What can we learn about neutrinos at SNOLAB !? Alain Bellerive Canada Research Chair Carleton University www.snolab.ca Outline • • • • • • • • • • Introduction & Neutrino Production in the Sun Review of Solar Neutrino Experiments Solar Neutrino Problem Neutrino Oscillation and Matter Effects Results from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Constraints on Oscillation Parameters The Next Phase for SNO Future Prospects at SNOLAB A Proposal for Xenon Double Beta Decay Search Summary and Conclusion Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 2 Evidence for Neutrino Oscillations First evidence of neutrino oscillation 2 e Atmospheric Neutrinos high energies Solar Neutrinos low energies Today’s talk Today’s talk !!! !!! Neutrinos Proton beam Pions Water target Cornell November 2004 e, , and e detector Muons and electrons Copper beam stop 30 meters Alain Bellerive Neutrino Beams and Reactors Tunable energies and distances! 3 Macroscopic Properties of the Sun Mean Distance from the Earth: 1.5 x 1011m Mass: 2 x 1030 kg Radius: 6.96 x 108 m Luminosity: 3.8 x 1026 W Neutrino flux: 6.5 x 1010 cm-2 s-1 SNU: Product of solar neutrino fluxes (measured or calculated) and calculated cross-sections 1 SNU 1 capture per s & per 1036 target atoms Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 4 Neutrino Production in the Sun Light Element Fusion Reactions p + p 2H + e+ + e 99.75 % p + e- + p 2H + e 0.25 % 3He + p 4He + e+ + e ~10-5 % 7Be + e- 7Li + e 8B 8Be* + e+ + e 15 % 0.02 % Neutrino Production Radius Chlorine Measurements: Homestake • 1960’s: 37Cl + e 37Ar + eConstruction of the Chlorine detector by Ray Davis • Depth: 4850 ft • Detector fluid: 3.8 x 105 l of C2Cl4 • Energy Thresold: 0.814 MeV • 1970 – 1995 Measurements of solar flux Sensitive to 8B & 7Be ’s • Observed rate (SNU) 2.56 ± 0.16(stat) ± 0.16(syst) • Expected rate (SNU) 7.6 +1.3 [1 from BP2000] Cleveland et al.,Ap. J. 496, 505(1998) –1.1 Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 6 Gallium Experiments 71Ga + e 71Ge + e- Energy Threshold: 0.233 MeV Radiochemical Target Small proportional counters are used to count the Germanium Sensitive to pp, 7Be, 8B, CNO, and pep ’s SAGE: Russian-American Gallium solar neutrino Experiment (INR RAS) • GALLEX/GNO:Gallium Neutrino Observatory in Gran Sasso A liquid metal target which contains 50 tons of gallium. 30 tons of natural gallium in an aqueous acid solution. Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 7 Gallium Measurements: SAGE (LowNu03) SAGE overall 1990-2003 +3.7 (syst) SNU 69.6 +4.4 (stat) -3.2 -4.3 Expected rate [1 from BP2000] +9 SNU 129 –7 Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 8 Gallium Measurements: GALLEX + GNO GALLEX GNO Expected rate [BP2000] 129 SNU Neutrino 2002 Water Detector: Super-Kamiokande • 8B neutrino measurement by x + e- → x + e- • Sensitive to e, , t (,t + e- ) 0.15 x (e + e-) • High statistics ~15ev./day • Real time measurement allow studies on time variations • Studies energy spectrum • 50 ktons of pure water with 11,146 PMTs (fiducial volume of 22.5 ktons for analysis) Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 10 Solar neutrino data in SK (period I) May 31, 1996 – July 13, 2001 (1496 days ) e- qsun 22400230 solar events Ee = 5.0 - 20 MeV 8B flux : 2.35 0.02 0.08 [x 106 /cm2/sec] Data SSM(BP2001) = 0.465 0.005 +0.016 –0.015 Solar Flux Measurement Results Chlorine – Gallium – Water experiments have different energy threshold !!! The data suggest an energy dependence !!! ??? What could explain such a variation ??? Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 14 Solar Neutrino Problem • Historically the first culprit was assumed to be the method of determining the solar flux. • In fact, the last 30 years showed that the SSM provides and accurate description of the macroscopic properties of our Sun. • The mass, radius, shape, luminosity, age, chemical composition, and photon spectrum of the Sun are precisely determined and used as input parameters. • Equation of state relates pressure and density; while the radiative opacity dictates photon transport. • Experimental fusion cross sections used to determined the nuclear reaction rates. Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 15 Neutrino Mixing: • As in the quark sector, it is possible to define a neutrino mixing matrix which relates the mass and weak eigenstates Mixing Matrix e t U e1 U e2 U e 3 1 U 1 U 2 U 3 2 Ut1 Ut 2 Ut 3 3 Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 17 Solar Neutrino Oscillations Pee = sin2(2q) sin2(1.27Dm2 L / E) • Physics: Dm2 & sin(2q) • Experiment: Distance (L) & Energy (E) e t U e1 U e2 U e 3 1 U 1 U 2 U 3 2 Ut1 Ut 2 Ut 3 3 Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive Dm2 Dm122 and q q12 3 Parameters ! Dm m m q Mixing angle 2 2 2 2 1 The state evolves with time or distance 18 Sensitivity to oscillations Vacuum Oscillations MSW Oscillations • Different types of experiments sensitive to different aspects of oscillation space • For s in matter can acquire an effective mass through scattering, enhancing oscillations 102 1 10-2 10-4 10-6 10-8 10-10 Accelerator [~GeV] Dm2 (eV2 ) Reactor [~MeV] Atmospheric [~GeV] Solar [~MeV] MSW L/E (km/GeV) LP2003 10-2 1 102 104 106 108 1010 MSW = Mikheyev – Smirnov - Wolfenstein 19 Matter-Enhanced Neutrino Oscillations Neutrinos produced in weak Pee state e High density of electrons in the Sun Superposition of mass states 1, 2, 3 changes through the MSW resonance effect Solar neutrino flux detected on Earth consists of e + ,t LP2003 Alain Bellerive 20 Neutrino Oscillations in matter Neutrino States Weak States Mass States First 1 Second First Second 2 e x Time Evolution Δm 2 Δm 2 q cos2θ sin2θ d e 1 eee cos cos qsinsin q q 1 4E1 4E 2 i T 2 T 2 2 Δm Δm q2 dt x 2 xx sin sin q cos Δm Δm q cos q cos2θ sin2θ 2 sin2θ 2G F N e e x d e cos2θ 4E i H 4E T 4E 2 4E 2 dt x Purexx Δmx x Pure Δm Pure sin2θ cos2θ 2 2 4E 4E x x sinsin 2 q q q 2q coscos Time Evolution 2 1 1 1 0 LP2003 sin 2qe e 2 sin 2q m q q 2 2 ( cos 2 q ) sin 2q q q 2 2GF N E / D m e Time Alain Bellerive 21 Mixing Parameters SMA Combination of the Chlorine, Gallium, SK, and CHOOZ restricted the mixing parameters Dm2 (eV2) LMA LOW VAC Pre SNO Allowed Regions Phys.Rev. D64 (2001) 093007 Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive JustSo2 tan2q 22 Subury Neutrino Observatory • Timeline • Experimental Apparatus • First Results from the D20 Phase • Most Recent Results from the Salt Phase • Outlook to the NCD Phase OVERAL PICTURE Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 23 SNO Timeline 1999 Commissioning 2000 D 2O 2001 2002 D2O + Salt 2003 2004 D2O 1998 2005 2006 D2O + 3He counters 3He counters: Install & Commission • Phase 1: D2O • Phase 2: D2O + Salt (NaCl) • Phase 1a: D2O • Phase 3: D2O + 3He counters Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 24 Underground laboratory in Sudbury SNOLAB Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 25 Sudbury Neutrino Observatory 2092 m to Surface (6010 m w.e.) PMT Support Structure, 17.8 m 9456 20 cm PMTs ~55% coverage within 7 m Acrylic Vessel, 12 m diameter 1000 tonnes D2O 1700 tonnes H2O, Inner Shield 5300 tonnes H2O, Outer Shield Urylon Liner and Radon Seal Energy Threshold = 5.511 MeV Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 26 Purpose of SNO • If Solar Neutrino Problem due to νe oscillation flavour mixing to νμ and/or ντ , SNO should provide direct evidence . • SNO measures flux of νe and flux of (νe+νμ+ντ). • Previous