The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Department of Education
350 Main Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148-5023
Telephone: (781) 338-3700
TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
February 8, 2007
Robert Kaufman, Executive Director
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School
25 Clinton Street
Framingham, MA 01702
Re: Mid-cycle Coordinated Program Review Report
Dear Mr. Kaufman:
Enclosed is the Department of Education's Mid-cycle Coordinated Program Review Report (Midcycle Report). This report contains findings based on onsite monitoring conducted to verify the
implementation and effectiveness of corrective action approved or ordered by the Department to
address findings of noncompliance included in the Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public
School’s (formerly Framingham Community Charter School) Coordinated Program Review
Report issued on February 11, 2004. The Mid-cycle Report also contains findings based on
onsite monitoring of special education compliance criteria that have been created or substantially
changed in response to IDEA 2004.
Another component of the Department’s Mid-cycle Review is the review of your school district's
self-assessment in the area of English learner education (ELE). (In the remainder of this letter,
please read “district” as meaning “school district or school.”) The purpose of this review is to
determine whether your district is implementing the significant changes in M.G.L. Chapter 71A,
governing the education of limited English proficient students, that were adopted by voters by
means of Question 2 in 2002. The Department has reviewed your district’s ELE self-assessment
(documentation and any written analysis of compliance) and, based solely on that selfassessment, is providing you in this report with findings on your ELE program and, where
necessary, corrective action to be implemented. Your district is urged to request technical
assistance in relation to any of these findings or this prescribed corrective action from me or from
staff in the Department’s Office of Language Acquisition and Achievement at 781-338-3534.
ELE guidance documents are available on the Department’s website at
http://www.doe.mass.edu/ell/ .
While the Department of Education found your district to have resolved certain noncompliance
issues, others were partially corrected or not addressed at all, or the Department’s onsite team
identified new issues of noncompliance, either noncompliance with special education criteria
added or substantially changed in response to IDEA 2004, noncompliance with ELE criteria, or
other new noncompliance. Where the district has failed to implement its approved Corrective
Action Plan, the Department views these findings to be serious.
1
In all instances where noncompliance has been found, the Department has prescribed corrective
action for the district that must be implemented without delay. You will find these requirements
for corrective action included in the attached report, along with requirements for progress
reporting. Please provide the Department with your written assurance that all of the Department's
requirements for corrective action will be implemented by your district within the timelines
specified. You must submit your statement of assurance to me by February 23, 2007.
Your staff's cooperation throughout this Mid-cycle Review is appreciated. Should you like
clarification of any part of our report, please do not hesitate to contact me at 781-338-3947.
Sincerely,
Jean E. Jonker, Mid-cycle Review Chairperson
Program Quality Assurance Services
Darlene Lynch, Director
Program Quality Assurance Services
c:
David P. Driscoll, Commissioner of Education
Edna Smith , Board of Trustees Chairperson
Neal Elliott, District Program Review Follow-up Coordinator
Encl.: Mid-cycle Coordinated Program Review Report
2
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
MID-CYCLE COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT
ONSITE MONITORING OF IMPLEMENTATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND OF
CERTAIN NEW REQUIREMENTS
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School
Date of Coordinated Program Review (CPR): November 18 - 21, 2003
Date of Coordinated Program Review Corrective Action Plan Approval: April 7, 2004
Dates of Corrective Action Plan Progress Reports: October 12, 2004, January 14, 2005, April 6, 2005, July 12, 2005 and October 4, 2005
Dates of this Mid-cycle Review Onsite Visit: January 18-19, 2007
Date of this Report: January 24, 2007
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS REPORT IS IN SEVERAL SECTIONS.
Criterion
Number/Topic
(Refer to full
text of 20062007 CPR
requirements)
Corrective
Action
Implemented and
Effective

Method(s) of
Verification
Basis of Determination that Corrective Action
was Implemented and has been Effective
Corrective
Action Not
Implement
ed Not
Effective
or New
Issues

