombe
resulted in just 4 responses. Of these 2 suggested that a local
business directory would be a good idea. There was no support for
a local business hub or for a small business park project.
With regard to broadband, it is currently hit and miss as to
whether the property you live in has acceptable broadband
speeds. It would appear that the vast majority of the parish still
suffers from an appalling service that is far below what would be
needed to run a successful business.
………………………………………………………………………………………
W&R-LC1: Landscape Character Policy
2. Development will be supported where it;
a) conserves the landscape and scenic beauty of the parish and the
key characteristics of this part of the Cotswold’s AONB
b) does not result in the loss of open spaces and cherished public
views from inside and outside of the parish
c) does not adversely impact on existing green horizons
The guidance on producing character assessments will give you a
useful template to identify and present valued features such as
views, vistas and green horizons:
http://www.stroud.gov.uk/docs/planning/planning_strategy.asp#s=
sectioncontent5&p=nbhood,npcharachter
Please use templates to identify valued views, vistas & green
horizons
See associated “Green Horizons” document.
………………………………………………………………………………………
W&R-NE1: Natural Environment Policy
5. Adopt best practice in Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) and
water quality.
The Council’s Water Resources Engineer has reviewed this section
and raised no issues.
No action required
Comment noted
Page Number:50
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
(c) the Coal
Authority(a); See
section 1 of the Coal
Industry Act 1994
(c.21).
Planning and Local Authority
Liaison Department
The Coal Authority
200 Lichfield Lane
Mansfield
Nottinghamshire
NG18 4RG
0345 762 6848
planningconsultation@coal.gov.uk
(d) the Homes and
Communities
Agency(b); See
section 2 of the
Housing and
Regeneration Act
2008 (c.17).
(e) Natural
England(c); See
section 1 of the
Natural Environment
and Rural
Communities Act
2006 (c.16).
Homes and Communities
Agency
2 Rivergate
Temple Quay
Bristol
BS1 6EH
mail@homesandcommunities.co.uk
Natural England
Customer Services
Hornbeam House
Crewe Business Park
Electra Way
Crewe
Cheshire
CW1 6GJ
T 0300 060 3900
26 October 2015
Our ref: 165296 & 164440
No comment received
No comment received
Dear Ms Dunn and Mr Rios
165296 Whiteshill and Ruscombe Neighbourhood Development
Plan
164440 Whiteshill and Ruscombe Neighbourhood Development
Plan Strategic Environmental Assessment and Habitat Regulations
Assessment Screening
Thank you for your consultations on the above, dated 11 September
2015 and 2 September 2015 respectively. We have responded to the
consultations together for ease of understanding. I apologise for the
lateness of this response.
Natural England is a non-departmental public body. Our statutory
purpose is to ensure that the natural environment is conserved,
enhanced, and managed for the benefit of present and future
generations, thereby contributing to sustainable development.
Comments on the Whiteshill and Ruscombe Neighbourhood
Development Plan
W&R-BE1: Built Environment: Open Spaces we welcome point 5, on
the inclusion of natural landscaping and features to benefit local
biodiversity.
We welcome the inclusion of the section on ‘Landscape Character’
(page 34) and the policy W&R-LC1: Landscape Character Policy. We
welcome the prominence given to the parish’s location within the
Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). We note
that there is a section entitled Rodborough Buffer Zone included
here that is currently blank. We suggest that this section could be
better covered under the heading ‘Natural Environment’ (page 41).
Natural England welcomes the ‘Natural Environment’ section (page
41) and policy W&R-NE1: Natural Environment Policy. We
particularly welcome the background on significant habitat and on
protected and UK BAP Priority species. We welcome the recognition
of the importance of connectivity in the NDP and its inclusion in
point 4 of policy NE1 which promotes the restoration, enhancement
or creation of priority habitat where appropriate.
Strategic Environmental Assessment – Screening
Where Neighbourhood Plans could have significant environmental
effects, they may require a Strategic Environmental Assessment
(SEA) under the Environment Assessment of Plans and Programmes
Page Number:51
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Regulations 2004. Further guidance on deciding whether the
proposals are likely to have significant environmental effects and the
requirements for consulting Natural England on SEA are set out in
the National Planning Practice Guidance at:
http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/blog/guidance/strat
egic-environmental-assessment-and-sustainability-appraisal/does-aneighbourhood-plan-require-a-sustainability-appraisal/
Natural England is satisfied that the Council’s conclusion that further
SEA is not required is appropriate.
