CSDS 565 Public School Methods in a Diverse Society (2 c.h.) Spring 2011 Instructor: E-mail: Phone: Office: Office Hours: Lissa Power-deFur, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, Professor, Graduate Coordinator, CSDS powerdefurea@longwood.edu 434.395-2369 Hull 257 or LCCLL T, Th 1 – 2 (Hull 257); Tuesday 5:15 – 5:45 (LCCLL); Wed 8 - 9 (Hull 257) Or by appointment Course Description This course is a study of service delivery and administrative requirements for public school speechlanguage pathology programs. The course includes a history of special education; review and application of federal and state requirements associated with special education; language and communication expectations of the classroom; collaborative service delivery approaches; and cultural competency needed to work with diverse students. 2 credits. Readings Required Texts American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2010). Roles and responsibilities of Speech-Language Pathologists in Schools [Professional Issues Statement]. Available from www.asha.org/policy. Tatum, B. D. (1999). “Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?” N.Y., N.Y.: Perseus Books Group. Virginia Department of Education. (2005). Speech language pathology services in public schools: Guidelines for best practice. Richmond, VA: Author. Available at http://www.doe.virginia.gov/special_ed/disabilities/speech_language_impairment/speech_lang_path ology_services.pdf Additional readings: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2002). A workload analysis approach for establishing speech-language caseload standards in the public schools. Guidelines. Available at http://www.asha.org/docs/html/GL200200066.html (Undated). Frequently Asked Questions: Speech-Language Pathology Assistants. Available at: http://www.asha.org/certification/faq_slpasst.htm 1 (Undated). Responsiveness to Intervention: New Roles for Speech-Language Pathologists. Available at http://www.asha.org/slp/schools/prof-consult/NewRolesSLP.htm (Undated). IDEA web site http://www.asha.org/advocacy/federal/idea/default.htm Continuum of Service Delivery Options Early Intervening Services IDEA Milestones IEPs and Eligibility for Services Medicaid and Third Party Reimbursement Missed Sessions (Undated). 2010 Schools Survey. http://www.asha.org/research/memberdata/2008SchoolsSurvey.htm (Undated.) “Adversely Affects Educational Performance.” http://www.asha.org/slp/schools/prof-consult/ed_performance.htm (read both links) Cultural Competence Checklists (Personal Reflection and Service Delivery) Council of Chief State School Officers. (undated). Common Core Standards. Available at http://www.corestandards.org/ LinguiSystems. (2007). Linguisystems Guide to RTI. Available at http://www.linguisystems.com/freedownloads_guides.php McGinty, A.S. & Justice, L.M. (2006). Classroom-based versus pull-out language intervention: An examination of the experimental evidence. EBP Briefs, 1 (1), 1 – 25. Available at http://www.asha.org/Members/ebp/compendium/reviews/Classroom-Based-Versus-Pull-outInterventions--A-Review-of-the-Experimental-Evidence.htm Power-deFur, L. (in press). When is a child with a speech-language impairment a child with a disability? Special education eligibility criteria. ASHA Leader. (on blackboard site under articles.) Power-deFur, L. (2010, Aug 31). Educational relevance of communication disorders. ASHA Leader. Power-deFur, L. and Alley, N.S. (2008). Legal and Financial Issues Associated with Providing Services in Schools to Children with Swallowing and Feeding Disorders. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools. Available at http://lshss.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/39/2/160 or through Longwood library. Technical and Training Assistance Center On-Line. NOTE – all of the TTAC Online documents are accessed from this main web site: http://ttaconline.org 2 Virginia Alternative/Alternate Assessment. http://ttaconline.org/staff/assessment/assess.asp Also, review some of the Aligned Standards of Learning from the same site. SOL Enhanced Scope and Sequence. http://ttaconline.org/staff/sol/sol.asp Data Collection for Speech-Language Pathologists. http://ttaconline.org/staff/s_training/s_course_info.asp?course=slps1213200894523pm&cauth or=SLPs Virginia Department of Education. (2010). Sample Elementary IEP Form (or Sample Transition IEP Form). Available at http://www.doe.virginia.gov/special_ed/iep_instruct_svcs/index.shtml (2009). Guidance on Evaluation and Eligibility for the Special Education Process. Available at http://www.doe.virginia.gov/special_ed/tech_asst_prof_dev/index.shtml (2009). Resource