CSDS 530 ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN COMMUNICATION DISORDERS Summer 2008 June 18, 20, 21, 25, 27, 28, July 2 8:30 – 12:30; July 9 1 – 5 Instructor: Lissa Power-deFur, Ph.D., CCC-SLP Office Hours: After class and by appointment Contact Information: Hull 263; 434-395-2369; powerdefurea@longwood.edu Course Description Discussion of the ASHA Code of Ethics, contemporary professional, multi-cultural, and legal issues with application to clinical practice. 2 credits Texts and Web Resources Irwin, D. , Pannbacker, M., Powell, T.W., Vekovius, G. (2007). Ethics of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology: An Illustrated Casebook. New York: Thomas/Delmar Learning. Lubinski, R., Golper, L.A., Frattali, C.M. (2007). Professional Issues in Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology. N.Y.: Thomson/Delmar Learning. Yairi, E. (2006). The Tudor study and Wendell Johnson. In R. Goldfarb (ed.), Ethics: A case study from fluency (pp. 35 – 62). San Diego: Plural Publishing. (available on Blackboard). Students will be asked to access various documents from the ASHA website (www.asha.org) including ASHA Issues in Ethics statements, policy and guidance documents, certification standards. In addition, students will be accessing licensure requirements from the Board of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology (www.dhp.virginia.gov/aud/) and the Board of Education (www.doe.virginia.gov) web sites Course Objectives The following conceptual framework competencies guide the planning and delivery of instruction in this course. Specific course objectives reflect this framework as they focus on the needs of the students for developing skills as professionals who will be knowledgeable, caring and ethical decision-makers. ASHA KASA Standards (applicable to this course) Standard IV-G: The applicant for certification must complete a program of study that includes supervised clinical experiences sufficient in breadth and depth to achieve the following skills outcomes (in addition to clinical experiences, skills may be demonstrated through successful performance on academic course work and examinations, independent projects, or other appropriate alternative methods) Upon completion of this course, students should be able to: 1. Demonstrate knowledge of, appreciation for, and ability to interpret the ASHA Code of Ethics, including the ability to make professional decisions informed by the code. (KASA IV-G) 1 Revision 8-07 Demonstrate knowledge of and ability to apply the ASHA Code of Ethics in an ethical decision-making model; identifying the appropriate choice of action when faced with an ethical dilemma. 2. Demonstrate understanding of certification requirements related to completion of the KASA form. (KASA IV-G) 3. Demonstrate knowledge of contemporary professional issues, including professional practice, academic program accreditation standards, ASHA practice policies and guidelines, and reimbursement procedures. (KASA IV-G) 4. Demonstrate knowledge about certification, specialty recognition, licensure, and other relevant professional credentials, including knowledge of state and federal regulations and policies related to the profession of speech-language pathology. (KASA IV-G) 5. Demonstrate understanding of the structure and purposes of ASHA. (KASA IV-G) 6. Discuss multicultural issues facing communication disorders specialists. (KASA IVG) Course Requirements Honor Code: Students are expected to abide by the Longwood University Honor Code at all times. Suspicion of any violation will be investigated and university policy will be followed. The Longwood Honor Code can be found at http://www.longwood.edu/judicial/the%20philosophy%20of%20The%20Honor%20Code.htm#Ph ilosophy%20of%20the%20Honor%20Code Students shall write the Academic Pledge on each assignment before submission. Failure to do so shall results in a 2 point deduction on each assignment. Disability Statement: The instructor is willing to meet reasonable accommodations for any students with a documented disability. The student should submit supporting material to the instructor. This includes the necessary accommodations as outlined by the Disability Support Center at Longwood University (http://www.longwood.edu/disability). This information must be submitted within the first 2 calendar days of class. Blackboard: Announcements and course documents will be posted on Blackboard. Students are encouraged to check Blackboard regularly and bring copies of the course documents to class. Attendance Policy In accordance with the Longwood University Attendance Policy, the class grade may be lowered one letter grade if a student misses 10% of the class meetings, and a grade of F may be assigned if a student misses 25% of class meetings. Absence, without prior consultation with the instructor, on a day when a student is scheduled to present a case study will result in a grade of zero on the assignment. 