Habitats Regulations Assessment
If the adoption of this Neighbourhood Plan is timetabled to take
place after the adoption of the Local Plan, then we are satisfied that
the conclusion of the HRA Screening is appropriate. However, if this
Neighbourhood Plan is timetabled for adoption before the Local
Plan, then the Local Plan cannot be relied upon in this way. In the
absence of an adopted Local Plan, the Neighbourhood Plan can only
proceed if adequate avoidance and mitigation measures can be
secured at the neighbourhood plan level. Given the late stage in
Local Plan production, we would recommend delaying the adoption
of this Neighbourhood Plan until after the Local Plan is adopted. This
would allow the Neighbourhood Plan to rely on the HRA of the Local
Plan and on measures secured in the Local Plan.
Rodborough Common SAC
We note that half of the NDP area is within the 3km zone of
influence for Rodborough Common Special Area of Conservation
(SAC); a European nature conservation site. As noted in the
Screening Report, any growth in this zone would need to meet the
requirements set out in the Interim Mitigation Strategy.
Cotswold Beechwoods SAC
Whiteshill and Ruscombe Parish is located approximately 4km from
the Cotswolds Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC); a
European nature conservation site.
There is growing awareness of the potential for growth across
Stroud District, Tewkesbury Borough, Gloucester City and the
Cotswolds Borough to result in additional recreational pressures on
the Cotswold Beechwoods SAC. Natural England is at the start of a
process to better understand the nature and scale of these potential
impacts, and what action, if any, is required. Due to the nature of
this issue, we will be working closely with the relevant Local
Authorities as mentioned above.
Policy ES6 in Stroud District’s emerging Local Plan provides for the
protection of all European sites. As this Neighbourhood Plan sits
below the Local Plan and is in accordance with it, we would
therefore consider that policy ES6 provides adequate protection for
the SAC, whilst our collective understanding emerges. However, as
the Local Plan has not yet been adopted, this policy cannot yet be
relied upon to ensure the protection of the SAC. Therefore as
specified above, we recommend delaying the adoption of this
Neighbourhood Plan until after the Local Plan is adopted.
If our understanding of the recreational impacts on the Cotswold
Beechwoods SAC has moved on by the time the NDP is finalised or
when planning permission is sought, then the best available
information at that time would need to be considered. Therefore
further Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) could still be required
at a later date.
Page Number:52
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
The Severn Estuary SAC/SPA/Ramsar site
Whiteshill and Ruscombe Parish is located approximately 9km from
the Severn Estuary Special Area of Conservation (SAC) / Special
Protection Area (SPA) / Ramsar site; these are European level nature
conservation designations.
Based on the best available information at this time (which includes
the work undertaken in inform the emerging Stroud District Local
Plan) Natural England advises that the Whiteshill and Ruscombe
NDP is unlikely to have a significant effect on the Severn Estuary
SAC/SPA/Ramsar site. It can therefore be screened out from further
assessment at this stage.
However, Stroud District Council is currently commissioning work to
investigate the effects of recreation on the estuary. If it were
established that visitors to the estuary are having an effect and that
people are coming from distances greater than 4km in significant
numbers, it may be necessary for the development to contribute to
agreed mitigation measures. If these investigations have been
completed before the NDP is finalised or when planning permission
is sought, then the best available information at that time would
need to be considered. Therefore further Habitat Regulations
Assessment (HRA) could still be required at a later date.
We would be happy to comment further should the need arise but if
in the meantime you have any queries please do not hesitate to
contact us.
For any queries relating to the specific advice in this letter only
please contact Hayley Fleming on 0300 060 1594. For any new
consultations, or to provide further information on this consultation
please send your correspondences to
consultations@naturalengland.org.uk.
We really value your feedback to help us improve the service we
offer. We have attached a feedback form to this letter and welcome
any comments you might have about our service.
Yours sincerely
Comments have been noted
(f) the Environment
Agency(d); See
section 1(1) of the
Environment Act
1995 (c.25).
Environment Agency
West Area Office
Riversmeet House
Northway Lane
Tewkesbury
Gloucestershire
GL20 8JG
shwgplanning@environment-agency.gov.uk
anita.bolton@environment-agency.gov.uk
CONSULTATION ON WHITESHILL AND RUSCOMBE
NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
Thank you for your consultation with respect to the emerging
Whiteshill and Ruscombe Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP),
which was received on 11 September 2015.
