Survey of new allocation model for Master Plan Team
The Master Plan team is interested in your awareness of and opinion of some changes that have been
made to the annual budget allocation process. In order to have more projects completed in a timely
manner, there has been an effort to not have every project go through the Master Planning Process. To
support this there have been set asides established for specific purposes. Two you might be familiar
with are classroom technology expansion/replacement and classroom maintenance/upgrades. Budgets
are set aside for both of these and input from Academic Affairs is provided to specify the classrooms to
be addressed and what technology or upgrades need to be done. We would like your feedback on how
this is working.

Are you aware of these classroom technology expansion/replacement and classroom
maintenance/upgrades set aside budgets?

Has the use of classroom technology expansion/replacement expedited the projects that get
done? Increased the number of projects that get done?

Has the use of classroom maintenance/ upgrades expedited the projects that get done?
Increased the projects that get done?

Would you recommend any improvements to the process?

Any other areas you would address with this budget set aside model?
Target audience
 Mary Broemel
 Dean’s Council and Academic Administrators Council
 Campus Councils
 Student Services Leadership Team