expt’s sensitive to only νe or mainly νe. Water Čerenkov expt’s: Kamiokande, Super-K Cornell November 2004 Radiochemical expt’s: 37Cl at Homestake and 71Ga at Gran Sasso/Baksan Alain Bellerive 27 Neutrino detection in SNO • PMTs detect Čerenkov photons from relativistic e-: e- – e- from CC or ES 43o reaction – γ from n-capture (NC reaction) usually Comptonscatters e- (pair production less likely). Cornell November 2004 Čerenkov cone Alain Bellerive 28 Neutrino detection in SNO • Hit pattern from Čerenkov cone indicates physics event. • PMT hit times and locations used to reconstruct edirection and location • Number of PMT hits used to estimate electron energy. Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 29 SNO observables - event by event PMT Information: Positions, Charges, Times Event Reconstruction Vertex, Direction, Energy, Isotropy Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 30 Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 31 Neutrino Reactions in SNO CC e d p p e− Produces Cherenkov Light Cone in D2O - Q = 1.445 MeV - good measurement of e energy spectrum - some directional info (1 – 1/3 cosq) - e only NC x d p n x n captures on deuteron 2H or 35Cl or 3He - Q = 2.22 MeV - measures total 8B flux from the Sun - equal cross section for all types ES x e− x e− Produces Cherenkov Light Cone in D2O - low statistics - mainly sensitive to e, some and t - strong directional sensitivity Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 32 An Ultraclean Environment • Highly sensitive to any g above neutral current (2.2 MeV) threshold. Uranium Thorium 3.27 MeV b 2.615 MeV g • Sensitive to 238U & 232Th decay chains Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 33 Three Ways to Catch Neutrons! (NC) x d x p n Pure D2O Salt 3He Nov. 99 - May 01 July 01 - Sep. 03 Summer 04 - Dec. 06 n captures on deuterium σ = 0.0005b 6.2 MeV γ n captures on chlorine σ = 44b 8.6 MeV multiple γ’s n captures on 3He in discrete prop. counter array σ = 5330b 0.764 MeV γ n γ γ γ γ n 3H* 2H PRL 87, 071301, 2001 PRL 89, 011301, 2002 PRL 89, 011302, 2002 Cornell November 2004 3H 5 cm n 36Cl* 35Cl 36Cl PRL 92, 181301, 2004 Alain Bellerive 3H p 3He n + 3He p + 3H 34 Subury Neutrino Observatory D2O Results Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 35 #EVENTS Shape Constrained Signal Extraction Results CC 1967.7 +61.9 +60.9 ES NC Cornell November 2004 263.6 +26.4 +25.6 576.5 +49.5 +48.9 Alain Bellerive 36 Shape Constrained Neutrino Fluxes Signal Extraction in FCC, FNC, FES with E > 5.511 MeV Fcc(e) = +0.06 +0.09 1.76 -0.05 (stat.) -0.09 (syst.) x106 cm-2s-1 Fes(x) = +0.24 +0.12 2.39 -0.23 (stat.) -0.12 (syst.) x106 cm-2s-1 Fnc(x) = +0.44 5.09 -0.43 x106 cm-2s-1 +0.46 (stat.) -0.43 (syst.) Signal Extraction in Fe, FeF=cc(e) +0.05 1.76 -0.05 = FtF=es(x) Ft +0.09 (stat.) -0.09 (syst.) and 6 cm-2s-1 x10 Fnc(x) = Fe + Ft Fe Fe 6 cm-2s-1 Ft x10 with 0.15 +0.45 +0.48 3.41 -0.45 (stat.) = (1) -0.45+(syst.) Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 37 SNO NC in D2O (April 2002) ~ 2/3 of initial solar e are observed at SNO to be ,t Flavor change at 5.3 level. Sum of all the fluxes agrees with SSM. FSSM = 5.05 -+1.01 0.81 106 cm-2 s-1 +0.46 FSNO = 5.09+0.44 -0.43 -0.43 106 cm-2 s-1 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 38 The Solar Neutrino Problem Experiment Exp/SSM •SAGE+GALLEX/GNO 0.55 •Homestake 0.34 •Kamiokande+SuperK 0.47 •SNO CC (June 2001) 0.35 SNO NC (April 2002) 1.01 SNO CC vs NC implies flavor change, which can then explain other experimental results. Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 39 Day/Night Asymmetries AX (F night F day ) (F night F day ) / 2 Signal Extraction for FCC, FNC, FES Fe and FTOT Allowing Atot 0 ATOT = -24.2 ± 16.1 +2.4 % - 2.5 Ae = 12.8 ± 6.2+1.5 % -1.4 Night - Day With constraint Atot = 0 +1.3 Ae = 7.0 ± 4.9 - 1.2 % Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 40 SNO: Constraint on mixing parameters Day/Night and Energy Spectra SNO Alone Allowed Regions Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 41 Progress in 2002 on the Solar Neutrino Problem March 2002 April 2002 with SNO Dec 2002 with KamLAND Subury Neutrino Observatory Salt Results Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 43 Advantages of Salt (original idea from Carleton) Neutrons capturing on 35Cl provide higher neutron energy above threshold. Higher capture efficiency Gamma cascade changes the angular profile. g n 35Cl 36Cl* Cornell November 2004 36Cl Alain Bellerive 44 Advantages of salt: n-detection efficiency With salt, higher E release from ncapture and higher σ for n-capture mean much higher NC detection efficiency. Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 45 isotropic Event vertex θij Isotropy variable, β14 , function of angles between each pair of hit PMTs (θij) in event. (similar to thrust in collider physics) Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive not isotropic Advantages of salt: event isotropy isotropy β14 β14 powerful discriminating variable between NC and CC/ES events. . 46 Calibration of detector Red – Data Blue – MC (neutron) and 16N (6 MeV γ) sources provide check of MC for β14 252Cf Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive triggered γ -ray source calibrates energy response 16N 47 D2O + Salt analysis: data set and data reduction 435,721,068 triggers • Data recorded from July 2001 to October 2002 (2/3 of D2O + salt data). • 254.2 live days (detector maintenance and calibration during remaining time). Instrumental background cuts Cosmic ray muons + spallation products Vtx reconstruction, PMT time and position disributions • Blind analysis performed – Analysis and cuts tuned with MC and “spoiled” subset of data. Cornell November 2004 Radius ≤ 550 cm, T ≥ 5.5 MeV 3055 events Alain Bellerive 48 Radioactive backgrounds • Ex situ measurements show U and Th levels lower than goals (1 background neutron/day). • Ex situ measurements consistent with in situ measurements • In situ measurements more precise so used for solar neutrino analysis. Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 49 Backgrounds U and Th Recall: 3055 candidate events Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 50 Measurement of CC, NC, ES events • MC PDFs compared to data; extended unbinned ML fit used to estimate free parameters in fit. • 3 (or 4) variables used to calculate likelihood PDFs: – – – – Radial position of reconstructed vertex Direction of electron w.r.t. Sun, cos θsun Event isotropy, β14 (PMT hit pattern) Electron kinetic energy (PMT hits) (optional) • Free parameters in fit: – number of NC, CC, ES signal events – “external neutron” background events Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive Matter enhanced oscillations change ES and CC spectra 51 PDFs for signals and backgrounds Isotropy Radius of fitted vertex β14 Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive (Rfit/6 m)3 52 PDFs for signals and backgrounds To Sun Away from Sun Sun-electron direction cos θsun Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive Electron kinetic energy Teff (MeV) 53 Flux results from fit Units for are 106 cm-2 s-1 Energy spectrum of 8B ν’s constrained to Ortiz, et al. spectrum Energy spectrum of 8B ’s unconstrained (Energy not used in fit) Standard Solar Model (Bahcall, Pinsonneault 2004) Cornell November 2004 BP04 = 5.82 ± 1.34 Alain Bellerive 54 Systematic uncertainties Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 55 Comparison to previous results and SSM (BP2000) More precise salt results confirm D2O results. Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 56 Interpretation of salt flux results: neutrino oscillation parameters SNO data only Ratio of CC/NC fluxes gives P(νe → νe) P(νe → νe) = 1- sin2(2θ)sin2(1.27Δm2L/E) Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 57 Interpretation of salt flux results: neutrino oscillation parameters 1-D projections of oscillation parameters give marginal uncertainties on tan2θ and Δm2. θ = 32.5+1.7-1.6 degrees Maximal mixing (θ = 45 degrees) excluded at 5.4 σ. Δm2 = (7.1+1.0-0.3) x 10-5 eV2 Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 58 Salt Removal: D2O Optics Restored ~1.2% 16N Nhit drop when salt was added to SNO Reverse osmosis a success Optical properties restored after the salt phase! Energy (MeV) Understand why the mean ~2.0% Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 59 Subury Neutrino Observatory NCD Phase Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 60 NCD Deployment Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 61 SNO NCD Phase NC Neutral Current Detectors x d p n x n 3He p t νx • Event by event separation • Break the correlation between NC & CC events • Measure in separate data streams NC & CC events • Different systematic errors than neutron capture on NaCl n • Commissioning Fall 04 (now!) Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 62 Optical Calibration: LIVE !!!!! Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 63 NCD Phase - Advantage of 3He counters Correlation Coefficient CC,NC NC,ES CC,ES D2O Salt 3He -0.950 -0.297 -0.208 -0.521 -0.064 -0.156 ~0 ~0 ~ -0.2 Reduction in anti-correlation between NC and CC will help to reduce uncertainty in CC/NC ratio. Smaller uncertainty in CC/NC ratio means smaller uncertainty in tan2θ. Best CC spectrum from D2O with NC constrained by NCD and overall consistency with Salt Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 64 What SNO might tell us in the future… The Ultimate D2o + Salt + NCD Analysis ! Salt phase 254 day results provide independent measurement of 8B solar neutrino flux, demonstrate flavor conversion to >7σ, and improve MSW parameter measurements. Goal for Final SNO Current Oscillation Picture: (D2O + salt + NCD) Results from full 391 days of salt data soon! Includes day-night and spectrum. 3He phase underway, for event-by-event NC discrimination…and even better physics! CC/NC ratio to 7% D/N asymmetry to 3% abs. uncertainty hep-ph/0406328 Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 65 SNOLAB EXO A Proposal for Double Beta Decay Search • Absolute Majorana Neutrino Mass Scale • Why Xenon? • Prototype at WIMP • Time Projection Chamber R&D Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 66 Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 67 Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 68 Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 69 There are two varieties of ββ decay 2ν mode: a conventional 2nd order process in nuclear physics 0ν mode: a hypothetical process can happen helicity only if: Mν ≠ 0 Since has to “flip” ν=ν Several new particles can take the place of the virtual ν But 0νββ decay always implies new physics Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 70 Effective Majorana ν mass (εi = ±1 if CP is conserved) m Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 3 2 U e,i mi i i 1 71 Xe is ideal for a large experiment •No need to grow crystals •Can be re-purified during the experiment •No long lived Xe isotopes to activate •Can be easily transferred from one detector to another if new technologies become available •Noble gas: easy(er) to purify •136Xe enrichment easier and safer: - noble gas (no chemistry