1 Longwood University Department of Special Education SPED 545 Psychoeducational Assessment Fall 2008 Instructor: Dr. Rachel Mathews Ph: 395 2532 (O) Office: 236 Hull Office Hours: e-mail: mathewsr@longwood.edu Blackboard:http://blackboard.longwood.edu Class: Sept.6 9-5 am, Sept.12&19 4-9 pm, Oct.3 4-9 pm,Oct.25 9-5 pm, Nov.7, 49pm Location: Hull 248 Course Description This course is designed to introduce students to the assessment process in special education by addressing procedural safeguards, data collection via informal and formal procedures, issues in assessment, psychometric properties of standardized tests, and administration, scoring, and interpretation of selected instruments. Textbook McLoughlin, J.M. & Lewis, R.B. (2007). Assessing Students with Special Needs (7th Ed). Merril Prentice Hall, New Jersey Professional Teacher Outcomes of the Longwood Conceptual Framework for Teacher Education are: TC1 Planning TC2 Implementation and Management of Instruction TC3 Evaluation and Assessment TC4 Knowledge of Subject TC5 Classroom Behavior Management TC6 Communication Skills TC7 Professional Responsibilities TC8 Technology TC9 Diversity F1 Educator Reflections Objectives of the Course At the end of this course each student will be able to: 2 I. Knowledge 2. Understand the various processes involved in assessment (TC3, T 4, CEC 8 K2 CEC8K2). 3. Understand the basic concepts of measurement and statistics related to assessments( TC3, TC 4, CECCC8K1). 4. Demonstrate knowledge of terminologies associated with assessment (TC3,TC4, CEC 8K1). 5. Have proficiency in litigations, legislations, and program standards in formal and informal assessment practices (TC4, CEC8K1, CEC8 K2) 6. Critique technical/psychometric properties of test instruments and their appropriateness for use with individuals from diverse background and individuals with special needs ( TC 4, TC 9, CEC8K4). 7. Administer, score, and interpret selected test instruments (TC3, TC 4, CEC 8S2). 8. Prepare written educational diagnostic reports and recommendations for instructional programming ( TC3, 4,& 6, CEC8S7) . 9. Understand how scores can be used to monitor progress of students (TC1,3,&4, CEC8S2) 10. Understand the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of standardized instruments (TC 3, CEC8 K4). II. Skills 1. Be able to identify, administer, and interpret scores, using unbiased standardized and nonstandardized instruments in identifying students with disabilities ( TC1,3,4&9, CEC8S2, CEC8S6). 2. Gather data using nonbiased formal and informal methods of assessments (TC4,CEC 8S1) 3. Have skills in administering and interpreting adaptive behavior scales, rating scales etc. according to the needs and relevance (TC3, & 9, CEC8K3 ). 4. Be knowledgeable in converting raw scores into transformed scores, e.g. grade eqvt., percentile rank, and be able to interpret these to laymen (TC 3,6, CEC8S7). 5. Demonstrate confidential record keeping skills (TC3, 4, &7, CEC8S9) 6. Have the ability to gather background information before testing (TC3, CEC8S1). 7. Understand factors influencing assessment findings such as cultural, behavioral, and learning diversity 8. Be knowledgeable in identifying and using nondiscriminatory testing procedures (TC 9, CEC8S2) 8. Incorporate informal observational data and background information in decision making process (TC 3, F1, CEC8S1 & CEC 8S2). 9. Understand the legal provisions and ethical issues, professional standards, and assessment responsibilities in the assessment procedures (TC 4, CEC8K2, CEC9S1) 10. Be able to keep records and be able to evaluate instructional outcomes using normreferenced, curriculum based, and criterion referenced tests (TC3,4, CEC8S8 & CEC8S9) 11. Be able to evaluate performance using alternate methods such as portfolio and artifacts. 12. Demonstrate proficiency in using technology to transform and interpret assessment data (TC4, CEC S8S3) 13. Be able to recommend instructional strategies, modifications, and accommodations based on the results (TC2&4, CEC 8K5&CEC8S8) 3 III. Dispositions 1. Test, score, and write reports without any biases (TC3, 4, 6&9, CEC8S2) 2. Adhere to the professional ethics on testing and all related services (TC 3 CEC9S1). 3. Communicate with other professional and parents in appropriate manner (TC6). 4. Disseminate information according to the professional code (TC 6&7, CEC9S1) 5. Knowledgeable in using assessment data for eligibility, program planning, placement, and program evaluation purposes (TC3&4, CEC8S6). 6. Ability to collaborate with family members and other professionals from related fields in the assessment process (TC 7, CEC10S4). Phone messages and e-mails I will return calls and/or reply to email messages within 48 hours of receiving them during the WEEKDAYS. I will NOT return any calls or reply to email message during the Weekends and on University holidays. Please do not expect me to reply to your e-mail messages immediately at any time as I do not look through e-mails through out the day. Course expectations 1. Active participation. Active participation in discussion is essential for an effective and productive experience. You are expected to participate in class discussions and to formulate your ideas on the basis of assigned readings, classroom discussions and your own work experience (if applicable). 