Document for Local Screening Requirements in Virginia Public Schools. Available at http://www.doe.virginia.gov/special_ed/tech_asst_prof_dev/index.shtml (2007). Procedures for Participation of Students with Disabilities in Virginia’s Accountability System. Available at http://www.doe.virginia.gov/testing/participation/participation_va_accountability_system.pdf (2006). Your Family’s Special Education Rights. Available at http://www.doe.virginia.gov/special_ed/regulations/state/procedural_safeguards/english_proc edural_safeguards.pdf (Undated). Complaints. Available at http://www.doe.virginia.gov/special_ed/resolving_disputes/complaints/index.shtml (Undated). Due Process. http://www.doe.virginia.gov/special_ed/resolving_disputes/due_process/index.shtml Standards of Learning sites: http://www.doe.virginia.gov/testing/common_core/index.shtml (main site) http://www.doe.virginia.gov/testing/alternative_assessments/vaap_va_alt_assessment_prog/v aap_aligned_sol.pdf (Aligned SOLs for Alternate Assessments) http://www.doe.virginia.gov/testing/sol/released_tests/index.shtml (released test items) Additional ASHA and VDOE readings may be assigned if new documents are released. There are various articles related to diversity under the Blackboard tab “articles.” 3 Course objectives and learning activities (and corresponding ASHA Knowledge and Skills Assessment [KASA] and VDOE licensure and endorsement standard - 2008 8VAC20-542-590. Special education speech-language disorders preK-12) Objective Learning Activities. Understand the history of public education, special education, and public school speech-language pathology services, including IDEA and NCLB. Explain federal & state requirements regarding evaluation, eligibility, IEP development, and implementation. Understand requirements associated with Medicaid billing in schools. Class discussion. Explain parent and student rights under IDEA, Section 504, &the Family Education Rights & Privacy Act (FERPA). Explain transition, selfadvocacy, guardianship, and discipline. Interview of parent of child receiving special education services. Class discussion. Identify the speech-language skills required for academic success, including mastery of the state (SOL) assessments. Observation of general education classroom. VDOE standard 9. Understanding of the knowledge, skills, and processes for educating special populations, including: (a) Historical perspective Reflection on special education. Observation of eligibility and IEP meetings. IEP Project. Reflection on data. SOL activity Explain advantages and disadvantages of various school-based service delivery methods, including: Response to Intervention (RtI); workload and caseload approaches. IEP Project. Explain approaches to respond to the culturallinguistic diversity of students and parents served in public schools. Reflections on MLK lecture, Moton Museum, Tatum book. Reflections on RtI, caseloads. Tatum discussion. Complete VDOE requirements in child abuse & technology. KASA standard Standard III D. The applicant must possess knowledge of the principles and methods of prevention, assessment and intervention for people with communication disorders … 10. Understanding of the knowledge, skills, and processes involved in the legal aspects associated with students with disabilities, including: (f) Advocacy & self-determination; (g) guardianship; (h) disciplinary practices, policies & procedures, & alternative placements/programs in schools. 1. Understanding of the knowledge, skills, and processes of communication, oral and written, as defined in the Virginia SOLs and how these are interrelated in forming a sound foundation for the understanding of speech and language acquisition 8. Understanding of the knowledge, skills, & processes of service delivery & instruction, including: (a) organization & administration of public school programs to provide services for persons with speech-language disorders; & (b) services available from related fields for those with communication disorders III B. The applicants must demonstrate knowledge of basic human comm… processes … including cultural basis. Child abuse and technology requirements. 