Basis of
Determination
that
Implementation of
Corrective Action
was Incomplete or
Ineffective or
Basis of Finding
of New
Noncompliance
SPECIAL
EDUCATION
Criteria
SE 32
Parent
Advisory
Council for
Special
Education

Document
Review,
Student
Record
Review,
Interviews
The charter school has met its obligation for
this criterion. The Parent Advisory Committee
is established, meets regularly, is supported by
the charter school, and serves in an advisory
capacity to the charter school.
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 1
Required Corrective
Action, Timelines for
Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
Criterion
Number/Topic
(Refer to full
text of 20062007 CPR
requirements)
Corrective
Action
Implemented and
Effective

SE 50
Responsibility
of the School
Principal and

Method(s) of
Verification
Document
Review,
Interviews
The charter school has met its obligation for
this criterion. The charter school has a director
of special education and has a District
Curriculum Accommodation Plan (DCAP) in
place.
Document
Review,
Interviews
See comment to right.
Administrator
of Special
Education
SE 51
Appropriate
special
education
teacher
certification
Partial
Basis of Determination that Corrective Action
was Implemented and has been Effective
Corrective
Action Not
Implement
ed Not
Effective
or New
Issues

Partial
Basis of
Determination
that
Implementation of
Corrective Action
was Incomplete or
Ineffective or
Basis of Finding
of New
Noncompliance
Documentation
and interviews
indicate that not
all special
education staff
who provide
direct special
education
services
described in IEPs
are appropriately
licensed.
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 2
Required Corrective
Action, Timelines for
Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
By April 20, 2007, submit
copies of licenses (or current
waivers) and professional
credentials for the special
education teacher, school
psychologist, guidance
counselor, and speech
pathologist. Develop and
implement a tracking
system/monitoring plan for
ensuring that special
education staff are
appropriately licensed
and/or credentialed. Submit
a description of the tracking
system/monitoring plan
along with a copy of the job
description for the staff
person responsible for
ensuring that all staff who
provide special education
services hold appropriate
Criterion
Number/Topic
(Refer to full
text of 20062007 CPR
requirements)
Corrective
Action
Implemented and
Effective

Method(s) of
Verification
Basis of Determination that Corrective Action
was Implemented and has been Effective
Corrective
Action Not
Implement
ed Not
Effective
or New
Issues

Basis of
Determination
that
Implementation of
Corrective Action
was Incomplete or
Ineffective or
Basis of Finding
of New
Noncompliance
Required Corrective
Action, Timelines for
Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
licensure.
SE 54
Professional
Development
Regarding
Special
Education
SE 56
Special
Education
programs and
services are
evaluated

Document
Review,
Interviews
The charter school has met its obligation for
this criterion. All required topics regarding
special education are annually covered through
the charter school’s professional development
plan.

Document
Review,
Interviews
The charter school has met its obligation for
this criterion. The charter school annually
evaluates its special education services and uses
the results of the PAC survey to make program
improvements.
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 3
Criterion
Number/Topic
Corrective
Action
Implemented and
Effective

Method(s) of
Verification
Basis of Determination that
Corrective Action was
Implemented and has been
Effective
Corrective
Action Not
Implemented
Not Effective
or New Issues

Basis of Determination
that Implementation of
Corrective Action was
Incomplete or Ineffective
or Basis of Finding of New
Noncompliance
Special
Education
Criteria
created or
revised in
response to
IDEA-2004
SE 6
Determination
of Transition
Services

Student
Record
Review,
Document
Review,
Interviews
The charter school has met its
obligation for this criterion.
The charter school documents
transition planning for students
at age 15 or older in the
students’ IEPs. The charter
school also conducts transition
meetings for students promoted
to high school.
* Please note that consistent
with the recently enacted
IDEA-2004 regulations, the
transition planning chart will
become a mandated form,
which should be maintained
with the student’s IEP. Refer to
Administrative Advisory SPED
2007-1 for guidance. The
Department is currently
revising this form, please
check the Department’s
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 4
Required Corrective
Action, Timelines for
Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
Special Education website for
updates.
SE 8
IEP Team
composition
and attendance
Criterion
Number/Topic
(Refer to full
text of 20062007 CPR
requirements)

