Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence: Guidelines Version 2.3 TRIM file number D10/500 Short description Guidelines on the nomination and selection process for the Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence Approved by Executive Director, Human Resources Responsible officer Director, Organisational and People Capability Responsible office Division of Human Resources Date introduced December, 2008 Date(s) modified 2 February, 2010 24 February 2011 3 August 2012 29 May 2013 25 February 2014 Next scheduled review date December 2014 Related University documents Generic Responsibilities of CSU Staff Refer to the Administration Manual for these documents. Policy on Standards, Expectations and Qualifications of Academic Staff Professional Activity Work Function Policy University Strategy Code of Conduct – re: conflict of interest Key words guidelines, awards, recognition, excellence, performance, professional activity, general staff, academic staff Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence: Guidelines Version 2.3 – 25 February 2014 Page 1 1. PURPOSE These guidelines describe the nomination and selection process for the ViceChancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence. 2. OBJECTIVES The objectives of the award are to: 3. (a) Encourage staff of Charles Sturt University (the University) to improve and enhance their own performance and the capability of others to develop to their full potential; (b) Formally recognise sustained high level contributions by individual employees and teams toward the development of professional knowledge and practice across the professions relevant to the University; and (c) Support ongoing professional and career development of University staff. NUMBER OF AWARDS There is one (1) Vice-Chancellor’s Award allocated in recognition of Professional Excellence to either an individual or a team. 4. STAFF ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA The Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence is open to staff who meet the following eligibility criteria for an individual or team nomination: Individual award nominations: (a) Academic staff appointed at remuneration levels A to E who: currently hold a continuing or fixed-term appointment at the University; and have completed a minimum of two (2) years’ service; and have successfully completed probation. Team award nominations: (b) May include a mix of both General and Academic staff; (c) At least one Academic staff member who meets the eligibility criteria outlined in 4(a) must be included within a team nomination. NOTE: Other nominated team members are not required to have successfully completed probation or a minimum of two (2) years’ service; (d) May include General staff appointed at remuneration levels 1 - 10 who hold a continuing, fixed-term appointment at the University; (e) May include casual staff. Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence: Guidelines Version 2.3 – 25 February 2014 Page 1 5. 6. 7. NOMINATIONS 5.1 Any Charles Sturt University staff member, student, member of the University community or an external professional partner of the University may nominate a staff member or team that he/she considers to be deserving of a Vice-Chancellor’s Award. 5.2 Nominees may not include honorary, visiting, adjunct or executive staff. 5.3 Staff may not be nominated or receive an Individual and a Team Award for the same achievement in any year. 5.4 Staff are not eligible to receive or to be nominated for an Individual Award if they have been a recipient of an Individual Award in this category within the past three (3) years. 5.5 Each nomination must meet all relevant eligibility criteria for either an individual or team nomination to be considered for an award. 5.6 Self nominations are not accepted for this award category SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA 6.1 All nominations must be based on excellence in professional activity for a sustained period of three (3) years or more, demonstrating clear alignment with the University’s Strategy, culture and values. 6.2 The selection committee meets to evaluate the nominations for the ViceChancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence against any ONE (1) of the following selection criteria: (a) a significant, sustained contribution to inform and enhance professional practice at a national or international level; OR (b) significant contribution and excellence toward developing and sustaining a nexus between teaching and professional practice; OR (c) significant contribution and excellence toward developing and sustaining a nexus between research and professional practice; OR (d) sustained, high level scholarship in professional practice (not recognised elsewhere). SELECTION COMMITTEE 7.1 The selection committee consists of: (a) (b) (c) (d) Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic), as Presiding Officer; One Dean, nominated by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic); Director of the Education for Practice Institute; One representative of the Heads of School Committee; Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence: Guidelines Version 2.3 – 25 February 2014 Page 2 8. 7.2 Depending upon the quality of the nominations received, the selection committee normally recommends one (1) individual or team nominee for the award to the Vice-Chancellor. 7.3 The selection committee’s recommendation and the Vice-Chancellor’s determination of an award are not subject to internal appeal or review. EXPECTATIONS OF AWARD RECIPIENTS The recipient of a Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence is expected to make their professional activity philosophies and/or practices more widely known throughout the University. For example, they may be invited to participate in seminars or presentations, write a paper or act as a mentor to their colleagues with respect to professional activity. APPENDIX 1 Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence: Official CSU Nomination Form Table of amendments Version number 1.1 Date 4/3/2009 Short description of amendment Sub-clause 3.4a – ratings for team members expanded. 