As you may be aware, we have recently provided comments to
Stroud District Council on a SEA/HRA Screening Opinion document,
and agreed with the council’s conclusions presented within the
report that following the analysis undertaken, a SEA and/or HRA of
the Whiteshill and Ruscombe NDP was not required.
For the full report
Page Number:53
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
dps1.rtf
(g) the Historic
Buildings and
Monuments
Commission for
England (known as
English
Heritage) (e); See
section 32 of the
National Heritage Act
1983 (c.47).
NP schedule of
information sources.doc
English Heritage
29 Queens Square
Bristol
BS1 4ND
Printed copies of the above report can be obtained from Stroud
District Council.
Comments have been noted
David Stuart
01179750680
David.stuart@historicEngland.org.uk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------Dear Ms Dunn
Thank you for your consultation on this Draft Plan.
We have not had any prior involvement in the Plan preparation
process and so this is our first opportunity to familiarise ourselves
with the community’s aspirations for its area.
Our observations can be summarised as follows:
1. Policy W&R-BE1 (p19) makes provision in point 3 that
proposals to demolish existing under-utilised or disused
buildings will be supported. This policy is caveated by
policy W&R-BE3 which in point 1 which requires designated
heritage assets to be preserved and enhanced.
While the latter may provide a safety net for designated
assets there is no mention of the preservation or
enhancement of undesignated heritage assets. This
suggests that such assets can be demolished under BE1 but
such a potentially sweeping liability is contrary to the
statutory provisions for the historic environment in the
National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and no doubt
to Local Plan policy.
It also runs counter to the thrust of the neighbourhood plan
which details and celebrates the rich and diverse defining
character of the area, not only in the Built Environment
section but throughout the document. While it is true that
the area does not have many designated heritage assets
this only emphasises the value of and important
contribution made to the area by its undesignated heritage
assets.
2. Point 1 of Policy BE1 in fact adds little to the provisions of
the NPPF; indeed, in the addition of its qualification –
“where possible” – to the statutory imperative to preserve
or enhance heritage assets it could be interpreted as
diluting that imperative, thereby not being in conformity.
3. We would therefore encourage your community to reflect
on the drafting of policy BE1, to ensure basic conformity
with overarching planning policy but also to see if it can
more meaningfully respond to and make provision for the
preservation and enhancement of locally significant
undesignated heritage assets. In doing this thought could
also be given to how such assets might be
identified. Relevant officers at Stroud District Council will
no doubt be able to advise on this issue in more detail.
4. I have attached a list of information sources which may be
useful.
Page Number:54
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Kind regards
David Stuart
David Stuart | Historic Places Adviser South West
Direct Line: 0117 975 0680 | Mobile: 0797 924 0316
Historic England | 29 Queen Square | Bristol | BS1 4ND
Comments have been noted and an additional policy has been
added to Policy W&R-BE3 to cover non-designated heritage assets.
Further, an appendix has been included defining the criteria to be
used for identifying non-designated heritage assets.
(h) Network Rail
Infrastructure Limited
(company number
2904587);
Network Rail Infrastructure
Limited
Kings Place
90 York Way
London
N1 9AG
property@networkrail.co.uk
Town Planning Team South West
Western House, 1 Holbrook Way, Swindon, SN1 1BD.
01793 389 610
amanda.hoyland@networkrail.co.uk
townplanningwestern@networkrail.co.uk
Lydia.whitaker@networkrail.co.uk
Claire Mahoney
Claire.Mahoney@networkrail.co.uk
No comment received
(i) the Highways
Agency;
(j) the Marine
Management
Organisation(f); See
section 1 of the
Marine and Coastal
Access Act 2009
(c.23).
Highways Agency
Temple Quay House
2 The Square
Temple Quay
Bristol
BS1 6HA
Mr N Chapman
0300 123 5000
neil.chapman@highwaysengland.co.uk
Sharpness Port Authority
Navigation House
Sharpness Dock
Berkeley
Gloucestershire
GL13 9UD
01453 811 862
18th September 2015
Dear Helen,
Thank you for consulting Highways England on your draft
Development Plan. We have no comment to make.