Corrective
Action
Implemented and
Effective

Student
Record
Review,
Document
Review,
Interviews
Method(s) of
Verification
The charter school has met its
obligation for this criterion.
Team meetings have the
required persons in attendance.
Basis of Determination that
Corrective Action was
Implemented and has been
Effective
SE 12
Frequency of
re-evaluation

Student
Record
Review,
Interviews
The charter school has met its
obligation for this criterion.
The charter school conducts a
re-evaluation every three years.
SE 13
Progress
Reports and
content

Student
Record
Review,
Document
Review,
Interviews
The charter school has met its
obligation for this criterion.
Progress reports are regularly
provided to parents.
Corrective
Action Not
Implemented
Not Effective
or New Issues

Basis of Determination
that Implementation of
Corrective Action was
Incomplete or Ineffective
or Basis of Finding of New
Noncompliance
*Please note that recently
enacted IDEA-2004
regulations have now changed
the content requirements for
IEP progress reports. Refer to
Administrative Advisory SPED
2007-1 for guidance. The
Department has changed the
progress report form, and it is
now available on the
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 5
Required Corrective
Action, Timelines for
Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
Department’s Special
Education website at
http://www.doe.mass.edu/sped/
iep/eng_toc.html.
SE 14
Review and
revision of
IEPs
SE 25B
Resolution of
disputes
SE 33
Involvement
in the General
Curriculum
SE 39A
Procedures for



Not
Applicable
Interviews,
The charter school has met its
Student Record obligation for this criterion.
Review
IEPs are reviewed annually.
Document
Review,
Interviews
Document
Review,
Student
Record
Review,
Interviews
The charter school has met its
obligation for this criterion.
The charter school has not had
a parent request to the Bureau
of Special Education Appeals
(BSEA). The charter school
knows its obligation to
convene a meeting with the
parent and relevant Team
members within 15 days of
receiving notice that the parent
has requested an official
hearing with BSEA.
The charter school has met its
obligation for this criterion.
Staff understand the MA
Curriculum Frameworks and
the expectations of the state for
student performance, as well as
understand the rights of
students with disabilities to be
full participants in the general
curriculum.
(SE 39A does not apply to
charter schools or vocational
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 6
schools)
services to
eligible private
school students
whose parents
reside in the
district
SE 39B
Procedures for
services to
eligible
students in
private schools
whose parents
reside out of
state
SE 46
Procedures for
suspension of
students with
disabilities
more than 10
days
Criterion
Number/Topic
(SE 39B does not apply to
charter schools or vocational
schools)
Not
Applicable

Corrective
Action
Implemented and
Effective

Document
Review,
Student
Record
Review,
Interviews
Method(s) of
Verification
The charter school has met its
obligation for this criterion.
The school adheres to its
procedures for students with
disabilities whose suspensions
exceed 10 consecutive school
days or a pattern has developed
for suspensions exceeding 10
cumulative days.
Basis of Determination that
Corrective Action was Implemented
and has been Effective
Corrective
Action Not
Implemented
Not Effective
or New
Issues

Basis of Determination
that Implementation of
Corrective Action was
Incomplete or Ineffective
or Basis of Finding of
New Noncompliance
Civil Rights
(MOA) and
Other
General
Education
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 7
Required Corrective Action,
Timelines for Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
Requirements
MOA 10A
Student
Handbooks
and Codes of
Conduct
Partial
Document
Review
The charter school submitted a
copy of the Family Handbook and
School Policies that contains all but
one of the required elements.
MOA 14
Counseling/
counseling
materials free
from bias and
stereotypes