3.4b added – at least one team member to have completed 2 or more years’ service at CSU. 1.2 2/11/ 2010 Remove requirement to achieve specific outcomes in the Performance Management Scheme for eligibility for nominations. Clarify nomination and selection process and minor edits to format. 2 24/2/2011 Removed all reference to “outstanding” from selection criteria and throughout document and replaced with reference to “excellence”. Minor edits to phrasing and format of guidelines and nomination form. Updated objectives, eligibility criteria, selection criteria and nominations. Nomination form included as an appendix. 2.1 3/8/2012 Dean replaced by Executive Dean. 2.2 29/5/2013 Award values 2.3 25/2/2014 Appendix – submission date changed Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence: Guidelines Version 2.3 – 25 February 2014 Page 3 Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence OFFICIAL CSU NOMINATION FORM 1. Nominator’s details. Nominator’s name and title: Staff/ Student/ other (please specify): Division/Section, Faculty/School/ Centre, Course/year of study/ other: CSU campus / location: Phone: E-mail: I wish to place a nomination for the Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence: Individual Award. Team Award. This nomination meets all eligibility criteria Signature: Date: 2. Nominees Details. Name of nominated employee or team: Name of Team Leader (applicable to a team nomination only). Staff number: Position title: Classification level: Division/Section, Faculty/School/ Centre: CSU campus / location: Phone: E-mail: I accept this nomination for the Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence and, if successful, agree to make my/ our professional activity philosophy and/or practices more widely known throughout the University. Signature: Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence: Nomination Form Version 2.3 – 25 February 2014 Date: Page 1 3. Please address each of the following selection criteria. (1) Nominee’s name: Staff number: Staff position: Classification level: Section: CSU campus/ location: E-mail: Phone: I accept this nomination as a member of the nominated team. Signature: Date: ___/___/___ (2) Nominee’s name: Staff number: Staff position: Classification level: Section: CSU campus/ location: E-mail: Phone: I accept this nomination as a member of the nominated team. Signature: Date: ___/___/___ (3) Nominee’s name: Staff number: Staff position: Classification level: Section: CSU campus/ location: E-mail: Phone: I accept this nomination as a member of the nominated team. Signature: Date: ___/___/___ (4) Nominee’s name: Staff number: Staff position: Classification level: Section: CSU campus/ location: E-mail: Phone: I accept this nomination as a member of the nominated team. Signature: Date: ___/___/___ (5) Nominee’s name: Staff number: Staff position: Classification level: Section: CSU campus/ location: E-mail: Phone: I accept this nomination as a member of the nominated team. Signature: Date: ___/___/___ Please copy and paste additional boxes as required. Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence: Nomination Form Version 2.3 – 25 February 2014 Page 2 4. Please select from the following. a significant, sustained contribution to inform and enhance professional practice at a national or international level; an outstanding contribution to developing and sustaining a nexus between teaching and professional practice; an outstanding contribution to developing and sustaining a nexus between research and professional practice; sustained, high level scholarship in professional practice (not recognised elsewhere). 5. Please indicate your reasons for nominating this individual or team. Please address the criterion relating to the individual or team nominee’s professional activity over a sustained period of 3 or more years. Include how the performance or achievement has contributed to the achievement of one or more of CSU’s key objectives or priorities. 1 page minimum, 5 pages maximum. If applicable, please provide supporting documentation of up to 5 pages. Expand this section 6. Statement from the nominees(s). Please address the criterion relating to the individual or team nominee’s professional activity over a sustained period of 3 or more years. 1 page minimum. 5 page maximum. Expand this section Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence: Nomination Form Version 2.3 – 25 February 2014 Page 3 7. Statement from the nominees Supervisor/ Manager. Expand this section Signature: (DVC/ Executive Dean/Head of School/ Director) Date: 8. Nomination checklist. Please ensure you have completed all requirements of this nomination form. Nomination meets all relevant eligibility criteria. Each section of the nomination form is completed as required. Nominee(s) contact details are provided along with signed acceptance. Supporting documentation of up to 5 pages provided (if applicable). Statement provided by the nominees Supervisor / Manager. Completed nomination forms may be emailed to vcawards@csu.edu.au by 30 May. Privacy Statement The personal information you provide on this form is protected by the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW). Provision of this information is a requirement of participation in the Vice-Chancellor’s Awards for Professional Excellence. Access to the information you provide is available to the nominator, nominee, nominee’s supervisor, nominee’s most senior manager, and those persons authorised to access the information in the course of their duties at CSU. This document will be stored in the Organisational and People Capability Directorate of the Division of Human Resources, Wagga Wagga. Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Professional Excellence: Nomination Form Version 2.3 – 25 February 2014 Page 4