4 Course Requirements Attendance and Participation: Students are expected to attend class, complete readings, and assignments prior to class, and participate in class discussions. Attendance is taken. Consistent with Longwood University Attendance Policy, a student’s grade may be lowered by one letter if 10% of class meetings are missed and a grade of F may be assigned if a student misses 25% of class meetings. ALL absences should be discussed with the instructor in advance, or as soon as the need for an absence is known. Absence during a quiz, test, or assigned oral presentation without prior consultation will result in a 0 on the assignment. Assignments turned in late will receive a 10% penalty for each class period late, for 30% of the total points. Bad Weather? If bad weather prevents holding class, the professor will inform students in an e-mail. The class will be rescheduled. Late Policy: Students are expected to turn assignments in on the date assigned. Arrangements may be made in advance for circumstances outside of the student’s control. Blackboard: Students are expected to access class documents (detailed information about assignments, class materials) on Blackboard and to check Blackboard at least weekly for class announcements, assignments, and readings. Disability Accommodations: Students needing an accommodation for a disability must speak with the instructor during the first week of class. Students may be asked to provide documentation from the Disability Support Center at Longwood University. All accommodations by the Disability Support Center will be provided. Honor Code All written work submitted for this class must be pledged with the Longwood Honor Code. Students shall write, in their own handwriting, and sign the following: “I have neither given nor received help on this work nor am I aware of any infraction of the Honor Code.” There will be a 2-point deduction for failure to include the honor code on any assignment. Learning Opportunities. NOTE: Make each topic in the interviews and observations a section heading in your paper. Interviews: During the semester, you will conduct a face-to face interview of a school-based speech-language pathologist and of a parent of a child who has received speech-language services in the schools. Be prepared to discuss your experiences in class. 5 Your reports of the interviews should integrate the information from the interview with the readings and class discussion. The analysis should integrate the interviews with the information presented in class. Interview 1: School-based speech-language pathologist. 20 points. It is preferred that the interview be with an SLP who has at least 5 years of experience in the schools and is currently working in schools. However, other arrangements may be made, as long as the SLP has worked in the schools. The following topics should be addressed: his/her educational and work experience, including the current school, professional development (2 pts) caseload (size; diversity in age, communication impairment, other disabilities, cultural-linguistic status) (2 pts) role and responsibilities in the school (various special education and non-special education teams and activities) (2 pts) relationship between the speech-language program and the other school programs (special education, general education, extra-curricular) (2 pts) types of collaboration with general and special educators (2 pts) view of the SOLs and SOL assessments (2 pts) views regarding the requirements of special education (e.g., evaluation, eligibility, IEP, parental rights) (2 pts) relationships with parents (2 pts) Find out what recommendations he/she has for you as a future speech-language pathologist (1 pts). Reflect on your interview skills and identify areas for improvement (2 pts). Use the SLP’s name in the report. Provide the name of the SLP you will be interviewing and his/her school experience by January 25. Interview due February 8. Interview 2: Parent of a child receiving speech-language services in the schools. 25 points. Interview a parent of a child who has been receiving special education services for a few years. Ideally, the child will be receiving speech-language services. The interview should include the following topics: Ask the parent about his/her child’s “story” (e.g., disability, age of identification, types of services received in the past and currently). (3 pts) What were his/her experiences on special education teams during the referral, evaluation, eligibility, and intervention processes? (3 pts) Did he/she feel like an equal participant? What did he/she especially like/dislike about how he/she was treated? (3 pts) 6 Did he/she understand the special education parental rights? (Be specific to identify rights that were easy and difficult to understand. Take a copy of the procedural safeguards with you to demonstrate the rights document. Give the parent your copy if he/she does not have one.) ( 4 pts) What does she think about the assessment program (SOL, VAAP) and the implications for his/her child? (2 pts) What hopes and dreams does he/she have for her child? (2 pts) What recommendations