Document
Review,
Interviews
The charter school has a process in
place to ensure that limitedEnglish-proficient students have
access to counseling in their native
language if requested.
MOA 17A
Use of
physical
restraint

Document
Review,
Interviews
The charter school has staff who
are trained to administer physical
restraint, and staff are aware of the
requirements of this regulation.
Method(s) of
Verification
Basis of Determination that
Corrective Action was Implemented
and has been Effective
Criterion
Number/Topic
MOA 22
Accessibility
of district
programs and
services for
students with
Corrective
Action
Implemented and
Effective

Partial
Document
Review,
Facility
Observation,
Interviews
The charter school has installed a
buzzer and video system at the 25
Clinton Street’s accessible entrance
to notify the office that a disabled
person is waiting to access the
building.
Partial
Corrective
Action Not
Implemented
Not Effective
or New
Issues

Partial
The discipline
procedures do not
include procedures for
students on Section 504
Accommodation Plans.
Basis of Determination
that Implementation of
Corrective Action was
Incomplete or Ineffective
or Basis of Finding of
New Noncompliance
The cafeteria and the
gymnasium located at 40
Clinton Street do not
currently provide for
handicap access into the
building and for the
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 8
No later than April 20, 2007,
submit a copy of the section of
the revised draft of the Family
Handbook and School Policies
that includes disciplinary
procedures for students on
Section 504 Accommodation
Plans.
Required Corrective Action,
Timelines for Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
Complete the ADA checklist
for the facility located at 40
Clinton Street and formulate a
plan that includes a specific
timeline to address any
identified issues in addition to
formulating a plan to address
disabilities
MOA 25
Institutional
selfevaluation
Partial
Document
Review,
Interviews
The charter school does evaluate its
program on an ongoing basis (i.e.,
through the Team Plus meetings) to
ensure that students have equal
access to all programs.
Partial
water fountains and
bathrooms.
the previously cited noncompliance access issues.
Submit the checklist and plan
by April 20, 2007.
Limited-Englishproficient students are
not provided equal
access to all programs
because the students are
not provided with an
English learner education
program as required by
M.G.L. c. 71A.
See ELE 5
Other
Regulated
Programs
Monitored
During this
Mid-cycle
Review
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 9
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
English Learner Education (ELE) Requirements
Mid-Cycle Review Findings and Corrective Action Based on the Department’s Review Of Local Self-Assessments
(Please refer to full text of 2006-2007 CPR requirements for ELE and related implementation guidance at
http://www.doe.mass.edu/pqa/review/cpr/instrument/chapter71A.doc )
ELE
Criterion
Number
and
Topic
ELE 1
Annual
Assessment
Implemented
Based on
Local ELE
SelfAssessment

Partial
Findings of Noncompliance Based on Department’s
Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment
(Criterion Determined to be Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented)
Required Corrective Action,
Timelines for Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
The charter school does not annually assess the English proficiency of
all limited English proficient (LEP) students.
By April 20, 2007, submit documentation that
confirms that identified LEP students are
administered required annual assessments: the
Massachusetts English Proficiency Assessment
(MEPA) and the Massachusetts English Language
Assessment – Oral (MELA-O).
ELE 2
MCAS
Participation
Not
Implemented
The charter school does not have a policy or procedures in place for
providing MCAS accommodations for LEP students.
By April 20, 2007, submit written policies and
procedures to ensure appropriate administration of
the MCAS to LEP students.
ELE 3
Initial
Identification
Not
Implemented
The charter school does not have a policy or procedure in place to
ensure the initial identification of LEP students upon enrollment.
Documentation provided did not contain a student roster based upon
initial screening, list of qualified staff to implement identification
procedures and a copy of the screening assessment tool.
By April 20, 2007, submit a copy of the home
language survey (English and other languages), a
list of students who have been screened, a
description of the assessments used to determine
English language proficiency in all four modalities
of reading, writing, speaking, and listening; and a
list of qualified staff (name, title, and role) to
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 10
ELE
Criterion
Number
and
Topic
Implemented
Based on
Local ELE
SelfAssessment