Regards
Gaye Fairfield, Asset Manager
Highways England | Temple Quay House | 2 The Square, Temple
Quay | Bristol | BS1 6HA
Tel: +44 (0) 117 3728526 | Mobile: + 44 (0) 7867372967
Web: http://www.highways.gov.uk
GTN: 1371 8526
No comment
16 September 2015
Dear Sir or Madam,
Re: Whiteshill and Ruscombe Neighbourhood Plan
Thank you for inviting the Marine Management Organisation (MMO)
to comment on the above consultation. I can confirm that the MMO
has no comments to submit in relation to this consultation as
Whiteshill and Ruscombe Neighbourhood Plan is not within our
remit. If you have any questions or need any further information
please just let me know. More information on the role of the MMO
can be found on our website www.gov.uk/mmo
Yours faithfully, Adam Kennedy
Assurance Officer Email: consultations@marinemanagement.org.uk
No comment
Page Number:55
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
The Marine Management
Organisation
As above
stakeholder@marinemanagement.org.uk
Angela.Atkinson@marinemanagement.org.uk
(k) any person—
(i) to whom the
electronic
communications code
applies by virtue of a
direction given
under section
106(3)(a) of the
Communications Act
2003; and
(ii) who owns or
controls electronic
communications
apparatus situated in
any part of the area
of the local planning
authority;
Mono Consultants Ltd (acting
on behalf of the Mobile
Operator Association)
Merlin House
Brunel Road
Theale
Berkshire
RG7 4AB
No comment
Ginny Hall Senior Planner
0141 270 2733
dpm@monoconsultants.com
No comment received
Mono Consultants Ltd (acting
on behalf of the Mobile
Operator Association)
Merlin House
Brunel Road
Theale
Berkshire
RG7 4AB
Ginny Hall Senior Planner
0141 270 2733
dpm@monoconsultants.com
02 (UK) Ltd (Telefonica UK
Limited)
260 Bath Road
Slough
Berkshire
SL1 4DX
Above Net Communication UK
ltd
Brandon House
180 Borough High Street
London
SE1 1LW
AT&T Telecommunications
Highhfield House
Headless Cross
Redditch
B97 5EQ
BT Group Plc
BT Centre
81 Newgate Street
London
EC1A 7AJ
Orange
Personal
Communication Services Ltd
St James Court
Great Park Road
Almondbury, Bradley Stoke
Bristol, BS32 4QJ
No comment received
No comment received
enquiries@above.net
uk_plant_enquiries@above.net
No comment received
No comment received
No comment received
No comment received
Page Number:56
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
(i) a Primary Care
Trust established
under section 18 of
the National Health
Service Act
2006(a) or continued
in existence by virtue
of that section;
Primary Care Trust
replaced by the
following:
NHS England, Director
of Public Health,
Clinical
Commissioning
Group, Health and
Wellbeing Board
Public Health
Telewest
Communications
(Cotswolds) Ltd
The Network Centre
Staverton Technology Park
Cheltenham
GL51 6TQ
Tiscali UK Ltd
Breckland
Linford Wood West
Milton Keynes
MK14 6LB
T-Mobile UK Ltd
Hatfield Business Park
Hatfield
Hertfordshire
AL10 9BW
Vodafone
The Connection
Newbury
Berkshire
RG14 2FN
NHS
England
Bath,
Gloucestershire, Swindon and
Wiltshire Area Team
1st Floor,
Bewley House
Marshfield Road
Chippenham
Wiltshire
SN15 1JW
No comment received
NHS South West
South West House
Blackbrook Park Avenue
Taunton
Somerset
TA1 2PX
Gloucestershire PCT
Edward Jenner Court
1010 Pioneer Avenue
Gloucester Business Park
Brockworth Gloucester
GL3 4FE
Director of Public Health for
Gloucestershire
Shire Hall
Westgate Street
go@southwest.nhs.uk
No comment received
No comment received
No comment received
england.contactus@nhs.net
No comment received
No comment received
enquiries@glos.nhs.uk
No comment received
Dr Peter Brambleby
01452 328496
peter.brambleby@gloucestershire.gov.uk
Page Number:57
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Clinical
Commissioning
Groups
Health and Wellbeing
Boards
(ii) a person to whom
a licence has been
granted under section
6(1)(b) and (c) of the
Electricity Act
1989(b);
Gloucester
GL1 2TG
NHS Gloucester
Sanger House
5220 Valiant Court
Gloucester Business Park
Brockworth
Gloucester
GL3 4FE
Gloucestershire Health and
Wellbeing Board
Shire Hall
Westgate Street
Gloucester
GL1 2TG
Western Power
Avonbank
Feeder Road
Bristol
BS2 0TB
No comment received
Npower Centre
Oak House
Bridgewater Road
Warndon
Worcester
WR4 9FP
Wales and West Utilities
Wales and West House (2nd
floor)