does he/she have for you as a future speech-language pathologist? (1 pt). Reflect on your interview skills and identify areas for improvement (2 pts). Use a the parents’ name and child’s initials in the report. Assure the parent that the information will not be used for any other purpose. Provide the name of the parent you will be interviewing, your relationship to the parent, person(s) assisting you in making the connection (if applicable), and your list of interview questions by Feb 8. Interview is due March 1. Observations. During the semester, you will observe a general education classroom and a special education meeting. As you speak with the school about the observations, be sure to get permission to participate in the meetings from the parents (in writing or orally). Be prepared to discuss your experience in class. Your reports should use examples to specify the behavior and communications you observe. Provide the names of your contact persons and the school division for these visits by January 25. Observation 1. General Education classroom. Observe a regular education classroom for at least ½ a day (2 ½ hours). Elementary is preferred. Students wishing to work at the middle/high school may request to observe there. If the class goes to “specials” (e.g., art, music) go with the class or reschedule to achieve the minimum amount of observation. 25 points. o Include the location, teacher(s), date, time on-site, schedule of classes/topics (1 pt) o Complete the Communication Observation form found in the VDOE SLP Guidelines, as if you were filling it out for an observation prior to eligibility determination for a particular child. Also complete the “Observation Form” found on page 50 of the VDOE Evaluation and Eligibility Guidelines. (2 pts) o Describe the classroom itself (layout, information on the walls, noise level, and amount of auditory and visual stimulation). (2 pts) o What were the classroom rules (written and unwritten)? (2 pts) o What SOLs were targeted? (Ask the teacher. If you do not have the opportunity to discuss the SOLS with the teacher, make an estimate. Look up the SOL on the VDOE web site and include in your report. Discuss how the activities related to the SOL.) (2 pts) 7 o Did you observe any integration of content areas (e.g., highlighting English concepts during a social studies lesson)? (1 pt) o Describe and provide examples of the linguistic complexity of teacher’s oral and written communication. Be specific in your analysis of the teacher’s syntax and semantics. (4 pts) o Describe and provide examples of the linguistic complexity expected of the children’s responses? Be specific in your analysis. (2 pts) o Count teacher and student utterances during a 15 minute instructional period, when there is communication between the teacher and students. Identify the classroom activity at the time. Calculate the ratio of teacher: student utterances. How would this effect a child with communication impairment (positively or negatively). (2 pts) o Describe and provide examples of the nonverbal communication the teacher uses? (2 pts) o Reviewing your observations and the data you gathered, consider how well would a child with communication impairment perform in this classroom. What aspects of instruction would enhance the child’s success? What aspects may be challenging? (3 pts) o What modifications would you recommend? (2 pts) Submit information on where you will do your observation by Feb 1. Report due February 15. Observation 2. Eligibility meeting OR IEP meeting. 25 points. Note. The school must expect the parent to attend the meeting. Please work with your contact to schedule an observation in a meeting with a parent. If the parent unexpectedly does not arrive, the meeting may be used. If this is the case, ask the team chair how the school will share the information with the parent and how the parent will be involved in making the decision. 1A Eligibility meeting. The meeting should include discussion of whether a child is eligible for special education with a speech-language impairment. (The child may be eligible for speech-language impairment as the primary disability or as a secondary disability.) o Describe the meeting (school, date, setting, all meeting participants, organization, and all actions taken). (4 pts) o Describe the child (age, grade, disability[ies], services) (3 pts) o If permitted, review the evaluation reports prior to the meeting. Did the parents have a copy of the report prior to the meeting? (When did they get the report?) (2 pts) o Describe the evaluation findings (2 pts). o Determine how the speech-language evaluation contributed to the