Digital IP: Software should be patentable =123 billion dollars1 Claire Finch, Christie Mitchell, Gail Hyman, Justin Craigwell-Graham Intellectual property Should be Protected Diamond vs. Diehr (March 3, 1981) Question: Could an invention be patentable if part of its process contained a computer program? Decision: “A machine which transforms materials physically under the control of a programmed computer is patentable.”3 Results: An increase in the number of software patent applications and the total eradication of any speculation over software patents in cases (in re Alappat and in re Lowry) The United States is a leader in the software industry, creating jobs and markets because of the protection of intellectual property. (Silicon Valley, California) References: The Oyez Project, Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981), Financial Benefits of Software Patents “Once created, it is often possible to reproduce software easily at very low cost. Thus, without appropriate protection against unauthorized copying and use, producers of software may not be able to recoup their investments…Although copyright protects "literal expressions" of software, it does not protect the "concept" behind the software, which often is a core part of its commercial value. Since such concepts behind the software often provide technical functions such as controlling machines or processing data, program developers started seeking protection of software through the patent system.” --From the World Intellectual Property Organization Helps promote investment in technology—security of investment Without investment, software development would not move forward as quickly—incentive to create new ideas Accelerates Innovation Patents encourage full disclosure of the invention to the public Do not have to disclose underlying source code with copyrights Working around patented software will ultimately lead to progress in the field Encourages commercialization of inventions and creates incentive for research and product development Software Patent Institute Database consisting of descriptions of software technologies Accelerates Innovation (2) Promoting public disclosures of useful inventions through issued patents. In exchange for the public disclosure of an invention in a published patent, an inventor is given the reward of exclusive rights in the invention for 20 years. Disclosure makes the availability of the invention, under sale or license, known to those who may have a use for it. Disclosure encourages others to consider making improvements or other substitutes. Most important, public disclosure can avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts in creating something that already exists (Gruner, 2000, pp. 1007-12). Software patents are essential to the growth of small software companies-- both in the US and in developing countries. Small US companies benefit from software patents: -While it is true that software patents help large companies, software patents are indispensable to small companies because it protects their ideas, allowing them to compete with the larger companies. “Attorneys should consider protection of intellectual property in a timely fashion for every client investing in new products, new markets or new collaborations. If intellectual property rights are not protected early, rights might be lost or limited by competitive activity. Proper use of the tools of intellectual property can protect a substantial portion of a company's value and can create the best opportunity for the company to succeed.” -from the Arizona Attorney, © 2008 State Bar of Arizona. Software Patents are essential to the success of small companies in less developed countries Software patents help businesses in developing countries gain the legitimacy that they need, in addition to protecting against crippling software piracy. Ex: India India pirated over $443 million worldwide in intellectual property in 2005 alone (Kopczynski) “However, recent data shows that India is losing more than it is gaining from software piracy. In its 2005 piracy study, the Business Software Alliance (BSA) notes: ‘India, whose IT exports are more than triple the size of its domestic IT market, still has a piracy rate of 74 percent, despite the strength of its world-class development skills and government efforts to quell piracy. This is a major inhibitor to the growth of a local packaged software industry.’” (Kopczynski) References 1. 2. 3. http://www.pff.org/digitalamerica/presentations/saop aulo/JohnDuffy.pdf http://www.sei.cmu.edu/programs/acquisitionsupport/publications/sw-patents.pdf The Oyez Project, Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981), http://www.oyez.org/cases/19801989/1980/1980_79_1112/