Spooner Close
Celtic Springs
Newport
NP10 8FZ
National Grid (c/o Amec)
No comment received
GLCCG.enquiries@nhs.net
shona.arora@gloucestershire.gov.uk
No comment received
sarah.scott@gloucestershire.gov.uk
No comment received
apritchard@westernpower.co.uk
No comment received
Mr Steve Gray
steve.gray@wwutilities.co.uk
No comment received
Julian Austin
n.grid@amec.com
Dear Sir / Madam
Whiteshill & Ruscombe Parish Council:
Neighbourhood Plan 2015 - 2031
SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF NATIONAL GRID
National Grid has appointed Amec Foster Wheeler to review and
respond to development plan consultations on its behalf. We are
instructed by our client to submit the following representation with
regards to the above Neighbourhood Plan consultation.
About National Grid
National Grid owns and operates the high voltage electricity
transmission system in England and Wales and operate the Scottish
high voltage transmission system. National Grid also owns and
operates the gas transmission system. In the UK, gas leaves the
transmission system and enters the distribution networks at high
pressure. It is then transported through a number of reducing
pressure tiers until it is finally delivered to our customer. National
Grid own four of the UK’s gas distribution networks and transport
Page Number:58
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
gas to 11 million homes, schools and businesses through 81,000
miles of gas pipelines within North West, East of England, West
Midlands and North London.
To help ensure the continued safe operation of existing sites and
equipment and to facilitate future infrastructure investment,
National Grid wishes to be involved in the preparation, alteration
and review of plans and strategies which may affect our assets.
Specific Comments
An assessment has been carried out with respect to National Grid’s
electricity and gas transmission apparatus which includes high
voltage electricity assets and high pressure gas pipelines.
National Grid has identified that it has no record of such apparatus
within the Neighbourhood Plan area.
Key resources / contacts
National Grid has provided information in relation to electricity and
transmission assets via the following internet link:
http://www2.nationalgrid.com/uk/services/land-anddevelopment/planning-authority/shape-files/
The electricity distribution operator in Stroud District Council is
Western Power Distribution, whilst the gas distribution operator is
Wales and West Utilities. Information regarding the transmission
and distribution network can be found at:
www.energynetworks.org.uk
Please remember to consult National
Grid on any Neighbourhood Plan
Documents or site-specific proposals
that could affect our infrastructure. We
would be grateful if you could add our
details shown below to your
consultation database: Julian Austin
Consultant Town Planner
n.grid@amecfw.com
Amec Foster Wheeler E&I UK
Gables House
Kenilworth Road
Leamington Spa
Warwickshire
CV32 6JX
Laura Kelly
Town Planner, National Grid
laura.kelly@nationalgrid.com
National Grid House
Warwick Technology Park
Gallows Hill
Warwick
CV34 6DA
Comments have been noted.
(iii) a person to whom
a licence has been
granted under section
7(2) of the Gas Act
1986(c);
AMEC Environment &
Infrastructure Limited
Gables House
Kenilworth Road
Leamington Spa
Warwickshire
CV32 6JX
British Gas Connections Ltd
30 Causeway
Staines
Middlesex
Julian Austin (Consultant Town Planner)
01926 439091
n.grid@amec.com
As above
Comments have been noted
No comment received
Page Number:59
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
(iv) a sewerage
undertaker
TW18 3BY
ES Pipelines Ltd
Hazeldean
Station Road
Leatherhead
Surrey
KT22 7AA
SSE Pipelines Ltd
55 Vastern Road
Reading
Berkshire
RG1 8BU
The Gas Transport Company
Ltd
Woolpit Business Park
Woolpit
Bury St Edmunds
Suffolk
IP30 9QU
United Utilities Network Ltd
Haweswater House
Lingley Mere Buisiness Park
Great Sankey
Warrington
Cheshire
WA5 3LP
Severn Trent
Severn Trent Centre
2 St John's Street
Coventry
CV1 2LZ
No comment received
No comment received
No comment received
No comment received
Ms Dawn Williams (Commercial Development Assistant)
02477 715 000
27th October 2015
Thank you for giving Severn Trent Water the opportunity to
comment the above consultation.