determination of eligibility. (2 pts) Complete VDOE’s speech-language impairment eligibility worksheet from the VDOE Evaluation and Eligibility guidelines. (1) Did the team find the child eligible or ineligible for special education? (1 pt) o How well did the parent understand the professionals’ reports on their evaluation? Support your thinking with examples of the parent’s verbal and nonverbal behavior. (2 pts) o How well did the other professionals understand the speech-language and other evaluation results? Support your thinking with examples of the professionals’ verbal and nonverbal behavior. (2 pts) 8 o What process did the team use to make decisions (e.g., voting, consensus, agreement)? (Describe the process and the parent’s participation in the decision-making process. (2 pts) o How was permission for your participation obtained? (2 pts) o What have you learned about your future role on an eligibility committee? (2 pts). Note: As a student, you are to be an observer, not a participant in the meeting. 1B IEP meeting. The meeting should be addressing speech-language services, either alone or in conjunction with other special education services. o Describe the meeting (date, setting, meeting participants, organization, actions taken). (4 pts) o Describe the child (age, grade, disability[ies], services) (3 pts) o If permitted, review any draft IEP (or portion of the IEP) prior to the meeting and the final IEP at the conclusion of the meeting. Describe the final IEP, addressing all sections of the IEP discussed. ( 4 pts) o Determine how the speech-language pathologist’s written/oral report contributed to the development of the IEP. (2 pts) o How do speech-language services support academic services? (2 pts) o How well did the parent understand the discussion? Support your thinking with examples of the parent’s verbal and nonverbal behavior. (2 pts) o How well did the other professionals understand the information offered by the speechlanguage pathologist or other professionals? Support your thinking with examples of the professionals’ verbal and nonverbal behavior. (2 pts) o What process did the team use to make decisions (e.g., voting, consensus, agreement)? Describe the process and the parent’s participation in the decision-making process. (2 pts) o How was permission for your participation obtained? (2 pts) o What have you learned about your future role on an IEP team? (2 pts) Note: As a student, you are to be an observer, not a participant in the meeting. Information on school contacts due January 25. Report due March 29. C. Activities Analysis of academic standards. (50 points) The purpose of this activity is to understand the linguistic complexity of the academic expectations students with disabilities face. This is an opportunity to apply the your knowledge of syntax and morphology. Due Mar 1 A. Review the Virginia Standards of Learning, the Aligned Standards of Learning and the Common Core Standards . (18 points) Identify 9 standards that require effective communication skills, as follows: 3 from Virginia SOLs. 3 from Common Core Standards. 3 from Aligned SOLs. 9 Standards from each source should reflect three different grade levels (elementary, middle, high), and three different content areas (e.g., English, math, history). Analyze the standards by the domains of language – pragmatics, phonology, syntax, morphology, semantics. All 5 domains must be represented at least once in the 9 standards. Include the entire standard in your paper. Highlight the section you are focusing on, and be specific about the communication skill that is required for mastery. (18 points) B. Review the Released Test Items for the SOLs. Identify 9 that require effective communication skills. At least 4 different content areas and three grade levels (elementary, middle, and secondary) must be identified. All 5 domains of language must be represented at least once in the 9 test items. Write out the entire test item (including pertinent parts of the reading passage to which the question refers), specify the year of the released item, and specify the communication skills that are required for success. (18 pts) C. Review of adopted textbooks. Identify and analyze 6 examples of the linguistic complexity of textbooks (available in Greenwood library). Each should be from a different grade level and include the major content areas (i.e., English/language arts, mathematics, history and social sciences, science). Look for questions at the end of a passage to determine the linguistic complexity of the comprehension task. (12 points) D. Team Project. This project is to be completed in teams of 3. Each person is