2. Timely submission of all assignments and taking all tests/exams. Course Requirements 1. Reference Manual. Prepare a brief handbook narrating all information needed to carry out special education eligibility and placement processes. You have a choice for completing this assignment as a team of two or by yourself as an individual project. If you decide to work as a team, both members in the team should attach a signed paper verifying your equal participation in the project. Grading will be team based. The length of the paper is limited to 5 double spaced typed pages. Your paper should be organized with sub headings. You are allowed to conduct an internet search for any assistance in completing this assignment. However, you should cite and give references. 2. Class exercises and participation. Exercises (in the form of multiple choice questions) based on selected chapters will be given. Upon completion you can send me your answers in order to get the answer key. I will not be using this result toward your final grading- rather think of it as a learning tool. 3. Review & Group presentation of an assigned Test - Follow your Instructor’s format. A handout on your review should be given to all class members. – 45 minutes followed by 10 minutes question and answer. 4 4. Test administration, report writing – Case study Demonstrate proficiency with administering, interpreting, and writing reports on standardized instruments. (WJ, WRMT, & Key Math). Minimum of 12 hours of field experience (Outside class time) is required for this project. Students have to make their own arrangements for the student to be tested. All completed protocols should also be submitted with the report. The reports should be typed (double spaced, except the Tables), and stapled. But do not staple the protocol. Instead, insert respective reports in the respective protocol. 5. Role play. Results of your case study should be presented in a multidisciplinary team simulation. You will be graded based on your ability to present the test results in an understandable manner to all members of the team. Additionally, your ability to design instructional strategies and a plan based on the results will be assessed. 6. Successfully complete all tests and exams. Tests and exam. will be based on all materials covered in lectures, workshops, and handouts. Note. Assignments submitted after the due date will be penalized by 1 point for each day. There will be no excuses. (Due to time limitation, oral presentation dates cannot be changed). Grading Summary Reference manual Test Test review – Oral presentation Test administration, report writing Role play Final examination 10% 15% 20% 30% 10% 15% Grading scale 95-100A, 89-94 B 83-88 C, 82 and below F ** Students must meet all requirements to receive the final grade above ‘F’**. Honor Code Students are expected to abide by the Longwood College Honor Code. All assignments and tests are to be pledged. It is the students’ responsibility to read and understand all college policies. Accommodation. In accordance with the College policy, students wishing to receive accommodation should submit documentation from the Academic Support Center on Campus. Reminders 5 1. All assignments should be typed, **double spaced**, and submitted on the due dates given. 2. All papers submitted should be **stapled together**. Do not use sleeves. Papers not stapled will not be graded. The instructor will not supply stapler. It is the students' responsibility to read carefully and understand the course syllabus well. If there is anything they do not understand they may seek clarification when they meet with the instructor during their scheduled conference with the professor. 3. Classroom manners. Please do not hold conversations with classmates whenever the professor or another person is speaking. This includes passing notes. Your undivided attention is a must. An atmosphere of mutual respect is in order. Turn off all cell phones and beepers. 4. Class Attendance. It is the students’ responsibility to attend class on time. If they miss a class for any reason, they will be held responsible for all material covered and announcements made in their absence. Students are to notify the instructor in advance if they must miss a class for illness or for a recognizable emergency. Their absence from class must be excused if make up privileges are to be granted. The Longwood University attendance policy will be followed for the final grading. A grade of ‘F’ will be assigned to students missing 25% of scheduled class meetings for any reason (excused or unexcused). Please be sure that cell phones and beepers are off. Courtesy to others is important. That means respecting the opinions of others, and, in general, doing your part to make this a positive learning environment for all students. Food or beverage, while acceptable, should be as quiet as possible, and you must clean up after yourself. All Papers MUST be stapled before submission. Unstapled papers will NOT be graded. Students will also have to provide their own staplers as NONE will be provided by the instructor. Note: Prospective applicants are allowed to enroll in up to six credit hours (2 courses) prior to being admitted to a degree or licensure only program and have those hours apply to the admitted program. Students should submit an Application for Graduate Admission promptly to avoid having course work in excess of the six credit hours not apply