We currently have no specific comments to make, but please keep
us informed when your plans are further developed when we will be
able to offer more detailed comments and advice.
In the mean time I hope the following statement will reassure you of
our obligations.
Position statement
As a water company we have an obligation to provide water supplies
and sewage treatment capacity for future development. It is
therefore important for us to work collaboratively with Local
Planning Authorities to provide relevant assessments of the impacts
of future developments. For outline proposals we are able to
provide general comments. Once detailed developments and
geographically site specific location are decided by local councils we
are able to provide more specific comments and modelling of the
network if required. For most developments we do not foresee any
particular issues; however where we consider there may be an issue
we would discuss in further detail with the local planning authority.
We will complete any necessary improvements to provide additional
capacity once we have sufficient confidence that a development will
go ahead. We do this to avoid making investments on speculative
developments so as to minimise customer bills.
Kind regards
Dawn
Page Number:60
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Dawn Williams
Growth & Water Efficiency Analyst
07554114125 mobile
Growth.development@severntrent.co.uk
Comments have been noted
(v) a water
undertaker;
Severn Trent
Severn Trent Centre
2 St John's Street
Coventry
CV1 2LZ
Ms Dawn Williams (Commercial Development Assistant)
02477 715 000
dawn.williams@severntrent.co.uk
Asset protection team:
jasveer-kaur.jeer@severntrent.co.uk
As above
Comments have been noted
Bristol Water Plc
corporate.affairs@bristolwater.co.uk
No comment received
Wessex Water
gillian.sanders@wessexwater.co.uk
planning.liaison@wessexwater.co.uk
11th September
Thank you for your consultation – please can you redirect to Severn
Trent Water. Whiteshill and Ruscombe is not within our statutory
area and as such we have no comments to make.
Regards Gillian Sanders
Comments have been noted
(m) voluntary bodies
some or all of whose
activities benefit all or
any part of the
neighbourhood area;
Gay-Glos
PO Box 171
Gloucester
GL1 4YE
01452 306800
Campaign for the Protection of
Rural England
Community House
15 College Green
Gloucester
Gloucestershire
GL1 2LZ
Ruth Dence (Chair)
01453 883973 (Pippa Schwartz, Secretary)
chairstroud@cpreglos.org.uk
Cotswold Conservation Board
The Old Prison
Fosseway
Cheltenham
GL54 3JH
Andrew Lord (Planning Officer)
01451 862004
andrew.lord@cotswoldsaonb.org.uk
No comment received
No comment received
8_Appendix A
Position Statement on Neighbourhood Plans (Final Version for Board Approval).doc
Page Number:61
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Dear Sir/Madam,
RE: Whiteshill and Ruscombe Neighbourhood Plan Consultation.
Thank you for consulting the Cotswolds Conservation Board on your
Neighbourhood Plan.
From the 1st October the Board has approved a Position Statement
for use (see attached) that provides additional guidance for
Neighbourhood Plan preparation.
We do recommend where possible to cross reference our additional
guidance within our Management Plan and Position Statements.
I hope the above and attached is of assistance.
With thanks
Andrew Lord
MA BA (Hons) MRTPI
Planning and Landscape Officer
Cotswolds Conservation Board
Comments have been noted
Stroud Preservation Trust
6 Castle Villas
Stroud
Gloucestershire
GL5 2HP
Camilla Hale
01453 766 273
sricam2000@yahoo.com
National Trust (Stroud Centre)
The Ebworth Centre
Camp
Stroud
Gloucestershire
GL6 7ES
Royal Society for the Protection
of Birds
South West Regional Office
Keble House
Southernhay Gardens
Exeter, Devon
EX1 1NT
Severn Wye Energy Agency
Unit 15 Highnam Business
Centre
Highnam
Gloucester
GL2 8DN
01452 810 055
woodchesterpark@nationaltrust.org.uk
No comment received
No comment received
01392 432 691
No comment received
Andy Bull (Head of Regional Strategy & Planning)
01597 829658
AndyB@severnwye.org.uk
No comment received
Page Number:62
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Sport England
21 Bloomsbury Street
London
WC1B 3HF
Tom Bowkett
Planning Administrator
T: 020 7273 1768
F: 01509 233 192
E:
Tom.Bowkett@sportengland.or
g
Sport England (South Local Government Relationship Manager
Jim Barrett - 020 7273 1855 jim.barrett@sportengland.org
11th September
Thank you for consulting Sport England on the above
Neighbourhood Consultation.