responsible for (a) identifying 3 Standards (at least one from each - SOL, Aligned, Common Core), 3 Released Test items and 2 textbooks; (b) leading the group’s analysis of the standard and test item; and (c) preparing the item for the assignment. Rating of team members. Each person will rate his/her team member’s performance confidentially, on a scale of 0 - 2. A rating of 2 is active, collaborative team member and a rating of 0 reflects marginally active, minimal leadership skills. Each person will receiving up to 3 points, based on the average rating of his/her peers. (2 pts) IEP and Intervention Project (75 points) Due April 5. Section B will be presented in class. A. IEP. Develop an IEP for a child with a speech-language impairment in the language area, using the model form on the Virginia Department of Education web site. Use the elementary IEP if you are designing a program for a child up through age 12. Use the Transition IEP if you are designing a program for a child above age 12. You may design the nature of the child’s deficit, linking the present level of performance to goals, objectives and services. Each 10 component (page) of the IEP must be completed. (Students must get permission to develop an IEP for a child with an articulation, fluency, or voice disorder.) (25 pts) B. SOL-linked intervention. Develop an intervention to support the child described in the IEP. The intervention will have 2 components: 1. direct intervention with the child in individual or small group speech-language therapy setting; 2. classroom based, working with a small group in the classroom or the whole class. The activity should include (a) the target SOL objective(s); (b) the intervention objectives (in measurable terms); (c) the procedures; (d) the materials (including word lists, scripts, as appropriate); (e) a graphic organizer or Marzano strategy (excluding reinforcement and feedback and cooperative learning) that supports the intervention; (f) a data collection instrument (that will document progress toward the objective). Implement your activity with any child (the child should be age appropriate for the activity, but does not need to have a disability). If using a client or family member of a client from the LCCLL get the professor’s permission in advance. Describe your intervention. Reflect on result and describe any adjustments you made as a result of this experience. Include references. Demonstrate the intervention in class (using a classmate as the student). Provide the class with a 1 – 2 page handout with items a – f. (50 points, 20 points for each intervention; 5 points for your reflection and 5 points for the presentation/demonstration). Reflection papers (10 pts each) Complete a written paper on each of the following topics. The paper should be 2 pages in length (approximately 700 – 800 words, unless otherwise stated), excluding references. The papers should integrate of information from class and the readings. References are required (using APA format). A. Reflect on Martin Luther King Symposium. Comment on Mrs. Howard’s presentation at the on January 20 (3:30 in Jarman Auditorium). Due Jan 25. 11 B. Reflect on the genesis of special education. Your reflection should address what you have learned about why special education became mandated in the US, its value, and its influence on services for and attitudes about persons with disabilities. Due February 1. C. Reflect on the TTAC Data collection training. Create a data collection instrument based on this training. Provide a 350 – 400 word narrative explanation of your thinking. Due February 8. D. Design a diagram picture that explains RTI. A narrative is not required. References are required. Due February 22. E. Write a 2 page memo to your special education director explaining why you would like to implement the workload caseload proposal. Your proposal should reflect the principles of RtI/Workload Caseload , the nature of your proposal (including evaluation), and the advantages to the district for implementation. Due March 29. F. Write the top 10 things speech-language pathologists should know when creating a caseload in the public schools. Due March 29. G. Reflect on your tour of the Moton Museum. Due one week after your visit. H. Reflect on the class discussion of the Tatum book. Your reflection should include new ideas that you learned, a reaction to the concepts presented by the author and/or in class, and a reflection on how this will influence your practice as a speech-language pathologist. Due April 26. Discussion of the Tatum book. (20 points) a. Students (in pairs) will lead discussion of a book chapter. The discussion