Findings of Noncompliance Based on Department’s
Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment
(Criterion Determined to be Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented)
Required Corrective Action,
Timelines for Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
implement identification procedures.
ELE 4
Waiver
Procedures
Not
Implemented
The charter school does not have procedures or a notice to inform
parents of their right to apply for a waiver of ELE.
Submit, by April 20, 2007, a notice that informs
parent(s) of their right to apply for a waiver that
includes all of the required elements.
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 11
ELE
Criterion
Number
and
Topic
Implemented
Based on
Local ELE
SelfAssessment

Findings of Noncompliance Based on Department’s
Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment
(Criterion Determined to be Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented)
ELE 5
Program
Placement
and Structure
Not
Implemented
The charter school does not provide LEP students with instruction
based upon the requirements of this criterion.
ELE 6
Program Exit
And
Readiness
Not
Implemented
The charter school’s program exit and readiness procedures do not
follow the requirements and the implementation guidance of this
criterion. The charter school did not submit documentation regarding
the specific procedures (e.g., test scores) in place to re-designate a
Required Corrective Action,
Timelines for Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
Submit by April 20, 2007:
 Explanation of how the charter school
intends to deliver an English Language
Learner program consistent with the
requirements of Chapter 71A.
 Description of the English language
support program in place for students K-12
for the 2006-07 SY.
 List of ELL students for the 06-07 SY.
Indicate the grade level and the classroom
placement of each student, as well as the
type and amount of English language
support that the student needs. Indicate
when the student receives instruction that
is based on the English Language
Proficiency Benchmarks and Outcomes.
Include a copy of their most recent annual
language proficiency assessments.
 Qualifications of the ESL/ELD teacher(s),
including a copy of current certification
and/or waiver
 Names of teachers participating in
sheltered English instruction training for
the 06-07 SY. Include the type and amount
of training received and scheduled.
Submit by April 20, 2007, written procedures for
re-designating a student from LEP to FLEP,
including the program exit criteria and the multiple
measures used to make the determination.
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 12
ELE
Criterion
Number
and
Topic
Implemented
Based on
Local ELE
SelfAssessment

Findings of Noncompliance Based on Department’s
Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment
(Criterion Determined to be Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented)
Required Corrective Action,
Timelines for Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
student from LEP to FLEP status.
ELE 7
Parent
Involvement
Partial
ELE 8
Declining
Entry to a
Program
Not
Implemented
The charter school provides some translation services when requested;
however, the charter school has not developed a mechanism that
provides multiple opportunities and a variety of methods for including
parents or guardians of LEP students in matters pertaining to their
children’s education.
By April 20, 2007, submit the charter school’s
mechanism for including parents or guardians of
LEP students in matters pertaining to their
children’s academic education.
Note: The charter school should provide multiple
opportunities and a variety of methods for parentteacher communication and document the
availability of such opportunities.
The charter school does not have policies and procedures for LEP
students who have declined entry to a program based upon the
requirements of this criterion.
Submit by April 20, 2007, policies, procedures,
and an implementation plan for providing supports
to LEP students whose parents decline entry into
an ELE program.
ELE 9
Instructional
Grouping
Not
Implemented
The charter school does not provide students with ESL/ELD
instruction at the appropriate proficiency level and based on the
English Language Proficiency Benchmarks and Outcomes.
ELE 10
Parental
Notification
Not
Implemented
The charter school does not have a parental notification letter.
Submit:
 Process for placing LEP students in
instructional groupings; and
 Description of English language
development curriculum.
Provide the Department with evidence of the
above, and with evidence that these have been
shared with appropriate personnel in the charter
school, by April 20, 2007.
Submit, by April 20, 2007, a parental notification
letter that contains the required elements of this
criterion. Also submit a translated copy of the
letter.
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 13
ELE
Criterion
Number
and
Topic
ELE 11
Equal Access
to Academic
Programs
and Services
ELE 12
Equal Access
to Nonacademic and
Extracurricular
Programs
ELE 13
Follow-up
Support
ELE 14
Licensure
Requirements
Implemented
Based on
Local ELE
SelfAssessment