2 Policy on Late Assignments. Students are expected to submit assignments on the due date. Work may be submitted late but there will be a 5% penalty each 24 hour period after due date until date of actual submission. Students with a significant personal emergency, may get an extension if approved by the instructor in advance. Students requesting such an extension should be prepared to offer an explanation of the problem and a reasonable proposal for an alternative due date. Use of technology in the classroom. Students are welcome to use laptop computers for note-taking. Courtesy is expected in the classroom: students should not use the computers for any other purpose nor should cell phones be used for text messaging. Such personal use of technology during class will be reflected in lowered participation grades. Class and Assignment Schedule Class 1. June 16 8:30 – 12:30 2. June 17 10:45 – 2:45 3. June 18 8:30 – 12:30 4. June 19 10:45 – 2:45 5. June 23 2 – 5 pm Hull 249 Topics Course Overview Scope of Practice What is Ethics? Ethical Principals Professional Issues ASHA Code of Ethics Professional Liability Ethical Decision-Making 6. June 27 A 8:30 – 10:00 B 10:30 – 12:30 7. June 30 2–5 Hull 249 8. July 7 Coding and Reimbursement Issues (guest speaker: Nancy Swigert 9 – 11) Professional Autonomy Workforce Issues Personality Types Effective Teams Ethics: Competence Professional Organizations, Credentials and Licensing Ethics: Public Statements and Professionalism A. Creating and Running a Rehabilitation Agency (Scott Rankins, M.S., guest speaker) B. Counseling (Dr. Linwood Cousins, guest speaker) Ethics: Beneficience and Nonmaleficence Ethics: Public Statements and Professionalism (cont) Tudor Study Ethics Case Presentations Ethics Case Presentations Reading/Assignments Lubinski, et al, Ch 1, 4 Irwin, et al, Ch 1 and 2 Irwin, et al, Ch 4 Lubinski, et al, ch 5 Journal entry 1 due Lubinski, Ch 7, 9, 12, 13 Journal entry 2 due Lubinski, Ch 26 Journal entry 3 due Irwin, et al, Ch 6, 7, 9, 10 Lubinski, et al, ch 2, 3 Credentials Matrix due Professional Organization flyer due Journal entry 4 due Lubinski, et al, ch 17 Journal entry 5 due Practice Paper due Irwin, et al, Ch 5 Journal entry 6 due Yairi article Journal entry 7 due 3 2–5 Hull 249 July 12 (due date, no class) Ethics Essay Due Journal entry 8 due Ethics Essay Rating due Assignments Professional Practice Paper (30 points) Identify an area of practice of high interest and low skill to you (as identified in the Scope of Practice activity completed in class). Review a minimum of 3 ASHA documents and 2 researchbased sources about this area of practice. In a 5-page paper, describe: the area of practice and the evidence-based practice you identified supporting this area of practice, specific skills you will need to develop, and concrete steps you will employ to build your skills throughout graduate school and in the first ten years of your career. 9 points 9 points 9 points 3 points Reflects ASHA documents Identifies evidence-based practice for this area of practice Based on analysis of readings, discusses the skills needs and plans steps to take Form (spelling, grammar, organization) Ethics Essay (25 points) Prepare a 500 word (max) essay on Principle of Ethics IV, addressing the importance and relevance of the principle of ethics and its rules. This essay may be appropriate for the ASHA Ethics 2008 Essay Contest Your essay will be graded (blindly) by your colleagues according to the following criteria: Clarity of Position, Support for Argument, Analysis, and Form. (A rating form will be provided). 20 points for your essay, based on the average rating. 