Longwood University
Professional Education Unit
2009-2010 Annual Report
2009-2010 Teacher Prep Entry
Program
Number
GPA
Art
6
3.20
Bio
2
2.70
Elem
93
3.12
Elem-Mid
15
2.98
English
9
3.30
History
12
3.18
Math
3
3.50
Middle
9
3.13
Music
4
3.25
PHETE
6
2.78
SPED
33
3.17
Theatre
3
2.87
Unit
198
3.13
&
Test Score
Art
Biology
Elementary
Elementary-Middle
English
History
Middle
Music
Physical Educ
Special Educ
CF9
A
5.0
4.0
4.8
5.0
5.0
4.7
5.0
5.0
3.6
5.0
CF9
B
5.0
2.5
4.8
5.0
5.0
4.3
5.0
5.0
3.9
5.0
CF9
C
5.0
2.0
4.7
5.0
5.0
4.2
5.0
5.0
3.4
5.0
CF9
D
5.0
3.5
4.8
5.0
5.0
4.6
5.0
5.0
3.9
5.0
CF
9E
5.0
4.0
4.8
5.0
5.0
4.7
5.0
5.0
4.4
5.0
CF
9F
5.0
4.0
4.8
5.0
5.0
4.7
5.0
5.0
4.1
5.0
CF9
G
5.0
4.0
4.8
5.0
5.0
4.7
5.0
5.0
4.6
5.0
CF9
H
5.0
3.0
4.7
5.0
5.0
4.4
5.0
5.0
3.9
5.0
CF
9I
5.0
4.0
4.8
5.0
5.0
4.7
5.0
5.0
4.6
5.0
CF
9J
5.0
2.0
4.7
5.0
5.0
4.2
5.0
5.0
3.7
5.0
CF9
K
5.0
3.5
4.8
5.0
5.0
4.6
5.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
2009 Disposition Assessments - Overall
Dispositions indicate some variance by program area. Please note your
individual program areas for response.
CF
9L
5.0
2.0
4.8
5.0
5.0
4.2
5.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
CF9A CF9B CF9C CF9D CF9E CF9F CF9G CF9H
Overall Averages
4.78
4.68
4.58
4.73
4.80
4.73
4.83
4.65
CF9I
4.75
CF9J
4.55
CF9K CF9L
4.58
Unit Disposition Data for Student Teaching
While this data indicates a disposition rating of 4.55-4.78 out of a
possible 5. Programs responded to individual student data on an as
needed basis.
4.58
Overall Averages
CF9A CF9B CF9C CF9D CF9E CF9F CF9G CF9H CF9I CF9J CF9K CF9L
3.93 3.57 3.43 3.29 4.29 4.36 4.07 3.57 4.29 3.57 3.71 3.71
Unit Dispositions for Early Clinical
You will note in comparison of this with the preceding slide that the Unit
appears to show growth in dispositions as the candidates mature during the
ITP process. Please review your program folders for individual student data.
Percentages of Field Experiences by Category Types
Working with Student With Special Needs
% of Candidates working with Students With
Physical Impairments a 504 Plan
% of Candidates working with an IEP
% of Candidates working with ESL
% of Candidates working with Gifted
Working with Diverse Students
% of Candidates working with African
American Students
% of Candidates working with Native
American/Alaska Native Students
% of Candidates working with Hispanic
Students
% of Candidates working with Asian Students
% of Candidates working with Diverse
Students (Aggregate)
34%
76%
29%
38%
92%
5%
53%
31%
92%
Diversity Data regarding Candidate exposure in Clinical
Placement
Please note the overall diversity of our partnership sites (available in Can
Teach in the OPS folder.
CANDIDATE ETHNICTY
American Indian or Alaska
Native
Asian
n
%
Average GPA
5
1%
6
1%
Black or African American
38
4%
Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
0
0% -
19
2%
832
89%
White
Two or more races
Race/ethnicity unknown
32
3% -
0
0% -
Total
932
100%
Female
801
86%
Male
131
14%
Total
932
Overall GPA
DIVERSITY Percentage
2.99
11%
2.77
2.93
2.68
2.90
3.01
3.02
2.82
Unit Demographic Data – Spring 2010
Please note the next slide and your program folders for demographic
data for individual programs
DIVERSITY PERCENTAGE COMPARISONS BY PROGRAM
Overall Diversity
Art
CSDS
Elementary
Elem-Middle
English
History/SSE
Math
Middle
Modern Language
Music
PHETE
Science
Special Ed
Theatre
11%
16%
15%
8%
14%
7%
10%
16%
3%
9%
14%
16%
13%
6%
29%
Diversity Percentage of the Unit and By Program 2010
Please review your program folders in Can Teach for individual program
data.