Planning Policy in the National Planning Policy Framework identifies
how the planning system can play an important role in facilitating
social interaction and creating healthy, inclusive communities.
Encouraging communities to become more physically active through
walking, cycling, informal recreation and formal sport plays an
important part in this process and providing enough sports facilities
of the right quality and type and in the right places is vital to
achieving this aim. This means positive planning for sport,
protection from unnecessary loss of sports facilities and an
integrated approach to providing new housing and employment
land and community facilities provision is important.
It is important therefore that the Neighbourhood Plan reflects
national policy for sport as set out in the above document with
particular reference to Pars 73 and 74 to ensure proposals comply
with National Planning Policy. It is also important to be aware of
Sport England’s role in protecting playing fields and the presumption
against the loss of playing fields (see link below), as set out in our
national guide, ‘A Sporting Future for the Playing Fields of England
– Planning Policy Statement’.
http://www.sportengland.org/facilities-planning/planning-forsport/development-management/planning-applications/playingfield-land/
Sport England provides guidance on developing policy for sport and
further information can be found following the link below:
http://www.sportengland.org/facilities-planning/planning-forsport/forward-planning/
Sport England works with Local Authorities to ensure Local Plan
policy is underpinned by robust and up to date assessments and
strategies for indoor and outdoor sports delivery. If local authorities
have prepared a Playing Pitch Strategy or other indoor/outdoor
sports strategy it will be important that the Neighbourhood Plan
reflects the recommendations set out in that document and that any
local investment opportunities, such as the Community
Infrastructure Levy, are utilised to support the delivery of those
recommendations.
http://www.sportengland.org/facilities-planning/planning-forsport/planning-tools-and-guidance/
If new sports facilities are being proposed Sport England
recommend you ensure such facilities are fit for purpose and
designed in accordance with our design guidance notes.
http://www.sportengland.org/facilities-planning/toolsguidance/design-and-cost-guidance/
If you need any further advice please do not hesitate to contact
Sport England using the contact details below.
Comments have been noted
Page Number:63
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Sustrans
2 Cathedral Square
College Green
Bristol
BS1 5DD
Campaign for Better Transport
Charitable Trust
16 Waterside
44 - 48 Wharf Road
London
N1 7UX
Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust
Reservoir Road
Gloucester
GL4 6SX
0117 926 8893
Rupert.Crossbee@sustrans.org.uk
No comment received
020 7566 6480
No comment received
Secretary, Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust
01452 383333
Colin.studholme@gloucestershirewildlifetrust.co.uk
No comment received
(n) bodies which
represent the
interests of different
racial, ethnic or
national groups in the
neighbourhood area;
(o) bodies which
represent the
interests of different
religious groups in the
neighbourhood area
(p) bodies which
represent the
interests of persons
carrying on business
in the neighbourhood
area
Stroud Youth Council
Ebley Mill
Ebley Wharf
Stroud
GL5 4UB
Cotswold Canals Trust
The Bell House
Wallbridge
Stroud
GL5 3JS
steve.miles@stroud.gov.uk
01453 754 504
GlosREC(Racial Equality
Council)
15 Brunswick Road
Gloucester GL1 1HG
01452 301290
enquiries@glosrec.org.uk
Equality South West Somerset
College
Wellington Road,
Taunton
Somerset
TA1 5AX
Please identify relevant bodies
within your area.