Partial
Partial
Findings of Noncompliance Based on Department’s
Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment
(Criterion Determined to be Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented)
Required Corrective Action,
Timelines for Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
LEP students have access to and are integrated into general education
classrooms. In addition, LEP students can access all curriculum
offerings, such as special education services and Section 504 Plans,
provided they meet eligibility requirements; however, the charter
school’s implementation practices do not meet all of the requirements
of this criterion. The charter school’s DCAP does not provide support
services for LEP students. However, the charter school has a process
in place to ensure that limited-English-proficient students have access
to counseling in their native language.
The charter school should revise their
implementation practices to meet the requirements
of this criterion.
The charter school’s undocumented implementation practices indicate
that all LEP students have access to nonacademic and extracurricular
programs; however, the charter school’s practices do not meet the
requirements of this criterion..
The charter school should revise and document the
implementation practices to meet the requirements
of this criterion.
Submit a copy of the updated implementation
practices regarding support services for LEP
students that will be included in the school’s
DCAP to the Department by April 20, 2007.
Submit a copy of the implementation practices to
the Department by April 20, 2007.
Not
Implemented
Not
Implemented
The charter school does not have a formal LEP program or a process
for determining when LEP students have become proficient and no
longer require supports or an ELE program.
Develop procedures to provide follow-up support
for students who have exited the ELE program.
Submit a copy of the plan by April 20, 2007.
The charter school did not provide documentation indicating that
members of the staff who provide English language instruction hold
current ESL teacher licensure or an approved ELL waiver.
Submit by April 20, 2007 evidence that LEP
students are receiving English language
development instruction from an appropriately
licensed teacher as required by this criterion.
Provide a copy of all ELE student weekly
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 14
ELE
Criterion
Number
and
Topic
Implemented
Based on
Local ELE
SelfAssessment

Findings of Noncompliance Based on Department’s
Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment
(Criterion Determined to be Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented)
Required Corrective Action,
Timelines for Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
instructional schedules that indicate the receipt of
services along with the staff person’s name and
copy of license.
ELE 15
Professional
Development
Requirements
Not
Implemented
The charter school has not implemented a professional development
plan that provides teachers and administrators with high quality
training as prescribed by the Department to ensure the progress of
LEP students in developing oral comprehension, speaking, reading
and writing of English.
The charter school must develop a professional
development plan that meets the requirements of
this criterion for teachers and administrators that
provides high quality training in:
1. Second language learning and teaching
2. Sheltering content instruction
3. Assessment of speaking and listening;
4. Teaching reading and writing to limited
English proficient students.
Submit a copy of the professional development
plan to the Department by April 20, 2007, and
evidence that the training has taken place by the
end of May 2007.
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 15
ELE
Criterion
Number
and
Topic
Implemented
Based on
Local ELE
SelfAssessment

ELE 16
Equitable
Facilities

ELE 17
Program
Evaluation
ELE 18
Records of
LEP
Students-
Not
Implemented
Findings of Noncompliance Based on Department’s
Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment
(Criterion Determined to be Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented)
Required Corrective Action,
Timelines for Implementation,
and Progress Reporting
At the time of the review, the charter school met the requirements of
this criterion.
In addition, the charter school has not developed an ongoing
evaluation process to ensure the ELE program is effective.
The charter school must develop a proposal for
evaluating the effectiveness of its ELE program
and submit it to the Department by April 20, 2007.
(To be reviewed during next CPR visit.)
Not Rated
Christa McAuliffe Regional Charter Public School Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
Page 16