TWS Comparison Summery - Holistic Scores
%4's
100%
0%
0%
%3's
%'2
%1's
0%
11%
12%
18%
90%
33%
38%
80%
50%
70%
36%
60%
74%
50%
33%
89%
40%
62%
30%
50%
Teacher Work Sample Data 2009-10
20%
45%
33%
The data indicate that 89% of the candidates scores 3’s or 4’s, Please
consider your individual candidates and programs
14% when reviewing this
information
10%
0%
Spring 09
Fall 08
SP 08
Fall 07
SP 07
Fall 06
2010: LU CF Standard 2 - Planning
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
CF1
CF2
CF3
CF4
CF5
%3's
LG1
LG2
LG3
LG4
%2's
LU TWS CF Standard 2 - Planning
The unit effectively had 100% of the candidates scoring 3’s on the
planning standard.
2010: CF Standard 4 - Implementation/ Management
100%
98%
96%
94%
92%
90%
88%
86%
84%
82%
DFI1
DFI2
DFI3
%3's
DFI4
%2's
TWS CF Standard 4
89+% candidates scored a 3 on standard 4
DFI5
DFI6
CF Standard 5 - Evaluation/Assessment
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
AP1
AP2
AP3
AP4
AP5
IDM1 IDM2 IDM3 ASL1
%3's
ASL2
ASL3
ASL4
%2's
TWS CF Standard 5 Evaluation and Assessment
100% or the unit candidates scored 3’s on this assessment of the teacher
work sample
Spring 2010: CF Standard 8 - Diversity
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
CF1
CF2
CF3
CF4
CF5
LG3
%3's
%2's
AP5
DFI5
IDM2
ASL2
TWS Data 2010
The Unit candidates scored 100% 3’ with the diversity assessment.
2010: CF Standard 9 - Dispositions
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
RSE1
RSE2
RSE3
%3's
RSE4
RSE5
%2's
TWS – CF9 Dispositions
The teacher work sample ratings for dispositions reflect the findings of
our other data regarding candidates with in the unit. 99% of the
candidates passed each TWS component.
Pass Rates on Content Licensure test for Initial Teacher Preparation 2009-10
Program
Name of Licensure
# of test Takers
%Passing
Elementary Education
VRA
118
100
Elementary Education
Elementary
120
100
Literacy and Culture
VRA
20
100
English
English
9
100
Middle School
Middle School
13
84
Social Studies
Social Studies
11
91
Music
Music
3
100
Art
Art
6
100
Foreign Language
Foreign Language
0
NA
Science
Biology
2
100
PHETE
Health and PE
5
100
UNIT
VCLA
174
100
Praxis and other Scores by program area
GPA Comparison: Program & Unit data
NOTE: THIS DATA DOES NOT FOLLOW A PARTICULAR STUDENT GROUP THESE NUMBERS ARE SOLEY BASED ON THE TERM
PRESENTED
TERM 07-08
Programs
Unit
Art
Biology/Science
Business
CSDS
Elementary
Elem-Middle
English
History/SSE
Math
Middle
Modern Language
Music
Physical Ed
Special Ed.
Theatre
Enrollment
Entry into Teacher Prep
2.95
2.95
2.84
3.06
3.00
3.06
2.84
2.93
3.06
3.05
2.99
2.80
2.84
3.00
3.44
3.08
3.23
2.95
3.09
3.02
3.12
3.43
3.17
3.32
3.11
3.03
2.60
3.05
3.03
2.51
Completion
3.33
2.50
2.94
3.30
3.30
3.32
3.38
3.60
3.38
3.32
3.60
3.29
3.32
3.86
2009-10 TERM
Programs
Unit
Art
Science (Biol/Chem)
Elementary
Elem-Middle
English
History/SSE
Math
Middle
Modern Language
Music
Physical Ed
Special Ed.
Theatre
Enrollment
Entry into Teacher Prep
3.04
3.04
2.90
3.12
3.22
3.24
2.75
2.89
2.96
2.95
3.15
2.32
3.04
3.41
Completion
3.13
3.20
2.70
3.12
2.98
3.30
3.18
3.50
3.13
3.34
3.36
2.97
3.36
3.28
3.65
3.28
3.47
3.43
3.25
2.78
3.17
2.87
3.46
2.99
3.30
3.21
CF 1 Program Comparisons Content
Knowledge 2010
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
SPED
PHETE
MUSIC
MOLA
MSE
LIBMEDIA
HIST/SSE
ELEM
BIOL
Art
NCI
Unit
0%
Final Clinical Evaluation
The Graph CF1 Program Comparisons across programs areas of Content Knowledge
is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in
student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework
Standard regarding content knowledge. The unit average was 82%.