5 points for completing the rating of your colleagues. Ethics Case Presentation (30 points) Each student will be given an ethic case, presented as if it was a complaint to the ASHA Board of Ethics. Each student should review the case and relevant ASHA policy and practice documents and Issues in Ethics statements. The student should present the case to the class, reviewing relevant facts. Principles and Rules of Ethics implicated should be identified. The presentation should include a recommendation for Board of Ethics action (no violation, possible violation, sanctions if there is a founded violation). The class will simulate the Board of Ethics and vote on your recommendations. After the simulation, provide your recommendation regarding an alternative approach the individual could have taken that would have avoided a possible violation of the Code of Ethics. A handout should be provided that includes the above information and recommendations (at least one ASHA Issues in Ethics Statement and one ASHA policy document must be referenced) 10 points 10 points 5 points 5 points Reflects knowledge of ASHA Code of Ethics Reflects knowledge of relevant ASHA policy documents Clear handout Reasonableness of alternative approach 4 Professional Organization Flyer (20 points) Building on the information in Chapter 3 of Lubinski, et al, develop a flyer to promote membership in ASHA, SHAV, an ASHA Special Interest Division, or attainment of Special Recognition through ASHA. This flyer should target a specific population (e.g., public school speech-language pathologists, 20-something graduate students, career professionals, career switchers). The target population should be identified in when the flyer is turned in. 10 points 5 points 5 points Accurately reflects information about the professional organization Information presented is appropriate for the values and interests of the target population Flyer (creativity, spelling, grammar, organization) Reflective Journal (80 points, 10/day) Complete a short (2 – 4 page, double-spaced) reflection each week, reflecting on your readings, the class material, and class discussions. Specific topics should be addressed each week, at a minimum. Journal 1: definition ethics and profession Journal 2: consider an ethical dilemma you have faced in the past and how the ethical decisionmaking framework would have been of assistance; professional liabity Journal 3: reimbursement and coding issues Journal 4: what have you learned about your personality type and how it will influence your relationships with colleagues and parents Journal 5: ethics scenarios discussed Journal 6: counseling Journal 7: ethics cases discussed Journal 8: overall course reflection Grading will be based on the degree to which your journal includes (a) information from the readings and the class material (5 points); (b) analysis and reflection on the information you learned (5 points). Credentials Matrix (20 points) Review the ASHA, Virginia Department of Education, and Board of Audiology and SpeechLangauge Pathology (BASLP) web sites to identify the academic, clinical, continuing education, ethical and other requirements that must be met to obtain certification (ASHA), licensure (Va Board of Education, BASLP) or recognition (ASHA Specialty Recognition) from that entity. Complete the matrix (provided). 8 points ASHA requirements 4 points Board of Education requirements 4 points BASLP requirements 4 points Specialty Recognition requirements Participation (40 points, 5 points/day) 5 This is a seminar-based class, therefore student participation is critical to mastering the principles and concepts presented. Each day, students’ participation will be rated according to the following rubric. 5 points 3 points 1 points involved, questions and comments reflect thorough knowledge of the readings some involvement, questions and comments reflect knowledge of the readings not involved, questions and comments do not reflect knowledge of the readings Points Assignments Professional Practice Paper Ethics Case Presentation Ethics Essay Points 30 points 30 points 30 points Professional Organizations Flyer Credentials Matrix Reflective Journal Participation TOTAL 20 points 20 pts 80 points 40 points 250 points Due Date June 25 June 30/July 7 Your Essay: July 9 Review of peers: July 12 July 2 June 23 Each day Each day Grades A+ A AB+ 243 – 250 points 230 - 242 225 - 229 220 - 224 B BD 205 - 219 200 - 204 below 200 Additional Resources Goldfarb, R. (2006). Ethics; A Case Study from Fluency. San Diego: Plural Publishing. Silverman, F.H. (1999). Professional issues in speech-language pathology and audiology. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. 6