01823 240 260
info@equalitysouthwest.org.uk
Confederation of British
Industry South West
2 Caspian Point
Caspian Way
Cardiff Bay
Cardiff, CF10 4DQ
Deborah Waddle (Director)
029 2097 7600
Deborah.waddle@cbi.org.uk
No comment received
Jack Telling (Company Secretary)
01453 825 709
jwtelling@aol.com
No comment received
Does not exist anymore
No comment received
No comment received
Page Number:64
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Home Builders Federation
HBF House
27 Broadwall
London
SE1 9PL
National Housing Federation
101 Victoria Street
Bristol
BS1 6PU
020 7960 1600
info@hbf.co.uk
No comment received
Jenny Allen (External Affairs Manager for the South West)
jenny.allen@housing.co.uk
0117 929 7388
07775 722 258
No comment received
Federation of Small Businesses
Cotswold Branch
Unit 9
Cirencester Office Park
Tetbury Road
Cirencester
Gloucestershire
GL7 6JJ
Russell Warner (Cotswold Branch Chair)
07760 207 194
Thank you for sending me your NDP as part of the consultation
process.
The FSB supports the draft LE1 policy to help local growth and
economic prosperity.
LE1: Local Economy Policy:
1. Enterprise development which is of a size and scale that does not
demonstrably have a significant and adverse effect upon the
character, infrastructure and environment of the villages will be
encouraged.
2. The employment of local trades’ people on projects located within
the designated area with the aim of mitigating transport congestion
and the carbon footprint of the parish will be encouraged.
You may also wish to incorporate some additional specific points in
your policies on encouraging home working. Supporting home
working helps reduce congestion on the roads (as recognised in the
Draft Plan on page 27) as well as giving people even more of a stake
in their community if they both live and work there.
The FSB agrees with the comments (and has lobbied for High Speed
Broadband throughout the country) as it is a critical enabler of
business development both from home and from business premises.
Overall the FSB supports your plan and I wish you well in progressing
your NDP to the next stage.
Best regards Russell Warner
Chair FSB - Cotswold Branch
Comments have been noted
Road Haulage Association
Third Floor, Shore House
Westbury Hill
Westbury on Trym
Bristol
BS9 3AA
gfirst Local Enterprise
Partnership
The Growth Hub
Oxstalls Campus
Oxstalls Lane
Gloucester, GL2 9HW
0117 962 5616
midlands-western@rha.uk.net
No comment received
Peter Carr (Deputy Chief Executive)
01242 715 480
info@gfirst.co.uk
No comment received
Page Number:65
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
Stroud Chamber of Trade and
Commerce
Fiona Mills Carolyn (Vice Chair)
01453 759 297
fiona@moonflower@icloud.com
No comment received
(q) bodies which
represent the
interests of disabled
persons in the
neighbourhood area
Allsorts
PO Box 3092
Stroud
GL6 1GN
Rachel Levay (Project Manager)
07980 750 915
rachel@allsortsglos.co.uk
No comment received
Disability Rights UK
Ground Floor
CAN Mezzanine
49-51 East Rd
London, N1 6AH
Carers Alliance
Carers Gloucestershire
2nd Floor
35 St Michael’s Square
Gloucester
GL1 1HX
Adult Carers United
Carers Gloucestershire
2nd Floor
35 St Michael’s Square
Gloucester
GL1 1HX
Gloucestershire Older Persons
Association
c/o 28 Byfords Close
Huntley
Gloucester
GL19 3SA
Care and Repair (Stroud)
23a Willow Road
Stonehouse
Gloucestershire
GL10 2DS
020 7250 8181
enquiries@disabilityrightsuk.org
Gloucestershire Voices
30A Lansdown
Stroud
Gloucestershire
GL5 1BG
Janet
07531 588333
01453 768827
gloucestershirevoices@hotmail.co.uk
No comment received
Jacky Martel
01452 386 283
jmartel@carersgloucestershire.org.uk
No comment received
Sarah Everitt
01452 872240
severitt@carersgloucestershire.org.uk
No comment received
Jim Rollinson (Secretary)
GOPA4672@hotmail.co.uk
No comment received
Jane Creed (Manager)
01453 753471
general@careandrepairstroud.co.uk
No comment received
No comment received
Page Number:66
Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Neighbourhood Development Plan – Issued December 2015
Consultation Statement
General Consultation
Bodies
Stagecoach Group plc
10 Dunkeld Road
Perth
PH1 5TW
Kevin Sharp (Operations Manager)
Stagecoach in Cheltenham & Stroud
Kevin.sharp@stagecoachbus.com
01242 544123/ 07880 054 940
No comment received
Royal Mail
Group Communications
100 Victoria Embankment
London
EC4Y 0HQ
Post Office Property Holdings
03457 740 740
No comment received
0345 611 2970
No comment received
END
Page Number:67