CF 4 - Implementation/Management 2010
%3's
%2's
100%
90%
18%
19%
24%
27%
25%
20%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
CF4A
CF4B
CF4C
CF4D
CF4E
CF4F
Graph CF4 – Implementation/Management 2010 is a graph of the percent of
candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and
receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual The Framework Standard
regarding the critical skill of establishing classroom management.
CF2 - Planning: Program Comparisons 2010
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Final Clinical Evaluations Program comparisons
The Graph CF2 Planning: Program Comparisons across programs areas is a graph of
the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student
teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard
regarding the critical skill of planning. The unit average was 79%.
CF3 Learning Climate - Program Comparisons
2010
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Conceptual Framework Standard 4 –
Implementation/Management
The Graph CF3 Learning Climate – Program Comparison 2010 is a graph of the percent of
candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an
exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of
establishing a positive learning climate. The unit average was 82%.
CF 5 - Evaluation/Assessment 2010
%3's
%2's
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
CF5A
CF5B
CF5C
CF5D
CF5E
The Graph CF5 – Evaluation/Assessment 2010 is a graph of the percent of
candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving
an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the critical
skill of evaluation and assessment. The unit average was 75%.
CF6 Communication 2010
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Please review your folders in Can Teach for Program
data
The Graph CF6 – Evaluation/Assessment Fall 2010 is a graph of the percent
of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and
receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard
regarding the critical skill of communication. The unit average was 84%.
CF7 Technology 2010
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
The Graph CF7 – Technology Fall 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates
completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an
exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the use
of technology in instruction. The unit average was 77%.
CF8 Diversity 2010
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
The Graph CF8 – Diversity Fall 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the
final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the
Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of working with diverse
students. The unit average was 81%.
Progra
m Area
N
Unit
NCI
Art
Elem
Biology
El/M
Eng
History
Library
Math
Middle
Music
PHETE
SP ED
Theatre
210
6
6
99
2
6
11
13
2
2
19
4
6
33
1
Final Clinical Evaluation 2009-10 % Candidates Meeting or Exceeding Expectations on
Performances
Conten Plannin Learnin Implem Evaluati Commu Techno Divert
g
g
enon/Ass ni-logy
sity
Knowle
Climate tation
essmen cation
dge
/Manag t
ement
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
94%
94%
94%
94%
94%
94%
94%
94%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
100%
100%
100%
94%
100%
94%
100%
94%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100% 100%
100%
98%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
99%
98%
98%
97%
100%
100%
98%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Graduate Education Program Diversity Unit
CANDIDATE ETHNICTY
American Indian or
Alaska Native
Asian
Black or African
American
Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Two or more races
Race/ethnicity unknown
Total
Female
Male
DIVERSITY Percentage
n
%
Average GPA
0
1
0%
0%
3.65
18
6%
3.76
0
6
278
0
0
303
281
22
8%
0%
2%
92%
0%
0%
93%
7%
3.70
3.87
3.86
3.83
Graduate Education Comparisons
Note C&I Music has 1 candidate
Diversity Percentage
Overall
CSDS
C & I K-8 Math
C& I Modern Language/
C & I Music
C&I Sped General Curr K-12
Ed Leadership
Elem PK-6 Initial Licensure
English
Guidance & Counseling
Literacy & Culture
Modern Language Initial Licensure
School Library Media
Special Education
8%
7%
0%
0%
100
%
33%
13%
0%
33%
29%
8%
0%
4%
5%
Full time vs. Part time
GPA Comparisons
Full Time
Part Time
Diversity percentage
Full Time
Part Time
Male
Female
3.84
3.93
3.89
3.86
Male
6%
9%
8%
7%
Female
92%
93%
Unit Data GPA Comparison
Year
Progra
ms
200708
Unit
200809
Unit
20092010
Averag
e
Averag
e
Unit
#
Li
c
1
9
4
2
0
7
2
1
0
Unit
NCI
1
4
Unit Praxis Comparisons
Percentage Passing
Enrollm
ent
Entry into Teacher
Prep
Completio
n
Praxis
I
VCL
A
96%
99%
PraxisII VRA
2.95
3.08
3.33
100%
100
%
2.98
3.09
3.35
100%
100
%
99%
98%
100%
100
%
100%
100%
100%
100
%
100%
100%
3.04
3.13
3.34
2.99
3.10
3.34
3.52
3.73
The dispositions Average for the Unit was 4.72 and for
NCI it was 4.9
Teacher Candidate Survey Responses: Overall
Ratings
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Please review your folders in Can Teach for individual program responses