Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Continuous Improvement
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Cont. Imp. Worksheet Prompt 3
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Resources and
infrastructure (e.g. staff,
technology,
committees, etc.)
support and sustain
ongoing continuous
improvement efforts.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Arts & Science Faculty Focus Group
Program Faculty Focus Group
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Continuous Improvement
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Cont. Imp. Worksheet Prompt 4
Cont. Imp. Worksheet Prompt 5 (last
column)
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Faculty/instructors and
staff contribute to a
Sponsoring
Organization’s
continuous
improvement efforts.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Program Faculty Focus Group
Arts & Science Faculty Focus Group
Program Supervisors Focus Group
1
2
3
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 2
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Continuous Improvement
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Cont. Imp. Worksheet Prompt 5 (overall)
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

As applicable (if scenario in prompt 2 warrants
data check)
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
The consistent and
ongoing use of internal
and external evidence,
including ESE data,
informs strategic
decisions that impact
the SO, the education
programs, candidates
and employing
organizations.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Arts & Science Faculty Focus Group
Leadership Interview
Program Faculty Focus Group
1
2
3
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 3
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Continuous Improvement
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Cont. Imp. Worksheet Prompt 5 (overall)
Cont. Imp. Worksheet Prompt 6
Partner Survey 5a & 5b
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

As applicable (if scenario in prompt 5 warrants
data check)
Program Completer Survey*
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
SO acts on feedback
solicited from internal
and external
stakeholders (including
candidates, graduates,
district and school
personnel and
employers) in
continuous
improvement efforts.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Arts & Science Faculty Focus Group
Candidate Focus Group
Completer Focus Group
Program Faculty Focus Group
Program Supervisors Focus Group
Supervising Practitioner Focus Group
1
2
3
4
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 4
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Continuous Improvement
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Annual Goals (see online profiles)
Cont. Imp. Worksheet Prompt 1
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
Yearly State Annual
Report establishes goals
in alignment with the
continuous
improvement process.
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Leadership Interview
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 5
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Continuous Improvement
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Cont. Imp. Worksheet Prompt 2
Strategic Plan (if included as supplemental
document)
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
Strategic plan includes
activities, timelines and
supports for meeting
educator preparation
programs’ annual goals.
ONSITE
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:
Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 6
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Continuous Improvement
Sponsoring Organization:
Overall Domain Summary
Criterion
Offsite
Output
Onsite
Commendation
Criterion
Met
Finding
Resources and infrastructure (e.g. staff,
technology, committees, etc.) support and
sustain ongoing continuous improvement
efforts.
Faculty/instructors and staff contribute to a
Sponsoring Organization’s continuous
improvement efforts.
The consistent and ongoing use of internal and
external evidence, including ESE data, informs
strategic decisions that impact the SO, the
education programs, candidates and employing
organizations.
SO acts on feedback solicited from internal and
external stakeholders (including candidates,
graduates, district and school personnel and
employers) in continuous improvement efforts.
Yearly State Annual Report establishes goals in
alignment with the continuous improvement
process.
Strategic plan includes activities, timelines and
supports for meeting educator preparation
programs’ annual goals.
Domain Summary
Overall Domain Recommendation
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs
Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 7