once admitted. Application materials are available by contacting the Office of Graduate Studies (434-395-2707 or graduate@longwood.edu) or on our web site at www.longwood.edu/graduatestudies/apply.htm. Class Schedule 6 Note: The following is a tentative schedule and subject to change due to the length of time spent on specific topics. Date 9/6 Topic Chapters/s Introduction and orientation Assessment, Testing, Diagnosis, Types of assessment, Norm referenced and Criterion referenced testings, Curriculum based assessments, Screening, Pre referral, referral, eligibility, Evaluation, Assessment tools selection, technical quality, factors influencing assessment cultural, behavioral, and learning diversity, non discriminatory testing, Professional and ethical issues 1,2, &3 9/12 4, 5 Formal & Informal assessments, School performance, group and individual tests, tests overview, Statistics Normal curve, Central tendency, Dispersion, Confidence interval, measurement error Testing preparation, administration, scoring, interpretation, Academic achievement 9/19 Assessment for Special Education Eligibility Academic achievement Workshop in class – WJ Ch.6 7 10/3 Test 1 Chpts. 1-6 Reading assessment Math assessment Workshop in class WRMT Chapters 10 & 11 Workshop in class Key Math ** WJ report due** 10/25 Intellectual performance and adaptive behavior Learning abilities- perceptual tests Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Test review Presentations 11/7 Classroom behavior and behavioral disorders, rating scales, interviews Chapter 9 Chapters 12, 13,14 Language , written and Oral Portfolio assessment **WRMT report& Key Math Reports due** Role play 11/14 Final Exam Tests for Review – Oral presentation – Use all materials reserved at the library Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement ( New edition) Vineland social maturity scale Behavioral assessment – BASC Comprehensive Test of Phonological Skills ( CTOPS) Visual perceptual Test – Beery Visual Motor Integration 8 Bibliography DeStefsno, L., Shriner, G., & Lloyd, C.A. (2001). Teacher decision making in participation of students with disabilities in large-scale assessment. Exceptional Children. 68, 7-22. Johnson, E., Kimbal. K, & Brown, S. O. (2001). A statewide review of the use of accommodations in large scale, high stakes assessments. Exceptional Children, 67, 251 – 264. Kampfier, H. S. & Horvath, L. S. ( 2001). Teacher’s perceptions of one state’s alternate assessment: Implications for practice and preparation. Exceptional Children, 67, 361-374. Salend, S. J. (2008). Determining appropriate testing accommodations: Complying with NCLB and IDEA. Teaching Exceptional Children v. 40 (4) 14-22. The Sixteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook (2005) The Mental Measurement Yearbook. Buros Institiute. Stanford, P. & Reeves, S. (2005). Assessment that drives instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37 (4), 18-23. 9 SPED 545 Test administration and Report Rubric Exceeds Expectation (3) Protocol – Basal Ceiling Raw scores Error responses given Tables Derived scores Meets expectation (2) Needs improvement (1) Face page – Completed all relevant data without any errors All subtests basals are correctly established All subtests ceilings are correctly established All subtests raw scores are computed without any errors All sections of all subtests are completed with error responses All Tables are completed according to the format of the sample given Titles and subheadings are correctly identified All data are transferred correctly Completed with some More than 20% of the gaps information is not completed Tables are completed; but deviated from the sample given Titles and subheading given showed errors or some are missing Some data transferred are incorrect Tables did not follow the sample format – titles and subheadings showed frequent errors All derived scores are computed Derived scores showed some errors More than 20% of the derived scores are Few errors in establishing basal Few errors in establishing ceiling Few errors in computing the raw scores Error responses are given in most of the subtests More than 20% of the subtests basals evidenced errors More than 20% of the subtests ceilings evidenced errors More than 20% of the subtests raw scores evidenced errors More than 20% of the subtests did not give error responses More than 20% of the data transferred are incorrect 10 without any errors incorrect Report Scoring Rubric Exceeds Expectation (3) Meets expectation (2) Report Title of the report All Identification data and All subheadings are given without any errors Most of the sections are completed; but a few parts are missing Interpretation Used norm scores, derived scores, error analyses data in interpreting the results; gave examples of questions asked and errors made Norm scores, derived More than 20% of the scores, error analyses parts are not given or data in interpreting showed errors the results; and gave examples of questions asked and errors made; but not complete Report showed excellent integration of all concepts Integrated most of the concepts Reflected an excellent integration of all findings Summary is vague without any reference to the findings Summary Needs improvement (1) More than 20% of the parts are not given or showed errors More than 20% of the summary is not based on the findings; very vaguely written 11