should be designed to enable student participation (rather than the leaders’ presentation of information). i. Questions are designed to facilitate discussion (5 pts) ii. Effectively lead discussion to enable wide discussion during the specified time period (5 pts) b. Students are expected to participate in class discussion (1 point per week, total of 10 points). Cultural Competency Checklists. (6 points) Download these checklists form the ASHA site, complete at the end of class and write one paragraph about this self-reflection. Quizzes (75 points) On-line quizzes will be posted to address the education and special education rights and procedures, based on the readings and class notes. (Some information comes only from readings). These are openbook, but timed. Students are on their honor to complete independently. The quizzes may be completed at any time, but no later than April 26. Virginia Department of Education child abuse recognition and technology requirements. Must be completed no later than April 26 During this course, students must demonstrate completion of these two standards, which are required for Va Department of Education licensure. 12 1. Child abuse (3 pts) a. Provide a copy of the training in child abuse completed in the school district in which you work. OR b. Complete child abuse recognition training created by the Va. Dept of Social Services http://www.vcu.edu/vissta/training/va_teachers/ It will take less than 2 hours to complete it. Please print 2 certificates of completion – one for your files and one for the class. 2. Technology (3 pts) a. Demonstrate completion of the training through previous coursework (e.g., EDUC 381 or CSDS 411 at Longwood). A transcript and syllabus can be used for courses at other universities. b. Provide artifacts to demonstrate your technology skills (contact Dr. Power-deFur if you need to use this approach for a checklist to complete). Completion of the course (i.e., getting a grade) is dependent upon completion of this assignment. Grading Interview of a speech-language pathologist Interview of a parent Observation 1: Eligibility or IEP meeting Observation 2: classroom Activity: SOL analysis Reflection A Reflection B Reflection C Reflection D Reflection E Reflection F Reflection G Reflection H Tatum book discussion ASHA cultural competency checklists Quizzes Final project: IEP and SOL-based Intervention Child abuse recognition and technology standards TOTAL A+ 392 – 400 (98 – 100%) A 372 – 391 (93 – 97%) A- 360 - 371(90 – 92%) B+ 352 - 370 (88 – 89%) B 332 – 351 (83 – 87%) B- 320 – 331 (80 – 82%) C – less than 320 20 20 25 25 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 6 75 75 4 400 Extra Credit – 5 points. (Keep a list of instructional strategies I use during class. .5 points/correct strategy). 13 CLASS CALENDAR - Note – diversity will be addressed weekly, through the discussion of the chapters of the Tatum text. Date Jan 18 Topic Introduction History of Public Education Decision-making styles Reading & Assignments Tatum Ch 1 Jan 25 IDEA requirements: child find, evaluation, eligibility VDOE, pp 11 – 38; Appendices D, E, F, G, H ASHA IDEA web site ASHA Role and Responsibilities document VDOE eligibility & screening documents Power-deFur, in press Tatum Ch 2 Feb 1 Feb 8 IDEA: IEPs, including transition, assessments, and graduation Documentation, parent and student rights Feb 15 No Child Left Behind State standards (Va.Standards of Learning) Feb 22 Service delivery approaches Response to Intervention Mar 1 Medicaid, Section 504, SSI, Dysphagia in Schools Reflection A due. Submit name of SLP and school contact persons. TTAC assessment web pages Tatum Ch 3 Info on class observation due. Reflection B due VDOE, p. 59 VDOE family rights, due process and complaints TTAC data training Tatum, Ch 4 SLP Interview due Info about parent interview due. Reflection C due TTAC and VDOE SOL sites McGinty and Justice article Tatum, Ch 5 VDOE pp. 39 – 46 Power-deFur, 2010 Tatum Ch 6 General Education Classroom Observation due Reflection D due Power-deFur & Alley VDOE, pp 47 – 62, 68 - 72 Tatum Ch 7 Parent Interview due Mar 9 No Class 14 March 15 Mar 22 Spring Break Caseloads Speech-language pathology assistants ASHA caseloads and SLPA documents Tatum Ch 8 Mar 29 Working with parents Academic Standards due Tatum Ch 9 April 5 Presentations on interventions Apr 12, 19,26 NO CLASS Apr 26 Deadline for completion of on-line quiz Parent interview due Special education meeting observation due Reflections E and F due Tatum Ch 10 IEP/Intervention Project due. Reflection H due. Child abuse and technology competencies due Cultural competency checklists due. 15