involved) - centrifuge feed rate in gram/s, all mass useful - centrifuge efficiency ~ Δm. For Xe 4.7 amu Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 72 Background due to the Standard Model 2bb decay 2bb spectrum (normalized to 1) 0bb peak (5% FWHM) (normalized to 10-6) 0bb peak (5% FWHM) (normalized to 10-2) Summed electron energy in units of the kinematic endpoint (Q) from S.R. Elliott and P. Vogel, Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci. 52 (2002) 115. The only effective tool here is energy resolution Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 73 Electrostatic analysis looking at field uniformity TPC Simulation Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 74 R&D Effort TPC New Initiative at Carleton Time Projection Chamber Application for EXO Overlap with detector development for the ILC World consensus to build a new e+ e- linear collider (LC) Detectors capable of precision measurements Track reconstruction with charge dispersion on resistive anode and resolution study Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 75 Conclusion • SNO provided direct evidence of flavor conversion of solar e’s • SNO (d2o+salt+ncd) will provide the ultimate measurment of the total (NC) solar x flux • Real-time data do not show large energy distortion nor time-like asymmetry • Matter Effect explains the energy dependence of solar oscillation • Large mixing angle (LMA) solutions are favored • Solar Neutrino Problem is now an industry for precise measurements of neutrino oscillation parameters – SNO (d2o+salt+NCD) Ultimate NC Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 76 Implications and Outlook Solar neutrinos demonstrate that neutrinos have mass and the minimum SM is incomplete – Unlike the quark sector where the CKM mixing angles are small, the lepton sector exhibits large mixing – The masses and mixing may play significant roles in determining structure formation in the early universe as well as supernovae dynamics and the creation of matter The coming decade will be exciting for neutrino physics helping delineate the New Standard Model that will include neutrino masses and mixing – Precision measurements of the leptonic mixing matrix – Determination of neutrino masses (e.g. EXO) – Investigation of lepton sector CP and CPT properties Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 77 A (probably incomplete) list of the different ideas discussed by various groups Experiment Nucleus Detector CUORE 130Te .77 t of TeO2 bolometers (nat) 7 x 1026 .014-.091 EXO 136Xe 10 t Xe TPC + Ba tagging 1 x 1028 .013-.037 GENIUS 76Ge 1 t Ge diodes in LN 1 x 1028 .013-.050 Majorana 76Ge 1 t Ge diodes 4 x 1027 .021-.070 MOON 100Mo 34 t nat.Mo sheets/plastic sc. 1 x 1027 .014-.057 DCBA 150Nd 20 kg Nd-tracking 2 x 1025 .035-.055 CAMEO 116Cd 1 t CdWO4 in liquid scintillator > 1026 .053-.24 COBRA 116Cd , 10 kg of CdTe semiconductors 1 x 1024 .5-2. Candles 48Ca Tons of CaF2 in liq. scint. 1 x 1026 .15-.26 GSO 116Cd 2 t Gd2SiO5:Ce scint in liq scint 2 x 1026 .038-.172 Xmass 136Xe 1 t of liquid Xe 3 x 1026 .086-.252 130Te T0ν (y) < mν > eV Note that the sensitivity numbers are somewhat arbitrary, as they depend on the author’s guesstimate of the background levels they will achieve Cornell November 2004 Alain Bellerive 78 Xe offers a qualitatively new tool against background: 136Xe 136Ba++ e- e- final state can be identified using optical spectroscopy (M.Moe PRC44 (1991) 931) Ba+ system best studied (Neuhauser, Hohenstatt, Toshek, Dehmelt 1980) Very specific signature “shelving” Single ions can be detected from a photon rate of 107/s 2P 1/2 650nm 493nm •Important additional constraint •Huge background reduction Cornell November 2004 4D 2S metastable 47s 3/2 1/2 Alain Bellerive 79